Abstract
Wastewater from sugar industries has complex characteristics and is considered as a challenge for environmental engineers in terms of its treatment. Treating the SIWW is thus crucially important not only for the environment, but also for the purpose of recycling water for use in industrial processes. Before treatment, it is important to know the effluent parameter as well as the effect on environment. Many different types of techniques or methods are introduced and modified according to the requirement due to their difference in compositions. To treat the SIWW, generally physicochemical methods or biological methods are applied combined or separately as per the water quality parameter. In this regard, an effort has been made to study the physicochemical characteristics, treatment, and effects of SIWW before treatment. Work done by various authors is summarized in the literature.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agrawal RN (1976) Sugar industry in India. Popular Prakashan Mumbai, Mumbai, pp 199–215
Ahmad S, Mahmoud TA (1982) Wastewater from a sugar refining industry. Water Res 16, 345–355
Alfieri Jr SA (1979) Downy mildew of sugarcane. Plant Pathology Circular No. 205
Alkaya E, Demirer GN (2011) Anaerobic-fed and sequencing-batch treatment of sugar-beet processing wastes: a comparative study. Water Environ Res 83(3):247–255
Amathussalam A, Abubaker MN, Jayabai N (2002) Impact of sugar-mill effluent on ground water a café study. J Ind Pollut 18(2):119–124
APHA (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC
Asaithambi P, Matheswaran M (2011) Electrochemical treatment of simulated sugar industrial effluent: optimization and modeling using a response surface methodology. Arab J Chem 4:63–70
Avasan M, Rao SRK (2001) Effect of sugar mill effluent on organic resources of fish. Pollut Res 20(2):167–171
Baskaran L, Sundaramoorthy P, Chidambaram ALA, Ganesh KS (2009) Growth and physiological activity of green gram (Vigna radiata L.) under effluent stress, Biol Res Int 2(2):107–114
Berliner JJ, Staff (1952) Sugar Waste No. 4749. A Berliner Research Report, 686 Broadway, 12, New York
Beruch AK, Sharma RN, Barach GC (1993) Impact of Sugar mills and distilleries effluents on water quality of river Gelabil Assam. Indian J Environ Health 35(4):288–293
Bhagat SK, Sah RC (2003) Compliance monitoring of industrial effluent standards in Nepal. Paper Presented in 6th Sustainable Development Conference, Islamabad
Bogliolol M, Bottinol A, Caparmellil G, De Petrol G, Servidal A, Pezzi G, Vallini G (1996) Clean water recycle in sugar extraction process: performance analysis of reverse osmosis in the treatment of sugar beet press water. Desalination 108:261–271
Bureau of Indian Standard (2010) Indian Standard specifications for drinking water IS: 10500. Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi
Cartiera S, Theoleyre MA, Decloux M (1997) Treatment of sugar decolorizing resin regeneration waste using nanofiltration. Desalination 113:7–17
Cheng L, Chen K, Wu H, Chen Y (2000) The brief introduction on the zero effluent of waste liquid of alcohol by composting in cane sugar factory. Guangxi Light Ind 2:31–32
Czabator FJ (1962) Germination value: an index combining speed and completeness of pine seed germination. Forensic Sci 8:386–396
Damodharan U, Reddy MV (2012) Impact of sugar industrial treated effluent on the growth factor in Sugarcane-Cuddalore. India J Sustain Bioenerg Syst 2:43–48
Department of Natural Science (2006) Wastewater characterization for evaluation of biological phosphorus removal. Available from www.dnr.state.wi.us/org/water/wm/water/wm/ww/biophos//into.htm. Accessed 13/6/2006
Doke KM, Khan EM, Rapolu J, Shaikh A (2011) Physico-chemical analysis of sugar industry effluent and its effect on seed germination of vigna angularis. Vigna Cylindrical and Sorghum Cerium Aunnals Environ Sci 5:7–11
EPA (2000) Risk characterization handbook, science policy council, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, p 20460
EPA (2002) Onsite wastewater treatment systems manual. EPA/625/R-00/008/2002. Available from http://www.epa.gov/owmitnet/mtbfact.htm. Accessed 02/06/2011
ETPI (2001) Environmental technology program for industry, environmental report on sugar sector. Mon Environ News 5(7):11–27
Farhadian M, Borghei M, Umrania VV (2007) Treatment of beet sugar wastewater by UAFB bioprocess. Bioresour Technol 98:3080–3083
Garrels RM, MacKenzie RT (1971) Evolution of sedimentary rocks. Norton, New York
Gehlawat LK (1990) Modernization of Indian sugar industry. Arnold Publishers, New Delhi, p 82
Grover DK, Grewal SS (1991) The problems of sugar industry in India. Vihar Publications, Allahabad
Guven G, Perendeci A, Tanyolac A (2009) Electrochemical treatment of simulated beet sugar factory wastewater. Chem Eng J 151(1–3):149–159
Hampannavar US, Shivayogimath CB (2010) Anaerobic treatment of sugar industry wastewater by Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor at ambient temperature. Int J Environ Sci 1(4):631–639
Hancock FD (1973) Algal ecology of a stream polluted through gold mining in winter water strandard. Hydrobiology 43:189–229
Hernfindez EPS, Cordoba LT (1994) Anaerobic treatment of sugar-mill wastewater in downflow fixed-bed reactors, Bioresour Technol 48:179–181
Hinkova A, Bubnik Z, Kadlec P, Pridal J (2002) Potentials of separation membranes in the sugar industry. Sep Purif Technol 26:101–110
Hosetti BB, Kulkarni AR, Patil HS (1994) Water quality in vayanthi, Nalla and Panchganga at Kolhapur. Indian J Environ Health 36(2):124–127
Human M, Drtil M, Derco J, Mrafkova L, Hormak M, Mico S (2001) Two-step pilot-scale anaerobic treatment of sugar beet pulp. Pol J Environ Stud 10(4): 237–243
Hurse JT, Connor AM (1999) Nitrogen removal from wastewater treatment lagoons. Water Sci Technol 39(6):191–198
Jenkins D, Richard M, Daigger G (2003) Manual on the causes and control of activated sludge bulking and foaming, 2nd edn. Lewis publishers, Boca Raton
Jha SK, Krishnamoorthy TM, Pandit GG, Nambi KSV (1999) History of accumulation of mercury and nickel in Thane Creek, Mumbai, using 210Pb dating technique. Sci Total Environ 236(1):91–99
Jha SK, Chavan SB, Pandit GG, Negi BS, Sada-sivan S (2002) Behaviour and fluxes of trace and toxic elements in creek sediment near Mumbai India. Environ-Mental Monit Assess 76(2):249–262
Jiang Y, Huang F (2000) Studies on new organic compound fertilizers special for sugarcane granulated from alcohol waste liquid. Sugar Cane Ind 4:22–28
Kannan K, Oblisami G (1990a) Influence of irrigation with pulp and paper mill effluent on soil chemical and microbiological properties. Biol Fertil Soils (Historical Archive) 10(3):197–201
Kannan K, Oblisami G (1990b) Influence of pulp and paper mill effluents on soil enzyme activities. Soil Biol Biochem 22:923–927
Karns LJ (1977) Control of Pollution of Kabul River and needed Legislation. Terminal report for the Government of Paskistan by UNIDO
Kcharche RM (1989) Sugar cooperatives in developing economy. Parimal Prakashan Mumbai, Mumbai
Khan M, Kalsoom M, Mahmood U, Riaz M, Khan AR (2003) Characterization and treatment of industrial effluent from sugar industry. J Chem Soc 25(3):242–247
Kisu GC, Barman SC, Bhargava SK (2000) Contamination of soil and plants potentially toxic elements irrigated with mixed industrial effluent and impact in the environment. Water Air Soil Pollut 120:121–137
Kolhe AS, Sarode AG, Ingale SR (2009) Study effluent from sugar cane industry. Sodh Samiksha aur Mulyankan, Jaipur
Koppar A, Pullammanappallil P (2008) Single-stage, batch. leach-bed, thermophilic anaerobic digestion of spent sugar beet pulp. Bioresour Technol 99:2831–2839
Kris M (2007) Wastewater pollution in China. Availablefrom http://www.dbc.uci/wsustain/suscoasts/krismin.html. Accessed 16/06/2008
Kumar SRD, Swamy RN, Ramkrishan K (2001) Pollution studies on sugar mill effluent physicochemical characteristics and toxic metals. Pollut Res 20(1):19–97
Kurosu O (2001) Nitrogen removal from wastewaters in microalgal-bacterial-treatment ponds. Available from http://www.Socrates.berkeley.edu/es196/projects/2001final/kurosu.pdf
Larsdotter K (2006) Microalgae for phosphorus removal from wastewater in a Nordic climate. A Doctoral Thesis from the School of Biotechnology, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm
Lokhande RS, Kelkar N (1999) Studies on heavy metals in water of Vasai Creek Maharashtra. Indian J Environ Protect 19(9):664–668
Lokhande RS, Singare PU, Pimple DS (2011) Quantification study of toxic heavy metals pollutants in sediment samples collected from Kasardi river flowing along the Taloja industrial area of Mumbai India. N Y Sci J 4(9):66–71
Manal SR (2002) Physico chemical Analysis of effluent from sugar Industry. Disseratation Report Dr, BAMU Aurangabad
Maruthi A, Rao SRK (2001) Effect of sugar mill effluent on organic resources of fish. Pollut Res 20(2):167–171
Matkar LS, Gangotri MS (2002) Physico chemical analysis of sugar industrial effluents. J Ind Pollut Control 18(2):139–144
Mccabe D, Vivona MA (1999) Treating process wastewater employing vacuum distillation using mechanical vapor recompression. Environ Progr 18(1):30
McCasland M, Trautmann N, Porter K, Wagenet R (2008) Nitrate: health effects in drinking water. Available from http://pmep.cee.comell.edu/facts.slides-self/facts/nit-heef-grw85.html
Metcalf INC, Eddy H (2003) Wastewater engineering: treatment and reuse, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, Boston
Monanmani K, Chitraraju G, Swaminathan K (1990) Effect of alcohol and chemical industrial effluents on physical and biological properties of soil. Pollut Res 9:79–82
