Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Comparative Study of USA and Canadian Water Quality Index Models

  • Published:
Water Quality, Exposure and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The US-based water quality index models originated from the National Sanitation Foundation (NSF) in additive (AWQI) and multiplicative (MWQI) forms in the early 1970s. The other model which has gained popularity in the recent years is Oregon Water Quality Index (OWQI) which is based on the harmonic averaging concept. The Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment Water Quality Index (CCME WQI) (also referred to as Canadian Water Quality Index, CWQI in the text) was commissioned in 2001 to assess the water quality of surface waters across Canada. The United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP) has endorsed the CCME WQI (or CWQI) model suitable for grading the quality of drinking waters world wide. The index scores from all the models range from 0 to 100, higher scores alluding to better quality. The water quality is categorized in five grades [excellent, good, fair, marginal, poor], with differential system of ranking while using the index score values. The present study evaluated the water quality data from 30 river sites across the province of Ontario, Canada for 5-year period 2002–04 through 2006–08 (3-year running averages) for the comparison of aforementioned WQI models. The parameters currently used in calculating CCME WQI (or CWQI) score in Ontario are: ammonia, chloride, nitrate, phosphate, chromium, nickel, and zinc (seven parameters). The parameters hardness, pH and temperature are monitored but are used as modifying parameters, i.e., they are taken into consideration by modifying the guidelines or the objective functions of some of the former seven parameters. The study indicated that AWQI and MWQI scores tended to be much higher in comparison to the CWQI scores. As a result, the grades of the water quality for AWQI and MWQI turned out to be superior in relation to CWQI. In contrast, the correspondence in terms of water quality grades between OWQI and CWQI was much closer and better. Overall, the CWQI formulation appeared to be the most stringent, followed by OWQI model to grade the quality of water for the aquatic uses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AB (2007) Water for life: Healthy aquatic ecosystem information synthesis and initial assessment of the status and health of aquatic ecosystems in Alberta: Surface water quality, sediment quality and non-fish biota. Alberta Environment, Edmonton, AB, Canada Technical Report # 278/279-01. Can be viewed at: http://environment.gov.ab.ca/info/library/7861.pdf

  • Brown RM, Mclelland N (1974) Up from chaos: The water quality index as an effective instrument in water quality management. National Sanitation Foundation, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 27 pp

  • Brown RM, Mclelland NI, Deininger RA, Tozer RG (1970) A water quality index—Do we dare? Water Sew Works 117(10):339–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown RM, Mclelland NI, Deininger RA, O’Connor M (1971) A water quality index—crashing the psychological barrier. Presented at 138th meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

  • Brown RM, Mclelland NI, Deininger R (1973) Validating the WQI. The paper presented at national meeting of American Society of Civil Engineers on Water Resources Engineering, Washington, DC

  • Cash KJ, Saffran KA, Wright CR (2001) Application of Canadian Water Quality Index (CWQI) to PPWB monitoring program. Technical Report, March 2001

  • CCME (2001) Canadian water quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life. CCME water quality index 1.0, User’s Manual. CCME, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. http://www.ccme.ca/assets/pdf/wqi_usermanualfctsht_e.pdf

  • CESI (2008) Water quality: National perspective. Environment Canada http://ec.gc.ca/indicateurs-indicators/default.asp?lang=En&n=A073189E-1

  • Cude CG (2001) Oregon water quality index: A tool for evaluating water quality management effectiveness. J Am Water Resour Assoc 37(1):125–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cude CG (2005) Accommodating change of bacterial indicators in long term water quality data sets. J Am Water Resour Assoc 41(1):47–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cude CG (2008) Interpretation and communication of water quality data using the Oregon Water Quality Index (OWQI). State of Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Laboratory and Environmental Assessment Division, Portland, USA. www.deq.state.or.us/lab/wqm/wqindex.htm

  • de Rosemond S, Duro DC, Dube M (2009) Comparative analysis of regional water quality in Canada using water quality index. Environ Monit Assess 56:230–240. doi:10.1007/s10661-008-0480-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinius SH (1987) Design of index quality. Water Resour Bull 23(5):823–843

    Google Scholar 

  • Dojlido JR, Best GA (1993) Chemistry of water and water pollution. Ellis Horwood, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dojlido J, Raniszewski J, Woyciechowska J (1994) Water quality index—Application for rivers in Vistula river basin in Poland. Water Sci Technol 30(10):57–64

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dube M, Johnson B, Dunn G, Culp J, Cash K, Munkittrick K, Wong I, Hedley K, Booty W, Lam D, Resler O, Storey A (2006) Development of a new approach to cumulative effects assessment: A northern river ecosystem example. Environ Monit Assess 113:87–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunnette DA (1979) A geographically variable water quality index used in Oregon. J Water Pollut Control Fed 51(1):53–61

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EPI (2010) Yale centre for environmental law and policy, Yale University. Can be viewed at: http://www.yale.edu./envirocenter

  • Hèbert S (2005) Comparison between the index of overall quality of water in Quebec (IQBP) and the water quality index CCME (WQI) for the protection of aquatic life. In: Monitoring the state of environment. Ministry of Sustainable Development, Environment and Parks Department, Quebec. ISBN 2-550-45900-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton RK (1965) An index number system for rating water quality. J Water Pollution Control Fed 37(3):300–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan A, Tobin A, Paterson R, Khan H, Warren R (2005) Application of CCME procedures for deriving site specific water quality guidelines for the CCME water quality index. Water Qual Res J Can 40:448–456

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan F, Husain T, Lumb A (2003) Water quality evaluation and trend analysis at selected watersheds of the Atlantic region of Canada. Environ Monit Assess 88:221–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Landwehr JA, Deininger RA (1976) A comparison of several water quality indexes. J Water Pollut Control Fed 48(5):944–958

    Google Scholar 

  • Linstone HA, Murray T (1975) The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Addison Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumb A, Halliwell D, Sharma T (2006) Application of the CCME water quality index to monitor water quality: A case study of the Mackenzie River basin, Canada. Environ Monit Assess 113:411–429

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lumb A, Sharma TC, Bibeault J-F (2011) A review of genesis and evolution of water quality index (WQI) and some future directions. J Water Qual Expo Health 3(1), 11–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland NI, Brown RM, Deininger RA, Landwehr J (1976a) Water quality index application in the Kansas River basin. Presented at the 46th annual conference, Water Pollution Control Fed, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

  • McClelland NI, Brown RM, Deininger RA (1976b) WQI-enhancing appreciation of quality improvement. National Sanitation Foundation, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercier V, Leger D (2003) Water quality survey. NB Department of Environment. Can be viewed at: http://www.gnb.ca/0009/0371/0013/index-e.asp

  • Mercier V, Leger D (2006) An assessment of the application of testing of the WQI of the CCME in the Atlantic Provinces: A discussion paper. Knowledge Integration Strategies Division, Environment Canada, Gatineau, Quebec K1A 0H3. Can be viewed. at: www.ec.gc.ca/soer-rec/English/recourse_network/CCME_e.cfm

  • Ott WR (1978) Environmental quality indices: Theory and practice. Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Parparov A, Hambright KD (2007) Composite water quality: evaluation and management feedbacks. Water Qual Res J Can 42(1):20–25

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rickwood CJ, Carr JM (2009) Development and sensitivity analysis of a global drinking water quality index. Environ Monit Assess 156:73–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rocchini R, Swain LG (1995) The British Columbia water quality index. Water Quality Branch, Environmental Protection Department, British Columbia Ministry of Environment Land and Parks, November 1995, 13 pp

  • Sarkar C, Abbasi SA (2006) Qualidex—a new software for generating water quality index. Environ Monit Assess 119, 201–231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma TC (2002) Canadian water quality index determination for 4 sites in the Mackenzie River basin. Contract KW405-02-0308 Report, September 2002, Ecological Monitoring and Assessment Network, Environment Canada, Burlington, ON, Canada

  • Sharma TC (2011) A comparative study of USA and Canadian water quality index models. Contract KW405-10-0542 Report, February, 2011, Landscape Science and Technology Division, Environment Canada, Burlington, ON, Canada

  • Sladecek V (1973) System of water quality from biological point of view. In: Advances in limnology, vol 7, Archiv fur Hydrobiologie. E Schweizerbart‘sch Verlagsbuch-handling, Stuttgart, Mai, Vladimir, 218 pages. ISBN 978-3-510-47005-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow J (1854) On the mode of communication of cholera. John Churchill, London, UK. Can be viewed at: http://www.ph.ucla.edu/epi/snow.html

  • Steinhart CE, Schierow LJ, Chesters G (1981) A review of water quality and related indices. Great Lakes Environmental Planning Study contribution No 38, Water Resources Centre, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706, USA

  • Steinhart CE, Schierow LJ, Sonzogni WC (1982) An environmental quality index for the Great Lakes. Water Resour Bull 18(6):1025–1031

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin A, Khan A, Khan H, Moores L, Taylor J (2007) Forestry water quality index—a planning tool for the assessment and communication of the impact of forestry activities on water quality. For Chron 83:207–214

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP GEMS/Water Program (2007) Report: Global drinking water quality index development and sensitivity analysis. United Nations Environmental Program Global Environmental Monitoring System (Gems)/Water Program. Retrieved on January 9. Can be viewed at: http://www.gemswater.org/publications/pdfs/gwqi.pdf

  • Wepener W, Euler N, van Vuren JHJ, du Preez HH, Kohler A (1992) Development of an aquatic toxicity index as a tool in the operation management of water quality in the Olifants River (Kruger National Park). KOEDOE 35(2):1–9

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Wildlife and Landscape Science Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment Canada, Canada Centre for Inland Waters, 867 Lakeshore Rd, Burlington, ON, Canada, L7R 4A6

    A. Lumb

  2. 51B-5305, Glen Erin Drive, Mississauga, ON, Canada, L5M 5N7

    T. C. Sharma

  3. Indicator Development and Integration, Water Quality Monitoring and Surveillance, Water Science & Technology, Environment Canada, 105 rue McGill, 7e étage, Montréal, QC, Canada, H2Y 2E7

    J.-F. Bibeault

  4. Head, Regional Studies, WQMS, Environment Canada, Canada Centre for Inland Waters, 867 Lakeshore Rd, Burlington, ON, Canada, L7R 4A6

    P. Klawunn

Authors
  1. A. Lumb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. C. Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J.-F. Bibeault
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. Klawunn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Lumb.

Additional information

This paper was presented at the 64th Annual Conference of Canadian Water Resources Association, held at St. John’s, NFL, Canada from June 27–30, 2011.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lumb, A., Sharma, T.C., Bibeault, JF. et al. A Comparative Study of USA and Canadian Water Quality Index Models. Water Qual Expo Health 3, 203–216 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-011-0056-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-011-0056-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation