Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Prediction of prone-to-supine tumor displacement in the breast using patient position change: investigation with prone MRI and supine CT

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

One of the challenges for clinical use of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is how to transfer prone MRI information to the operating theater with a supine surgical position. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate tumor displacement in the breast by changing the patient position from prone to supine (prone-to-supine tumor displacement), using preoperative prone MRI and supine computed tomography (CT).

Methods

Preoperatively, 55 Japanese women with 57 breast cancer lesions underwent breast MRI in the prone position and breast CT in the supine position. Tumor positions in both the prone and supine positions were measured on X-, Y-, and Z-coordinates by fixing the nipple to the origin (0, 0, 0). As an indicator of the mobility of the breast, the ratio of the breast projection between the prone MRI and supine CT (prone-to-supine projection ratio) was calculated. The direction and distance of prone-to-supine tumor displacement was analyzed by dividing the breast into four quadrants according to the tumor position.

Results

When changing the patient position from prone to supine, tumors located in the inner-upper and inner-lower quadrants tended to move radially toward the center of the nipple. The movement distance of the tumors in the inner-lower and outer-lower quadrants was very strongly correlated with the prone-to-supine breast projection ratio (r ≥ 0.8, p < 0.05). Conversely, in the outer-upper quadrant, the direction of tumor displacement was variable, and the distance of tumor displacement did not correlate with the prone-to-supine projection ratio.

Conclusions

The present study showed that prone-to-supine tumor displacement in the breast differs depending on tumor location. The inner-lower quadrant of the breast may be the most predictable area for prone-to-supine tumor displacement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Deurloo EE, Peterse JL, Rutgers EJ, Besnard AP, Muller SH, Gilhuijs KG. Additional breast lesions in patients eligible for breast-conserving therapy by MRI: impact on preoperative management and potential benefit of computerised analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2005;41:1393–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pediconi F, Catalano C, Padula S, Roselli A, Moriconi E, Dominelli V, et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography: does it affect surgical decision-making in patients with breast cancer? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;106:65–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mann RM, Hoogeveen YL, Blickman JG, Boetes C. MRI compared to conventional diagnostic work-up in the detection and evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: a review of existing literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;107:1–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, Lord SJ, Warren RM, Dixon JM, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3248–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Houssami N, Hayes DF. Review of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer: should MRI be performed on all women with newly diagnosed, early stage breast cancer? CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:290–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Plana MN, Carreira C, Muriel A, Chiva M, Abraira V, Emparanza JI, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative assessment of patients with primary breast cancer: systematic review of diagnostic accuracy and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:26–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Turnbull L, Brown S, Harvey I, Olivier C, Drew P, Napp V, et al. Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375:563–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B, Decker T, Federico M, Gilbert FJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46:1296–316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Carbonaro LA, Tannaphai P, Trimboli RM, Verardi N, Fedeli MP, Sardanelli F. Contrast enhanced breast MRI: spatial displacement from prone to supine patient’s position. Preliminary results. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(6):771–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Park VY, Kim MJ, Kim EK, Moon HJ. Second-look US: how to find breast lesions with a suspicious MR imaging appearance. Radiographics. 2013;33:1361–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shih TC, Chen JH, Liu D, Nie K, Sun L, Lin M, et al. Computational simulation of breast compression based on segmented breast and fibroglandular tissues on magnetic resonance images. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55:4153–68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Pathmanathan P, Gavaghan DJ, Whiteley JP, Chapman SJ, Brady JM. Predicting tumor location by modeling the deformation of the breast. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008;55:2471–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuhlmann M, Fear EC, Ramirez-Serrano A, Federico S. Mechanical model of the breast for the prediction of deformation during imaging. Med Eng Phys. 2013;35:470–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hsu CM, Palmeri ML, Segars WP, Veress AI, Dobbins JT 3rd. An analysis of the mechanical parameters used for finite element compression of a high-resolution 3D breast phantom. Med Phys. 2011;38:5756–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Nipshagen MD, Beekman WH, Esmé DL, de Becker J. Anatomically shaped breast prosthesis in vivo: a change of dimension? Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007;31:540–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Weum S, de Weerd L, Kristiansen B. Form stability of the style 410 anatomically shaped cohesive silicone gel-filled breast implant in subglandular breast augmentation evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:409–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Klein Zeggelink WF, Deurloo EE, Muller SH, Schultze Kool LJ, Gilhuijs KG. Reproducibility of mammary gland structure during repeat setups in a supine position. Med Phys. 2002;29:2062–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nishikawa K, Tozaki M, Fukuda K. Supine MR mammography with parallel imaging technique. Jpn J Magn Reson Med. 2004;24:34–9.

