Advertisement

Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants

, Volume 24, Issue 6, pp 1047–1058 | Cite as

Novel screening protocol for precise phenotyping of salt-tolerance at reproductive stage in rice

  • Krishnendu ChattopadhyayEmail author
  • Amaresh Kumar Nayak
  • Bishnu Charan Marndi
  • Annie Poonam
  • Koushik Chakraborty
  • Ramani Kumar Sarkar
Research Article
  • 181 Downloads

Abstract

The present study reports an unequivocal and improved protocol for efficient screening of salt tolerance at flowering stage in rice, which can aid phenotyping of population for subsequent identification of QTLs associated with salinity stress, particularly at reproductive stage. To validate the new method, the selection criteria, level and time of imposition of stress; plant growth medium were standardized using three rice genotypes. The setup was established with a piezometer placed in a perforated pot for continuous monitoring of soil EC and pH throughout the period of study. Further, fertilizer enriched soil was partially substituted by gravels for stabilization and maintaining the uniformity of soil EC in pots without hindering its buffering capacity. The protocol including modified medium (Soil:Stone, 4:1) at 8 dS m−1 salinity level was validated using seven different genotypes possessing differential salt sensitivity. Based on the important selection traits such as high stability index for plant yield, harvest index and number of grains/panicle and also high K+ concentration and low Na+– K+ ratio in flag leaf at grain filling stage were validated and employed in the evaluation of a mapping population in the modified screening medium. The method was found significantly efficient for easy maintenance of desired level of soil salinity and identification of genotypes tolerant to salinity at reproductive stage.

Keywords

Salinity tolerance Screening technique Flowering stage Rice Modified system 

Abbreviations

PH

Plant height (cm)

PL

Panicle length (cm)

DAF

Days to 50% flowering

PN

Panicle number/plant

PY

Plant yield (g)

GRAIN

Number of grains/plant

DEG

Spikelet degeneration (%)

STE

Spikelet sterility (%)

FET

Spikelet fertility (%)

HI

Harvest index

SW

Straw weight (g)

EC

Electrical conductivity (dS m−1)

YSI

Yield stability index

K+

K+ concentration (µg/ml)

Na+

Na+ concentration (µg/ml)

Na–K

Na+/K+ ratio

Notes

Acknowledgements

The financial support provided by the Director, ICAR-NRRI, Cuttack and the National Innovation on Climate Resilient Agriculture project (NICRA, ICAR), New Delhi, India are thankfully acknowledged.

Authors’ contributions

KC, AKN, BCM, AP and RKS performed the experiments. KC, AKN, KoC, and RKS discussed the results. KC, KoC and AKN wrote the article. All authors have approved the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

12298_2018_591_MOESM1_ESM.docx (43 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 42 kb)

