Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Prum’s Aesthetic Theory of Evolution: Beauty Happens and it can Change a Great Many Things

Review of: Richard O. Prum. The Evolution of Beauty: How Darwin’s Forgotten Theory of Mate Choice Shapes the Animal World - and Us. Anchor Books, New York. 448 p.

  • Published:
Biosemiotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Chamberlin, T. C. (1931). The method of multiple working hypotheses. The Journal of Geology, 39, 155–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doebeli, M., Ispolatov, Y., & Simon, B. (2017). Point of view: Towards a mechanistic foundation of evolutionary theory. Elife, 6, e23804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. (1995). Reinventing Darwin: The great evolutionary debate. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1977). Eternal metaphors of palaeontology. Developments in Palaeontology and Stratigraphy (pp. 1–26). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (2002). The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J., & Lewontin, R. C. (1979). The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceeding of the Royal Society of London B, 205, 581–598.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, J., & Emmeche, C. (1991). Code-duality and the semiotics of nature. In M. Anderson & F. Merrell (Eds.), On semiotic modeling (pp. 117–166). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonski, D. (2008). Biotic interactions and macroevolution: Extensions and mismatches across scales and levels. Evolution, 62, 715–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovaka, K. (2016). Underdetermination and evidence in the developmental plasticity debate. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axx038.

  • Kull, K., Deacon, T., Emmeche, C., Hoffmeyer, J., & Stjernfelt, F. (2011). Theses on biosemiotics: Prolegomena to a theoretical biology. In C. Emmeche & K. Kull (Eds.), Towards a semiotic biology: Life is the action of signs (pp. 25–41). Singapore: World Scientific.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, E. A., & Gould, S. J. (1993). Species selection on variability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 90, 595–599.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Longo, G., Montévil, M., Kauffman, S.,( 2012). No entailing laws, but enablement in the evolution of the biosphere, Proceedings of the fourteenth international conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation conference companion. ACM, pp. 1379–1392.

  • Maran, T. (2011). Becoming a sign: The mimic’s activity in biological mimicry. Biosemiotics, 4(2), 243–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maran, T., & Kleisner, K. (2010). Towards an evolutionary biosemiotics: Semiotic selection and semiotic co-option. Biosemiotics, 3(2), 189–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, C. R. (2006). Explaining the Cambrian “explosion” of animals. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 34, 355–384.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, C. R. (2014). The evolution of morphogenetic fitness landscapes: Conceptualising the interplay between the developmental and ecological drivers of morphological innovation. Australian Journal of Zoology, 62, 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinelli, D. (2001). Methodologies and problems in zoomusicology. Sign Systems Studies, 29(1), 341–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinelli, D. (2017). Zoosemiotics, typologies of signs and continuity between humans and other animals. In R. Gordon & J. Seckbach (Eds.), Biocummunication: Sign-mediated interactions between cells and organisms (pp. 63–85). Singapore: World Scientific.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, M. A., & Ohtsuki, H. (2008). Prevolutionary dynamics and the origin of evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 14924–14927.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci, M., & Müller, G. (2010). Evolution – the extended synthesis. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prum, R. O. (2010). The Lande–Kirkpatrick mechanism is the null model of evolution by intersexual selection: Implications for meaning, honesty, and design in intersexual signals. Evolution, 64, 3085–3100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prum, R. O. (2013). Coevolutionary aesthetics in human and biotic artworlds. Biology and Philosophy, 28, 811–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, S. H. (2004). Evolutionary theory: Mathematical and conceptual foundations. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seilacher, A. (2013a). Cyclism revisited: Extinction and ‘Achilles’ Heels' keep diversification in check on macroevolutionary time scales. Historical Biology, 25, 239–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seilacher, A. (2013b). Patterns of macroevolution through the Phanerozoic. Palaeontology, 56, 1273–1283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shine, R., Brown, G., & Phillips, B. (2011). An evolutionary process that assembles phenotypes through space rather than through time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 5708–5711.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, C., & Harnik, P. G. (2009). Assessing the role of abundance in marine bivalve extinction over the post-Paleozoic. Paleobiology, 35, 631–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiridonov, A., Brazauskas, A., & Radzevičius, S. (2015). The role of temporal abundance structure and habitat preferences in the survival of conodonts during the mid-early Silurian Ireviken mass extinction event. PLoS One, 10, e0124146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrba, E. S., & Gould, S. J. (1986). The hierarchical expansion of sorting and selection: Sorting and selection cannot be equated. Paleobiology, 12, 217–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, P., Plotnick, R. E., & Lyons, S. K. (2018). Evidence for trait-based dominance in occupancy among fossil taxa and the decoupling of macroecological and macroevolutionary success. The American Naturalist, 192, E000–E000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geology and Mineralogy, Vilnius University, M. K. Čiurlionio 21/27, LT-03101, Vilnius, Lithuania

    Andrej Spiridonov

  2. Laboratory of Bedrock Geology, Nature Research Centre, Akademijos str. 2, LT-08412, Vilnius, Lithuania

    Andrej Spiridonov

Authors
  1. Andrej Spiridonov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrej Spiridonov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spiridonov, A. Prum’s Aesthetic Theory of Evolution: Beauty Happens and it can Change a Great Many Things. Biosemiotics 11, 455–462 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-018-9343-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-018-9343-x

Search

Navigation