Skip to main content
Log in

Application of DRASTIC model and GIS for evaluation of aquifer vulnerability: case study of Asadabad, Hamadan (western Iran)

  • Article
  • Published:
Geosciences Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years DRASTIC method has been used to map groundwater vulnerability to pollution in very areas. As this method is used in different places without any evolution, it cannot bring up the effects of pollution type and characteristics. Hence, the method needs to be calibrated and reformed for a specific aquifer and pollution. In the present resent research, the rates of DRASTIC parameters have been reformed so that the vulnerability potential to pollution can be determine more exactly. The new rates were calculated using the relationships between each parameter and the nitrate concentration in the groundwater. The suggested methodology was applied to Asadabad aquifer located in western of Iran. The measured nitrate condensation values were used to correlate the pollution potential in the aquifer to DRASTIC index. The results showed that the modified DRASTIC is better than the original method for nonpoint source pollutions in agricultural zones. Application of the new rates, a new DRASTIC map was expanded that shows that 2.1 percent of the area fall in high vulnerability class. This percentage was 2.5 before the modification. The assessed area was 34.2% and 58.19% for moderate class and, for low vulnerability class, 63.7% and 31.39% respectively, before and after using of the new rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Abadi, A.M., Al-Shamma’a, A.M., and Aljabbari, M.H., 2017, A GIS-based DRASTIC model for assessing intrinsic groundwater vulnerability in northeastern missan governorate, southern Iraq. Applied Water Science, 7, 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Zabet, T., 2002, Evaluation of aquifer vulnerability to contamination potential using the DRASTIC method. Environmental Geology, 43, 203–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aller, L., Bennet, T., Lehr, H.J., Petty, R.J., and Hackett, G., 1987, DRASTIC: a standardized system for evaluating groundwater pollution potential using hydrogeological settings. Report EPA-600/2-87-035, Environmental Research Laboratory, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, 622 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous, 2014, Report on hydroclimatological water balance. Hamadan provincial water authority, Hamadan, 136 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodrud-Doza, M., Islam, A.T., Ahmed, F., Das, S., Saha, N., and Rahman, M.S., 2016, Characterization of groundwater quality using water evaluation indices, multivariate statistics and geostatistics in central Bangladesh. Water Science, 30, 19–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosig, K., Geyer, T., Subah, A., and Sauter, M., 2008, Travel time based approach for the assessment of vulnerability of karst groundwater: the Transit Time Method. Environmental geology, 54, 905–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Civita, M., 1994, La carte della vulnerbilita? degli aquifer all’inquinamento. Teoria & practica. (Aquifer vulnerability maps to pollution). Pitagora Ed, Bologna. (in Italian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Civita, M. and De Regibus, C., 1995, Sperimentazione di alcune metdologie per la valutazione della vulnerabilita’ degli aquifer. Quaderni di Geologia Applicata, Pitagora Ed. Bologna, 3, 63–71. (in Italian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Corniello, A., Ducci, D., and Napolitano, P., 1997, Comparison between parametric methods to evaluate aquifer pollution vulnerability using GIS: an example in the “Piana Company”, southern Italy. In: Marinos, P.G., Koukis, G.C., Tsiambaos, G.C., and Stournaras, G.C., (eds.), Engineering Geology and the Environmental. Balkema, Rotterdam, p. 1721–1726.

  • Daly, D., Dassargues, A., Drew, D., Dunne, S., Goldscheider, N., Neales, S., Popescu, C., and Zwahlen, F., 2002, Main concepts of the European approach for karst groundwater vulnerability and assessment and mapping. Hydrogeology Journal, 10, 340–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doerfliger, N., Jeannin, P.Y., and Zwahlen, F., 1999, Water vulnerability assessment in karst environments: a new method of defining protection areas using a multi-attribute approach and GIS tools (EPIK method). Environment Geology, 39, 165–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, S.S.D., 1987, Fundamental concepts in aquifer vulnerability, pollution risk and protection strategy. In: van Duijvenbooden, W. and van Waegeningh, H.G. (eds.), TNO Committee on Hydrological Research, the Hague. Vulnerability of Soil and Groundwater to Pollutants, Proceedings and Information, 38, p. 69–86.

  • El-Gawad, H.S.A., 2014, Aquatic environmental monitoring and removal efficiency of detergents. Water Science, 28, 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsokkary, I.H. and Abukila, A.F., 2014, Risk assessment of irrigated lacustrine & calcareous soils by treated wastewater. Water Science, 28, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghazavi, R. and Ebrahimi, Z., 2015, Assessing groundwater vulnerability to contamination in an arid environment using DRASTIC and GOD models. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 12, 2909–2918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gundogdu, K.S. and Guney, I., 2007, Spatial analyses of groundwater level using universal kriging. Journal of Earth System Science, 116, 49–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huan, H., Wang, J., and Teng, Y., 2012, Assessment and validation of groundwater vulnerability to nitrate based on a modified DRASTIC model: a case study in Jilin City of northeast China. Science of the Total Environment, 440, 14–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessica, E.L. and Sonia, T., 2009, Groundwater vulnerability assessment and integrated water resource management. Watershed management bulletin, 13, 18–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalinski, R.J., Kelly, W.E., Bogardi, I., Ehrman, R.L., and Yamamoto, P.O., 1994, Correlation between DRASTIC vulnerabilities and incidents of VOC contamination of municipal wells in Nebraska. Ground Water, 32, 31–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V., 2007, Optimal contour mapping of groundwater levels using universal kriging–a case study. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 52, 1038–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLay, C.D.A., Dragden, R., Sparling, G., and Selvarajah, N., 2001, Predicting groundwater nitrate concentrations in a region of mixed agricultural land use: a comparison of three approaches. Environmental Pollution, 115, 191–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council, 1993, Groundwater vulnerability assessment: predicting relative contamination potential under conditions of uncertainty. Committee for assessing groundwater vulnerability, National Academic Press, Washington D.C., 224 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neshat, A., Pradhan, B., Pirasteh, S., and Shafri, H.Z.M., 2014, Estimating groundwater vulnerability to pollution using a modified DRASTIC model in the Kerman agricultural area, Iran. Environmental Earth Sciences, 71, 3119–3131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oroji, B. and Solgi, I., 2016, Vulnerability assessment of Asadabad (Hamadan) plain groundwater by GIS. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 14, 91–104. (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Panagopoulos, G.P., Antonakos, A.K., and Lambrakis, N.J., 2006, Optimization of the DRASTIC method for groundwater vulnerability assessment via the use of simple statistical methods and GIS. Hydrogeology Journal, 14, 894–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polemio, M., Dragone, V., and Limoni, P.P., 2009, Monitoring and methods to analyse the groundwater quality degradation risk in coastal karstic aquifers (Apulia, Southern Italy). Environmental Geology, 58, 299–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popescu, I.C., Gardin, N.N., Brouye’re, S., and Dassargues, A., 2008, Groundwater vulnerability assessment using physically based modeling: from challenges to pragmatic solution. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Calibration and Reliability in Groundwater Modeling: Credibility in Modelling, Copenhagen, Sep. 9–13, p. 83–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rundquist, D.C., Rodekohr, D.A., Peters, A.J., Ehrman, L.D., and Murray. G., 1991, Statewide groundwater vulnerability assessment in Nebraska using the DRASTIC/GIS model. Geocarto International, 6, 51–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupert, M.G., 1999, Improvements to the DRASTIC ground-water vulnerability mapping method. USGS fact sheet FS-066-99, USGS, Reston, 6 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, Inc., 1999, SAS Online Doc, Version eight: Accessed on August 23, 2004, at URL” <http://v8doc.sas.com/sashtml>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secunda, S., Collin, M.L., and Melloul, A.J., 1998, Groundwater vulnerability assessment using a composite model combining DRASTIC with extensive agricultural land use in Israel’s Sharon region. Journal of Environmental Management, 54, 39–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirazi, S.M., Imran, H.M., and Akib, S., 2012, GIS-based DRASTIC method for groundwater vulnerability assessment: a review. Journal of Risk Research, 15, 991–1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solgi, I. and Oroji, B., 2018, A survey of nitrate and nitrite concentrations in groundwater of urban and agricultural areas of the Asadabad plain. Iran Water Resources Research, 13, 161–167. (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesoriero, A.J, Inkpen, E.L., and Voss, F.D., 1998, Assessing groundwa ter vulnerability using logistic regression. Proceedings of Source Water Assessment and Protection 98: a Technical Conference, Dallas, Apr. 28–30, p. 157–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thapinta, A. and Hudak, P.F., 2003, Use of geographic information systems for assessing groundwater pollution potential by pesticides in central Thailand. Environment International, 29, 87–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Stempvoort, D., Ewert, D., and Wassenaar, L., 1993, Aquifer vulnerability index: a GIS compatible method for groundwater vulnerability mapping. Canadian Water Resources Journal, 18, 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Hoyer, M. and Sofner, B., 1998, Groundwater vulnerability mapping in carbonate (Karst) area of Germany. Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources, Hanover, Archive No. 117854, 38 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrba, J. and Zaporozec, A., 1994, Guidebook on Mapping Groundwater Vulnerability. International Association of Hydrogeologists, International Contributions to Hydrogeology, 16, 131 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., He, J., and Chen, H., 2012, Assessment of groundwater contamination risk using hazard quantification, a modified DRASTIC model and groundwater value, Beijing Plain, China. Science of the Total Environment, 432, 216–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Balal Oroji.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oroji, B., Karimi, Z.F. Application of DRASTIC model and GIS for evaluation of aquifer vulnerability: case study of Asadabad, Hamadan (western Iran). Geosci J 22, 843–855 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-017-0082-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-017-0082-9

Key words

Navigation