Sugar Tech

, Volume 19, Issue 6, pp 623–631 | Cite as

Insecticides from Different Classes Impact on Neomaskellia andropogonis Population Under Sugarcane Field Conditions

  • Pegah Koohzad-Mohammadi
  • Masumeh Ziaee
  • Amin Nikpay
Research article
  • 67 Downloads

Abstract

Sugarcane whitefly is one of the important pest of sugarcane. Chemical and biological controls are used in an integrated program to prevent sugarcane whitefly infestations. Several insecticides from various groups have been registered to control whiteflies. In this study, efficacy of deltamethrin 2.5% EC, dinotefuran 20% SG and spiromesifen 240 SC was evaluated against sugarcane whitefly, Neomaskellia andropogonis Corbett (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) under field conditions. The population of whitefly at different life stages was recorded at 3, 7, 15 and 30 days after spraying the insecticides. According to the findings, cumulative reduction in whitefly population was recorded by application of insecticides even after 30-day post-treatment. Application of insecticides significantly increased the mortality level of whitely at different life stages compared to the control. However, higher level of mortality was observed for dinotefuran (more than 65% mortality in all stages) and deltamethrin (75% egg, 48% nymph, 70% pupae and 87% adult mortality), 30 days after spraying insecticides on IRC99-02 variety of sugarcane. Our results revealed that all tested insecticides were toxic against N. andropogonis and can effectively control different life stages of sugarcane whitefly.

Keywords

Chemical control Insecticides Life stages Whitefly 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are appreciated from Shahid Chamran University for financial and logistic support of this project.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest among the authors.

References

  1. Ahmed, A., A. Suhail, Z. Abdin, S. Iftikhar, and K. Zahoor. 2004. Biodiversity of insects associated with sugarcane crop in Faisalabad. Pakistan Entomologist 26: 65–69.Google Scholar
  2. Askarianzadeh, A. 2011. Evaluation of quality damage of sugarcane whitefly, Neomaskellia andropogonis (Hom., Aleyrodidae) on sugarcane in Khuzestan province. Plant Protection (Scientific Journal of Agriculture) 34: 59–67.Google Scholar
  3. Askarianzadeh, A., and S. Manzari. 2006. Neomaskellia andropogonis (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), a new genus and species record for Iran. Journal of Entomological Society of Iran 26: 13–14.Google Scholar
  4. Askarianzadeh, A., S. Moharramipour, K. Kamali, and Y. Fathipour. 2008. Evaluation of damage caused by stalk borers, Sesamia spp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), on sugarcane quality in Iran. Entomological Research 38: 263–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balikai, R., S. Lingappa, A. Biradar, and R. Teggelli. 1998. Incidence of sugarcane whitefly in Karnataka. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 11: 820–821.Google Scholar
  6. Bhavani, B., and C.V.N. Rao. 2013. Management of sugarcane white fly (Aleurolobus barodensis Mask.) in north coastal districts of Andhra Pradesh, India. International Journal of Social Science & Interdisciplinary Research 2: 112–115.Google Scholar
  7. Charernsom, K., and W. Suasa-ard, 1989. Sugarcane whitefly, Aleurolobus barodensis Maskell, and its parasites in Thailand. Proceedings XX Congress of the International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists: 769-802.Google Scholar
  8. Inayatullah, C. 1984. Sugar-cane aleurodids, Aleurolobus barodensis (Maskell) and Neomaskellia andropogonis Corbett (Hom.: Aleyrodidae), and their natural enemies in Pakistan. Insect Science and Its Application 5: 279–282.Google Scholar
  9. James, G. 2004. Sugarcane. 2nd edn, 216. London: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Jena, B., and N. Nayak. 1994. Whitefly management in sugarcane. Indian Sugar 43: 849–850.Google Scholar
  11. Mann, R., and K. Singh. 2003. Screening of sugarcane genotype for their reaction against sugarcane whitefly (Aleurolobus barodensis Mask.). Indian Sugar Journal 23: 110–111.Google Scholar
  12. Minaei-Moghadam, M., P. Shishebor, E. Soleyman-Nejadian, and A. Askarianzadeh. 2010. Seasonal population changes of Neomaskellia andropogonis Corbett (Hom.: Aleyrodidae) in south Khuzestan. Plant Protection (Scientific Journal of Agriculture) 32: 15–24.Google Scholar
  13. Nikpay, A., 2016. Effects of burning trashes on leaf feeders Mythimna spp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) damage in sugarcane fields. In 38th Conference of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, ed. Bruce, R.C., Makay, 135. Queensland, Australia.Google Scholar
  14. Nikpay, A. 2017. Damage assessment of sugarcane whitefly Neomaskellia andropogonis Corbett and population dynamics on seven commercial varieties in Southwest of Iran. Sugar Tech 19: 198–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nikpay, A., and F.R. Goebel. 2016. Major sugarcane pests and their management in Iran. Proceedings of the International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists 29: 103–108.Google Scholar
  16. Nikpay, A., and P. Sharafizadeh. 2017. First report of wild hosts of sugarcane whitefly Neomaskellia andropogonis Corbett (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) associated with sugarcane agro-ecosystems in Iran. Sugar Journal 3: 18–23.Google Scholar
  17. Nikpay, A., E. Soleyman-Nejadian, S. Goldasteh, and H. Farazmand. 2015. Response of sugarcane and sugarcane stalk borers Sesamia spp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to calcium silicate fertilization. Neotropical Entomology 44: 498–503.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Qian, M.-H., Q.-B. Hu, S.-X. Ren, N.S. Mandour, B.-L. Qiu, and P.A. Stansly. 2012. Delayed development of the whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) and increased parasitism by Encarsia bimaculata in response to sublethal doses of piperonyl butoxide. Insect Science 19: 403–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rajak, D., and A. Varma. 2001. Natural enemy complex of insect-pest of sugarcane in the southern zone of Andhra Pradesh. Indian Journal of Sugarcane Technology 6: 114–116.Google Scholar
  20. Sadeghzadeh-Hemayati, S., H. Hamdi, D. Fathollah-Taleghani, and H. Amili, 2011. Strategic framework for sugarcane research. Psychology and Arts, Tehran-Iran.Google Scholar
  21. SPSS. 2007. SPSS 16 for Windows user’s guide release. Chicago: Spss Inc.Google Scholar
  22. Srikanth, J., S. Easwaramoorthy, and S. Jalali. 2016. A 100 years of biological control of sugarcane pests in India: review and perspective. CAB Reviews 11: 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vemuri, S., K. Suresh, and M.V. Kumar. 2014. Whitefly (Aleurolobus Barodensis Mask.) population fluctuations in diverse conditions of sugarcane crop in Medak district of Andhra Pradesh, India. ZENITH International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research 4: 217–221.Google Scholar
  24. Vijayaraghavan, C., and A. Regupathy. 2006. Bioefficacy of thiamethoxam (Actara 25WG) against sugarcane whitefly Aleurolobus barodensis Maskell. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2: 299–304.Google Scholar
  25. Walker, G.P., T.M. Perring, and T.P. Freeman. 2009. Life history, functional anatomy, feeding and mating behavior. In Bemisia: Bionomics and management of a global pest, ed. P.A. Stansly, and S.E. Naranjo, 109–160. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Sugar Research & Promotion 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pegah Koohzad-Mohammadi
    • 1
  • Masumeh Ziaee
    • 1
  • Amin Nikpay
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of AgricultureShahid Chamran University of AhvazAhvazIran
  2. 2.Department of Plant ProtectionSugarcane & By-products Development Company, Salman-Farsi UnitAhvazIran

Personalised recommendations