Advertisement

Exposure and Health

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 15–26 | Cite as

Assessment of Health Risk of Children from Traditional Biomass Burning in Rural Households

  • Deep Chakraborty
  • Naba Kumar MondalEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Indoor air pollution from burning of solid unprocessed biomass fuel and health risk arising from it are a crucial issue in developing countries. Smoke deposits (black soot) from traditional cooking stoves in the kitchen are characterized, and the health risk of children arising from it is assessed. Five types of wood, sissoo (Dalbergia sissoo), banyan (Ficus benghalensis), eucalyptus (Eucalyptus sp.), palm (Borassus flabellifer) and mixed wood were used by the villagers as their main cooking fuels. Black soots were collected and characterization was done by X-Ray fluorescence spectroscopy, atomic absorption spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy. The highest concentration of lead was observed in soot from sissoo wood burning among the five types of black soots, followed by mixed wood, palm, banyan and eucalyptus. The quantitative estimation of manganese concentration was found to be very high in all varieties of black soot. Surface morphology study revealed that all the surfaces of black soot were similar in nature. Using metal concentration derived from the five types of black soot, exposure of children to heavy metals was calculated via three types of exposure pathways and it was found that the average daily exposure level of all elements was in the order of hand-to-mouth ingestion > dermal contact > inhalation. It was also noted that the non-carcinogenic hazard indexes and carcinogenic risks of metals in black soots were both well under the safe values.

Keywords

Indoor air pollution Black soot Cooking stoves Surface morphology Chemical characterization Children’s health risk assessment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge their sincere thanks to the funding agency, UGC F. No. 42-434/2013(SR), dated 12 March 2013 for providing necessary funds for conducting the present research. The authors are also thankful to the Department of Environmental Science and University Science Instrumentation Centre (USIC) of the University of Burdwan for providing research support. They are also grateful to all the participants who took part in this study and all others who provided invaluable help and support in conducting the study.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this manuscript.

Ethical Approval

For this study ethical approval was granted by the Ethical Committee Board of the University of Burdwan.

