Advertisement

The influence of warm forming in natural aging and springback of Al-Mg-Si alloys

  • Vasco Simões
  • Hervé Laurent
  • Marta Oliveira
  • Luís Menezes
Original Research
  • 156 Downloads

Abstract

Warm forming is a very interesting solution to improve formability and reduce springback. Natural aging is an open issue for heat treatable aluminum alloys, since it causes variability in sheet metal forming operations, namely in the parts shape, as well as in-service behavior. Therefore, this work aims to study the contribution of warm forming to minimize the variability caused by natural aging and reduce the springback in sheet metal forming operations. The thermo-mechanical behavior of two Al-Mg-Si alloys, EN AW 6016-T4 and EN AW 6061-T6, is studied in function of temperature (from 22 to 300 °C) using uniaxial tensile tests, cylindrical cup tests and split ring (springback) tests. Moreover, for the EN AW 6016-T4, the study was also performed in function of the storage time (from 1 to 18 months). At 22 °C, the increase of the storage time leads to a clear increase of the yield stress and of the work hardening and, consequently, of the springback. Warm forming at temperatures between 200 and 250 °C, using a short exposure time, reduces the yield stress and the work hardening and, consequently, springback for both alloys. Moreover, the effect of natural aging is minimized. Thus, warm conditions can be used as an effective solution to minimize the variability caused by the natural aging and reduce the springback in forming operations of heat treatable aluminum alloys.

Keywords

Al-Mg-Si alloys Natural aging Warm forming Springback 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the funding that sponsored this research work: the national funds from the French Ministry of Higher Education and the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) via the project P2020-PTDC/EMS-TEC/6400/2014 (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016876) and by UE/FEDER funds through the program COMPETE 2020, under the project CENTRO-01-0145-FEDER-000014 (MATIS). The first author V. Simões is also grateful to the FCT for the PhD grant SFRH/BD/90669/2012. The authors are also grateful to Constellium (Estelle Muller) for supplying the material. Moreover, the authors acknowledge the technical staff of IRDL, for their help in some of the experimental procedures (Anthony Jégat and Hervé Bellegou).

