Sugar Tech

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 143–153 | Cite as

Recovery of Residual Nitrogen (15N) from Urea in the First Ratoon of Irrigated Sugarcane

  • Alefe Viana Souza Bastos
  • Marconi Batista Teixeira
  • Edson Cabral da Silva
  • Leonardo Nazário Silva dos Santos
  • José Joaquim de Carvalho
  • Cícero Teixeira Silva Costa
Research Article
  • 60 Downloads

Abstract

Despite many losses, nitrogen may remain in the soil for more than one cycle. It can benefit the culture of sugarcane due to its longevity. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the yield of stalks and the recovery of residual N from urea applied to sugarcane (plant-cane cycle), which could be used by sugarcane ratoon subjected to different levels of water replacement and residual nitrogen doses. The experiment was conducted at an experimental area belonging to the Federal Institute Goiano, campus Rio Verde, Brazil, using plastic pots containing dystrophic Red Latosol from Cerrado and cattle manure. The experimental design was completely randomized with three replications analyzed in 3 × 3 split plots. The treatments consisted of three levels of water replacement (75, 50 and 25% of field capacity) and three residual N doses (60, 120 and 180 kg ha−1) in the form of urea enriched with 15N applied to plant-cane in a preceding cycle. Residual N doses influenced the stalk yield. The highest stalk yields was achieved by high water replacements. The nitrogen recovery was high in the residual N dose of 60 kg ha−1 initially applied to plant-cane when associated with water replacement at 75%. Regardless of the N dose applied, the use of residual N was less than 7.06% of the amount originally applied to plant-cane.

Keywords

Cerrado Nitrogen use efficiency Red Latosol Saccharum spp. Stalk yield 15N isotope dilution 

Notes

Acknowledgements

To the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) for funding the current study, to the Brazilian Coordination for Updating of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), to Goiano Federal Institute, Campus Rio Verde, GO, Brazil (IFgoiano) and to Foundation for Support of Research in the state of Goias (FAPEG).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bastos, A.V.S., M.V. da Silva, E.C. da Silva, M.B. Teixeira, T. Muraoka, F.A.L. Soares, and R.D. Coelho. 2016. Agroindustrial yield of sugarcane grown under different levels of water replacement and nitrogen fertilization. African Journal of Agricultural Research 11: 2623–2629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrie, A., and S.J. Prosser. 1996. Automated analysis of light–element stable isotopes by isotope ratio mass spectrometry. In Mass spectrometry of soils, eds. by T.W. Boutton, and S. Yamsahi, 1–46. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  3. Castro, S.G.Q., S.T. Decaro Jr., H.C.J. Franco, P.S.G. Magalhães, A. Garside, and M.A. Mutton. 2016. Best practices of nitrogen fertilization management for sugarcane under green cane trash blanket in Brazil. Sugar Tech 19: 1–6.Google Scholar
  4. Christoffoleti, P.J., S.J.P. de Carvalho, R.F. López-Ovejero, M. Nicolai, E. Hidalgo, and J.E. Silva. 2007. Conservation of natural resources in Brazilian agriculture: Implications on weed biology and management. Crop Protection 26: 383–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Farias, C.H.A., P.D. Fernandes, H.M. de Azevedo, and J. Dantas Neto. 2008. Índices de crescimento da cana-de-açúcar irrigada e de sequeiro no Estado da Paraíba. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 12: 356–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fortes, C., P.C.O. Trivelin, A.C. Vitti, D.A. Ferreira, H.C.J. Franco, and R. Otto. 2011. Recovery of nitrogen (15N) by sugarcane from previous crop residues and urea fertilisation under a minimum tillage system. Sugar Tech 13: 42–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Franco, H.C.J., R. Otto, C.E. Faroni, A.C. Vitti, E.C.A. Oliveira, and P.C.O. Trivelin. 2011. Nitrogen in sugarcane derived from fertilizer in Brazilian field conditions. Field Crops Research 121: 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Franco, H.C.J., R. Otto, A.C. Vitti, C.E. Faroni, E.C.D.A. Oliveira, C. Fortes, and P.C.O. Trivelin. 2015. Residual recovery and yield performance of nitrogen fertilizer applied at sugarcane planting. Scientia Agricola 72: 528–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gava, G.D.C., P.C.O. Trivelin, A.C. Vitti, and M.D. Oliveira. 2003. Recuperação do nitrogênio (15N) da ureia e da palhada por soqueira de cana-de-açúcar (Saccharum spp.). Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 27: 621–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Laan, M., A. Jumman, and S.R. Perret. 2015. Environmental benefits of improved water and nitrogen management in irrigated sugar cane: A combined crop modelling and life cycle assessment approach. Irrigation and Drainage 64: 241–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Oliveira, R.C., N.F. da Silva, F.N. Cunha, M.B. Teixeira, F.A.L. Soares, and M.S. Campos. 2016. Effect of water replacement and nitrogen fertilization on productivity variables of sugar cane. African Journal of Agricultural Research 11: 633–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Padrón, R.A.R., H.M.C.M. Nogueira, R.R. Cerquera, G.D. Albino, and C.U. Nogueira. 2015. Caracterização físico-hídrica do solo argissolo amarelo para estabelecimento de projeto e manejo da irrigação. Acta Iguazu 4: 36–47.Google Scholar
  13. Santos, H.G., P.K.T. Jacomine, L.H.C. Anjos, V.A. Oliveira, J.F. Lumbreras, M.R. Coelho, J.A. Almeida, T.J.F. Cunha, and J.B. Oliveira. 2013. Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos. Brasília: Embrapa.Google Scholar
  14. Schultz, N., E. Lima, M.G. Pereira, and E. Zonta. 2010. Residual effects of nitrogen, potassium and vinasse, fertilization on cane plant and ratoon harvested with and without straw burning. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 34: 811–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Trivelin, P.C.O. 2000. Utilização do nitrogênio pela cana-de-açúcar: três casos estudados com o uso do traçador 15N. Thesis. Centro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultura Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba.Google Scholar
  16. Trivelin, P.C.O., M.D. Oliveira, A.C. Vitti, G.D.C. Gava, and J.A. Bendassolli. 2002. Nitrogen losses of applied urea in the soil-plant system during two sugar cane cycles. Brazilian Agricultural Research 37: 193–201.Google Scholar
  17. Vieira-Megda, M.X., E. Mariano, J.M. Leite, H.C.J. Franco, A.C. Vitti, M.M. Megda, and P.C.O. Trivelin. 2015. Contribution of fertilizer nitrogen to the total nitrogen extracted by sugarcane under Brazilian field conditions. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 101: 241–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Vitti, A.C., P.C.O. Trivelin, G.J.C. Gava, C. Penatti, I.R. Bologna, C.E. Faroni, and H.C.J. Franco. 2007. Sugar cane yield related to the residual nitrogen from fertilization and the root system. Brazilian Agricultural Research 42: 249–256.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Sugar Research & Promotion 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alefe Viana Souza Bastos
    • 1
  • Marconi Batista Teixeira
    • 1
  • Edson Cabral da Silva
    • 1
  • Leonardo Nazário Silva dos Santos
    • 1
  • José Joaquim de Carvalho
    • 1
  • Cícero Teixeira Silva Costa
    • 1
  1. 1.Irrigation DepartmentGoiano Federal InstituteRio VerdeBrazil

Personalised recommendations