Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Efficacy of manual lymphatic drainage and intermittent pneumatic compression pump use in the treatment of lymphedema after mastectomy: a randomized controlled trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study has two aims. The first was to investigate the efficacy and contribution of an intermittent pneumatic compression pump in the management of lymphedema, and the second was to evaluate the correlation of our measurement methods.

Methods

This study was designed as a controlled clinical trial at the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department of Ataturk University Faculty of Medicine. Thirty-one patients with upper extremity lymphedema following mastectomy participated in the study. The patients were divided into two groups. The complex decongestive physical therapy (CDT) group (group 1, n = 15) received allocated treatment, including skin care, manual lymphatic drainage, compression bandages, compression garments, and exercises. The other group had CDT combined with an intermittent pneumatic compression pump (group 2, n = 16). Both groups were treated five times a week for 3 weeks (for a total of 15 sessions). Patients were assessed according to circumference measurements of landmarks, limb volume difference, dermal thickness with ultrasonography (USG), and pain.

Results

We observed significant differencse in both groups when comparing them before and after therapy. The baseline median volume difference of group 1 was 630 (180–1,820), and after therapy it was 480 (0–1,410). In group 2, the beginning median volume difference was 840 (220–3,460), and after therapy it was 500 (60–2,160). However, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of the above-mentioned parameters.

Conclusion

We concluded that the pneumatic compression pump did not contribute to the reduction of lymphedema. In addition, gauging dermal thickness using USG may prove to be a useful measurement method in the evaluation of lymphedema.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stanton AW, Modi S, Mellor RH, Levick JR, Mortimer PS. Recent advances in breast cancer-related lymphedema of the arm: lymphatic pump failure and predisposing factors. Lymphat Res Biol. 2009;7:29–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Edwards TL. Prevalence and aetiology of lymphoedema after breast cancer treatment in southern Tasmania. Aust N Z J Surg. 2000;70:412–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McLaughlin SA, Wright MJ, Morris KT, Giron GL, Sampson MR, Brockway JP, et al. Prevalence of lymphedema in women with breast cancer 5 years after sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary dissection: objective measurements. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:5213–9. doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.16.3725.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Golshan M, Smith B. Prevention and management of arm lymphedema in the patient with breast cancer. J Support Oncol. 2006;4:381.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheifetz O, Haley L. Breast cancer action. Management of secondary lymphedema related to breast cancer. Can Fam Phys. 2010;56:1277–84.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hayes SC, Janda M, Cornish B, Battistutta D, Newman B. Lymphedema after breast cancer: incidence, risk factors, and effect on upper body function. J Clin Oncol. 2008;20(26):3536–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yen TW, Fan X, Sparapani R, Laud PW, Walker AP, Nattinger AB. A contemporary, population-based study of lymphedema risk factors in older women with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:979–88.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Deo SV, Ray S, Rath GK, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for development of lymphedema following breast cancer treatment. Indian J Cancer. 2004;41:8–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Norman SA, Localio AR, Potashnik SL, et al. Lymphedema in breast cancer survivors: incidence, degree, time course, treatment, and symptoms. J Clin Oncol. 2009;20(27):390–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vignes S, Porcher R, Arrault M, Dupuy A. Long-term management of breast cancer-related lymphedema after intensive decongestive physiotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;101:285–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Koul R, Dufan T, Russell C, Guenther W, Nugent Z, Sun X, et al. Efficacy of complete decongestive therapy and manual lymphatic drainage on treatment-related lymphedema in breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;67:841–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheville AL, McGarvey CL, Petrek JA, Russo SA, Taylor ME, Thiadens SR. Lymphedema management. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2003;13:290–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Leduc O, Leduc A, Bourgeosis P, Belgrado JP. The physical treatment of upper limb edema. Cancer. 1998;83:2835–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kozanoglu E, Basaran S, Paydas S, Sarpel T. Efficacy of pneumatic compression and low-level laser therapy in the treatment of postmastectomy lymphoedema: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23:117–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Haghighat S, Lotfi-Tokaldany M, Yunesian M, Akbari ME, Nazemi F, Weiss J. Comparing two treatment methods for post mastectomy lymphedema: complex decongestive therapy alone and in combination with intermittent pneumatic compression. Lymphology. 2010;43:25–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Szolnoky G, Lakatos B, Keskeny T, et al. Intermittent pneumatic compression acts synergistically with manual lymphatic drainage in complex decongestive physiotherapy for breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema. Lymphology. 2009;42:188–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Consensus Document of the International Society of Lymphology. The diagnosis and treatment of peripheral lymphedema. Lymphology. 2009;42:51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Petrek JA, Pressman PI, Smith RA. Lymphedema: current issues in research and management. CA Cancer J Clin. 2000;50:292–307.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Taylor R, Jayasinghe UW, Koelmeyer L, Ung O, Boyages J. Reliability and validity of arm volume measurements for assessment of lymphedema. Phys Ther. 2006;86:205–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mutlu H, Akca Z, Teke HU, Ugur H. Evaluation of peripheral blood smear for myelodysplasia in breast cancer patients who received adjuvant anthracycline. Eurasian J Med. 2011;43:173–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chachaj A, Małyszczak K, Pyszel K, et al. Physical and psychological impairments of women with upper limb lymphoedema, following breast cancer treatment. Psychooncology. 2010;19:299–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pyszel A, Malyszczak K, Pyszel K, Andrzejak R, Szuba A. Disability, psychological distress and quality of life in breast cancer survivors with arm lymphoedema. Lymphology. 2006;39:185–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cohen SR, Payne DK, Tunkel RS. Lymphedema: strategies for management. Cancer. 2001;92:980–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hamner JB, Fleming MD. Lymphedema therapy reduces the volume of edema and pain in patients with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:1904–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Karadibak D, Yavuzsen T, Saydam S. Prospective trial of intensive decongestive physiotherapy for upper extremity lymphedema. J Surg Oncol. 2008;97:572–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yamamoto R, Yamamoto T. Effectiveness of the treatment-phase of 2-phase complex decongestive physiotherapy for the treatment of extremity lymphedema. Int J Clin Oncol. 2007;12:463–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lawenda BD, Mondry TE, Johnstone PA. Lymphedema: a primer on the identification and management of a chronic condition in oncologic treatment. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59(1):8–24. doi:10.3322/caac.20001.

  28. Oremus M, Dayes I, Walker K, Raina P. Systematic review: conservative treatments for secondary lymphedema. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Devoogdt N, Christiaens MR, Geraerts I, et al. Effect of manual lymph drainage in addition to guidelines and exercise therapy on arm lymphoedema related to breast cancer: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2011;343:5326. doi:10.1136/bmj.d5326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Szuba A, Achalu R, Rockson SG. Decongestive lymphatic therapy for patients with breast carcinoma-associated lymphedema. A randomized, prospective study of a role for adjunctive intermittent pneumatic compression. Cancer. 2002;95:2260–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mellor RH, Bush NL, Stanton AW, Bamber JC, Levick JR, Mortimer PS. Dual-frequency ultrasound examination of skin and subcutis thickness in breast cancer related lymphedema. Breast J. 2004;10:496–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hulya Uzkeser.

About this article

Cite this article

Uzkeser, H., Karatay, S., Erdemci, B. et al. Efficacy of manual lymphatic drainage and intermittent pneumatic compression pump use in the treatment of lymphedema after mastectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Breast Cancer 22, 300–307 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-013-0481-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-013-0481-3

Keywords

Navigation