Abstract
Commercial sugarcane propagation is vegetative, using either whole sticks or stem sections known as setts for plantation establishment. Although simple and cost-effective, such multiplication takes a year to generate planting material and does not eliminate disease-causing viruses. In vitro micropropagation is an alternative, and the South African Sugarcane Research Institute has developed a process called NovaCane® to provide disease-free, true-to-type planting material. Field assessment of plants derived from in vitro culture for two cultivars, N41 and N48, showed no difference in stalk height, population, biomass and estimated recoverable crystal content when compared with conventional, sett-derived plants during the first year of cultivation (plant cane). However, differences were observed in stalk diameter, with cultivar N41 showing a significant reduction after all three in vitro treatments [(a) regular NovaCane® culture; (b) addition of an ethylene inhibitor, cobalt chloride (CoCl2); and (c) plants derived from a ‘secondary’ shoot meristem excision from in vitro plants] compared with conventionally produced plants. In the first ratoon crop, the only difference observed was in N41 stalk population where tiller number increased in NovaCane® plants after secondary meristem initiation. These results suggest that although there may be some genotype response to in vitro propagation using NovaCane®, overall yield is not compromised in either the plant or first ratoon crops.
References
Hoy, J.W., K.P. Bischoof, S.B. Milligan, and K.A. Gravois. 2003. Effect of tissue culture explant source on sugarcane yield components. Euphytica 129: 237–240.
Ibrahim, M., B. Tolera, J. Aman, and T. Negi. 2016. Evaluation of tissue culture raised sugarcane planting materials against their donor conventional seed sources as initial source of seed cane at Tendaho Sugar Development project, north-eastern Ethiopia. Journal of Horticulture 3: 1–4.
Jalaja, N.C., D. Neelamathi, and T.V. Sreenivasan. 2008. Micropropagation for quality seed production in sugarcane in Asia and the Pacific. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome; Asia–Pacific Consortium on Agricultural Biotechnology, New Delhi; Asia-Pacific Association of Agricultural Research Institutions, Bangkok, p. i-x + 46.
Lal, M., A.K. Tiwari, and G. Kavita. 2015. Commercial scale micropropagation of sugarcane: Constraints and remedies. Sugar Tech 17: 339–347.
Lourens, A.G., and F.A. Martin. 1987. Evaluation of in vitro propagated sugarcane hybrids for somaclonal variation. Crop Science 27: 793–796.
Mishra, S., T.K. Nailwal, and R.C. Pant. 2014. In vitro study of ethylene during tillering in sugarcane. Sugar Tech 16: 255–263.
Murashige, T., and F. Skoog. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum 15: 473–497.
Ramgareeb, S., S.J. Snyman, T. van Antwerpen, and R.S. Rutherford. 2010. Elimination of virus and rapid propagation of disease-free sugarcane (Saccharum spp. cultivar NCo376) using apical meristem culture. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 96: 263–271.
Rutherford, R.S., S.J. Snyman, and M.P. Watt. 2014. In vitro studies on somaclonal variation and induced mutagenesis: progress and prospects in sugarcane (Saccharum spp.)—A review. The Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology 89: 1–16.
Shoonees-Muir, B.M., M.A. Ronaldson, G. Naidoo, and P.M. Schorn. 2009. SASTA laboratory manual including the official methods, 5th ed. Mount Edgecombe, Durban: South African Technologists’ Association.
Watt, M.P., M. Banasiak, D. Reddy, E.H. Albertse, and S.J. Snyman. 2009. In vitro minimal growth storage of Saccharum spp. hybrid (genotype 88H0019) at two stages of direct somatic embryogenic regeneration. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 96: 263–271.
Acknowledgements
Funding from the South African Sugarcane Research Institute (SASRI) and the National Research Foundation of South Africa (Grant 85414) is gratefully acknowledged. Authors thank Mrs G.M. Meyer (SASRI) for proofreading the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SNS carried out the experimental work as part of his M.Sc. degree (University of KwaZulu-Natal). SR and SJS conceived the idea and wrote the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Snyman, S.J., Shezi, S.N. & Ramburan, S. Field Assessment of In Vitro Micropropagated NovaCane® Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids). Sugar Tech 20, 609–612 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-017-0574-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-017-0574-y