Advertisement

Building Simulation

, Volume 11, Issue 5, pp 871–898 | Cite as

Building simulation: Ten challenges

  • Tianzhen Hong
  • Jared Langevin
  • Kaiyu Sun
Review Article

Abstract

Buildings consume more than one-third of the world’s primary energy. Reducing energy use and greenhouse-gas emissions in the buildings sector through energy conservation and efficiency improvements constitutes a key strategy for achieving global energy and environmental goals. Building performance simulation has been increasingly used as a tool for designing, operating and retrofitting buildings to save energy and utility costs. However, opportunities remain for researchers, software developers, practitioners and policymakers to maximize the value of building performance simulation in the design and operation of low energy buildings and communities that leverage interdisciplinary approaches to integrate humans, buildings, and the power grid at a large scale. This paper presents ten challenges that highlight some of the most important issues in building performance simulation, covering the full building life cycle and a wide range of modeling scales. The formulation and discussion of each challenge aims to provide insights into the state-of-the-art and future research opportunities for each topic, and to inspire new questions from young researchers in this field.

Keywords

building energy use energy efficiency building performance simulation energy modeling building life cycle zero-net-energy buildings 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy of the U.S. DOE under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231.

References

  1. ACEEE (2017). The State Energy Efficiency Scorecard. Available at http://aceee.org/state-policy/scorecard. Accessed 17 Aug 2017.
  2. Ahn KU, Kim DW, Park CS, de Wilde P (2017). Predictability of occupant presence and performance gap in building energy simulation. Applied Energy, 208: 1639–1652.Google Scholar
  3. Amazon (2017). Amazon Mechanical Turk. Available at https://www.mturk.com/mturk/welcome. Accessed 17 Aug 2017.
  4. American Heating and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) (2017). Historical Data. Available at http://www.ahrinet.org/Resources/Statistics/Historical-Data.aspx. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.
  5. American Heating and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) (2018). AHRI Certification Directory. Available at https://www.ahridirectory.org/ahridirectory/pages/home.aspx. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.
  6. Andrews CJ, Krogmann U (2009). Explaining the adoption of energyefficient technologies in U.S. commercial buildings. Energy and Buildings, 41: 287–294.Google Scholar
  7. Andrade-Cabrera C, Turner WJN, Burke D, Neu O, Finn DP (2016). Lumped parameter building model calibration using particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Asia Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association (ASIM 2016), Jeju Island, R.O. Korea.Google Scholar
  8. Andrade-Cabrera C, Burke D, Turner WJN, Finn DP (2017). Ensemble Calibration of lumped parameter retrofit building models using Particle Swarm Optimization. Energy and Buildings, 155: 513–532.Google Scholar
  9. ANSI/ASHRAE (2014). ASHRAE Guideline 14–2014. Measurement of Energy, Demand, and Water Savings. Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.Google Scholar
  10. Argonne National Laboratory (2018). NEK5000. Available at https://nek5000.mcs.anl.gov. Accessed 14 Jan 2018.
  11. Arup (2012). The Technical Feasibility of Zero Net Energy Buildings in California. Available at http://www.energydataweb.com/cpucFiles/pdaDocs/904/California_ZNE_Technical_Feasibility_Report_Final.pdf. Accessed 28 Jan 2018.
