2-deoxy-2- [18F] fluoro-d-glucose (FDG) PET is commonly used for the assessment of vessel wall inflammation. Guidelines for analysis of arterial wall FDG signal recommend the use of the average of maximal standardized uptake value (mean SUVmax) and target-to-blood (mean TBRmax) ratio. However, these methods have not been validated against a gold standard such as tissue activity ex vivo or net uptake rate of FDG (Ki) obtained using kinetic modeling. We sought to evaluate the accuracy of mean SUVmax and mean TBRmax for aortic wall FDG signal quantification in comparison with the net uptake rate of FDG.
Dynamic PET data from 13 subjects without prior history of cardiovascular disease who enrolled in a study of vascular inflammation were used for this analysis. Ex vivo measurement of plasma activity was used as the input function and voxel-by-voxel Patlak analysis was performed with t* = 20 minute to obtain the Ki image. The FDG signal in the ascending aortic wall was quantified on PET images following recent guidelines for vascular imaging to determine mean SUVmax and mean TBRmax.
The Ki in the ascending aortic wall did not correlate with mean SUVmax (r = 0.10, P = NS), but correlated with mean TBRmax (r = 0.82, P < 0.001) (Figure 1B). Ki and Ki_max strongly correlated (R = 0.96, P < 0.0001) and similar to Ki, Ki_max did not correlate with mean SUVmax (r = 0.17, P = NS), but correlated with mean TBRmax (r = 0.83, P < 0.001).
Kinetic modeling supports the use of mean TBRmax as a surrogate for the net uptake rate of FDG in the arterial wall. These results are relevant to any PET imaging agent, regardless of the biological significance of the tracer uptake in the vessel wall.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
18F-fluorodeoxyglucose, 2-deoxy-2- [18F] fluoro-D-glucose
Positron emission tomography
Standardized uptake value
Tarkin JM, Joshi FR, Rudd JH. PET imaging of inflammation in atherosclerosis. Nat Rev Cardiol 2014;11:443-57.
Bucerius J, Hyafil F, Verberne HJ, Slart RH, Lindner O, Sciagra R, et al. Position paper of the Cardiovascular Committee of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) on PET imaging of atherosclerosis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2016;43:780-92.
Toczek J, Hillmer AT, Han J, Liu C, Peters D, Emami H, et al. FDG PET imaging of vascular inflammation in post-traumatic stress disorder: A pilot case-control study. J Nucl Cardiol 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01724-w.
van den Hoff J, Oehme L, Schramm G, Maus J, Lougovski A, Petr J, et al. The PET-derived tumor-to-blood standard uptake ratio (SUR) is superior to tumor SUV as a surrogate parameter of the metabolic rate of FDG. Ejnmmi Res 2013;3:1-8.
Braune A, Hofheinz F, Bluth T, Kiss T, Wittenstein J, Scharffenberg M, et al. Comparison of static and dynamic F-18-FDG PET/CT for quantification of pulmonary inflammation in acute lung injury. J Nucl Med 2019;60:1629-34.
Keramida G, Peters AM. Tissue standardized uptake value is a closer surrogate of blood fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose clearance after division by blood standardized uptake value, illustrated in brain and liver. Nucl Med Commun 2019;40:552-4.
Patlak CS, Blasberg RG. Graphical evaluation of blood-to-brain transfer constants from multiple-time uptake data. Generalizations. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1985;5:584-90.
Spence AM, Muzi M, Graham MM, O’Sullivan F, Krohn KA, Link JM, et al. Glucose metabolism in human malignant gliomas measured quantitatively with PET, 1-[C-11]glucose and FDG: Analysis of the FDG lumped constant. J Nucl Med 1998;39:440-8.
Keyes JW Jr. SUV: Standard uptake or silly useless value? J Nucl Med 1995;36:1836-9.
Mensel B, Quadrat A, Schneider T, Kuhn JP, Dorr M, Volzke H, et al. MRI-based determination of reference values of thoracic aortic wall thickness in a general population. Eur Radiol 2014;24:2038-44.
Rausch I, Cal-Gonzalez J, Dapra D, Gallowitsch HJ, Lind P, Beyer T, et al. Performance evaluation of the biograph mCT flow PET/CT system according to the NEMA NU2-2012 standard. Ejnmmi Phys 2015;2:26.
Huet P, Burg S, Le Guludec D, Hyafil F, Buvat I. Variability and uncertainty of 18F-FDG PET imaging protocols for assessing inflammation in atherosclerosis: Suggestions for improvement. J Nucl Med 2015;56:552-9.
Al-Mashhadi RH, Tolbod LP, Bloch LO, Bjorklund MM, Nasr ZP, Al-Mashhadi Z, et al. (18)Fluorodeoxyglucose accumulation in arterial tissues determined by PET signal analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;74:1220-32.
van der Valk FM, Verweij SL, Zwinderman KA, Strang AC, Kaiser Y, Marquering HA, et al. Thresholds for arterial wall inflammation quantified by (18)F-FDG PET imaging: Implications for vascular interventional studies. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;9:1198-207.
Mehran M. Sadeghi is a consultant for Bracco Research USA. Jakub Toczek, Jing Wu, Ansel T. Hillmer, Jinah Han, Irina Esterlis, Kelly P. Cosgrove and Chi Liu have no conflict of interest to disclose.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The authors of this article have provided a PowerPoint file, available for download at SpringerLink, which summarizes the contents of the paper and is free for re-use at meetings and presentations. Search for the article DOI on SpringerLink.com.
The authors have also provided an audio summary of the article, which is available to download as ESM, or to listen to via the JNC/ASNC Podcast.
This work was supported by the VA National Center for PTSD, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (K01AA024788), and National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH110674).
About this article
Cite this article
Toczek, J., Wu, J., Hillmer, A.T. et al. Accuracy of arterial [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose uptake quantification: A kinetic modeling study. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 27, 1578–1581 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-020-02055-x
- Vascular imaging
- Image analysis