    Google Scholar 

  19. LaTrenta LR, Menell JH, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Dershaw DD, Liberman L. Breast lesions detected with MR imaging: utility and histopathologic importance of identification with US. Radiology. 2003;227(3):856–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Beran L, Liang W, Nims T, Paquelet J, Sickle-Santanello B. Correlation of targeted ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities of the breast. Am J Surg. 2005;190:592–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Meissnitzer M, Dershaw DD, Lee CH, Morris EA. Targeted ultrasound of the breast in women with abnormal MRI findings for whom biopsy has been recommended. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:1025–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Abe H, Schmidt RA, Shah RN, et al. MR-directed (“second-look”) ultrasound examination for breast lesions detected initially on MRI: MR and sonographic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:370–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim TH, Kang DK, Jung YS, Kim KS, Yim H. Contralateral enhancing lesions on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with breast cancer: role of second look sonography and imaging findings of synchronous contralateral cancer. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31:903–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fausto A, Casella D, Mantovani L, Giacalone G, Volterrani L. Clinical value of second-look ultrasound: is there a way to make it objective? Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(Suppl 1):S36–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Siegler P, Holloway CM, Causer P, Thevathasan G, Plewes DB. Supine breast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011;34:1212–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yamashiro N, Tozaki M, Ogawa T, Kawano N, Suzuki T, Ozaki S, et al. Preoperative MRI marking technique for the planning of breast-conserving surgery. Breast Cancer. 2009;16:223–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tozaki M, Fukuda K. Supine MR mammography using VIBE with parallel acquisition technique for the planning of breast-conserving surgery: clinical feasibility. Breast. 2006;15:137–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nakano S, Kousaka J, Fujii K, Yorozuya K, Yoshida M, Mouri Y, et al. Impact of real-time virtual sonography, a coordinated sonography and MRI system that uses an image fusion technique, on the sonographic evaluation of MRI-detected lesions of the breast in second-look sonography. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;134:1179–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nakano S, Yoshida M, Fujii K, Yorozuya K, Kousaka J, Mouri Y, et al. Real-time virtual sonography, a coordinated sonography and MRI system that uses magnetic navigation, improves the sonographic identification of enhancing lesions on breast MRI. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012;38:42–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nakano S, Yoshida M, Fujii K, et al. Fusion of MRI and sonography image for breast cancer evaluation using real-time virtual sonography with magnetic navigation: first experience. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2009;39:552–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Uematsu T. Real-time virtual sonography (RVS)-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy for lesions initially detected with breast MRI. Jpn J Radiol. 2013;31:826–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

SN received a research grant from Toshiba Medical Systems and Daiichi Sankyo Company. HS, SI, and MK have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Nagoya University School of Medicine, 65 Tsuruma-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan

    Hiroko Satake, Satoko Ishigaki, Mariko Kitano & Shinji Naganawa

Authors
  1. Hiroko Satake
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Satoko Ishigaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mariko Kitano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shinji Naganawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroko Satake.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Satake, H., Ishigaki, S., Kitano, M. et al. Prediction of prone-to-supine tumor displacement in the breast using patient position change: investigation with prone MRI and supine CT. Breast Cancer 23, 149–158 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-014-0545-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-014-0545-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation