|
Variety
|
Country
|
Type
|
Cluster A–B (r2 = 0.75)
|
Cluster A1–A2 (r2 = 0.14)
|
Common characteristicsa
|
|---|
|
IRGA-417 (2008)
|
Brazil
|
Premium
|
A
|
A1
| |
|
Guodao 6
|
China
|
2nd best
|
A
|
A1
| |
|
BRS Jaçanã (2008)
|
Brazil
|
2nd best
|
A
|
A1
| |
|
IRGA-417 (2009)
|
Brazil
|
Premium
|
A
|
A1
| |
|
Koshihikari
|
Japan
|
Premium
|
A
|
A1
| |
|
Hashemi
|
Iran
|
Premium
|
A
|
A1
| |
|
BRS Primavera (2009)
|
Brazil
|
2nd best
|
A
|
A2
| |
|
Pelde
|
Australia
|
Premium
|
A
|
A2
| |
|
Khazar
|
Iran
|
2nd best
|
A
|
A2
| |
|
PTT1
|
Thailand
|
2nd best
|
A
|
A2
| |
|
IR64
|
Philippines
|
Premium
|
A
|
A2
|
High sweet taste
|
|
Zhongzheyou 1
|
China
|
Premium
|
A
|
A2
| |
|
KDML105
|
Thailand
|
Premium
|
A
|
A2
| |
|
Langi
|
Australia
|
2nd best
|
A
|
A2
| |
|
Koshiibuki
|
Japan
|
2nd best
|
A
|
A2
| |
|
Sambha Mahsuri
|
India
|
Premium
|
B
| |
High water-like metallic
|
|
Swarna
|
India
|
2nd best
|
B
| |
High astringent
|
|
IRRI-132
|
Philippines
|
2nd best
|
B
| |
High sour/silage
|
|
Low sweet taste
|
- The varieties are listed in the tables in the order they appear in the cluster analysis tree chart
- aCluster A means were significantly higher (P < 0.01) than cluster B means for sweet taste (1.1 versus 0.5) and significantly lower (P < 0.01) for sour/silage (0.7 versus 1.4), water-like metallic (0.8 versus 1.3), and astringent (1.1 versus 1.6). Cluster A2 means for sweet taste (1.2 versus 0.9) and water-like metallic (0.7 versus 0.9) were significantly higher (P < 0.01) and lower (P < 0.02), respectively, than means for cluster A1