Abstract
Due to increasing generation of municipal solid waste and lack of understanding about the different stages of municipal solid waste management (MSWM) practices, several cities in Asian countries and elsewhere are facing environmental and health problems caused by improper municipal solid waste management. Based on literatures of municipal solid waste management practices, there have been no established criteria for effective municipal solid waste management practices. This study aimed to investigate the existing municipal solid waste management practices, and develop MSWM indicators and their influencing factors responsible for effective MSWM practices which covered collection efficiency, treatment efficiency, benefit/cost ratio, and social satisfaction. Based on data collected from 80 cities in three Asian countries (Malaysia, Nepal, and Thailand), factors influencing the efficiency of the municipal solid waste management indicators were identified using Response Surface Methodology. A municipal solid waste management effectiveness diagram with the satisfactory levels for MSWM practices was developed and tested with actual data of four cities in Asian countries having different municipal solid waste management efficiencies. The findings identified the influencing factors affecting the municipal solid waste management efficiencies of these tested cities and proposed effective measures for improving municipal solid waste management practices. The effective municipal solid waste management measures, as proposed, are recommended for implementation by various cities to minimize environmental pollution and protect public health.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ADB (2013) Solid waste management in Nepal: current status and policy recommendations. Asian Development Bank, Philippines
AIT (2004) Municipal solid waste management in Asia. Environmental Engineering and Management School of Environment Resources and Development, Bangkok
Alam R, Chowdhury M, Hasan G, Karanjit B, Shrestha L (2008) Generation, storage, collection and transportation of municipal solid waste: a case study in the city of Kathmandu, capital of Nepal. Waste Manag 28:1088–1097
Alavi N, Goudarzi G, Babaei AA, Jaafarzadeh N, Hosseinzadeh M (2013) Municipal solid waste landfill site selection with geographic information systems and analytical hierarchy process: a case study in Mahshahr country. Iran Waste Manag Res 31(1):98–105
Burntley SJ (2007) A review of municipal solid waste composition in the United Kingdom. Waste Manag 27(10):1274–1285
Chaerul M, Fahruroji AR, Fujiwara T (2014) Recycling of plastic packaging waste in Bandung City, Indonesia. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 16:509–518
Che Y, Yang K, Jin Y, Zhang W, Shang Z, Tai J (2013) Residents’ concerns and attitudes toward a municipal solid waste landfill: integrating a questionnaire survey and GIS techniques. Environ Monit Assess 185:10001–10013
Chung SS, Lo CWH (2008) Local waste management constraints and waste administrators in China. Waste Manag 28:272–281
Dangi BM, Pretz RC, Urynowicz AM et al (2011) Municipal solid waste generation in Kathmandu Nepal. J Environ Manag 92:240–249
European Environment Agency (2013) Municipal solid waste management in Netherlands. EEA
Fobil JN, Armah NA, Hogarh JN et al (2006) The influence of institutions and organizations on urban waste collection systems: an analysis of waste collection system in Accra, Ghana (1985–2000). J Environ Manag 86(1):262–271
Guerrero LA, Maas G, Hogland W (2013) Solid waste management challenges for cities in developing countries. Waste Manag 33:220–232
Hazra T, Goel S (2009) Solid waste management in Kolkata, India: practices and challenges. Waste Manag 29:470–478
Henry RK, Yongsheng Z, Jun D (2006) Municipal solid waste management challenges in developing countries: kenyan case study. Waste Manag 26:92–100
Huang YT, Pan TC, Kan JJ (2011) Performance assessment for municipal solid waste collection in Taiwan. J Environ Sanit Manag 92:1277–1283
Japan Environmental Sanitation Center (2012) Solid waste management and recycling technology of Japan. Minister’s Secretariat Waste Management and Recycling Department, Nagoya
Linzner R, Salhofer S (2014) Municipal solid waste recycling and the significance of informal sector in urban China. Waste Manag Res 32:896–907
Manaf LA, Samah MAA, Zukki NIM (2009) Municipal solid waste management in Malaysia: practices and challenges. Waste Manag 29:2902–2906
Moghadam MRA, Mokhtarani N, Mokhtarani B (2009) Municipal solid waste management in Rasht City. Iran Waste Manag 29:485–489
Moh YC, Manaf LA (2014) Overview of household solid waste recycling policy status and challenges in Malaysia. Resour Conserv Recycl 82:50–61
Ramzan N, Degenkolbe S, Witt W (2008) Evaluating and improving environmental performance of HC’s recovery system: a case study of distillation unit. Chem Eng J 140:201–213
Sankoh FP, Yan X, Tran Q (2013) Environmental and health impact of solid waste disposal in developing cities: a case study of granville brook dumpsite, Freetown, Sierra Leone. J Environ Prot 4:665–670
Sarkis J, Dijkshoorn J (2007) Relationships between solid waste management performance and environmental practice adoption in welsh small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs). Int J Prod Res 45(21):4989–5015
Sasaki S, Araki T, Tambunan AH, Prasadja H (2014) Household income, living and working conditions of dumpsite waste pickers in Bantar Gebang: toward integrated waste management in Indonesia. Resour Conserv Recycl 89:11–21
Scheinberg A (2011) Value added: modes of sustainable recycling in the modernization of waste management systems. Ph.D Wageningen University, Wageningen
Sharholy M, Ahmad K, Vaishya RC, Gupta RD (2007) Municipal solid waste characteristics and management in Allahabad, India. Waste Manag 27:490–496
Sharholy M, Ahmad K, Mahmood G, Trivedi RC (2008) Municipal solid waste in Indian cities: a review. Waste Manag 28:459–467
Simonetto EO, Borenstein D (2007) A decision support system for the operational planning of solid waste collection. Waste Manag 27:1286–1297
Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, London
Sujauddin M, Huda MS, Rafiqul Hoque ATM (2008) Household solid waste characteristics and management in Chittagong, Bangladesh. Waste Manag 28:1688–1695
Suttibak S, Nitivattananon V (2008) Assessment of factors influencing the performance of solid waste recycling programs. J Resour Conversat and Recycl 53:45–56
UNICEF/WHO (2012) Progress on drinking water and sanitation. 2012 update. UNICEF/WHO Joint monitoring Program for water supply and sanitation. Available at: http://www.unicef.org/media/files/JMPreport2012.pdf
United Nations Development Programme (2008) Malaysia developing a solid waste management model for Penang. UNDP, kuala Lumpur
United Nations Environment Programme Report (2015) Global waste management outlook. UNEP
United Nations Human Settlements Programme (2011) Collection of municipal solid waste management: Key issues for decision-makers in developing countries. UN-HABITAT, Nairobi
World Bank (2000) Solid-waste ecological enhancement project
World Bank (2005) Waste management in China: issues and recommendations. working paper No. 9. Urban development working papers. East Asia infrastructure department, May, Washington, DC
Worthington AC, Dollery BE (2001) Measuring efficiency in local government: an analysis of new South Wales municipalities’ domestic waste management function. Policy Stud J 29(1):232–249
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge support from the Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR) North–South, Research Partnerships for User Driven Sanitation, co-funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF), the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), and the participating institutions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taweesan, A., Koottatep, T. & Polprasert, C. Effective Measures for Municipal Solid Waste Management for Cities in Some Asian Countries. Expo Health 9, 125–133 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-016-0227-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-016-0227-5