  12. Au-Yong CP, Ali AS, Ahmad F (2014). Improving occupants’ satisfaction with effective maintenance management of HVAC system in office buildings. Automation in Construction, 43: 31–37.Google Scholar
  13. Azar E, Menassa CC (2012). Agent-based modeling of occupants and their impact on energy use in commercial buildings. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 26: 506–518.Google Scholar
  14. Baetens D, De Coninck R, Jorissen R, Picard F, Helsen D, Saelens L (2015). OpenIDEAS—An open framework for integrated district energy simulations. In: Proceedings of the 14th International IBPSA Building Simulation Conference, Hyderabad, India.Google Scholar
  15. Baetens R, De Coninck R, Van Roy J, Verbruggen B, Driesen J, Helsen L, Saelens D (2012). Assessing electrical bottlenecks at feeder level for residential net zero-energy buildings by integrated system simulation. Applied Energy, 96: 74–83.Google Scholar
  16. Balaras CA, Dascalaki EG, Droutsa KG, Kontoyiannidis S (2016). Empirical assessment of calculated and actual heating energy use in Hellenic residential buildings. Applied Energy, 164: 115–132.Google Scholar
  17. BEMbook (2018). History of Building Energy Modeling. Available at http://bembook.ibpsa.us. Accessed 20 Jan 2018.
  18. Blum D, Wetter M (2017). MPCPy: An open-source software platform for model predictive control in buildings. In: Proceedings of the 15th International IBPSA Building Simulation Conference, San Francisco, USA.Google Scholar
  19. Bonvini M, Sohn MD, Granderson J, Wetter M, Piette MA (2014). Robust on-line fault detection diagnosis for HVAC components based on nonlinear state estimation techniques. Applied Energy, 124: 156–166.Google Scholar
  20. Bordass B, Cohen R, Field J (2004). Energy performance of non-domestic buildings: Closing the credibility gap. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Improving Energy Efficiency in Commercial Buildings.Google Scholar
  21. BSRIA and UBT (2014). the Soft Landings Framework.Google Scholar
  22. Burman E, Mumovic D, Kimpian J (2014). Towards measurement and verification of energy performance under the framework of the European directive for energy performance of buildings. Energy, 77: 153–163.Google Scholar
  23. Buskirk RV (2014). Estimating Energy Efficiency Technology Adoption Curve Elasticity with Respect to Government and Utility Development Program Indicators. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(93)90208-W. Google Scholar
  24. Cacabelos A, Eguía P, Febrero L, Granada E (2017). Development of a new multi-stage building energy model calibration methodology and validation in a public library. Energy and Buildings, 146: 182–199.Google Scholar
  25. Cai B, Liu Y, Fan Q, Zhang Y, Liu Z, Yu S, Ji R (2014). Multi-source information fusion based fault diagnosis of ground-source heat pump using Bayesian network. Applied Energy, 114: 1–9.Google Scholar
  26. Calì D, Osterhage T, Streblow R, Müller D (2016). Energy performance gap in refurbished German dwellings: Lesson learned from a field test. Energy and Buildings, 127: 1146–1158.Google Scholar
  27. California Public Utilities Commission (2008). California Long Term Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan. Available at http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=5305. Accessed 28 Jan 2018.
  28. Chandra Putra H, Andrews CJ, Senick JA (2017). An agent-based model of building occupant behavior during load shedding. Building Simulation, 10: 845–859.Google Scholar
  29. Chen Y, Hong T, Piette MA (2017). Automatic generation and simulation of urban building energy models based on city datasets for city-scale building retrofit analysis. Applied Energy, 205: 323–335.Google Scholar
  30. Chen Y, Hong T, Luo X (2018). An agent-based stochastic occupancy simulator. Building Simulation, 11: 37–49.Google Scholar
  31. Cheung H, Braun JE (2015). Development of Fault Models for Hybrid Fault Detection and Diagnostics Algorithm. Boulder, CO, USA: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.Google Scholar
  32. Cheung H, Braun JE (2016). Empirical modeling of the impacts of faults on water-cooled chiller power consumption for use in building simulation programs. Applied Thermal Engineering, 99: 756–764.Google Scholar
  33. Choi JH, Loftness V, Aziz A (2012). Post-occupancy evaluation of 20 office buildings as basis for future IEQ standards and guidelines. Energy and Buildings, 46: 167–175.Google Scholar
  34. Chong A, Lam KP, Pozzi M, Yang J (2017). Bayesian calibration of building energy models with large datasets. Energy and Buildings, 154: 343–355.Google Scholar
  35. Clarke JA (2001). Energy Simulation in Building Design. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  36. Clarke JA (2015). A vision for building performance simulation: A position paper prepared on behalf of the IBPSA Board. Building Performance Simulation, 8: 39–43.Google Scholar
  37. Clarke JA, Hensen JLM (2015). Integrated building performance simulation: Progress, prospects and requirements. Building and Environment, 91: 294–306.Google Scholar
  38. Clevenger CM, Haymaker J (2006). The impact of the building occupant on energy modeling simulations. In: Proceedings of the Joint International Conference on Computing and Decision Making in Civil and Building Engineering.Google Scholar
  39. Coakley D, Raftery P, Keane M (2014). A review of methods to match building energy simulation models to measured data. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 37: 123–141.Google Scholar
  40. Comstock MC, Braun JE, Groll EA (2002). A survey of common faults for chillers. ASHRAE Transactions, 108(1): 819–825.Google Scholar
  41. Cotts D, Roperathy K, Payant R (2010). The Facility Management Handbook, 3rd edn. New York: American Management Association.Google Scholar
  42. Consumer Technology Association (2018). Historical Sales Data. Available at https://www.cta.tech/Research-Standards/Historical-Sales-Data.aspx. Accessed 16 Aug 2017.
  43. Creswell JW (2006). The foundations of mixed methods research. In: Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL (eds), Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. pp. 19–52.Google Scholar
  44. Cui Y, Yan D, Hong T, Xiao C, Luo X, Zhang Q (2017). Comparison of typical year and multiyear building simulations using a 55-year actual weather data set from China. Applied Energy, 195: 890–904.Google Scholar
  45. Cumali Z, Sezgen O (1989). Simulation and optimization in the real time control of building environmental systems. In: Proceedings of International IBPSA Building Simulation Conference, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
  46. Dasgupta A, Prodromou A, Mumovic D (2012). Operational versus designed performance of low carbon schools in England: Bridging a credibility gap. HVAC & R Research, 18: 37–50.Google Scholar
  47. de Wilde P (2014). The gap between predicted and measured energy performance of buildings: A framework for investigation. Automation in Construction, 41: 40–49.Google Scholar
  48. de Dear RJ (1998). Global database of thermal comfort field experiments. ASHRAE Transactions, 104: 1141–1152.Google Scholar
  49. Djuric N, Novakovic V (2009). Review of possibilities and necessities for building lifetime commissioning. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13: 486–492.Google Scholar
  50. D’Oca S, Chen CF, Hong T, Belafi Z (2017). Synthesizing building physics with social psychology: An interdisciplinary framework for context and occupant behavior in office buildings. Energy Research and Social Science, 34: 240–251.Google Scholar
  51. D’Oca S, Hong T, Langevin J (2018). The human dimensions of energy use in buildings: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81: 732–742.Google Scholar
  52. Du Z, Jin X (2008). Multiple faults diagnosis for sensors in air handling unit using Fisher discriminant analysis. Energy Conversion and Management, 49: 3654–3665.Google Scholar
  53. Eley C (2016). Design Professional’s Guide to Zero Net Energy Buildings. Washington DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  54. Electric Power Research Institute (2018). Load Shape Library. Available at http://loadshape.epri.com. Accessed 21 Jan 2018.
  55. Elliott DB, Anderson DM, Belzer DB, Dirks JA (2004). Methodological framework for analysis of buildings-related programs. The GPRA metrics effort. Richland, WA, USA: Pacific Northwest National Lab.Google Scholar
  56. Emmanuel W, Jérôme K (2015). A verification of CitySim results using the BESTEST and monitored consumption values. In: Proceedings of Building Simulation Applications Conference, Bolzano, Italy.Google Scholar
  57. Energy and Environmental Economics (E3) (2016). Introduction—EnergyPATHWAYS Documentation. Available at http://energypathways.readthedocs.io/en/latest/introduction.html. Accessed 21 Jan 2018.
  58. ENERGY STAR (2017). Unit Shipment Data. Available at https://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=partners.unit_shipment_data.
  59. ENERGY STAR (2018). ENERGY STAR Certified Products. Available at https://data.energystar.gov. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.
  60. EPA Office of Air and Radiation (2017). National Awareness of ENERGY STAR for 2016: Analysis of 2016 CEE Household Survey. Washington DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
  61. European Commission–Energy (2018). EU Building Stock Observatory. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/eubuildings. Accessed 21 January 2018.
  62. Fabi V, Andersen RV, Corgnati S, Olesen BW (2012). Occupants’ window opening behaviour: A literature review of factors influencing occupant behaviour and models. Building and Environment, 58: 188–198.Google Scholar
  63. Fang Z, Li N, Li B, Luo G, Huang Y (2014). The effect of building envelope insulation on cooling energy consumption in summer. Energy and Buildings, 77: 197–205.Google Scholar
  64. Farese P, Gelman R, Hendron R (2012). A Tool to Prioritize Energy Efficiency Investments. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Available at http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy12osti/54799.pdf? Google Scholar
  65. Frei B, Sagerschnig C, Gyalistras D (2017). Performance gaps in Swiss buildings: An analysis of conflicting objectives and mitigation strategies. Energy Procedia, 122: 421–426.Google Scholar
  66. Fuchs M, Teichmann J, Lauster M, Streblow R, Müller D (2015). Approach for simulation-based scenario analyses of district energy systems. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Efficiency, Cost, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems.Google Scholar
  67. Gaetani I, Hoes PJ, Hensen JLM (2016). Occupant behavior in building energy simulation: Towards a fit-for-purpose modeling strategy. Energy and Buildings, 121: 188–204.Google Scholar
  68. Galvin R (2014). Making the ‘rebound effect’ more useful for performance evaluation of thermal retrofits of existing homes: Defining the ‘energy savings deficit’ and the ‘energy performance gap.’ Energy and Buildings, 69: 515–524.Google Scholar
  69. Garrett A, New J (2015). Scalable tuning of building models to hourly data. Energy, 84: 493–502.Google Scholar
  70. Gao D, Wang S, Shan K, Yan C (2016). A system-level fault detection and diagnosis method for low delta-T syndrome in the complex HVAC systems. Applied Energy, 164: 1028–1038.Google Scholar
  71. Ghahramani A, Jazizadeh F, Becerik-Gerber B (2014). A knowledge based approach for selecting energy-aware and comfort-driven HVAC temperature set points. Energy and Buildings, 85: 536–548.Google Scholar
  72. Gilshannon ST, Brown DR (1996). Review of methods for forecasting the market penetration of new technologies. U.S. Department of Energy, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, PNNL-11428. Available at https://doi.org/10.2172/432867. Google Scholar
  73. Göçer Ö, Hua Y, Göçer K (2015). Completing the missing link in building design process: Enhancing post-occupancy evaluation method for effective feedback for building performance. Building and Environment, 89: 14–27.Google Scholar
