Evaluating the potential of forming spot-welded layups out of fibre reinforced thermoplastic tape without previous consolidation

  • Alexander Schug
  • Dennis Rinker
  • Roland Hinterhoelzl
  • Klaus Drechsler
Original Research
  • 60 Downloads

Abstract

With an automated tape laying machine like the Fiberforge RELAY2000, spot-welded 2D layups of unidirectional fibre reinforced thermoplastic tape can be produced within short time. The layup process is usually followed by a consolidation step to remove the air of the layup and to fuse the plies. After this, the preforms can be formed into 3D parts. As the consolidation step is very time and energy consuming, methods were investigated within this study to form carbon fibre reinforced polyamide 6 layups without any previous consolidation. A variety of challenges during pre-heating, handling and forming may occur. To cope with this, a number of different approaches were compared in terms of processability and resulting part quality: 1. Additional ultrasonic spot-welds to improve the heating in an infrared oven. 2. Vacuum setup with polyimide films to remove air and improve the heat transfer between the plies. 3. Vacuum setup with polyamide 6 films with the same aims as with the polyimide foil plus an improved formability. The quality of the formed parts was examined using thermography, microsections, void content and fibre volume fraction measurements. The reference were formed parts made of consolidated preforms. The evaluation revealed that the vacuum setup with polyamide 6 films generated the best results that were also comparable to the reference. The additional matrix material caused a reduction of fibre volume fraction and an increase in thickness, but also enabled new possibilities for joining with other parts.

Keywords

ATL Thermoplastic Forming Consolidation Thermography Composites PA6 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work was funded by the Bavarian Ministry of Economic Affairs and Media, Energy and Technology and the Government of Swabia (RvS-SG20-3451-1/19/8). The authors would like to thank the Celanese Corporation for the supply of the material, as well as Matthias Lukawsky and Tobias Betz for their help with the forming experiments.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Lengsfeld H, Wolff-Fabris F, Krämer J, Lacalle J, Altstädt V (2015) Faserverbundwerkstoffe: Prepregs und ihre Verarbeitung. In: 1st edn. Carl Hanser Verlag, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dieffenbacher GmbH (2017) Tailored blank line with Fiberforge and Fibercon systems. http://www.dieffenbacher.de/upload/downloads/Brochure_Fiberforge_Fibercon_2017.pdf. Accessed 19 Dec 2017
  3. 3.
    Burkhart A, Cramer D (2006) Continuous-fibre reinforced thermoplastic tailored blanks. JEC Composite Mag 43(22):41–43Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Campbell F (ed) (2004) Manufacturing processes for advanced composites. Elsevier Science, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Åström BT (1997) Manufacturing of polymer composites. CRC Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lebrun G, Denault J, Bureau M (2002) Influence of Consolidation and Forming Parameters in the Molding of Continuous Fibre Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites. In: 2nd Annual Automotive Composites ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hohmann A, Albrecht S, Lindner JP et al (2018) Recommendations for resource efficient and environmentally responsible manufacturing of CFRP products. Carbon Composites e.V, AugsburgGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Almeida O de, Bessard E, Bernhart G (2012) Influence of processing parameters and semi-finished product on consolidation of carbon/PEEK laminates. In: proc. 15th European conference on composite materials ECCM15Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Radlmaier V, Heckel C, Winnacker M, Erber A, Koerber H (2017) Effects of thermal cycling on polyamides during processing. Thermochim Acta 648:44–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2016.12.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ostgathe M, Breuer U, Mayer C, Neitzel M (1996) Fabric reinforced Thermopalstic composites: manufacturing and processing. In: Proc. 7th European conference on composite materials ECCM7, pp 195–200Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wakeman MD, Cain TA, Rudd CD, Brooks R, Long AC (1998) Compression moulding of glass and polypropylene composites for optimised macro- and micro- mechanical properties—1 commingled glass and polypropylene. Compos Sci Technol 58(12):1879–1898.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00011-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Trudel-Boucher D, Fisa B, Denault J, Gagnon P (2005) Thermoforming complex parts from unconsolidated and consolidated polypropylene/glass fibre fabrics. Polym Polym Compos 13(6):543–558Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Trudel-Boucher D, Fisa B, Denault J, Gagnon P (2006) Experimental investigation of stamp forming of unconsolidated commingled E-glass/polypropylene fabrics. Compos Sci Technol 66(3–4):555–570.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.036
  14. 14.
    Long AC, Wilks CE, Rudd CD (2001) Experimental characterisation of the consolidation of a commingled glass/polypropylene composite. Compos Sci Technol 61(11):1591–1603.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00059-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Svensson N, Shishoo R (1998) Manufactoring of thermoplastic composites from commingled yarns - a review. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 11(1):22–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Slange TK, Warnet L, Grouve W, Akkerman R (2016) Influence of Preconsolidation on consolidation quality after stamp forming of C/PEEK composites. In: Proc. 19th international ESAFORM conference on material forming: ESAFORM2016Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    AVK–Industrievereinigung Verstärkte Kunststoffe e. V. (2014) Handbuch Faserverbundkunststoffe/Composites: Grundlagen - Verarbeitung - Anwendungen, 4th edn. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Celanese (2016) CELSTRAN CFR-TP PA6 CF60–03 - PA6 DatasheetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Margossian A (2017) Forming of tailored thermoplastic composite blanks: material characterisation, Simulation and validation. Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität MünchenGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lessard H, Lebrun G, Benkaddour A, Pham XT (2015) Influence of process parameters on the thermostamping of a [0/90]12 carbon/polyether ether ketone laminate. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 70:59–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.12.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    DIN Deutsches Institut für Normung e. V. (1998) DIN EN 2564 - Determination of the fibre-, resin- and void contentsGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Breitenstein O, Warta W, Langenkamp M (2011) Lock-in thermography: basics and applications to functional diagnostics of electronic components. Springer series in advanced microelectronics, vol 10. Springer, Berlin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Perterer M (2012) Schadenidentifikation und -bewertung von CFK-Bauteilen mittels phasenmodulierter Thermographie. Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität MünchenGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Edevis GmbH Testing of CFRP Components. https://www.edevis.com/download/AppNote_OTvis_CFRP_EN.pdf. Accessed 15 Mar 2018
  25. 25.
    Yüksel F, Hinterhoelzl R, Drechsler K (2016) Experimental investigation of direct adhesion of CFR-Thermoplast on steel. In: proc. euro hybrid. Mater Struct 2016Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fraunhofer Research Institution for Casting, Composite and Processing Technology IGCVAugsburgGermany
  2. 2.Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringTechnical University of MunichGarching b. MünchenGermany

Personalised recommendations