Funding

This study was funded by the French Ministry of Higher Education and the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) via the project P2020-PTDC/EMS-TEC/6400/2014 (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016876) and by UE/FEDER funds through the program COMPETE 2020, under the project CENTRO-01-0145-FEDER-000014 (MATIS). The first author V. Simões was also funded by the FCT for the PhD grant SFRH/BD/90669/2012.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Miller WS, Zhuang L, Bottema J et al (2000) Recent development in aluminium alloys for the automotive industry. Mater Sci Eng A 280:37–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00653-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bolt PJ, Lamboo N, Rozier P (2001) Feasibility of warm drawing of aluminium products. J Mater Process Technol 115:118–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li D, Ghosh A (2003) Tensile deformation behavior of aluminum alloys at warm forming temperatures. Mater Sci Eng A 352:279–286.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00915-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moon YH, Kang SS, Cho JR, Kim TG (2003) Effect of tool temperature on the reduction of the springback of aluminum sheets. J Mater Process Technol 132:365–368.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00925-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grèze R, Manach PY, Laurent H et al (2010) Influence of the temperature on residual stresses and springback effect in an aluminium alloy. Int J Mech Sci 52:1094–1100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2010.04.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hirsch J (2011) Aluminium in innovative light-weight car design. Mater Trans 52:818–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Suri R, Otto K, Boothroyd G (1999) Variation modeling for a sheet stretch forming manufacturing system. CIRP Ann - Manuf Technol 48:397–400.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63211-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhong H, Rometsch P, Cao L et al (2010) Tensile properties and work hardening behaviour of alloy 6016 in naturally aged and pre-aged conditions. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on aluminium alloys. Japan Institute of Light Metals, Tokyo, Japan, pp 2203–2208Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leacock AG, Howe C, Brown D et al (2013) Evolution of mechanical properties in a 7075 Al-alloy subject to natural ageing. Mater Des 49:160–167.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.02.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marretta L, Lorenzo RD (2010) Influence of material properties variability on springback and thinning in sheet stamping processes: a stochastic analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 51:117–134.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2624-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Prillhofer R, Rank G, Berneder J et al (2014) Property criteria for automotive Al-Mg-Si sheet alloys. Materials 7:5047–5068.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma7075047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ding L, Weng Y, Wu S et al (2016) Influence of interrupted quenching and pre-aging on the bake hardening of Al–Mg–Si alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 651:991–998.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.11.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yan Y (2014) Investigation of the negative and positive effect of natural aging on artificial aging response in Al-Mg-Si alloys. PhD-thesis, Technische Universität BerlinGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Engler O, Schäfer C, Myhr OR (2015) Effect of natural ageing and pre-straining on strength and anisotropy in aluminium alloy AA 6016. Mater Sci Eng A 639:65–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.04.097 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Werinos M, Antrekowitsch H, Ebner T et al (2016) Hardening of Al–Mg–Si alloys: effect of trace elements and prolonged natural aging. Mater Des 107:257–268.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.06.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pogatscher S, Antrekowitsch H, Leitner H et al (2011) Mechanisms controlling the artificial aging of Al–Mg–Si Alloys. Acta Mater 59:3352–3363.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2011.02.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fan X, He Z, Zhou W, Yuan S (2016) Formability and strengthening mechanism of solution treated Al–Mg–Si alloy sheet under hot stamping conditions. J Mater Process Technol 228:179–185.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.10.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kumar M, Poletti C, Degischer HP (2013) Precipitation kinetics in warm forming of AW-7020 alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 561:362–370.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2012.10.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ghosh M, Miroux A, Werkhoven RJ et al (2014) Warm deep-drawing and post drawing analysis of two Al–Mg–Si alloys. J Mater Process Technol 214:756–766.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.10.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    AMAG (2012) AluReport 03/2012 - 7xxx-high strength aluminum sheets for lightweight automotive applications. 6–9Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Banhart J, Chang CST, Liang Z et al (2010) Natural aging in Al-Mg-Si alloys - a process of unexpected complexity. Adv Eng Mater 12:559–571.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201000041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    ISO 6892-1:2009 (2009) Metallic materials - tensile testing - part 1: method of test at room temperature. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kurukuri S (2010) Simulation of thermally assisted forming of aluminium sheet. PhD-thesis, University of TwenteGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kaufman JG (2008) Properties of aluminum alloys: fatigue data and effects of temperature, product form, and processing. ASM International, Materials ParkGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    The Aluminum Association (2015) International alloy designations and chemical composition limits for wrought aluminum and wrought aluminum alloys. http://www.aluminum.org/sites/default/files/TEAL_1_OL_2015.pdf. Accessed 9 Feb 2017