  74. Google Labs (2011). Google Correlate. Available at https://www.google.com/trends/correlate. Accessed 17 Aug 2017.
  75. Google Labs (2018). Google Trends. Available at https://trends.google.com/trends. Accessed 17 Aug 2017.
  76. Grimm V, Berger U, DeAngelis DL, Polhill JG, Giske J, Railsback SF (2010). The ODD protocol: A review and first update. Ecological Modelling, 221: 2760–2768.Google Scholar
  77. Gunay HB, O’Brien W, Beausoleil-Morrison I (2013). A critical review of observation studies, modeling, and simulation of adaptive occupant behaviors in offices. Building and Environment, 70: 31–47.Google Scholar
  78. Haldi F, Robinson D (2009). Interactions with window openings by office occupants. Building and Environment, 44: 2378–2395.Google Scholar
  79. Haldi F, Robinson D (2010). Adaptive actions on shading devices in response to local visual stimuli. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 3: 135–153.Google Scholar
  80. Han H, Cao Z, Gu B, Ren N (2012). PCA-SVM-Based Automated Fault Detection and Diagnosis (AFDD) for vapor-compression refrigeration systems. HVAC&R Research, 16: 295–313.Google Scholar
  81. Harish VSKV, Kumar A (2016). A review on modeling and simulation of building energy systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 56: 1272–1292.Google Scholar
  82. Haas R, Biermayr P (2000). The rebound effect for space heating empirical evidence from Austria. Energy Policy, 28: 403–410.Google Scholar
  83. Hens H, Parijs W, Deurinck M (2010). Energy consumption for heating and rebound effects. Energy and Buildings, 42: 105–110.Google Scholar
  84. Hensen JLM, Lamberts R (2011). Building Performance Simulation for Design and Operation. Abingdon, UK: Spon Press.Google Scholar
  85. Henser DA, Rose JM, Greene WH (2015). Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer, 2nd edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Heo Y, Choudhary R, Augenbroe GA (2012). Calibration of building energy models for retrofit analysis under uncertainty. Energy and Buildings, 47: 550–560.Google Scholar
  87. Heschong Mahone Group (2012). Road to ZNE: Mapping Pathways to ZNE Buildings in California. Available at https://energydesignresources.com/media/18918368/hmg-road-to-zne-final-report_withappendices.pdf. Accessed 28 Jan 2018.
  88. Heydarian A, Becerik-Gerber B (2017). Use of immersive virtual environments for occupant behaviour monitoring and data collection. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 10: 484–498.Google Scholar
  89. Higgins A, Paevere P, Gardner J, Quezada G (2012). Combining choice modelling and multi-criteria analysis for technology diffusion: An application to the uptake of electric vehicles. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79: 1399–1412.Google Scholar
  90. Higgins A, Syme M, McGregor J, Marquez L, Seo S (2014). Forecasting uptake of retrofit packages in office building stock under government incentives. Energy Policy, 65: 501–511.Google Scholar
  91. Hong T, Zhang J, Jiang Y (1997). IISABRE: An integrated building simulation environment. Building and Environment, 32: 219–224.Google Scholar
  92. Hong T, Chou SK, Bong TY (2000). Building simulation: An overview of developments and information sources. Building and Environment, 35: 347–361.Google Scholar
  93. Hong T, Fisk WJ (2010). Assessment of energy savings potential from the use of demand controlled ventilation in general office spaces in California. Building Simulation, 3: 117–124.Google Scholar
  94. Hong T, Lin HW (2013). Occupant behavior: Impact on energy use of private offices. In: Proceedings of the 1st Asia Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association (ASim 2012), Shanghai, China.Google Scholar
  95. Hong T, Chang W-K, Lin H-W (2013). A fresh look at weather impact on peak electricity demand and energy use of buildings using 30-year actual weather data. Applied Energy, 111: 333–350.Google Scholar
  96. Hong T, Piette MA, Chen Y, Lee SH, Taylor-Lange SC, Zhang R, Sun K, Price P (2015a). Commercial building energy saver: An energy retrofit analysis toolkit. Applied Energy, 159: 298–309.Google Scholar
  97. Hong T, D’Oca S, Taylor-Lange SC, Turner WJN, Chen Y, Corgnati SP (2015b). An ontology to represent energy-related occupant behavior in buildings. Part II: Implementation of the DNAS framework using an XML schema. Building and Environment, 94: 196–205.Google Scholar
  98. Hong T, D’Oca S, Turner W, Taylor-Lange SC (2015c). An ontology to represent energy-related occupant behavior in buildings. Part I: Introduction to the DNAs framework. Building and Environment, 92: 764–777.Google Scholar
  99. Hong T, Chen Y, Lee SH, Piette MA (2016a). CityBES: A web-based platform to support city-scale building energy efficiency. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Urban Computing Workshop, San Francisco, USA.Google Scholar
  100. Hong T, Sun K, Zhang R, Hinokuma R, Kasahara S, Yura Y (2016b). Development and validation of a new variable refrigerant flow system model in EnergyPlus. Energy and Buildings, 117: 399–411.Google Scholar
  101. Hong T, Sun H, Chen Y, Taylor-Lange SC, Yan D (2016c). An occupant behavior modeling tool for co-simulation. Energy and Buildings, 117: 272–281.Google Scholar
  102. Hong T, Yan D, D’Oca S, Chen CF (2017a). Ten questions concerning occupant behavior in buildings: The big picture. Building and Environment, 114: 518–530.Google Scholar
  103. Hong T, Kim J, Jeong J, Lee M, Ji C (2017b). Automatic calibration model of a building energy simulation using optimization algorithm. Energy Procedia, 105: 3698–3704.Google Scholar
  104. Hong T (2018). IEA EBC annexes advance technologies and strategies to reduce energy use and GHG emissions in buildings and communities. Energy and Buildings, 158: 147–149.Google Scholar
  105. Institute for Building Efficiency (2016). 2016 Energy Efficiency Indicator Survey. Milwaukee, WI, USA: Institute for Building Efficiency.Google Scholar
  106. International Energy Agency. (2017). Energy Technology Perspectives 2017: Catalysing Energy Technology Transformations. Available at https://doi.org/10.1787/energy_tech-2017-en.
  107. International Energy Agency (IEA) Energy in Buildings and Communities Programme (2018). IEA-EBC Annex 70—Building Energy Epidemiology: Analysis of Real Building Energy Use at Scale. Available at https://energyepidemiology.org. Accessed 21 Sept 2017.
  108. Jaccard M, Dennis M (2006). Estimating home energy decision parameters for a hybrid energy-economy policy model. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 11: 91–100.Google Scholar
  109. Johnson NR (2017). Building Energy Model Calibration for Retrofit Decision Making. Master Thesis, Portland State University, USA.Google Scholar
  110. Joint Global Change Research Institute (2017). Global Change Assessment Model. Available at http://www.globalchange.umd.edu/gcam. Accessed 21 Jan 2018.
  111. Jones RV, Fuertes A, de Wilde P (2015). The gap between simulated and measured energy performance: A case study across six identical new-build flats in the UK. In: Proceedings of International Conference of the International Building Performance Simulation Association.Google Scholar
  112. Karaguzel OT, Zhang R, Lam KP (2014). Coupling of whole-building energy simulation and multi-dimensional numerical optimization for minimizing the life cycle costs of office buildings, Building Simulation, 7: 111–121.Google Scholar
  113. Karlsson F, Rohdin P, Persson ML (2007). Measured and predicted energy demand of a low energy building: Important aspects when using Building Energy Simulation. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology, 28: 223–235.Google Scholar
  114. Keirstead J, Jennings M, Sivakumar A (2012). A review of urban energy system models: Approaches, challenges and opportunities. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16: 3847–3866.Google Scholar
  115. Kim YJ, Park CS (2016). Stepwise deterministic and stochastic calibration of an energy simulation model for an existing building. Energy and Buildings, 133: 455–468.Google Scholar
  116. Kim YS, Heidarinejad M, Dahlhausen M, Srebric J (2017). Building energy model calibration with schedules derived from electricity use data. Applied Energy, 190: 997–1007.Google Scholar
  117. Kok N, McGraw M, Quigley JM (2012). The diffusion over time and space of energy efficiency in building. Annals of Regional Science, 48: 541–564.Google Scholar
