Advertisement

Water Quality, Exposure and Health

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 557–566 | Cite as

Suitability of Fluoride-Contaminated Groundwater for Various Purposes in a Part of Vaniyar River Basin, Dharmapuri District, Tamil Nadu

  • G. Jagadeshan
  • L. ElangoEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Groundwater has become a vital source of water for domestic and agricultural activities all over the world. The objective of this study is to investigate the fluoride-rich groundwater for assessing its suitability for drinking and irrigational purposes in Vaniyar River basin, Dharmapuri district, Tamil Nadu. About 650 groundwater samples were collected and analysed. Na–Cl and Ca–Mg–Cl–SO4 are the major hydrochemical types of groundwater present in this area. The concentrations of major ions are within the permissible limits of Bureau of Indian Standards in most of the area. Fluoride concentration exceeded the maximum permissible limit of the drinking water standards of 1.5 mg/l in 446 samples. The use of this groundwater for drinking purpose has caused dental and skeletal fluorosis to many of the residents of the area. The major source for fluoride in groundwater is due to the leaching of fluoride-bearing minerals in the rocks of this area. Fluoride ions from biotite and hornblende minerals leach into the groundwater and contribute to high fluoride concentration in this region. The groundwater of this area is characterised by high salinity and low sodium. Even though groundwater in the area is suitable for irrigation, it is not suitable for domestic purpose in most of the region.

Keywords

Fluoride Dental and skeletal fluorosis Biotite and hornblende Sodium adsorption ratio Permeability index 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the University of Grants Commission with Centre with Potential for Excellence in Environmental Sciences (Grant no. F.No.1-9/2002 (NS/PE)) for financial support.

References

  1. Aghazadeh N, Mogaddam A (2010) Investigation of hydrochemical characteristics of groundwater in the Harzandat aquifer, northwest of Iran. Environ Monit Assess. doi: 10.1007/s10661-010-1575-4 Google Scholar
  2. Alexakis D (2011) Assessment of water quality in the Messolonghi-Etoliko and Neochorio region (West Greece) using hydrochemical and statistical analysis methods. Environ Monit Assess. doi: 10.1007/s10661-011-1884-2 Google Scholar
  3. Baalousha H (2010) Assessment of a groundwater quality monitoring network using vulnerability mapping and geostatistics: a case study from Heretaunga Plains, New Zealand. Agric Water Manag 97:240–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhargava DS, Killender DJ (1988) The technology of water resources in industries, a rational approach. J Ind Water Works Assoc 20:107–112Google Scholar
  5. Brindha K, Rajesh R, Murugan R, Elango L (2012) Nitrate pollution in groundwater in some rural areas of Nalgonda district, Andhra Pradesh, India. J Environ Sci Eng 54:64–70Google Scholar
  6. Bureau of Indian Standards Drinking water (BIS) (2013) Specification. IS: 10500, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  7. Carroll D (1962) Rainwater as a chemical agent of geological processes, A review U.S. Geological survey water- supply paper 1535Google Scholar
  8. Davis SN, Wiest RJ (1966) Hydrogeology, vol 463. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Doneen LD (1964) Water quality for agriculture. Department of Irrigation, University of California, Davis, p 48Google Scholar
  10. Edmunds WM, Smedley PL (1996) Groundwater geochemistry and health with special reference to developing countries. Geol Soc Spec Pub 113:91–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Freeze RA, Cherry JA (1979) Groundwater. PrenticeHall, Englewood Cliffs, p 604Google Scholar
  12. Frengstad B, Skrede AK, Banks D, Krog JR, Siewers U (2000) The chemistry of Norwegian groundwater: III. The distribution of trace elements in 476 crystalline bedrock groundwaters, as analysed by ICPMS techniques. Sci Total Environ 246:21–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jagadeshan G, Kalpana L, Elango L (2015) Major ion signatures for identification of geochemical reactions responsible for release of fluoride from geogenic sources to groundwater and associated risk in Vaniyar River basin, Dharmapuri district, Tamil Nadu, India. Environ Earth Sci. doi: 10.1007/s12665-015-4250-9 Google Scholar
  14. Lahermo P, Backman B (1999) Nitrates in groundwater in Finland: the most endangering quality problem. Hydrogeol Land Use Manag: 329–333Google Scholar
  15. Laluraj CM, Gopinath G, Dineshkumar PK (2005) Groundwater chemistry of shallow aquifers in the coastal zones of Cochin. Indus Appl Ecol Environ Res 3(1):133–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mishra PC, Behera PC, Patel RK (2005) Contamination of water due to major industries and open refuse dumping in the steel city of Orissa-a case study. J Environ Sci Eng 47:141–154Google Scholar
  17. Nickson RT, McArthur JM, Shrestha B, Kyaw -Nyint TO, Lowry D (2005) Arsenic and other drinking water quality issues, Muzaffargarh District, Pakistan. Appl Geochem 20:55–68Google Scholar
  18. Omo-Irabor O, Olobaniyi SB, Oduyemi K, Akunna J (2008) Surface and groundwater water quality assessment using multivariate analytical methods: a case study of the Western Niger Delta, Nigeria. Phys Chem Earth 33:666–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Piper AM (1944) A graphic procedure in the geochemical interpretation of water analysis. Trans Geophysics Union 25:914–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ramesh K, Elango L (2006) Groundwater quality assessment in Tondiar basin, Indian. J Environ Protect 26:497–504Google Scholar
  21. Rao NS (2006) Nitrate pollution and its distribution in the groundwater of Srikakulam district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Environ Geol 51:631–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Reimann C, Caritat P (1998) Chemistry elements in the environment. Factsheets for the geochemists and environmental scientist: 398Google Scholar
  23. Richards LA (1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline and Alkali soils, USDA handbook No. 60, vol 160. Printing Office, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  24. Sahinci A (1991) Geochemistry of natural waters (in Turkish). Reform Printing Office, Izmir, p 548Google Scholar
  25. Saleh A, Al-Ruwaih F, Shehata M (1999) Hydrogeochemical processes operating within the main aquifers of Kuwait. J Arid Environ 42:195–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sarala C, Ravi Babu P (2012) Assessment of groundwater quality parameters in and around Jawaharnagar, Hyderabad. Int J Sci Res Publ 2:1–6Google Scholar
  27. Sathish S, Elango L (2011) Groundwater quality and vulnerability mapping of an unconfined coastal aquifer. J Spat Hydrol 11:18–33Google Scholar
  28. Sawyer GN, Cartly DL, Parkin GF (2003) Chemistry for environmental engineering and science, 5th edn. McGraw Hill, New York 152 Google Scholar
  29. Sujatha D, Reddy BR (2012) Quality Characterization of groundwater in the south-eastern part of the Ranga Reddy District, Andhra Pradesh, India. Environ Geol 44:579–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Todd DK (2001) Groundwater Hydrology. Wiley, Canada, pp 280–281Google Scholar
  31. Wilcox LV (1955) Classification and use of irrigation waters USDA Circular 969, Washington, DC, United State of AfricaGoogle Scholar
  32. World health organisation (WHO) (2004) Fluoride in drinking-water, background document for development of WHO guidelines for drinking water quality 17Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeologyAnna UniversityChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations