A Low Incidence of Cytomegalo Virus Infection Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Despite a High Seroprevalence
- 21 Downloads
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality following allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). We wanted to study if the high sero-prevalence seen in our population translated into a high incidence of CMV infection following SCT. This is a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent allogeneic SCT between January 2008 and December 2012 at our centre. 475 patients underwent allogeneic SCT for malignant (46.5%) and non-malignant (53.5%) haematological disorders. 463 (97.4%) SCT recipients and 403 (84.8%) SCT donors were IgG seropositive for CMV. CMV reactivation within 100 days post SCT was seen in 174 (36.6%) at a median of 41 days (range 10–100) post SCT. Ganciclovir was used in 166 patients (95.4%) for a mean duration of 16 days (range 5–32). 157 patients (90%) responded to therapy. Sixty-six patients (42.3%) had secondary reactivation of the virus. Use of a male donor (p = 0.000), donor and recipient age > 15 (p = 0.005 and 0.000), unrelated donor (p = 0.000), degree of HLA mismatch (p = 0.000), occurrence of acute GVHD (p = 0.000) and steroid refractory acute GVHD (p = 0.026) were identified as risk factors for CMV reactivation while early neutrophil recovery (< 15 days) was found to be protective (p = 0.004). On multivariate analysis, male donor (p = 0.042), degree of HLA mismatch (p = 0.006), the occurrence of acute GVHD (p = 0.000) and steroid refractory acute GVHD (p = 0.031) continued to remain significant. 5-year overall survival was significantly better in patients without CMV reactivation compared to those who developed reactivation of CMV (68.9 ± 3.7 vs 58.2 ± 4.9% p = 0.004). The incidence of CMV infection does not seem to be higher despite a high sero-prevalence of CMV. However, patients who developed CMV infection post SCT had inferior outcomes.
KeywordsCytomegalo virus Stem cell transplantation Seroprevalence
AJD performed the clinical data accrual, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper. SM and AMA performed the laboratory tests, analyzed the data and wrote the paper. KML performed the statistical analysis and wrote the paper. AK, AA, FNA, AS, and VM analyzed the data and wrote the paper. BG designed the study, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Informed consent was obtained from all human participants involved in this study. All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- 5.Lilleri D, Gerna G, Furione M, Bernardo ME, Giorgiani G, Telli S et al (2007) Use of a DNAemia cut-off for monitoring human cytomegalovirus infection reduces the number of preemptively treated children and young adults receiving hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation compared with qualitative pp65 antigenemia. Blood 110(7):2757–2760CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Pietersma FL, van Dorp S, Minnema MC, Kuball J, Meijer E, Schuurman R et al (2011) Influence of donor cytomegalovirus (CMV) status on severity of viral reactivation after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in CMV-seropositive recipients. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 52(7):e144–e148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Das B, Kaur G, Basu S (2014) Seroprevalence of cytomegalovirus antibodies among blood donors and multitransfused recipients—a study from north India. Transfus Apheresis Sci Off J World Apheresis Assoc Off J Eur Soc Haemapheresis 50(3):438–442Google Scholar
- 13.Kim DH, Kim JG, Lee NY, Sung WJ, Sohn SK, Suh JS et al (2004) Risk factors for late cytomegalovirus infection after allogeneic stem cell transplantation using HLA-matched sibling donor: donor lymphocyte infusion and previous history of early CMV infection. Bone Marrow Transplant 34(1):21–27CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Sharma SK, Kumar S, Agrawal N, Singh L, Mukherjee A, Seth T et al (2013) Cytomegalovirus reactivation following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J Infect Dev Ctries 7(12). [cited 2018 Apr 5]. http://www.jidc.org/index.php/journal/article/view/2947
- 20.George B, Pati N, Gilroy N, Ratnamohan M, Huang G, Kerridge I et al (2010) Pre-transplant cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus remains the most important determinant of CMV reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the era of surveillance and preemptive therapy. Transpl Infect Dis Off J Transplant Soc 12(4):322–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Winston DJ, Young J-AH, Pullarkat V, Papanicolaou GA, Vij R, Vance E et al (2008) Maribavir prophylaxis for prevention of cytomegalovirus infection in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study. Blood 111(11):5403–5410CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 26.Clancy LE, Blyth E, Simms RM, Micklethwaite KP, Ma C-KK, Burgess JS et al (2013) Cytomegalovirus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes can be efficiently expanded from granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized hemopoietic progenitor cell products ex vivo and safely transferred to stem cell transplantation recipients to facilitate immune reconstitution. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant J Am Soc Blood Marrow Transplant 19(5):725–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar