Variety
|
Country
|
Type
|
Cluster A–B (r2 = 0.58)
|
Cluster A1–A2 (r2 = 0.21)
|
Common characteristicsa
|
---|
IRGA-417 (2008)
|
Brazil
|
Premium
|
A
|
A1
| |
BRS Jaçanã (2008)
|
Brazil
|
2nd best
|
A
|
A1
| |
Khazar
|
Iran
|
2nd best
|
A
|
A1
| |
IR64
|
Philippines
|
Premium
|
A
|
A1
| |
Pelde
|
Australia
|
Premium
|
A
|
A1
| |
Langi
|
Australia
|
2nd best
|
A
|
A1
| |
Koshihikari
|
Japan
|
Premium
|
A
|
A1
| |
Sambha Mahsuri
|
India
|
Premium
|
A
|
A1
| |
Guodao 6
|
China
|
2nd best
|
A
|
A1
| |
Koshiibuki
|
Japan
|
2nd best
|
A
|
A1
| |
Hashemi
|
Iran
|
Premium
|
A
|
A1
| |
Swarna
|
India
|
2nd best
|
A
|
A2
|
High sewer animal
|
IRRI-132
|
Philippines
|
2nd best
|
A
|
A2
| |
IRGA-417 (2009)
|
Brazil
|
Premium
|
B
| |
High popcorn
|
PTT1
|
Thailand
|
2nd best
|
B
| |
High corn
|
BRS Primavera
|
Brazil
|
2nd best
|
B
| |
High hay-like musty
|
Zhongzheyou 1
|
China
|
Premium
|
B
| |
High grain/starchy
|
KDML105
|
Thailand
|
Premium
|
B
| |
High sweet aromatic
|
- The varieties are listed in the tables in the order they appear in the cluster analysis tree chart
- aCluster B means were significantly higher (P < 0.01) than cluster A means for popcorn (1.2 versus 0.7), corn (0.9 versus 0.6), hay-like musty (1.3 versus 0.9), grain/starchy (2.3 versus 1.9), and sweet aromatic (0.7 versus 0.4)