Advertisement

International Journal of Social Robotics

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 225–234 | Cite as

Avoiding the Content Treadmill for Robot Personalities

  • Daniel H. Grollman
Article

Abstract

Robot personalities are today painstakingly hand-crafted by content creators who specify motions, facial animations, and scripts in order to convey a unifying sense of character via interactions. While user preferences can be incorporated by modifying these behaviors to some degree, such as by inserting a user’s name or preference into a script, by and large new content must be continually created in order to maintain the robot’s ‘freshness.’ This content treadmill represents a long tail of work that diverts resources away from improving the underlying capabilities of the robot. Here we outline a novel method for defining robot personality that allows each robot to have and express a unique personality through varying behaviors that reduces the need for content creation.

Keywords

Human–robot interaction Robot personality 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to Michael Gielniak for writing the simulator and running studies, and to Dave Hygh, Quentin Michelet, and Patrick Martin for making the robots and keeping them running.

References

  1. 1.
    Cha E, Dragan AD, Srinivasa SS (2015) Perceived robot capability. In: Robot and human interactive communication, pp 541–548Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dragan AD, Lee KCT, Srinivasa SS (2013) Legibility and predictability of robot motion. In: International conference on human-robot interaction, pp 301–308Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gielniak MJ, Thomaz AL (2012) Enhancing interaction through exaggerated motion synthesis. In: International conference on human-robot interaction, pp 375–382Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Grollman DH (2016) Infinite personality space for non-fungible robots. In: International conference on social robotics, pp 94–103Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jung MF, Lee JJ, DePalma N, Adalgeirsson SO, Hinds PJ, Breazeal C (2013) Engaging robots: easing complex human-robot teamwork using backchanneling. In: Computer supported cooperative work, pp 1555–1566Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kidd C (2008) Designing for long-term human-robot interaction and application to weight loss. PhD thesis, MITGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kiesler S, Goetz J (2002) Mental models of robotic assistants. In: CHI ’02 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, pp 576–577Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kirby R (2010) Social robot navigation. PhD thesis, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moshkina LV (2011) An integrative framework of time-varying affective robotic behavior. PhD thesis, Atlanta, GA, USAGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mumm J, Mutlu B (2011) Human-robot proxemics: physical and psychological distancing in human-robot interaction. In: International conference on human-robot interaction, pp 331–338Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Phillips EK, Schaefer K, Billings DR, Jentsch F, Hancock PA (2016) Human-animal teams as an analog for future human-robot teams: influencing design and fosterning trust. J Hum Robot Interact 5(1):100–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sheh RKM, Hengst B, Sammut C (2011) Behavioural cloning for driving robots over rough terrain. In: International conference on robotic systems, pp 732–737Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sundar SS, Waddell TF, Jung EH (2016) The hollywood robot syndrome: media effects on older adults’ attitudes toward robots and adoption intentions. In: International conference on human robot interaction, pp 343–350Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sutcliffe A, Grollman D, Pineau J (2014) Estimating people’s subjective experiences of robot behavior. In: AAAI fall symposium on AI for HRIGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wada K, Shibata T (2006) Robot therapy in a care house—its sociopsychological and physiological effects on the residents. In: International conference on robotics and automationGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Misty Robotics, Inc.BoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations