Advertisement

Water Quality, Exposure and Health

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 1–13 | Cite as

Quality of Municipal Wastewater Compared to Surface Waters of the River and Artificial Canal Network in Different Areas of the Eastern Po Valley (Italy)

  • Livia Vittori AntisariEmail author
  • Carlo Trivisano
  • Carlo Gessa
  • Massimo Gherardi
  • Andrea Simoni
  • Gilmo Vianello
  • Nicoletta Zamboni
Article

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyse the macro (Ca, Mg, K, Na, P, S and Si) and micro (Al, B, Ba, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Li, Mn, Mo, Ni, Sr, V and Zn) elements in the wastewater effluents of five treatment plants situated in towns located in the eastern Po Valley (Italy). Two of the plants (Imola and Castenaso) discharge wastewater into rivers (Santerno and Idice rivers, respectively in the Reno basin) while the other three (Codigoro, Copparo and Tresigallo) empty into a complex network of artificial canals (Burana–Po di Volano basin). The wastewater pollution hazard on surface water bodies was studied and the wastewater suitability for irrigation was assessed by comparing the physicochemical and microbiological characteristics with the water quality of artificial canals used for irrigation purposes. From November 2006 till July 2007, samples of surface water and wastewater were collected monthly in 21 georeferenced sites. The metal constituents were determined by Inductive Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry. The data were analysed using cluster analysis (CA). The results of CA showed that wastewater characteristics depend on the plants’ potentiality, their efficiency and type of waste. The CA carried out on fresh water showed that the water characteristics of the sampling point of the Reno basins were different with respect to the Burana–Po di Volano basin. CA was also used to differentiate studied sites between the two basins and within the same basin to distinguish the different pollution sources. The geolithological and environmental matrices together with anthropogenic activities lead to a greater variety in the composition of surface water as compared to wastewater, due to the controlled conditions imposed during treatment processes. The results show a good suitability of wastewater for irrigation uses, especially in comparison to the water drawn from the drainage network of the Burana–Po di Volano basin. The levels of Escherichia coli found in the wastewater preclude its use for irrigation purposes. In fact, Italian law (Legislative Decree 152/2006) establishes values of E. coli that are too low for the reclamation and reuse of wastewater in agricultural areas. The levels detected both in wastewater and fresh water exceeded this legal value, even if the E. coli levels found in wastewater are actually lower than those detected in surface water bodies and artificial canals (420–946 CFU/100 mL of E. coli in treatment plants vs. 2246 CFU/100 mL in artificial canals and 15,729 CFU/100 mL in river water). Significantly, the analysis of samples upstream and downstream of the plants showed that wastewater has no impact on the level of metal constituents in the surface water bodies.