  26. 26.
    Coër J, Bernard C, Laurent H et al (2011) The effect of temperature on anisotropy properties of an aluminium alloy. Exp Mech 51:1185–1195.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-010-9415-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mahabunphachai S, Koç M (2010) Investigations on forming of aluminum 5052 and 6061 sheet alloys at warm temperatures. Mater Des 1980-2015 31:2422–2434.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.053 Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ayres RA (1977) Enhanced ductility in an aluminum-4 Pct magnesium alloy at elevated temperature. Metall Trans A 8:487–492.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02661760 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shehata F, Painter MJ, Pearce R (1978) Warm forming of aluminium/magnesium alloy sheet. J Mech Work Technol 2:279–290.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3804(78)90023-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Esmaeili S, Lloyd DJ (2004) Effect of composition on clustering reactions in AlMgSi(Cu) alloys. Scr Mater 50:155–158.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2003.08.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hirth SM, Marshall GJ, Court SA, Lloyd DJ (2001) Effects of Si on the aging behaviour and formability of aluminium alloys based on AA6016. Mater Sci Eng A 319–321:452–456.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(01)00969-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ding L, Jia Z, Zhang Z et al (2015) The natural aging and precipitation hardening behaviour of Al-Mg-Si-Cu alloys with different Mg/Si ratios and Cu additions. Mater Sci Eng A 627:119–126.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2014.12.086 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Banhart J, Lay MDH, Chang CST, Hill AJ (2011) Kinetics of natural aging in Al-Mg-Si alloys studied by positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy. Phys Rev B 83:14101.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.83.014101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Coër J, Laurent H, Oliveira MC et al (2017) Detailed experimental and numerical analysis of a cylindrical cup deep drawing: pros and cons of using solid-shell elements. Int J Mater Form:1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-017-1357-4
  35. 35.
    Laurent H, Coër J, Manach PY et al (2015) Experimental and numerical studies on the warm deep drawing of an Al–Mg alloy. Int J Mech Sci 93:59–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.01.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Jelt Grease 5411 aerosol 95cSt. http://fr.rs-online.com/web/p/graisses/4612124/. Accessed 25 Nov 2015
  37. 37.
    ASTM E2492-07(2012) (2012) Standard test method for evaluating springback of sheet metal using the Demeri split ring test. ASTM Int 03.01. doi: https://doi.org/10.1520/E2492-07R12
  38. 38.
    Gnaeupel-Herold T, Foecke T, Prask HJ, Fields RJ (2005) An investigation of springback stresses in AISI-1010 deep drawn cups. Mater Sci Eng A 399:26–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.02.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Xia ZC, Miller CE, Ren F (2004) Springback behavior of AA6111-T4 with split-ring test. In: AIP conference proceedings. AIP Publishing, pp 934–939Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yoon JW, Dick RE, Barlat F (2011) A new analytical theory for earing generated from anisotropic plasticity. Int J Plast 27:1165–1184.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2011.01.002 CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Simões VM, Coër J, Laurent H et al (2013) Sensitivity analysis of process parameters in the drawing and ironing processes. Key Eng Mater 554–557:2256–2265.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.554-557.2256 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Colgan M, Monaghan J (2003) Deep drawing process: analysis and experiment. J Mater Process Technol 132:35–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00253-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Palumbo G, Tricarico L (2007) Numerical and experimental investigations on the Warm Deep Drawing process of circular aluminum alloy specimens. J Mater Process Technol 184:115–123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hu P, Liu YQ, Wang JC (2001) Numerical study of the flange earring of deep-drawing sheets with stronger anisotropy. Int J Mech Sci 43:279–296.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7403(99)00119-8 CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Simões VM, Laurent H, Oliveira MC, Menezes LF (2016) Natural aging effect on the forming behavior of a cylindrical cup with an Al-Mg-Si alloy. AIP Conf Proc 1769:200021.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4963639 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Xiao L-H, Yuan D-H, Xiang J-Z et al (2016) Residual stress in the cylindrical drawing cup of SUS304 stainless steel evaluated by split-ring test. Acta Mech Sinica 32:125–134.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-015-0516-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ragab MS, Orban HZ (2000) Effect of ironing on the residual stresses in deep drawn cups. J Mater Process Technol 99:54–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00360-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Simões VM, Oliveira MC, Neto DM et al (2017) Numerical study of springback using the split-ring test: influence of the clearance between the die and the punch. Int J Mater Form:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-017-1351-x
  49. 49.
    Laurent H, Grèze R, Manach PY, Thuillier S (2009) Influence of constitutive model in springback prediction using the split-ring test. Int J Mech Sci 51:233–245.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2008.12.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vasco Simões
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hervé Laurent
    • 1
  • Marta Oliveira
    • 2
  • Luís Menezes
    • 2
  1. 1.Univ. Bretagne Sud, FRE CNRS 3744, IRDLLorientFrance
  2. 2.CEMMPRE, Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of Coimbra, Polo IICoimbraPortugal

Personalised recommendations