Advertisement

Sugar Tech

, Volume 19, Issue 6, pp 616–622 | Cite as

Economic Impact of Cotesia flavipes (Cameron) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) for Controlling Sugarcane Moth Borers in Thailand

  • Tewee Maneerat
  • Sopon Uraichuen
  • Wiwat Suasa-ard
Research article
  • 217 Downloads

Abstract

Sugarcane moth borer pests in Thailand include the crambids Chilo infuscatellus Snellen, Chilo sacchariphagus (Bojer), Chilo tumidicostalis (Hampson) and Scirpophaga excerptalis (Walker) and the noctuid Sesamia inferens (Walker). The economic impact of the larval endoparasitoid, Cotesia flavipes (Cameron) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) was studied through field experiments and benefit–cost analysis. Augmentative biological control research was conducted over two consecutive cropping seasons (2009–2011) to compare yields and net income of sugarcane between plots where C. flavipes was released every month (1250 adults/ha) and plots without releases. In treated plots, significantly (P < 0.05) higher yields were obtained: 84.38 ± 5.21 t/ha in the 2009/2010 and 86.47 ± 7.07 t/ha in the 2010/2011 cropping seasons, compared to control plots; 66.45 ± 7.62 t/ha in the 2009/2010 and 67.60 ± 4.79 t/ha in the 2010/1011 cropping seasons, respectively. Net income of the farmer from treated areas of USD 1637.78/ha in the 2009/2010 and USD 1340/ha in the 2010/2011 cropping seasons were significantly (P < 0.05) higher than those in the untreated areas: USD 532.37/ha in 2009/2010 and USD 322.61/ha in 2010/2011 cropping seasons.

Keywords

Sugarcane moth borers Economic impact Cotesia flavipes Biological control 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT). We thank our colleagues from National Biological Control research Center (NBCRC) who provided insights and expertise that greatly assisted our research. I would like to thank faculty of Natural Resources, Prince of Songkla University for providing all the possible facilities and necessary during this work.

Funding

This study was funded by National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) (Grant Number 2554250501002).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Associate professor Dr. Wiwat Suasa-ard has received research grants from the National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT). Dr. Tewee Maneerat has received a speaker honorarium from Thailand Society of Sugar Cane Technologists (TSSCT) presentation in XXIX ISSCT Congress 2016. Assistant Professor Dr. Sopon Uraichuen declares that he has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alam, M.M., F.D. Bennett, and K.P. Carl. 1971. Biological control of Diatraea saccharalis (F.) in Barbados by Apanteles flavipes Cam. and Lixophaga diatraeae. Entomophaga 16: 151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alleyne, M., and R.N. Wiedenmann. 2001. Encapsulation and hemocyte numbers in three lepidopteran stemborers parasitized by Cotesia flavipes-complex endoparasitoids. Entomologia Experimentalis et Application 100: 279–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bale, J.S., J.C. Van Lenteren, and F. Bigler. 2008. Biological control and sustainable food production. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 363: 761–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bess R, Ambargis ZO. 2011. Input-output models for impact analysis: suggestions for practitioners using RIMS II multupliers. In The 50th Southern regional science association conference, 23–27 Mar 2011, New Orleans, Louisiana.Google Scholar
  5. Euteneuer B. 2011. World’s top 10 sugar-producing countries in 2010–2011. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2011-10-06/world-s-top-10-sugar-producing-countries-in-2010-2011-table-. Accessed 7 Mar 2016.
  6. Fatima, B., N. Ahmad, R.M. Memon, M. Bux, and Q. Ahmad. 2009. Enhancing biological control of sugarcane shoot borer, Chilo infuscatellus (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), through use of radiation to improve laboratory rearing and field augmentation of egg and larval parasitoids. Biocontrol Science and Technology 19: 277–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fuchs, T.W., F.R. Huffman, and J.W. Smith Jr. 1979. Introduction and establishment of Apanteles flavipes (Hym.: Braconidae) on Diatraea saccharalis (Lep.: Pyralidae) in Texas. Entomophaga 24: 109–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gifford, J.R., and G.A. Mann. 1967. Biology, rearing, and a trial release of Apanteles flavipes in the Florida Everglades to control the sugarcane borer. Journal of Economic Entomology 60 (44): 47.Google Scholar
  9. Goebel FR, Achadian E, Kristini A, Sochib M, Adi H. 2011. Investigation of crop losses due to moth borers in Indonesia. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, 33: 9.Google Scholar
  10. Goebel, F.R., E. Roux, M. Marquier, J. Frandon, H. Do Thi Khanh, and E. Tabone. 2010. Biocontrol of Chilo sacchariphagus (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) a key pest of sugarcane: Lessons from the past and future prospects. Sugar Cane International 28: 128–132.Google Scholar
  11. Hussnain, Z., A. Naheed, and S. Rizwana. 2007. Biological control of insect pests of sugarcane (Saccharum sp.). Pakistan Sugar Journal 22: 14–23.Google Scholar
  12. Jiang, N., M. Sétamou, A.J. Ngi-Song, and C.O. Omwega. 2004. Performance of Cotesia flavipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in parasitizing Chilo partellus (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) as affected by temperature and host stage. Biological Control 3: 155–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Legaspi, J.C., B.C. Legaspi, E.G. King, and R. Saldana. 1997. Mexican rice borer, Eoreuma loftini (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas: its history and control. Subtropical Plant Science 49: 53–59.Google Scholar
  14. Lewanich, A. 1975. The study on taxonomy of lepidopterous pest of sugarcane insect pest. The reported study assessment analysis of sugarcane, 159–200. Bangkok: Division of entomology and zoology.Google Scholar
  15. Lv, J., L.T. Wilson, J.M. Beuzelin, W.H. White, T.E. Reagan, and M.O. Way. 2011. Impact of Cotesia flavipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) as an augmentative biocontrol agent for the sugarcane borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) on rice. Biological Control 56: 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mahmoud, A.M.A., E.J. De Luna-Santillana, and M.A. Rodríguez-Perez. 2011. Parasitism by the endoparasitoid, Cotesia flavipes induces cellular immune suppression and enhances susceptibility of the sugar cane borer, Diatraea saccharalis to Bacillus thuringiensis. Journal of Insect Science 11: 119. (available online: insectscience. org/11.119).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Mohyuddin, A.I. 1991. Utilization of natural enemies for the control of insect pests of sugarcane. Insect Science and its Application Journal 12: 19–26.Google Scholar
  18. Pitakpaibulkij W, Jarurungsipong R, Suntornpagasit R, Rakthum N. 2015. Industry research sugar industry. Tris rating. Accessed 7 Mar 2016. http://www.trisrating.com/en/pdf/3_Sugar%20Industry-e%20August.pdf.
  19. Praneetvatakul, S. 2009. Economic impact evaluation on researches of national biological control research center. Kasetsart University Journal of Economics 16 (2): 48–64. (In Thai).Google Scholar
  20. Sallam, N., E. Achadian, A. Kristini, M. Sochib, and H. Adi. 2010. Monitoring sugarcane moth borers in Indonesia: towards better preparedness for exotic incursions. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists 32: 181–192.Google Scholar
  21. Shah, A.H., N. Rashid, M.S. Haider, F. Saleem, M. Tahir, and J. Iqbal. 2009. An efficient, short and cost-effective regeneration system for transformation studies of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). Pakistan Journal of Botany 42: 609–614.Google Scholar
  22. Suasa-ard W. 1982. Ecology of sugarcane moth borers and their parasites in Thailand. PhD Thesis, Kasetsart University.Google Scholar
  23. Suasa-ard W. 2000. Chilo tumidicostalis (Hampson) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and its natural enemies in Thailand. Sugarcane Pest Management in the New Millennium. In Proceedings of the IV ISSCT Sugarcane Entomology Workshop. 710 February 2000. Khon Kaen, Thailand.Google Scholar
  24. Suasa-ard W. 2010. Natural enemies of important insect pests of field crops and utilization as biological control agents in Thailand. In Proceedings of International Seminar on Enhancement of Functional Biodiversity Relevant to Sustainable Food Production in ASPAC. 911 November 2010. Tsukuba, Japan.Google Scholar
  25. Suasa-ard W, Allsopp PG. 2000. Sugarcane pest management strategies in the New Millennium. In Proceedings of the IV ISSCT Sugarcane Entomology Workshop. 710 February 2000, Khon Kaen,Thailand.Google Scholar
  26. Suasa-ard W, Maneerat T, Homrahud D. 2014. Process development of Cotesia flavipes Cameron (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) for commercial production. Administration and proceeding in research project of national biological control research center, Headquarters. pp. 173-200.Google Scholar
  27. Suasa-ard, W, Maneerat T, Wonnarat P, Kernasa O. 2010. Technological development of Cotesia flavipes (Cameron) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) for commercial production. In: Annual reports of national biological control research center 2010. 1–3 September 2010, Petchaburi, Thailand.Google Scholar
  28. Van Driesche, R.G., S. Lyon, K. Jacques, T. Smith, and P. Lopes. 2002. Comparative cost of chemical and biological whitefly control in poinsettia: Is there a gap? Florida Entomologist 85: 488–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Sugar Research &#38; Promotion 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tewee Maneerat
    • 1
  • Sopon Uraichuen
    • 2
  • Wiwat Suasa-ard
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Pest Management, Faculty of Natural ResourcesPrince of Songkla UniversitySongkhlaThailand
  2. 2.Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture at Kamphaeng SaenKasetsart UniversityNakhon PathomThailand
  3. 3.National Biological Control Research Center, Central Regional CenterKasetsart UniversityNakhon PathomThailand

Personalised recommendations