Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy of Posaconazole Prophylaxis in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Undergoing Induction Chemotherapy: An Observational Study in Resource Limited Settings

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Large randomized controlled trials have shown significant decrease in incidence of invasive fungal infection in acute myeloid leukemia patients with Posaconazole prophylaxis. However, very less is known about value of Posaconazole prophylaxis in resource limited settings. This observational cohort study evaluated the incidence of fungal infection in patients with hematological malignancies undergoing induction chemotherapy with Posaconazole as antifungal prophylaxis and was compared with historical controls who received Fluconazole as fungal prophylaxis. The study was conducted from Oct 2013 to July 2015 in Department of Hematology of a tertiary care center. Fifty-three patients of acute myeloid leukemia on Posaconazole as fungal prophylaxis and 53 historical controls on Fluconazole as fungal prophylaxis were included for final analysis. Baseline characteristics were well matched between groups. Patients on Fluconazole were more likely to experience breakthrough IFDs (28.3 and 11.3%; p = 0.028) than in patients receiving Posaconazole prophylaxis. No significant difference was observed in overall, attributable mortality or in shift to first line antifungal. Both Posaconazole and Fluconazole were well tolerated with no major adverse effects requiring discontinuation of the drug. Minor side effects were seen in 39 and 47% patients in study and control group respectively. Vomiting and nausea were the commonest side effects seen in both study and control group (26 vs. 34% and 38 vs. 40% of patients, respectively). The results of our study in patients with acute myeloid leukemia provide evidence that Posaconazole prophylaxis significantly decreases the incidence of fungal infection and is well tolerated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barreto JN, Beach CL, Wolf RC, Merten JA, Tosh PK, Wilson JW et al (2013) The incidence of invasive fungal infections in neutropenic patients with acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes receiving primary antifungal prophylaxis with voriconazole. Am J Hematol 88(4):283–288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ananda-Rajah MR, Grigg A, Downey MT, Bajel A, Spelman T, Cheng A et al (2012) Comparative clinical effectiveness of prophylactic voriconazole/posaconazole to fluconazole/itraconazole in patients with acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy over a 12-year period. Haematologica 97(3):459–463

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Maertens JA, Frère P, Lass-Flörl C, Heinz W, Cornely OA (2007) Primary antifungal prophylaxis in leukaemia patients. Eur J Cancer Suppl 5(2):43–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Seshadri S, Baumann MA (2008) Reverse isolation for neutropenic patients. Commun Oncol 5:628–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Goodman JL, Winston DJ, Greenfield RA, Chandrasekar PH, Fox B, Kaizer H et al (1992) A controlled trial of fluconazole to prevent fungal infections in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation. N Engl J Med 326(13):845–851

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Slavin MA, Osborne B, Adams R, Levenstein MJ, Schoch HG, Feldman AR et al (1995) Efficacy and safety of fluconazole prophylaxis for fungal infections after marrow transplantation–a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. J Infect Dis 171(6):1545–1552

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cornely OA, Ullmann AJ, Karthaus M (2003) Evidence-based assessment of primary antifungal prophylaxis in patients with hematologic malignancies. Blood 101(9):3365–3372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cornely OA, Maertens J, Winston DJ, Perfect J, Ullmann AJ, Walsh TJ et al (2007) Posaconazole vs. fluconazole or itraconazole prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia. N Engl J Med 356(4):348–359

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Minetto P, Guolo F, Mikulska M, Pastori G, Giannoni L, Furfaro E et al (2014) Posaconazole for primary antifungal prophylaxis in AML patients: a real life single center experience and a comparison with the historical cohort. Blood 124(21):5255

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kung H-C, Johnson MD, Drew RH, Saha-Chaudhuri P, Perfect JR (2014) Clinical effectiveness of posaconazole versus fluconazole as antifungal prophylaxis in hematology–oncology patients: a retrospective cohort study. Cancer Med 3(3):667–673

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Girmenia C, Frustaci AM, Gentile G, Minotti C, Cartoni C, Capria S et al (2012) Posaconazole prophylaxis during front-line chemotherapy of acute myeloid leukemia: a single-center, real-life experience. Haematologica 97(4):560–567

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nagappan V, Deresinski S (2007) Posaconazole: a broad-spectrum triazole antifungal agent. Clin Infect Dis 45(12):1610–1617

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Divya Bansal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

Ethical clearance was taken from the Institutional ethics committee.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was taken from all the participants of this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bansal, D., Seth, T., Kumar, R. et al. Efficacy of Posaconazole Prophylaxis in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Undergoing Induction Chemotherapy: An Observational Study in Resource Limited Settings. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus 34, 460–465 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-018-0916-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-018-0916-2

Keywords

Navigation