Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Heteroresistance to Fluconazol in Clinical and Environmental Brazilian Strains of Cryptococcus neoformans/C. gattii Species Complex

  • Clinical Mycology Lab Issues (S Córdoba, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Fungal Infection Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Study

To review the literature on heteroresistance to fluconazole (FLC) and investigate the level of heteroresistance to FLC (LHF), we analyzed 100 clinical and environmental Brazilian Cryptococcus strains.

Recent Findings

Heteroresistance is a phenomenon described as the emergence of resistant subpopulation cells within a single susceptible strain that can tolerate higher concentrations of fluconazole above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) level.

Summary

We found lower FLC-MICs (0.12–64 mg/L) than LHF (8–128 mg/L). Highly heteroresistant adapted subpopulations (256 mg/L) was found in minority (9%) strains, but importantly, 33% showed low FLC-MIC (8 mg/L). We concluded for similar LHF in both species, but higher LHF in clinical strains in comparison to environmental ones. Our findings stressed that the LHF is not correlated to species and pretty is strain-dependent and alert about high heteroresistant subpopulations that hardly reverts to the original LHF even upon the removal of drug pressure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Chakrabarti A, Jatana M, Kumar P, Chatha L, Kaushal A, Padhye AA. Isolation of Cryptococcus neoformans var. gattii from Eucalyptus camaldulensis in India. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35(12):3340–2.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen SC-A, Meyer W, Sorrell TC. Cryptococcus gattii infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014;27(4):980–1024.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Dixit A, Carroll SF, Qureshi ST. Cryptococcus gattii: an emerging cause of fungal disease in North America. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2009;2009:840452.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Byrnes EJ, Heitman J. Cryptococcus gattii outbreak expands into the Northwestern United States with fatal consequences. F1000 Biol Rep [Internet]. 2009 Aug 17 [cited 2016 Nov 16];1. Available from: http://www.f1000.com/prime/reports/b/1/62.

  5. Datta K, Bartlett KH, Baer R, Byrnes E, Galanis E, Heitman J, et al. Spread of Cryptococcus gattii into Pacific Northwest region of the United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15(8):1185–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kidd SE, Hagen F, Tscharke RL, Huynh M, Bartlett KH, Fyfe M, et al. A rare genotype of Cryptococcus gattii caused the cryptococcosis outbreak on Vancouver Island (British Columbia, Canada). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(49):17258–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Harris JR, Lockhart SR, Debess E, Marsden-Haug N, Goldoft M, Wohrle R, et al. Cryptococcus gattii in the United States: clinical aspects of infection with an emerging pathogen. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2011;53(12):1188–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Marr KA. Cryptococcus gattii: the tip of the iceberg. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53(12):1196–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Park B, Parka Kathleen A, Benjamin J. Parka, Chiller, Barbara J. Marstonc, et al. Estimation of the current global burden of cryptococcal meningitis among persons living with HIV/AIDS [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2016 Aug 29]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0b013e328322ffac

  10. Perfect JR, Dismukes WE, Dromer F, Goldman DL, Graybill JR, Hamill RJ, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of cryptococcal disease: 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society Of America. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2010 Feb 1;(AFST(3):291–322.

  11. •• Sionov E, Chang YC, Garraffo HM, Kwon-Chung KJ. Heteroresistance to fluconazole in Cryptococcus neoformans is intrinsic and associated with virulence. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53(7):2804–15. An early study that introduces the concept of heteroresisance to fluconazole among C. neoformans strains.

  12. •• Varma A, Kwon-Chung KJ. Heteroresistance of Cryptococcus gattii to fluconazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54(6):2303–11. An early study that introduces the concept of heteroresisance to fluconazole among C. gattii strains.

  13. Trilles L, Wang B, Firacative C, Lazéra M dos S, Wanke B, Meyer W. Identification of the major molecular types of Cryptococcus neoformans and C. gattii by hyperbranched rolling circle amplification. Wang P, editor. PLoS One 2014; 9(4):e94648.

  14. Silva PR da, Rabelo RA de S, de S, Terra APS, Teixeira DNS. Susceptibility to antifungal agents among Cryptococcus neoformans varieties isolated from patients at a university hospital. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2008;41(2):158–162.

  15. Andrade-Silva L, Ferreira-Paim K, Mora DJ, da Silva PR, Andrade AA, Lages-Silva E, et al. RAPD analysis with the primer L15996 of Brazilian clinical and environmental Cryptococcus neoformans isolates. Mycopathologia. 2012;174(1):53–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Souto ACP, Bonfietti LX, Ferreira-Paim K, Trilles L, Martins M, Ribeiro-Alves M, et al. Population genetic analysis reveals a high genetic diversity in the Brazilian Cryptococcus gattii VGII population and shifts the global origin from the Amazon rainforest to the semi-arid desert in the Northeast of Brazil. Reynolds TB, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2016;10(8):e0004885.

  17. Trilles L, Fernández-Torres B, dos Lazéra M, S, Wanke B, Guarro J. In vitro antifungal susceptibility of Cryptococcus gattii. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(10):4815–7.