References

  1. Ahmadizadeh M, Vispo NA, Calapit-Palao CDO, Pangaan ID, Vina CD, Singh RK (2016) Reproductive stage salinity tolerance in rice: a complex trait to phenotype. Ind J Plant Physiol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-016-0268-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhowmik SK, Islam MM, Emon RM, Begum SN, Siddika A, Sultana S (2007) Identification of salt tolerant rice cultivars via phenotypic and marker-assisted procedures. Pak J Biol Sci 10(24):4449–4454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouslama M, Schapaugh WT (1984) Stress tolerance in soybean. Part. I: evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance. Crop Sci 24:933–937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chattopadhyay K, Nath D, Das G, Mohanta RL, Marndi BC, Singh DP, Sarkar RK, Singh ON (2013) Phenotyping and QTL-linked marker-based genotyping of rice lines with varying level of salt tolerance at flowering stage. Indian J Genet 73(4):434–437Google Scholar
  5. Chattopadhyay K, Marndi BC, Sarkar RK, Singh ON (2017) Stability analysis of backcross population for salinity tolerance at reproductive stage in rice. Indian J Genet 77(1):51–58.  https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-6906.2017.00007.4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cho L, Yoon J, An G (2017) The control of flowering time by environmental factors. Plant J 90:708–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Federer CA, Hornbeck JW (1985) The buffer capacity of forest soils in New England. Water Air Soil Pollut 26:163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gregorio GB, Senadhira D, Mendoza RD (1997) Screening rice for salinity tolerance. IRRI discussion paper series no. 22, International Rice Research Institute, Manila (Philippines), pp 1-30Google Scholar
  9. Hossain H, Rahman MA, Alam MS, Singh RK (2015) Mapping of quantitative trait loci associated with reproductive-stage salt tolerance in rice. J Agro Crop Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12086 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Iqbal SA, Islam MM, Hossain A, Malaker A (2015) DNA fingerprinting of rice lines for salinity tolerance at reproductive stage. Adv Crop Sci Technol.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-8863.S1-006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Islam MR, Gregorio GB, Salam MA, Collard BCY, Singh RK, Hassan L (2012) Validation of SalTol linked markers and haplotype diversity on chromosome 1 of rice. Mol Plant Breed 3(10):103–114Google Scholar
  12. Lutts S, Kinet JM, Bouharmont J (1995) Changes in plant response to NaCl during development of rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties differing in salinity resistance. J Exp Bot 46:1843–1852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Matoh T, Kairusmee P, Takahashi E (1986) Salt-induced damage to rice plants and alleviation effect of silicate. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 32(2):295–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mohammadi R, Vispo NAG, Amas JC, Sajise AG, Mamiit A, Gregorio GB (2011) Gravel-based hydroponic system: a new method for evaluating reproductive stage salinity tolerance in rice. Philippine J Crop Sci 36(1),http://agris.fao.org/aos/records/PH2013000609
  15. Molla KA, Debnath AB, Ganie SA, Mondal TK (2015) Identification and analysis of novel salt responsive candidate gene based SSRs (cgSSRs) from rice (Oryza sativa L.). BMC Plant Biol 15(1):1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Munns R, Tester M (2008) Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Ann Rev Plant Biol 59:651–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rao PS, Mishra B, Gupta SR, Rathore A (2008) Reproductive stage tolerance to salinity and alkalinity stresses in rice genotypes. Plant Breed 127:256–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Razzaque S, Haque T, Elias SM, Rahman MdS, Biswas S, Schwartz S, Ismail AM, Walia H, Juenger TE, Seraj ZI (2017) Reproductive stage physiological and transcriptional responses to salinity stress in reciprocal populations derived from tolerant (Horkuch) and susceptible (IR29) rice. Sci Rep 7:46138.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep46138 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Ryu JY, Lee HJ, Seo PJ, Jung JH, Ahn JH, Park CM (2014) The Arabidopsis floral repressor BFT delays flowering by competing with FT for FD binding under high salinity. Mol Plant 7:377–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Saha A, Sarkar RK, Yamagishi Y (1998) Effect of time of nitrogen application on spikelet differentiation and degeneration of rice. Bot Bull Acad Sin 39:119–123Google Scholar
  21. Shereen A, Mumtaz S, Raza S, Khan MA, Solangi S (2005) Salinity effects on seedling growth and yield components of different inbred rice lines. Pak J Bot 37(1):131–139Google Scholar
  22. Vijayan J, Senapati S, Ray S, Chakraborty K, Molla KA, Basak N, Pradhan B, Yeasmin L, Chattopadhyay K, Sarkar RK (2017) Transcriptomic and physiological studies identify cues for germination stage oxygen deficiency tolerance in rice. Environ Exp Bot 147:234–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vispo NA, Daep R, Mojares R, Pangaan ID, Babu AP, Singh RK (2015) A novel phenotyping technique for reproductive-stage salinity tolerance in rice. Procedia Environ Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2015.07.141 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yoshida S, Forno DA, Cock JH, Gomez KA (1976) Laboratory manual for physiological studies of rice, 3rd edn. IRRI, Los Banos, pp 61–66Google Scholar
  25. Yugandhar P, Veronica N, Panigrahy M, Rao DN, Subrahmanyam D, Voleti SR, Mangrauthia SK, Sharma RP, Sarla N (2017) Comparing hydroponics, sand, and soil medium to evaluate contrasting rice Nagina 22 mutants for tolerance to phosphorus deficiency. Crop Sci 57(4):2089–2097.  https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2016.07.0594 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zaman SK, Chowdhury DAM, Bhyiyan NI (1997) The effect of salinity on germination, growth, yield and mineral composition of rice. Bangladesh J Agric Sci 24(1):103–109Google Scholar
  27. Zeng L, Kwon TR, Xuan L, Wilson C, Grieve CM, Gregorio GB (2004) Genetic diversity analysis by microsatellite markers among rice genotypes with different adaptation to saline soils. Plant Sci 166:1258–1275CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Prof. H.S. Srivastava Foundation for Science and Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Krishnendu Chattopadhyay
    • 1
    Email author
  • Amaresh Kumar Nayak
    • 1
  • Bishnu Charan Marndi
    • 1
  • Annie Poonam
    • 1
  • Koushik Chakraborty
    • 1
  • Ramani Kumar Sarkar
    • 1
  1. 1.ICAR-National Rice Research InstituteCuttackIndia

Personalised recommendations