Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative assessment of ISSR, DAMD and SCoT markers for evaluation of genetic diversity and conservation of landrace chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes collected from north-west of Iran

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Morphological traits and three molecular markers techniques: start codon targeted (SCoT), inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) and directly amplified minisatellite DNA (DAMD) markers were compared for fingerprinting of 40 landraces chickpea genotypes collected from different geographical locations of north-west of Iran. Variance analysis of ten measured morphological traits showed significant differences existed between genotypes. Cluster analysis based on morphological traits, divided genotypes in three distinct clusters. Average polymorphism information content (PIC) for ISSR, DAMD and SCoT markers was 0.216, 0.232 and 0.232, respectively, and this revealed that SCoT markers were more informative, followed by ISSRs marker, than other markers for the assessment of diversity amongst genotypes. Cluster analysis for three different molecular types revealed that genotypes taken for the analysis can be divided in three and four distinct clusters. Accessions from same geographical regions mostly showed more genetic similarities than those from origins far isolated apart. These results suggest that efficiency of SCOT, DAMD and ISSR markers was relatively the same in fingerprinting of genotypes but SCOT and DAMD analysis are more effective in fingerprinting of chickpea genotypes. To our knowledge, this is the first detailed report of a comparison of performance among two targeted DNA region molecular markers (SCoT and DAMD) and the ISSR technique on a set of samples of chickpea. Overall, our results indicate that SCOT, ISSR and DAMD fingerprinting could be used to detect polymorphism for genotypes of chickpea.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

DAMD:

Directly amplified minisatellite DNA

ISSR:

Inter simple sequence repeat

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

PIC:

Polymorphism information content

SCoT:

Start codon targeted

References

  • Ahmad F, Slinkard AE (1992) Genetic relationships in the genus Cicer L. as revealed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of seed storage proteins. Theor Appl Genet 84:688–692

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrs HD, Weatherley PE (1962) A re-examination of the relative turgidity techniques for estimating water deficits in leaves. Aust J Biol Sci 15:413–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Botstein D, With RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW (1980) Construction of genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 32:314–331

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho MA (2004) Germplasm characterization of Arachis pintoi Krap. and Greg. (Leguminosae). PhD Thesis, University of Florida, USA.

  • Chahal GS, Gosal SS (2002) Principles and procedures of plant breeding: biotechnological and conventional approaches. Narosa, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Collard BCY, Mackill DJ (2009) Start Codon Targeted (SCOT) polymorphism: a simple novel DNA marker technique for generating gene-targeted markers in plants. Plant Mol Biol Rep 27:86–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Vicente MC, Guzmán FA, Engels J, Rao VR (2005) Genetic characterization and its use in decision making for the conservation of crop germplasm. The role of biotechnology. In: International workshop the role of biotechnology for the characterization and conservation of crop, forestry, animal and fishery genetic resources. FAO, FOBIOTECH, ECOGENE, SIGA, Turin, pp 121–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Fatehi R, Talebi R, Fayyaz F (2011) Characterization of Iranian landrace wheat accessions by inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. J Appl Env Biol Sci 1(10):423–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez MN, Figueiras AM, Benito C (2002) The use of ISSR and RAPD markers for detection DNA polymorphism, genotype identification and genetic diversity among barley cultivars with known origin. Theor Appl Genet 104:845–851

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta PK, Rustgi S (2004) Molecular markers from the transcribed/expressed region of the genome in higher plants. Funct Integr Geonomics 4:139–162

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harlan JR (1975) Our vanishing genetic resources. Science 188:618–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harlan JR (1992) Crops and man. Am Soc Agron Crop Sci, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath DD, Iwana GK, Delvin RH (1993) PCR primed with VNTR core sequences yield species specific patterns and hypervariable probes. Nucleic Acids Res 21:5782–5785

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ince AG, Karaca M, Onus N (2009) Development and utilization of diagnostic DAMD-PCR markers for Capsicum accessions. Genet Resour Crop Evol 56:211–221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iruela M, Rubio J, Cubero JI, Gil J, Milan T (2002) Phylogenetic analysis in the genus Cicer and cultivated chickpea using RAPD and ISSR markers. Theor Appl Genet 104:643–651

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys AJ, Wilson V, Thein SL (1985) Hypervariable ‘minisatellite’ regions in human DNA. Nature 314:67–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kang HW, Park DS, Go SJ, Eun MY (2002) Fingerprinting of diverse genomes using PCR with universal rice primers generated from repetitive sequence of Korean weedy rice. Mol Cells 13:281–287