  18. Arendrup MC, Meletiadis J, WMouton JW, Lagrou K, Petr Hamal, Guinea J and the Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing (AFST) of the ESCMID European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). EUCAST definitive document E.DEF 7.3.1: Method for the determination of broth dilution minimum inhibitory concentrations of antifungal agents for yeasts. [Internet] 2017 Jan 15 [cited 2017 Sep 23] Avaiable from: http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/ PDFs /EUCAST_files/AFST/ Files/EUCAST_E_Def_7_3_1_Yeast_testing__definitive.pdf.

  19. Vidal JE, Penalva de Oliveira AC, Dauar RF, Boulware DR. Strategies to reduce mortality and morbidity due to AIDS-related cryptococcal meningitis in Latin America. Braz J Infect Dis. 2013;17(3):353–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Witt MD, Lewis RJ, Larsen RA, Milefchik EN, Leal MAE, Haubrich RH, et al. Identification of patients with acute AIDS-associated cryptococcal meningitis who can be effectively treated with fluconazole: the role of antifungal susceptibility testing. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;22(2):322–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Friese G, Discher T, Füssle R, Schmalreck A, Lohmeyer J. Development of azole resistance during fluconazole maintenance therapy for AIDS-associated cryptococcal disease. AIDS Lond Engl. 2001;15(17):2344–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dannaoui E, Abdul M, Arpin M, Michel-Nguyen A, Piens MA, Favel A, et al. Results obtained with various antifungal susceptibility testing methods do not predict early clinical outcome in patients with cryptococcosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50(7):2464–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Gomez-Lopez A, Zaragoza O, Dos Anjos Martins M, Melhem MC, Rodriguez-Tudela JL, Cuenca-Estrella M. In vitro susceptibility of Cryptococcus gattii clinical strains. Clin Microbiol Infect Off Publ Eur Soc Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008;14(7):727–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. May RC, Stone NRH, Wiesner DL, Bicanic T, Nielsen K. Cryptococcus: from environmental saprophyte to global pathogen. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016;14(2):106–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. • Sionov E, Chang YC, Garraffo HM, Dolan MA, Ghannoum MA, Kwon-Chung KJ. Identification of a Cryptococcus neoformans cytochrome P450 lanosterol 14α-demethylase (Erg11) residue critical for differential susceptibility between fluconazole/voriconazole and itraconazole/posaconazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56(3):1162–9. A well-performed study on molecular mechanism of susceptibility to azole drugs.

  26. • Ngamskulrungroj P, Chang Y, Hansen B, Bugge C, Fischer E, Kwon-Chung KJ. Characterization of the chromosome 4 genes that affect fluconazole-induced disomy formation in Cryptococcus neoformans. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33022. An extensive and well-performed study suggesting the genes required for maintenance of endoplasmic reticulum integrity and their role for the formation of disomic chromosomes.

  27. •• Sionov E, Chang YC, Kwon-Chung KJ. Azole heteroresistance in Cryptococcus neoformans: emergence of resistant clones with chromosomal disomy in the mouse brain during fluconazole treatment. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57(10):5127–30. The first study showing the occurrence of the in vivo heteroresistance to fluconazole.

  28. •• Ngamskulrungroj P, Chang Y, Hansen B, Bugge C, Fischer E, Kwon-Chung KJ. Cryptococcus neoformans Yop1, an endoplasmic reticulum curvature-stabilizing protein, participates with Sey1 in influencing fluconazole-induced disomy formation. FEMS Yeast Res. 2012;12(7):748–54. A large study that demonstrates factors influencing disomy and presents important news in heteroresistance among C. neoformans strains.

  29. • Sionov E, Lee H, Chang YC, Kwon-Chung KJ. Cryptococcus neoformans overcomes stress of azole drugs by formation of disomy in specific multiple chromosomes. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6(4):e1000848. An early study demonstrating disomy as basis for heteroresistance to fluconazole in C. neoformans strains.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo - FAPESP (process number 2013/04567-5). We thank Dr. Marcio Rodrigues (Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) for kindly providing strain of C. neoformans H99. We thank Allan Antonio Kubo, Catia Regina Costa, Gisele Monteiro Santo Pedro, Gislene Palmeira Lucchi, Hélid Raquel Lautenschlaeger Rodrigues De Lucca, Olga Maria Diniz, and Sylvana Kwong Arregui Bay from Instituto Adolfo Lutz - Rio Claro, and Andrés Avelino Baez from Instituto Adolfo Lutz – São Paulo for excellent technical support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. S. C. Melhem.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

The article if part of Topical Collection on Clinical Mycology Lab Issues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feliciano, L.M., Ramos, S.D.P., Szeszs, M.W. et al. Heteroresistance to Fluconazol in Clinical and Environmental Brazilian Strains of Cryptococcus neoformans/C. gattii Species Complex. Curr Fungal Infect Rep 11, 190–196 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12281-017-0298-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12281-017-0298-1

Keywords

Navigation