References

  1. Alves CA, Vicente A, Monteiro C, Gonçalves C, Evtyugina M, Pio C (2011) Emission of trace gases and organic components in smoke particles from a wildfire in a mixed-evergreen forest in Portugal. Sci Total Environ 409:1466–1475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amodio M, Andriani E, de Gennaro G, Loiotile DA, Di Gilio A, Placentino MC (2012) An integrated approach to identify the origin of PM10 exceedances. Environ Sci Poll Res 19:3132–3141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balakrishnan K, Sambandam S, Ramaswamy P, Mehta S, Smith KR (2004) Exposure assessment for respirable particulates associated with household fuel use in rural districts of Andhra Pradesh, India. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 14(Suppl. 1):S14–S25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barbieri E, Fontúrbel FE, Herbas C, Barbieri FL, Gardon J (2014) Indoor metallic pollution and children exposure in a mining city. Sci Total Environ 487:13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barbosa R, Dias D, Lapa N, Lopas H, Mendes B (2013) Chemical and Eco-toxicological properties of size fractionated biomass ashes. Fuel Process Technol 109:124–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bo Y, Cai H, Xie SD (2008) Spatial and temporal variation of historical anthropogenic WMVOCs emission inventories in China. Atmos Chem Phys 8:7297–7316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bond TC, Streets DG, Yarber KF, Nelson SM, Woo J, Klimont ZA (2004) Technology based global inventory of black and organic carbon emission from combustion. J Geophys Res 109:D14203. doi: 10.1029/2003JD003697 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chakraborty D, Mondal NK, Datta JK (2014) Indoor pollution from solid biomass fuel and rural health damage: a micro-environmental study in rural area of Burdwan, West Bengal. Int J Sustain Built Environ 3(2):262–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dekonning HW, Smith KR, Last JM (1985) Biomass fuel combustion and health. Bull World Health Org 63:11–26Google Scholar
  10. Devakumar D, Semple S, Osrin D, Yadav SK, Kurmi OP, Saville NM, Shrestha B, Manandhar DS, Costello A, Ayres JG (2014) Biomass fuel use and the exposure of children to particulate air pollution in southern Nepal. Environ Int 66:79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ezzati M, Lopez AD, Rodgers A, Vander HS, Murray CJ, Comparative Risk Assessment Collaborating Group (2002) Selected major risk factors and global and regional burden of disease. Lancet 2(360):1347–1360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fergusson J, Schroeder O (1985) Lead in house dust of Christchurch, New Zealand: sampling, levels and sources. Sci Total Environ 46:61–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ferreira-Baptista L, De Miguel E (2005) Geochemistry and risk assessment of street dust in Luanda, Angola: a tropical urban environment. Atmos Environ 39:4501–4512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fine PM, Cass GR, Simoneit BRT (2001) Chemical characterization of fine particle emissions from fire place combustion of wood grown in the North-Eastern United States. Environ Sci Technol 35(13):2665–2675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fine PM, Cass GR, Simoneit BRT (2002) Chemical characterization of fine particle emissions from fireplace combustion of woods grown in the southern United States. Environ Sci Technol 36:1442–1451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fine PM, Cass GR, Simoneit BRT (2004) Chemical characterization of fine particle emissions from the wood stove combustion of prevalent United States tree species. Sci Total Environ 21:705–721Google Scholar
  17. Huang Y, Ho SSH, Ho KF, Lee SC, Yu JZ, Louie PKK (2011) Characteristics and health impacts of VOCs and carbonyls associated with residential cooking activities in Hong Kong. J Hazard Mater 186:344–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hwang H, Park E, Young T, Hammock B (2008) Occurrence of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in indoor dust. Sci Total Environ 404:26–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lin Y, Fang F, Wang F, Xu M (2015) Pollution distribution and health risk assessment of heavy metals in indoor dust in Anhui rural China. Environ Monit Assess 187:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lu X, Wu X, Wang Y, Chen H, Cao P, Fu L (2014) Risk assessment of toxic metals in street dust from a medium-sized industrial city of China. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety 106:154–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lucas J, Bellanger L, Strat Y, Tertre A, Glorennec P, Bot B et al (2014) Source contributions of lead in residential floor dust and within-home variability of dust lead loading. Sci Total Environ 471:768–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lund MT, Berntsen TK, Heyes C, Klimont Z (2014) Global and regional climate impact of black carbon and co-emitted species from the on-road diesel sector. Atmos Environ 98:50–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mendell JM, Health GA (2005) Do indoor pollutants and thermal conditions in schools influence student performance? A critical review of the literature. Indoor Air 15:27–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Molnár P, Gustafson P, Johannesson S, Boman J, Barregard L, Sallsten G (2005) Domestic wood burning and PM2.5 trace elements: personal exposures, indoor and outdoor Levels. Atmos Environ 39:2643–2653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Naeher LP, Brauer M, Lipsett M, Zelikoff JT, Simpson CD, Koenig JQ et al (2007) Wood smoke health effects: a review. Inhal Toxicol 19:67–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Philippe G, Lucas J, Mandin C, Bot B (2012) French children’s exposure to metals via ingestion of indoor dust, outdoor playground dust and soil: contamination data. Environ Int 45:129–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Popovicheva OB, Kozlov VS, Engling G, Diapouli E, Persiantseva NM, Timofeev MA, Fan TS, Saraga D, Eleftheriadis K (2015) Small-scale study of siberian biomass burning: I. Smoke microstructure. Aerosol Air Qual Res 15:117–128Google Scholar
  28. Salam A, Hasan M, Begum BA, Begum M, Biswas SK (2013) Chemical characterization of biomass burning deposits from cooking stoves in Bangladesh. Biomass Bioenergy 52:122–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schmidl C, Marr IL, Caseiro A, Kotianová P, Berner A, Bauer H, Kasper-Giebl A, Puxbaum H (2008) Chemical characterisation of fine particle emissions from wood stove combustion of common woods growing in mid-European alpine regions. Atmos Environ 42:126–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Smith KR, Mehta S, Maeusezahl-Feuz M (2004) Indoor air pollution from household use of solid fuels. In: Ezzati M, Lopez AD, Rodgers A, Murray CJL (eds) Comparative quantification of health risks: global and regional burden of disease attribution to selected major risk factors. World Health Organization, Geneva, pp 1–24Google Scholar
  31. Stiernstrom S, Hemstrom K, Wik O, Carlsson G, Bengtsson B-E, Breitholtz M (2011) An eco-toxicological approach for hazard identification of energy ash. Waste Manag 31:342–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sundell J (2004) On the history of indoor air quality and health. Indoor Air 14:51–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tripathi A (1994) Airborne lead pollution in the city of Varanasi, India. Atmos Environ 28:2317–2323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. USEPA (1989) Risk assessment guidance for superfund (volume I) human health evaluation manual Washington: Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, US Environmental Protection Agency. pp 1–89Google Scholar
  35. USEPA (1996) Soil screening guidance: technical background document. EPA/540/R-95/128, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency ResponseGoogle Scholar
  36. USEPA (2001) Supplemental guidance for developing soil screening levels for superfund sites. OSWER 9355.4-24, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency ResponseGoogle Scholar
  37. Vassura I, Venturini E, Marchetti S, Piazzalunga A, Bernardi E, Fermo P, Passarini F (2014) Markers and influence of open biomass burning on atmospheric particulate size and composition during a major bonfire event. Atmos Environ 82:218–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Viana M, Pandolfi M, Minguillón MC, Querol X, Alastuey A, Monfort E, Celades I (2008) Inter comparison of receptor models for PM source apportionment: case study in an industrial area. Atmos Environ 42:3820–3832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. World Health Organization (revised) (2007) Indoor air pollution: national burden of disease estimates. WHO/SDE/PHE/07.01 rev, Geneva. www.who.intindoorair/publicationsindoor_air_national_burden_estimate_revised.pdf. Accessed on 5 Sept 2007
  40. Zhang W, Tong Y, Wang H, Chen L, Ou L, Wang X, Liu G, Zhu Y (2014) Emission of metals from pelletized and uncompressed biomass fuels combustion in rural household stoves in China. Sci Rep 4:1–7Google Scholar
  41. Zheng N, Liu J, Wang Q, Liang Z (2010) Health risk assessment of heavy metal exposure to street dust in the zinc smelting district, Northeast of China. Sci Total Environ 408(4):726–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environmental Chemistry Laboratory, Department of Environmental ScienceThe University of BurdwanBurdwanIndia

Personalised recommendations