Keywords

Reclaimed wastewater Reuse in agriculture Water quality ICP-OES Cluster analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angelakis AN, Marecos do Monte MHF, Bontoux L, Asano T (1998) The status of wastewater reuse practices in the Mediterranean basin: need for guidelines. Water Res 10:2201–2217 Google Scholar
  2. APAT and IRSA_CNR (2003) Metodi analitici per le acque Google Scholar
  3. ARPA (2004) La qualità delle acque superficiali del bacino idrografico del Fiume Reno. Biennio 2003–2004 Google Scholar
  4. Bhangu I, Whitfield PH (1997) Seasonal and long-term variations in water quality of the Skeena River at Usk, British Columbia. Water Res 31:2187–2194 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bondesan M (2001) L’evoluzione idrografica della pianura ferrarese negli ultimi 3000 anni. In: Territorio e preistoria. Storia di Ferrara, vol I. Corbo, Ferrara Google Scholar
  6. Buzier R, Tusseau-Vuillemin M-H, dir Meriadec CM, Rousselot O, Mouchel J-M (2006) Trace metal speciation and fluxes within a major French wastewater treatment plant: Impact of the successive treatments stages. Chemosphere 65:2419–2426 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chakrapani GJ, Saini RK, Yadav SK (2009) Chemical weathering rates in the Alaknanda-Bhagirathi river basins in Himalayas, India. J Asia Earth Sci 34:347–362 Google Scholar
  8. Cidu R, Biddau R (2007) Transport of trace elements under different seasonal conditions: Effects on the quality of river water in a Mediterranean area. Appl Geochem 22:2777–2794 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cirelli GL, Consoli S, Di Grande V (2008) Long-term storage of reclaimed water: The case studies in Sicily. Desalination 218: 62–73 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Croce F, Dardanoni L (1991) Significance and current status of wastewater reuse in Sicily. Water Sci Technol 24:45–54 Google Scholar
  11. Dalai TK, Krishnaswami S, Sarin MM (2002) Major ion chemistry in the headwaters of the Yamuna river system: Chemical weathering, its temperature dependence and CO2 consumption in the Himalaya. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 66:3397–3416 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gaillardet J, Dupre B, Allegre CJ, Negrel P (1997) Chemical and physical denudation in the Amazon River Basin. Chem Geol 142:141–173 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Han L, Zhuang G, Cheng S, Wang Y, J Li (2007) Characteristics of resuspended road dust and its impact on the atmospheric environment in Beijing. Atmos Environ 41:7485–7499 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ingri J, Torsasander P, Andersson PS, Morth C-M, Kusakabe M (1997) Hydro-geochemistry of sulfur isotopes in the Kalix river catchment, northern Sweden. Appl Geochem 12:483–496 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kalavrouziotis IK, Robolas P, Koukoulakis DH, Papadopoulos AH (2008) Effects of municipal reclaimed wastewater on the macro- and micro-elements status of soil and Brassica oleracea Var Italica and B.olereacea Var Gommifera. Agric Water Manag. doi: 10.1016/sagwat200711.004 Google Scholar
  16. Karvelas SM, Katsoyannis A, Samara C (2003) Occurrence and fate of heavy metals in the wastewater treatment process. Chemosphere 53:1201–1210 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liberti L, Lopez A (1991) Strategy for agriculture wastewater reuse in southern Italy. In: Proceedings of the twelfth international symposium on desalination and water reuse, Malta, vol 3, pp 173–182 Google Scholar
  18. Lopez A, Vurro M (2008) Planning agricultural wastewater reuse in southern Italy: The case of Apulia region. Desalination 218:164–169 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lopez A, Pollice A, Lonigro A, Masi S, Palese AM, Girelli GL, Toscano A, Passino R (2006) Agricultural wastewater reuse in Southern Italy. Desalination 187:323–334 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Markich SJ, Brown PL (1998) Relative importance of natural and anthropogenic influences on the fresh surface water chemistry of the Hawkesbury–Nepean river, south-eastern Australia. Sci Total Environ 217:201–230 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Piano di Tutela delle Acque (PTA) (2003) della Regione Emilia Romagna, Quadro conoscitivo Attività E, Allegato A Google Scholar
  22. Pollice A, Lopez A, Laera G, Rubino P, Lonigro A (2004) Tertiary filtered municipal wastewater as alternative water source in agriculture: a field investigation in southern Italy. Sci Total Environ 324:201–210 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Simeonov V, Simeonova P, Samara C, Zachariadis G, Voutsa D, Anthemidis A, Sofonious M, Kouimtzis Th (2003) Assessment of the surface water quality in northern Greece. Water Res 37(17):4119–4124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Singh KP, Malik A, Sinha S (2005) Water quality assessment and apportionment of pollution sources of Gomti river (India) using multivariate statistical techniques—A case study. Anal Chim Acta 538:355–374 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tchobanoglous G, Burton FL, Stensel DH (2003) Wastewater engineering, treatment & reuse, 4th edn. McGraw Hill, New York Google Scholar
  26. Turek M, Dydo P, Trojanowska J (2008) Electrodialytic utilization of boron IE column post-regeneration lyes. Desalination 223:113–118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. USEPA (1992) Handbook of RCRA ground-water monitoring copnstituents: chemical and physical properties. 40 CFR Part 264, Appendix IX, EPA/530/R-92/022 Google Scholar
  28. Wang X-L, Lu Y-L, Han J-Y, He G-Z, Wang T-Y (2007) Identification of anthropogenic influences on water quality of rivers in Taihu watershed. J Environ Sci 19:475–481 Google Scholar
  29. WHO (1989) Health guidelines for the use of watewater in agriculture and aquaculture. Report of a WHO Scientific Group Series 778, Worl Health Organization, Geneva Google Scholar
  30. Wunderlin DA, del Pilar Diaz M, Ame MV, Pesce SF, Hued AC, de los Angeles Bastoni M (2001) Pattern recognition techniques for the evaluation of spatial and temporal variations in water quality. A case study: Suquía river basin (Córdoba-Argentina). Water Res 35:2881–2894 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Livia Vittori Antisari
    • 1
    Email author
  • Carlo Trivisano
    • 2
  • Carlo Gessa
    • 1
  • Massimo Gherardi
    • 1
  • Andrea Simoni
    • 1
  • Gilmo Vianello
    • 1
  • Nicoletta Zamboni
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Agro-Environmental Science and TechnologyUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Statistical Sciences “Paolo Fortunati”University of BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations