Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Crus I in the Rodent Cerebellum: Its Homology to Crus I and II in the Primate Cerebellum and Its Anatomical Uniqueness Among Neighboring Lobules

  • Review
  • Published:
The Cerebellum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the human cerebellum, the crus I and crus II lobules (or the ansiform lobule), which are implicated in cognitive and visuomotor functions, are significantly expanded compared to other anterior and posterior lobules, which are involved mainly in somatosensorimotor function. In applying rodent models, it is essential to identify the lobules that are homologous to human crus I and crus II. Observation of the lobular structure in human, macaque, marmoset, rat, and mouse has indicated that human crus I and II are homologous to crus I in rodents (referred to as “ansiform area, AA”). This new lobular definition is supported by lobule-based mapping of the olivocerebellar climbing fiber and Purkinje cell (PC) projection patterns in rodents; crus II and simple lobules are innervated by the mediocaudal part of each inferior olive subnucleus and project to the dorsal part of the cerebellar nuclei, while crus I (or the AA) is innervated by the rostrolateral part of each inferior olive subnucleus and projects to the ventral part of the cerebellar nuclei. Concerning zebrin stripes, the central lobules (lobules VI–VII and AA or crus I in rodents) show a laterally expanded arrangement solely of positive stripes. Our recent analysis has shown that this arrangement of zebrin-positive stripes in the AA originates from their developmental process. Between E14.5 and E17.5, lateral protrusion and shift has been observed in the domains of protocadherin 10-positive PC subsets (which would become zebrin-positive later) in the central area of the immature cerebellum that eventually becomes lobules VI–VII and AA or crus I. These data suggest that the AA (or crus I in rodents) is a unique lobule in the mammalian cerebellum which is characterized by distinct connectivity from neighboring lobules, a massive expansion in skillful primates, and the formation of longitudinal stripes different from that in neighboring anterior and posterior lobules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Larsell O. The comparative anatomy and histology of the cerebellum from monotremes through apes. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press; 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bolk L. Das Cerebellum der Saugetiere, Eine Vergleichend Anatomische Untersuchung. Jena: Verlag von Gustav Fischer; 1906.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Balsters JH, Cussans E, Diedrichsen J, Phillips KA, Preuss TM, Rilling JK, et al. Evolution of the cerebellar cortex: the selective expansion of prefrontal-projecting cerebellar lobules. NeuroImage. 2010;49(3):2045–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.045.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stoodley CJ, Schmahmann JD. Functional topography in the human cerebellum: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. NeuroImage. 2009;44(2):489–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.039.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Luo Y, Fujita H, Nedelescu H, Biswas MS, Sato C, Ying S, et al. Lobular homology in cerebellum hemispheres of humans, non-human primates and rodents: a structural, axonal tracing and molecular expression analysis. Brain Struct Funct. 2017;222(6):2449–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-017-1436-9.

  6. Brodal P. The pontocerebellar projection in the rhesus monkey: an experimental study with retrograde axonal transport of horseradish peroxidase. Neuroscience. 1979;4(2):193–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4522(79)90082-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Larsell O. The cerebellum of the cat and the monkey. J Comp Neurol. 1953;99(1):135–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.900990110.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Paxinos G, Huang X-F, Toga AW. The rhesus monkey brain in stereotaxic coordinates. San Diego: Academic Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Paxinos G, Watson C, Petrides M, Rosa M, Tokuno H. The marmoset brain in stereotaxic coordinates. San Diego: Academic Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vibulyaseck S, Fujita H, Luo Y, Anh KT, Oh-Nishi A, Ono Y, et al. Spatial rearrangement of Purkinje cell subsets forms the transverse and longitudinal compartmentalization in the mouse embryonic cerebellum. J Comp Neurol. 2017;525(14):2971–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.24250.

  11. Schmahmann JD, Doyon J, McDonald D, Holmes C, Lavoie K, Hurwitz AS, et al. Three-dimensional MRI atlas of the human cerebellum in proportional stereotaxic space. NeuroImage. 1999;10(3):233–60. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.1999.0459.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Voogd J. Cerebellum. In: Paxinos G, editor. The rat nervous system. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004. p. 205–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012547638-6/50010-9.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Fujita H, Oh-Nishi A, Obayashi S, Sugihara I. Organization of the marmoset cerebellum in three-dimensional space: lobulation, aldolase C compartmentalization and axonal projection. J Comp Neurol. 2010;518(10):1764–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.22301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sugihara I, Wu HS, Shinoda Y. The entire trajectories of single olivocerebellar axons in the cerebellar cortex and their contribution to cerebellar compartmentalization. J Neurosci. 2001;21(19):7715–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ruigrok TJH. Ins and outs of cerebellar modules. Cerebellum. 2011;10(3):464–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-010-0164-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sugihara I, Shinoda Y. Molecular, topographic and functional organization of the cerebellar cortex: a study with combined aldolase C and olivocerebellar labeling. J Neurosci. 2004;24(40):8771–85. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1961-04.2004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sugihara I, Fujita H, Na J, Quy PN, Li BY, Ikeda D. Projection of reconstructed single Purkinje cell axons in relation to the cortical and nuclear aldolase C compartments of the rat cerebellum. J Comp Neurol. 2009;512(2):282–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.21889.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kelly RM, Strick PL. Cerebellar loops with motor cortex and prefrontal cortex of a nonhuman primate. J Neurosci. 2003;23(23):8432–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Steele CJ, Anwander A, Bazini P-L, Trampel R, Schaefer A, Turner R, et al. Human cerebellar sub-millimeter diffusion imaging reveals the motor and non-motor topography of the dentate nucleus. Cereb Cortex. 2017;27(9):4537–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhw258.

  20. Glickstein M, May JG 3rd, Mercier BE. Corticopontine projection in the macaque: the distribution of labeled cortical cells after large injections of horseradish peroxidase in the pontine nuclei. J Comp Neurol. 1985;235(3):343–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902350306.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schmahmann JD, Pandya DN. Anatomic organization of the basilar pontine projections from prefrontal cortices in rhesus monkey. J Neurosci. 1997;17(1):438–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Burne RA, Eriksson MA, Saint-Cyr JA, Woodward DJ. The organization of the pontine projection to lateral cerebellar areas in the rat: dual zones in the pons. Brain Res. 1978;139(2):340–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(78)90934-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mihailoff GA, Burne RA, Azizi SA, Norell G, Woodward DJ. The pontocerebellar system in the rat: an HRP study. II. Hemispheral components. J Comp Neurol. 1981;197(4):559–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.901970403.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dalley JW, Cardinal RN, Robbins TW. Prefrontal executive and cognitive functions in rodents: neural and neurochemical substrates. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004;28(7):771–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.09.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hawkes R, Leclerc N. Antigenic map of the rat cerebellar cortex: the distribution of parasagittal bands as revealed by monoclonal anti-Purkinje cell antibody mobA113. J Comp Neurol. 1987;256(1):29–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902560104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sillitoe RV, Marzban H, Larouche M, Zahedi S, Affanni J, Hawkes R. Conservation of the architecture of the anterior lobe vermis of the cerebellum across mammalian species. Prog Brain Res. 2005;148:283–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(04)48022-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fujita H, Aoki H, Ajioka I, Yamazaki M, Abe M, Oh-Nishi A, et al. Detailed expression pattern of aldolase C (Aldoc) in the cerebellum, retina and other areas of the CNS studied in Aldoc-Venus knock-in mice. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e86679. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086679.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Fujita H, Morita N, Furuichi T, Sugihara I. Clustered fine compartmentalization of the mouse embryonic cerebellar cortex and its rearrangement into the postnatal striped configuration. J Neurosci. 2012;32(45):15688–703. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1710-12.2012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Mr. Gideon Anokye Sarpong for reading the manuscript and Dr. Suteera Vibulyaseck for her help in preparing the manuscript.

Support

JSPS KAKENHI 16K070025.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Izumi Sugihara.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sugihara, I. Crus I in the Rodent Cerebellum: Its Homology to Crus I and II in the Primate Cerebellum and Its Anatomical Uniqueness Among Neighboring Lobules. Cerebellum 17, 49–55 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-017-0911-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-017-0911-4

Keywords

Navigation