Monteiro SN, Rodriquez RJS, De Souza MV, D’Almeida JRM (1998) Sugar cane bagasse waste as reinforcement in low cost composites. Adv Perform Mater 5(3):183–191
Nadia MA, Mahmood AK (2006) Study on effluent from selected sugar mill in Pakistan: potential environmental, health, and economic consequences of an excessive pollution load. Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SPDI), Islamabad
Nagaraju M, Narasimha G, Rangaswamy V (2009) Impact of sugar industry effluents on soil cellulose activity. Int Biodeterior Biodegr 63:1088–1092
Narasimha G, Babu GVAK (1999) Physicochemical and biological properties of soil samples collected from soil contaminated with effluents of cotton ginning industry. J Environ Biol 20:235–239
Nath K, Singh D, Sharma YK (2007) Combinatorial effects of distillery and sugar factory effluents in crop plants. J Environ Biol 28(3):577–582
Ogutveren UB, Yavuzve UY, Koparal AS (2009) Treatment of sugar industry wastewater by an electrochemical method. In: 60th annual meeting of The ISE, Beijing, pp 16–21
Okoh AT, Odjadjare EE, Igbinosa EO, Osode AN (2007) Wastewater treatment plants as a source of microbial pathogens in receiving water sheds. Afr J Biotechnol 6(25):2932–2944
Prasad D, Sivaram TK, Yegnaraman V (2006) Microbial fuel cell constructed with a micro-organism isolated from sugar industry effluent. J Power Sour 160(2):991–996
Pruthi S (1995) History of sugar industry in India. Reliance Publishing House, New Delhi
Ramkrishan K, Thamizhiniyan P, Sundaramoorthy P, Kumar SD (2001) Effect of sugarmill raw and yeast freated effluent on scred germination and seadling growth of paddy. Asain J Microbiol Biotechnol Environ 3(1–2):37–40
Resource Quality Services (2004) Eutrophication and toxic cyanobacteria. Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, South Africa. Available from www.dwaf.gov.za/WQS/eutrophication/toxalga.html. Accessed 14 March 2007
Rybicki S (1997) Advanced wastewater treatment: phosphorus removal from wastewater. Report No 1. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm
Sahu SK, Ajmal PY, Pandit GG, Puranik VD (2009) Vertical distribution of polychlorinated biphenyl congeners in sediment core from Thane Creek area of Mumbai India. J Hazard Mater 164(2–3):1573–1579
Salequzzaman M, Tariqul Islam SM, Tasnuva A, Kashem MA, Mahedi al Masud M (2008) Environmental impact of sugar industry-a case study on Kushtia sugar mills in Bangladesh. J Innovat Deviat Strategy 2(3):31–35
Samuel S, Muthukkaruppan SM (2011) Physico-chemical analysis of sugar mill effluent, contaminated soil and its effect on seed germination of paddy. Int J Pharm Biol Arch 2(5):1469–1472
Santhi SK, Pandian SR (2012) Effect of sugar mill effluent on seed germination of peanut (Arachis Hypogaea) and green gram (Vigna Radiata). Int J Pharm Chem Sci 1(2):804–806
Saranraj P, Stella D (2012) Bioremediation of sugar mill effluent by immobilized bacterial consortium. Int J Res Pure Appl Microbiol 2(4):43–48
Saxena C, Madan S (2012) Evaluation of adsorbents efficacy for the removal of pollutants from sugar mill effluent. ARPN J Agric Biol Sci 7(5):325–329
Siddiqui WA, Waseem M (2012) A comparative study of sugar mill treated and untreated effluent-a case study. Orient J Chem 28(4):1899–1904
Singare PU, Lokhande RS, Jagtap AG (2010) Study of physico-chemical quality of the industrial waste water effluent from Gove industrial area of Bhiwandi city of Maharashtra, India. Interdiscip Environ Rev11(4):263–273
Singare PU, Lokhande RS, Bhattacharjee SS (2011) Physico-chemical analysis of the sediment samples col-lected from Thane Creek of Maharashtra, India. Interdiscip Environ Rev 12(2):95–107
Singh (1999) On economizing use of water in sugar plants. A case study seminar on water economy in sugar factory. In: 26th-O. S.T.A. Annual Convention Part-I
Thorat SP, Wagh SB (1999) Physico chemical analysis of tannery water. J Ind Pollut Control 16(1):107–109
Van Larsdrecht MC (2005) Role of biological processes in phosphate recovery. Natural History Museum, London
WHO (2004) Guidelines for drinking water quality, vol 1. World Health Organization Press, Geneva
WHO (2006) Guidelines for the safe use of wastewater, excreta and greater, vol 3. World Health Organisation Press, Geneva
Acknowledgments
Author expresses his humble acknowledgement to the Department of Chemical Engineering, NIT Raipur for funding and providing other facilities.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sahu, O.P., Chaudhari, P.K. The Characteristics, Effects, and Treatment of Wastewater in Sugarcane Industry. Water Qual Expo Health 7, 435–444 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-015-0158-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-015-0158-6