Atherosclerosis is among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in developed countries.1 It is directly responsible for the majority of ischemic cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, involved 7.0 and 2.8 million people every year, respectively.2 Vascular calcification is a complex biological process that is a hallmark of atherosclerosis.3 However, the complex atheroma pathogenesis process causes a late clinical diagnosis of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Specifically, coronary atherosclerotic plaque rupture is the principal precipitant of acute myocardial infarction and an important cause of sudden cardiac death. Rupture is challenging to predict because most plaques are non-obstructive and are not identified by stress testing or coronary angiography.4,5 Furthermore, the rapid progression of existing vascular calcium is driven by ongoing microcalcification, carries a poor prognosis, and is not responsive to current medical therapies.6 Therefore, the early and effective detection, particularly of plaques vulnerable to rupture, of atherosclerotic disease is vital to the effective prevention and management of life-threatening cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarctions and cerebrovascular accidents.7 Assessment of Framingham risk factors such as dyslipidemia, hypertension, and diabetes can identify patients at risk of developing atherosclerotic disease but cannot clarify the extent or vulnerability of existing plaques. Clinical evaluations performed in symptomatic patients, such as the ankle-brachial index and cardiac stress tests, are useful to investigate the presence of intraluminal stenosis, but the degree of stenosis alone has not been shown to be predictive of plaque rupture.8,9
The most reliable method of risk stratification therefore remains radiologic examination, which can visualize not only luminal stenosis but also plaque morphology. Conventional ultrasonography and angiography techniques can be used to examine the extent of luminal stenosis, while cardiac computed tomography (CT) can be used to obtain calcium scores to quantify the calcification of the coronary vessels.7 Yet, other modalities, including multidetector CT coronary angiography, magnetic resonance imaging, intravascular ultrasonography, and optical coherence tomography, have begun to be implemented with the specific aim of determining plaque composition.10,11 The plaque composition most strongly associated with rupture includes a thin fibrous cap, a lipid-rich necrotic core, neovascularization, intraplaque hemorrhage, and microcalcifications.10 Microcalcification is one of the key markers of plaque’s instability and degenerative changes in aortic valve stenosis. However, due to the small diameter of the formed calcic vesicles, they cannot be detected on routine CT, which only identifies macrocalcification (~ 200-500 µm in diameter). Molecular imaging modalities are capable of detecting microscopic processes such as inflammation and microcalcification. These chemical composition changes occur early in the disease process and precede the aforementioned morphologic developments. Foremost among these molecular techniques is positron emission tomography (PET) using the radiotracer 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), a radiolabeled glucose analogue that serves as a marker of metabolic activity and, by extension, inflammation. By contrast, 18F-sodium fluoride (NaF) is a specific marker of bone mineralization that has traditionally been used in diagnosing metastatic bone cancer but has recently been applied to vascular calcification.7
18F-NaF has also shown considerable promise in allowing the evaluation of patients at risk of atherosclerosis. It differs from 18F-FDG in its molecular binding characteristics and, thus, the manner in which it illustrates disease burden. Whereas 18F-FDG is taken up by metabolically active cells and is considered a surrogate for inflammation, 18F-NaF is incorporated into areas of calcium deposition by exchanging the hydroxyl ions of hydroxyapatite crystals with radiolabeled fluoride to form fluorapatite.4 The pattern of this tracer uptake depends on differences in regional blood flow, the density of hydroxyapatite as well as exposed crystal surface area. 18F-NaF binds avidly to microcalcification, while areas of macrocalcification show only peripheral uptake thanks to its large volume (low surface-area-to-volume ratio).6,12,13 Consequently, 18F-NaF PET scans are not affected by the major limitation of myocardial uptake and can be used to assess the coronary arteries in addition to the peripheral vasculature, while 18F-FDG uptake is too intense in the myocardium to enable detection of coronary pathology.14
Previous studies evaluated the role of 18F-NaF in the evaluation of coronary artery disease. Dweck et al14 conducted the first feasibility study on the coronary arteries and found a higher uptake in patients with coronary atherosclerosis. 18F-NaF seems to distinguish between patients with dormant calcific disease, established many months or years previously, and subjects with metabolically active disease where the calcification process is ongoing. Importantly this distinction seems to be of clinical relevance, with higher rates of anginal symptoms, prior major adverse cardiovascular events, and cardiovascular risk factor scores observed in those with active disease.14 The spatial resolution of PET/CT is sufficient to localize 18F-NaF activity to specific coronary territories, suggesting that 18F-NaF might be able to identify the presence and location of recent plaque rupture.14 Later, several studies have shown that vascular uptake of 18F-NaF is not only correlated with advancing age, but also with risk factors for atherosclerotic and cardiovascular disease,15,16,–17 suggesting the evidence that this modality could be diagnostic for atherosclerosis and spurred a series of confirmatory studies. A prospective trial performed by Joshi et al13 in 40 patients undergoing 18F-NaF PET/CT after myocardial infarction showed that intense tracer uptake localizes to recent plaque rupture in patients with acute myocardial infarction and in those with symptomatic carotid artery disease. Moreover, plaques with high 18F-NaF activity were significantly more likely to demonstrate high-risk morphologic features with positive remodeling, microcalcification, and necrosis of the lipid core, on ultrasonography.13 Vascular 18F-NaF uptake also correlated with the presence of microvessels seen on optical coherence tomography, suggesting that 18F-NaF avid lesions had increased inflammation.18 Therefore, 18F-NaF PET imaging might provide the positive predictive value required to consider treatment in patients at high risk for cardiovascular events in the absence of clinical symptoms.
In the current issue of the Journal, Silva Mendes et al19 conducted a systematic review aimed to summarize and consolidate 18F-NaF PET imaging potentialities to study cardiovascular disease and serve as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in high-risk populations, becoming an assessment method for the early detection of cardiovascular complications. The authors reviewed and resumed 31 articles on the potential use of 18F-NaF in cardiovascular fields. They included studies that used 18F-NaF PET as imaging technique in cardiovascular conditions, performed only on humans. Their results showed that in atherosclerosis, most studies report a positive correlation with the burden of cardiovascular risk factors and vascular calcification. A higher uptake was found in culprit plaques/rupture sites in coronary and carotid arteries and it was also linked to high-risk features in histology and intravascular imaging analysis of the plaques. In aortic stenosis, this tracer displayed an increasing uptake with disease severity. The results of this systematic review highlight the role of 18F-NaF as a promising tool to identify high-risk plaques, which sets ground to a potential use of this tracer in evaluating atherosclerotic disease progression and degenerative changes in aortic valve stenosis.19
Some studies tested whether 18F-NaF findings are incremental to conventional imaging techniques such as coronary artery calcium score measurement by cardiac CT, considering that microcalcification is not apparent in the latter. In a prospective analysis of 89 healthy subjects with low cardiovascular risk, Blomberg et al16 showed that the estimated future risk for cardiovascular disease development increases linearly with coronary 18F-NaF accumulation. 18F-NaF uptake was also a good predictor of aortic valve disease progression by CT calcium score after 1 year, with concordant distribution of new calcic deposits in regions with previous radiotracer accumulation. This technique holds major promise as a means of identifying high-risk and ruptured plaque, and potentially informing the future management and treatment of patients with stable and unstable coronary artery disease. However, the lack of prospective studies, which are essential to the validation of the prognostic value of 18F-NaF, and the lack of a standardized protocol regarding the dose injected and uptake period can sustain significant bias in the results reported by Silva Mendes et al;19 therefore, the clinical application of 18F-NaF PET in atherosclerosis requires further validation. Additional prospective studies are needed to determine the prognostic value of this tracer, which based on the ability to identify plaques at risk of rupture. It is also necessary evaluate the possibility of 18F-NaF uptake by other cells that might substantially alter understanding of clinical implications of predictive roles of calcific deposits in the plaques.20 Calcification is ubiquitous in atherosclerosis and hence its contribution to the plaque behavior and prognostic outcomes needs careful characterization. PET/CT imaging using 18F-NaF can detect active calcium deposition at multiple levels on a single scan, suggesting that whole-body scans can potentially identify high-risk lesions in multiple vascular beds.
It could be useful conducting a meta-analysis on the role of 18F-NaF PET imaging in cardiovascular disease to combine the results from multiple studies in an effort to increase power over individual studies. Outcomes from a meta-analysis may include a more precise estimate of 18F-NaF uptake in patients with cardiovascular disease, than any individual study contributing to the pooled analysis. In addition to evaluation of plaque composition and disease activity, PET/CT also allows for functional assessment of atherosclerotic lesions. The peculiar advantage of hybrid PET combined with CT is the possibility to perform absolute quantification of coronary vascular function and coronary artery calcium, beyond myocardial perfusion evaluation as a part of the same examination.21 Vulnerable plaque characteristics are associated with hemodynamically significant coronary artery lesions and a combined evaluation of morphological and functional characteristics of vulnerable plaque might provide better identification of culprit lesions with an incremental prognostic definition.
References
Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M, De Simone G, Ferguson TB, Flegal K, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2009 Update. Circulation 2009;119:e21-181.
Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet 2013;380:2095-128.
Doherty TM, Asotra K, Fitzpatrick LA, Qiao JH, Wilkin DJ, Detrano RC, et al. Calcification in atherosclerosis: Bone biology and chronic inflammation at the arterial crossroads. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:11201-6.
Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, Casscells SW, Litovsky S, Rumberger J, et al. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: A call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I. Circulation 2003;108:1664-72.
Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Farb A, Schwartz SM. Lessons from sudden coronary death: A comprehensive morphological classification scheme for atherosclerotic lesions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2000;20:1262-75.
Irkle A, Vesey AT, Lewis DY, Skepper JN, Bird JL, Dweck MR, et al. Identifying active vascular microcalcification by (18)F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography. Nat Commun 2015;7:7495.
McKenney-Drake ML, Moghbel MC, Paydary K, Alloosh M, Houshmand S, Moe S, et al. (18)F-NaF and (18)F-FDG as molecular probes in the evaluation of atherosclerosis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018;45:2190-200.
Tarkin JM, Joshi FR, Rudd JH. PET imaging of inflammation in atherosclerosis. Nat Rev Cardiol 2014;11:443-57.
Maehara A, Mintz GS, Bui AB, Walter OR, Castagna MT, Canos D, et al. Morphologic and angiographic features of coronary plaque rupture detected by intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:904-10.
Osborn EA, Jaffer FA. Imaging atherosclerosis and risk of plaque rupture. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2013;15:359.
Steinl DC, Kaufmann BA. Ultrasound imaging for risk assessment in atherosclerosis. Int J Mol Sci 2015;16:9749-69.
Vesey AT, Jenkins WS, Irkle A, Moss A, Sng G, Forsythe RO, et al. (18)F-fluoride and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography after transient ischemic attack or minor ischemic stroke: Case–control study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;10:e004976.
Joshi NV, Vesey AT, Williams MC, Shah AS, Calvert PA, Craighead FH, et al. 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography for identification of ruptured and high-risk coronary atherosclerotic plaques: A prospective clinical trial. Lancet 2014;383:705-13.
Dweck MR, Chow MW, Joshi NV, Williams MC, Jones C, Fletcher AM, et al. Coronary arterial 18F-sodium fluoride uptake: A novel marker of plaque biology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1539-48.
Derlin T, Wisotzki C, Richter U, Apostolova I, Bannas P, Weber C, et al. In vivo imaging of mineral deposition in carotid plaque using 18F-sodium fluoride PET/CT: Correlation with atherogenic risk factors. J Nucl Med 2011;52:362-8.
Blomberg BA, de Jong PA, Thomassen A, Lam MG, Vach W, Olsen MH, et al. Thoracic aorta calcification but not inflammation is associated with increased cardiovascular disease risk: Results of the CAMONA study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017;44:249-58.
Beheshti M, Saboury B, Mehta NN, Torigian DA, Werner T, Mohler E, et al. Detection and global quantification of cardiovascular molecular calcification by fluoro18-fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography—A novel concept. Hell J Nucl Med 2011;14:114-20.
Strauss HW, Nakahara T, Narula N, Narula J. Vascular calcification: The evolving relationship of vascular calcification to major acute coronary events. J Nucl Med 2019;60:1207-12.
Silva Mendes BI, Oliveira-Santos M, Vidigal Ferreira MJ. Sodium fluoride in cardiovascular disorders: A systematic review. J Nucl Cardiol 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01832-7(Epub ahead of print).
Shaw LJ, Narula J, Chandrashekhar Y. The never-ending story on coronary calcium: Is it predictive, punitive, or protective? J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;65:1283-5.
Zampella E, Acampa W, Assante R, Nappi C, Gaudieri V, Mainolfi CG, et al. Combined evaluation of regional coronary artery calcium and myocardial perfusion by (82)Rb PET/CT in the identification of obstructive coronary artery disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018;45:521-9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosure
V. Cantoni, R. Assante, and A. Cuocolo declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cantoni, V., Assante, R. & Cuocolo, A. 18F-sodium fluoride: An old tracer with a new promising clinical application. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 28, 1474–1476 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01892-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01892-9