Influence of machining parameters on surface quality during high speed edge trimming of carbon fiber reinforced polymers

  • Mohamed Slamani
  • Jean-François Chatelain
  • Hossein Hamedanianpour
Original Research


CVD diamond-coated carbide tools could provide an economical alternative for trimming CFRPs components compared to their PCD tools counterpart. Nevertheless, there are still some technical issues to understand related to wear resistance and surface quality. In this work, a CVD tool with six straight flutes was used to investigate the relationship between surface roughness, surface damage, tool wear, cutting force and cutting parameters during the high speed trimming of CFRPs. Statistical techniques for identifying and selecting the best cutting conditions for CVD tool are developed. In terms of tool wear, results show that the best operational condition to minimize the tool wear is achieved at lower feed rates and higher cutting speeds. Experimental results show also that a 0° ply orientation represents the worst case and produces the maximum tool wear. Furthermore, a strong correlation between the feed force and the tool wear was observed. It was found that the surface roughness decreases as a reciprocal function of cutting length. This decrease was due to the matrix burning/sticking and the thermal damage related to the low thermal conductivity of CFRP. In such situation, Ra becomes inappropriate indicator for roughness evaluation. On the other hand, it wasn’t seen any type of delamination or fiber pull-out on the trimmed surface of all coupons for the three tool life tests. Accordingly, delamination can be avoided using high fixture rigidity, high quality of CFRP laminates, a suitable cutting tool and stable operational conditions.


Surface roughness Surface quality Tool wear Cutting force Regression model Carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) 



This study was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (grant number 217168–2012).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Davim JP (2010) Machining Composite Materials. John Wiley & Sons Inc., London, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sheikh-Ahmad JY (2009) Machining of polymer composites. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Everstine G, Rogers T (1971) A theory of chip formation of FRP composite materials. Journal of Comput Mater Sci 5(1):94–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Koplev A (1980) Cutting of CFRP with single edge tools. Proceedings of the third international conference on composite materials 2, Paris, France 1597–605Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Roudgé M, Cherif M, Cahuc O, Darnis P, Danis M (2008) Multi-layer Materials Qualitative Approach of the Process. Int J Mater Form 1(S1):949–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Caggiano A (2018) Machining of Fibre Reinforced Plastic Composite Materials, materials, doi:
  7. 7.
    Sheikh-Ahmad J, Twomey J, Kalla D, Lodhia P (2007) Multiple regression and committee neural network Force prediction models in milling FRP. Mach Sci Technol 11:391–412Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koplev A, Lystrup A, Vorm T (1983) The cutting process, chips and cutting forces in machining CFRP. Composites 14(4):371–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Slamani M, Gauthier S, Chatelain J-F (2015) A study of the combined effects of machining parameters on cutting force components during high speed robotic trimming of CFRPs. Measurement 59:268–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Arola D, Ramulu M (1997) Orthogonal cutting of fiber-reinforced composites: A finite element analysis. IJMS 39(5):597–613zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chatelain J-F, Zaghbani I (2012) A Comparison of Special Helical Cutter Geometries Based on Cutting Forces for the Trimming of CFRP Laminates. International Journal of Mechanics 6(1):52–59Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rimpault X, Chatelain J-F, Klemberg-Sapieha JE, Balazinski M (2017) Tool wear and surface quality assessment of CFRP trimming using fractal analyses of the cutting force signals. CIRP-JMST 16:72–80Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Haiyan W, Xuda Q, Hao L, Chengzu R (2012) Analysis of cutting forces in helical milling of carbon fiber-reinforced plastics. Proc Inst Mech Eng B JEng Manuf 227(1):62–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Boudelier A, Ritou M, Garnier S, Furet B (2018) Cutting force model for machining of CFRP laminate with diamond abrasive cutter. Prod Eng 12(2).
  15. 15.
    Slamani M, Chatelain J-F, Hamedanianpour H (2015) Comparison of two models for predicting tool wear and cutting force components during high speed trimming of CFRP. Int J Mater Form 8(2):305–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xu W, Zhang L (2018) Tool wear and its effect on the surface integrity in the machining of fibre-reinforced polymer composites. Compos Struct 188.
  17. 17.
    Kerrigan K, O’Donnell GE (2016) On the relationship between cutting temperature and workpiece polymer degradation during CFRP edge trimming. Procedia CIRP 55:170–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ghidossi P, El-Mansori M, Pierron F (2004) Edge machining effects on the failure of polymer matrix composite coupons. Composites Part A 35(7–8):989–999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rajasekaran T, Vinayagam BK, Palanikumar K, Prakash S (2010) Influence of machining parameters on surface roughness and material removal rate in machining carbon fiber reinforced polymer material. Frontiers in Automobile and Mechanical Engineering (FAME) 1:75–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Arola D, Ramulu M, Wang DH (1996) Chip formation in orthogonal trimming of graphite/epoxy composite. Composites Part A 27(2):121–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang XM, Zhang LC (2003) An experimental investigation into the orthogonal cutting of unidirectional fibre reinforced plastics. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43(10):1015–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang C, Ming W, An Q, Chen M (2017) Machinability characteristics evolution of CFRP in a continuum of fiber orientation angles. Mater Manuf Process 32(9):1041–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hintzea W, Brügmanna F (2018) Influence of spatial tool inclination on delamination when milling CFRP. J Mater Process Technol 252:830–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Su F, Yuan J, Sun F, Wang Z, Deng Z (2018) Analytical cutting model for a single fiber to investigate the occurrences of the surface damages in milling of CFRP. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96(5-8).
  25. 25.
    Gilpin A (2009) Tool solutions for machining composites. Reinf Plast 53(6):30–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    ISO Standard 8688–2 (1989) International standard for tool life testing in end milling, part 2, 1st edn, 1989-05-01.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zaghbani I, Chatelain J-F, Songmene V, Berube S, Atarsia A (2012) A comprehensive analysis of cutting forces during routing of multilayer carbon fiber-reinforced polymer laminates. J Compos Mater 46(16):1955–1971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Slamani M, Gauthier S, Chatelain J-F (2016) Comparison of surface roughness quality obtained by high speed CNC trimming and high speed robotic trimming for CFRP laminate. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 42:63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Berube S (2012) Évaluation de la performance d’outils de coupe dédiés au détourage de structures composites carbone/époxy. Master dissertation, École de technologie supérieure de Montréal, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sheikh-Ahmad JY, Urban N, Cheraghi H (2012) Machining Damage in Edge Trimming of CFRP. Mater Manuf Process 27(7):802–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    ASME (2009) ANSI B46.1: Surface Texture (Surface Roughness, Waviness, and Lay). ASME, New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Duboust N, Ghadbeigi H, Pinna C, Ayvar-Soberanis S, Collis A, Scaife R, Kerrigan K (2017) An optical method for measuring surface roughness of machined carbon fibre-reinforced plastic composites. J Compos Mater 51(3):289–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Eneyew ED, Ramulu M (2014) Experimental study of surface quality and damage when drilling unidirectional CFRP composites. Journal of Materials Research and Technology 3(4):354–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Trefethen LN, Bau D (1997) Numerical Linear Algebra. SIAM, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mason RL, Gunst RF, Hess J-L (2003) Statistical design and analysis of experiments, with applications to engineering and science. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., HobokenGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hamedanianpour H, Chatelain JF (2013) Effect of Tool Wear on Quality of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer Laminate during Edge Trimming. Appl Mech Mater 325–326:34–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    El-Hofy MH, Soo SL, Aspinwall DK, Sim WM (2011) Pearson D, Harden P. Factors Affecting Workpiece Surface Integrity in Slotting of CFRP. Procedia Engineering 19:94–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohamed Slamani
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jean-François Chatelain
    • 1
  • Hossein Hamedanianpour
    • 1
  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentÉcole de Technologie SupérieureMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of TechnologyUniversity of M’silaM’silaAlgeria

Personalised recommendations