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karaca M, Saha S, Zipf A, Jenkins JN, Lang DJ (2002) Genetic diversity among forage bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.): evidence from chloroplast and nuclear DNA fingerprinting. Crop Sci 42:2118–2127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Labdi M, Robertson LD, Singh KB, Charrier A (1996) Genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships among the annual Cicer species as revealed by isozyme polymorphisms. Euphytica 88:181–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lassner MW, Peterson P, Yoder JI (1989) Simultaneous amplification of multiple DNA fragments by polymerase chain reaction in the analysis of transgenic plants and their progeny. Plant Mol Biol Rep 7:116–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood Z, Athar M, Khan MA, Ali M, Saima S, Dasti AA (2011) Analysis of genetic diversity in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers. Afr J Biotech 10(2):140–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Maric S, Bolaric S, Martincic J, Pejic I, Kozumplik V (2004) Genetic diversity of hexaploid wheat cultivars estimated by RAPD markers, morphological traits and coefficients of parentage. Plant Breed 123:366–369

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Métais I, Aubry C, Hamon B, Jalouzot R (2000) Description and analysis of genetic diversity between commercial bean lines (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theor Appl Genet 101:1207–1214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naghavi MR, Jahansouz MR (2005) Variation in the agronomic and morphological traits of Iranian chickpea accessions. J Integ Plant Biol 47:375–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nei (1973) Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:3321–3323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nevo E, Payne PL (1987) Wheat storage proteins: diversity of HMW glutenin subunits in wild emmer from Israel. Geographical patterns and ecological predictability. Theor Appl Genet 74:827–836

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perrier X, Jacquemoud-Collet JP (2006) DARwin software, http://darwin.cirad.fr/darwin

  • Perrier X, Flori A, Bonnot F (2003) Data analysis methods. In: Hamon P, Seguin M, Perrier X, Glaszmann JC (eds) Genetic diversity of cultivated tropical plants. Science Publishers, Enfield, pp 43–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell W, Morgante M, Andre C, Hanafey M, Vogel J, And TS, Rafalski A (1996) The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis. Mol Breed 2:225–238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rajesh PN, Sant VJ, Gupta VS, Muehlbauer FJ, Ranjekar PK (2002) Genetic relationships among annual and perennial wild species of Cicer using inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) polymorphism. Euphytica 129:15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf FJ (1998) NTSYS-pc numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version 2.02. Exeter Publications, Setauket

    Google Scholar 

  • Saeed A, Hovsepyan H, Darvishzadeh R, Imtiaz M, Panguluri SK, Nazaryan R (2011) Genetic diversity of iranian accessions, improved lines of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and their wild relatives by using simple sequence repeats. Plant Mol Biol Rep 29:848–858

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc (1996) SAS/STAT software, change and enhancements. Release 6.11. SAS Institute Inc, North Carolina

    Google Scholar 

  • Sofalian M, Chaparzadeh N, Javanmard A, Hejazi MS (2008) Study the genetic diversity of wheat landraces from northwest of Iran based on ISSR molecular markers. Int J Agri Bio 10(3):466–468

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Talebi R, Fayaz R, Mardi M, Pirsyedi SM, Naji AM (2008a) Genetic relationships among chickpea (Cicer arietinum) elite lines based on RAPD and agronomic markers. Int J Agric Biol 10:301–305

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Talebi R, Naji AM, Fayaz F (2008b) Geographical patterns of genetic diversity in cultivated chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) characterized by amplified fragment length polymorphism. Plant Soil Environ 54:447–452

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tanya P, Taeprayoon P, Hadkam Y, Srinives P (2011) Genetic diversity among Jatropha and Jatropha-related species based on ISSR markers. Plant Mol Biol Rep 29:252–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres AM, Weeden NF, Martin A (1993) Linkage among isozyme, RFLP and RAPD markers in Vicia faba. Theor Appl Genet 85:935–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Maesen LJG (1987) Origin, history and taxonomy of chickpea. In: Saxena MC, Singh K (eds) The Chickpea. CAB Inter, Wallingford, pp 11–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe AD, Liston A (1998) Contribution of PCR based methods to plant systematic and evolutionary biology. In: Soltis PS, Soltis DE, Doyle JJ (eds) Molecular systematic of plants II. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 43–86

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zeven AC, de Wet JMJ (1982) Dictionary of cultivated plants and their regions of diversity. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank as this study was supported by Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj branch. Also, we wish to present our special thanks to Iranian National Gene Bank for kindly supplying seeds of genotypes.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reza Talebi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pakseresht, F., Talebi, R. & Karami, E. Comparative assessment of ISSR, DAMD and SCoT markers for evaluation of genetic diversity and conservation of landrace chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes collected from north-west of Iran. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 19, 563–574 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-013-0181-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-013-0181-7

Keywords

Navigation