Influence of machining parameters on surface quality during high speed edge trimming of carbon fiber reinforced polymers
CVD diamond-coated carbide tools could provide an economical alternative for trimming CFRPs components compared to their PCD tools counterpart. Nevertheless, there are still some technical issues to understand related to wear resistance and surface quality. In this work, a CVD tool with six straight flutes was used to investigate the relationship between surface roughness, surface damage, tool wear, cutting force and cutting parameters during the high speed trimming of CFRPs. Statistical techniques for identifying and selecting the best cutting conditions for CVD tool are developed. In terms of tool wear, results show that the best operational condition to minimize the tool wear is achieved at lower feed rates and higher cutting speeds. Experimental results show also that a 0° ply orientation represents the worst case and produces the maximum tool wear. Furthermore, a strong correlation between the feed force and the tool wear was observed. It was found that the surface roughness decreases as a reciprocal function of cutting length. This decrease was due to the matrix burning/sticking and the thermal damage related to the low thermal conductivity of CFRP. In such situation, Ra becomes inappropriate indicator for roughness evaluation. On the other hand, it wasn’t seen any type of delamination or fiber pull-out on the trimmed surface of all coupons for the three tool life tests. Accordingly, delamination can be avoided using high fixture rigidity, high quality of CFRP laminates, a suitable cutting tool and stable operational conditions.
KeywordsSurface roughness Surface quality Tool wear Cutting force Regression model Carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP)
This study was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (grant number 217168–2012).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Davim JP (2010) Machining Composite Materials. John Wiley & Sons Inc., London, EnglandGoogle Scholar
- 4.Koplev A (1980) Cutting of CFRP with single edge tools. Proceedings of the third international conference on composite materials 2, Paris, France 1597–605Google Scholar
- 6.Caggiano A (2018) Machining of Fibre Reinforced Plastic Composite Materials, materials, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11030442
- 7.Sheikh-Ahmad J, Twomey J, Kalla D, Lodhia P (2007) Multiple regression and committee neural network Force prediction models in milling FRP. Mach Sci Technol 11:391–412Google Scholar
- 11.Chatelain J-F, Zaghbani I (2012) A Comparison of Special Helical Cutter Geometries Based on Cutting Forces for the Trimming of CFRP Laminates. International Journal of Mechanics 6(1):52–59Google Scholar
- 12.Rimpault X, Chatelain J-F, Klemberg-Sapieha JE, Balazinski M (2017) Tool wear and surface quality assessment of CFRP trimming using fractal analyses of the cutting force signals. CIRP-JMST 16:72–80Google Scholar
- 14.Boudelier A, Ritou M, Garnier S, Furet B (2018) Cutting force model for machining of CFRP laminate with diamond abrasive cutter. Prod Eng 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-018-0813-4
- 16.Xu W, Zhang L (2018) Tool wear and its effect on the surface integrity in the machining of fibre-reinforced polymer composites. Compos Struct 188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.018
- 24.Su F, Yuan J, Sun F, Wang Z, Deng Z (2018) Analytical cutting model for a single fiber to investigate the occurrences of the surface damages in milling of CFRP. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96(5-8). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1797-0
- 26.ISO Standard 8688–2 (1989) International standard for tool life testing in end milling, part 2, 1st edn, 1989-05-01.Google Scholar
- 29.Berube S (2012) Évaluation de la performance d’outils de coupe dédiés au détourage de structures composites carbone/époxy. Master dissertation, École de technologie supérieure de Montréal, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- 31.ASME (2009) ANSI B46.1: Surface Texture (Surface Roughness, Waviness, and Lay). ASME, New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
- 34.Trefethen LN, Bau D (1997) Numerical Linear Algebra. SIAM, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- 35.Mason RL, Gunst RF, Hess J-L (2003) Statistical design and analysis of experiments, with applications to engineering and science. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., HobokenGoogle Scholar