Skip to main content
Log in

A visualization approach for robustness analysis in multicriteria disaggregation–aggregation approaches

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Operational Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The assessment of criteria weights in multicriteria decision aid methods of value system approaches, often leads to the assessment of preference models with a low degree of robustness due to the assessment of several compatible value functions. This research work presents a methodological frame, which aims to three issues: (a) to explain the nature of low robustness of the estimated preference models, utilising tomographical techniques, visual tools, and specific indices for the robustness measurement, (b) to support the Decision Makers (DMs) towards a deeper understanding of his/her value system, and (c) to acquire additional preference information by the DM estimating a value functions of higher robustness through focused interactive feedbacks. The main scope of this research work is to exploit and enrich the interactive nature of the multicriteria disaggregation–aggregation approach. The proposed methodology is applied on a real world case study along with the utilisation of the RAVI (Robustness Analysis with Visual and Interactive approaches) software developed to support the above mentioned methodological approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beuthe M, Scannella G (2001) Comparative analysis of UTA multicriteria methods. Eur J Oper Res 130(2):246–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouyssou D (1990) Building criteria: a prerequisite for MCDA In: Bana e Costa CA (ed) Readings in multiple criteria decision-aid, Springer, Heidelberg, pp 58–80

  • Doumpos M, Zopounidis C (2016) Data-driven robustness analysis for multicriteria classification problems using preference disaggregation approaches. In: Doumpos M, Zopounidis C, Grigoroudis E (eds) Robustness analysis in decision aiding, optimization, and analytics, vol 241. Springer, Cham, pp 21–37

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Doumpos M, Zopounidis C, Galariotis E (2014) Inferring robust decision models in multicriteria classification problems: an experimental analysis. Eur J Oper Res 236(2):601–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueira J, Roy B (2002) Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos’ procedure. Eur J Oper Res 139(2):317–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueira JR, Greco S, Słowiński R (2009) Building a set of additive value functions representing a reference preorder and intensities of preference: GRIP method. Eur J Oper Res 195(2):460–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greco S, Mousseau V, Słowiński R (2008) Ordinal regression revisited: multiple criteria ranking using a set of additive value functions. Eur J Oper Res 191(2):416–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greco S, Kadziński M, Mousseau V, Słowiński R (2012) Robust ordinal regression for multiple criteria group decision: UTAGMS-GROUP and UTADISGMS-GROUP. Decis Support Syst 52(3):549–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigoroudis E, Siskos Y (2010) Customer satisfaction evaluation: methods for measuring and implementing service quality. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hurson C, Siskos Y (2014) A synergy of multicriteria techniques to assess additive value models. Eur J Oper Res 238(2):540–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquet-Lagreze E, Siskos J (1982) Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision-making, the UTA method. Eur J Oper Res 10(2):151–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadziński M, Greco S, Slowiński R (2012a) Extreme ranking analysis in robust ordinal regression. Omega 40(4):488–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadziński M, Greco S, Słowiński R (2012b) Selection of a representative value function in robust multiple criteria ranking and choice. Eur J Oper Res 217(3):541–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadziński M, Ghaderi M, Wąsikowski J, Agell N (2017) Expressiveness and robustness measures for the evaluation of an additive value function in multiple criteria preference disaggregation methods: an experimental analysis. Comput Oper Res 87(Supplement C):146–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maňas M, Nedoma J (1968) Finding all vertices of a convex polyhedron. Numer Math 12(3):226–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy B (2010) Robustness in operational research and decision aiding: a multi-faceted issue. Eur J Oper Res 200(3):629–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simos J (1990a) Evaluer l’impact Sur l’environnement: Une Approche Originale Par l’analyse Multicritère et La Négociation. Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes, Lausanne

    Google Scholar 

  • Simos J (1990b) L’évaluation Environnementale: Un Processus Cognitif Négocié. Thèse de Doctorat, DGF EPFL, Lausanne

  • Siskos Y (1980) Comment modeliser les preferences au moyen de fonctions d’utilite additives. RAIRO Recherche Operationnelle 14:53–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siskos E, Tsotsolas N (2015) Elicitation of criteria importance weights through the Simos method: a robustness concern. Eur J Oper Res 246(2):543–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siskos Y, Yannacopoulos D (1985) UTASTAR, an ordinal regression method for building additive value functions. Investigacao Operacional 5(1):39–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Siskos Y, Spyridakos A, Yannacopoulos D (1993) MINORA: A multicriteria decision aiding system for discrete alternatives, J Inf Sci Technol. In: Siskos Y, Zopounidis C (eds) Special issue on multicriteria decision support systems, 2, pp 136–149

  • Siskos Y, Spyridakos A, Yannacopoulos D (1999) Using artificial intelligence and visual techniques into preference disaggregation analysis: the MIIDAS system. Eur J Oper Res 113(2):281–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siskos Y, Grigoroudis E, Matsatsinis NF (2016) UTA Methods. In: Greco S, Ehrgott M, Figueira J (eds) Multiple criteria decision analysis, vol 233. Springer. New York, NY, pp 315–362

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Spyridakos A, Psaromiligkos Y, Vryzidis L, Litsardaki M, Salmon I (2012) Survey forest fire detection systems via multicriteria disaggregation-aggregation approach: the case of Lycabettus Hill. Int J Multicriteria Decis Mak 2(1):29–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spyridakos A, Tsotsolas N, Yannacopoulos D, Siskos E (2015) Estimating criteria weights exploiting priorities of the criteria and techniques of robustness analysis In: 4th International Symposium and 26th National Conference on Operational Rearch, Chania, Crete, Greece on June 4–6

  • Tsotsolas N, Spyridakos A, Siskos E, Salmon I (2016) Criteria weights assessment through prioritizations (WAP) using linear programming techniques and visualizations. Oper Res Int J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-016-0280-7

  • Zopounidis C, Doumpos M (2000) PREFDIS: a multicriteria decision support system for sorting decision problems. Comput Oper Res 27(7):779–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Spyridakos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spyridakos, A., Tsotsolas, N., Siskos, Y. et al. A visualization approach for robustness analysis in multicriteria disaggregation–aggregation approaches. Oper Res Int J 20, 1841–1861 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-018-0394-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-018-0394-1

Keywords

Navigation