  118. Koomey J (2000). Avoiding “the big mistake” in forecasting technology adoption. In: Proceedings of the Energex Conference.Google Scholar
  119. Kristensen MH, Choudhary R, Petersen S (2017). Bayesian calibration of building energy models: Comparison of predictive accuracy using metered utility data of different temporal resolution. Energy Procedia, 122: 277–282.Google Scholar
  120. La Fleur L, Moshfegh B, Rohdin P (2017). Measured and predicted energy use and indoor climate before and after a major renovation of an apartment building in Sweden. Energy and Buildings, 146: 98–110.Google Scholar
  121. Lam KP, Zhao J, Ydstie EB, Wirick J, Qi M, Park J (2014). An EnergyPlus whole building energy model calibration method for office buildings using occupant behavior data mining and empirical data. In: Proceedings of 2014 ASHRAE/IBPSA-USA Building Simulation Conference, pp. 160–167.Google Scholar
  122. Langevin J, Gurian PL, Wen J (2015a). Tracking the human-building interaction: A longitudinal field study of occupant behavior in air-conditioned offices. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42: 94–115.Google Scholar
  123. Langevin J, Wen J, Gurian PL (2015b). Simulating the human-building interaction: Development and validation of an agent-based model of office occupant behaviors. Building and Environment, 88: 27–45.Google Scholar
  124. Langevin J, Wen J, Gurian PL (2016). Quantifying the human-building interaction: Considering the active, adaptive occupant in building performance simulation. Energy and Buildings, 117: 372–386.Google Scholar
  125. Lara RA, Naboni E, Pernigotto G, Cappelletti F, Zhang Y, Barzon F, Romagnoni P (2017). Optimization tools for building energy model calibration. Energy Procedia, 111: 1060–1069.Google Scholar
  126. Lauro F, Moretti F, Capozzoli A, Khan I, Pizzuti S, Macas M, Panzieri S (2014). Building fan coil electric consumption analysis with fuzzy approaches for fault detection and diagnosis. Energy Procedia, 62: 411–420.Google Scholar
  127. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (2018). FLEXLAB: Facility for Low-Energy eXperiments in Buildings. Available at https://Flexlab.lbl.gov. Accessed 14 Jan 2018.
  128. Lee YS, Malkawi AM (2014). Simulating multiple occupant behaviors in buildings: An agent-based modeling approach. Energy and Buildings, 69: 407–416.Google Scholar
  129. Lee T, Yao R, Coker P (2014). An analysis of UK policies for domestic energy reduction using an agent based tool. Energy Policy, 66: 267–279.Google Scholar
  130. Lee SH, Hong T, Piette MA, Sawaya G, Chen Y, Taylor-Lange SC (2015). Accelerating the energy retrofit of commercial buildings using a database of energy efficiency performance. Energy, 90: 738–747.Google Scholar
  131. Lee SH, Hong T (2017). Leveraging zone air temperature data to improve physics-based energy simulation of existing buildings. In: Proceedings of International IBPSA Building Simulation Conference, San Francisco, USA.Google Scholar
  132. Lee S, Bilionis I, Karava P, Tzempelikos A (2017). A Bayesian approach for probabilistic classification and inference of occupant thermal preferences in office buildings. Building and Environment, 118: 323–343.Google Scholar
  133. Li J (2011). Modeling household energy consumption and adoption of energy-efficient technology using recent micro-data. In: Proceedings of USAEE/IAEE North American Conference, Redefining the Energy Economy: Changing Roles of Industry, Government, and Research, Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
  134. Li X, Wen J (2014). Review of building energy modeling for control and operation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 37: 517–537.Google Scholar
  135. Li C, Hong T, Yan D (2014). An insight into actual energy use and its drivers in high-performance buildings. Applied Energy, 131: 394–410.Google Scholar
  136. Li D, Hu G, Spanos CJ (2016a). A data-driven strategy for detection and diagnosis of building chiller faults using linear discriminant analysis. Energy and Buildings, 128: 519–529.Google Scholar
  137. Li Q, Augenbroe G, Brown J (2016b). Assessment of linear emulators in lightweight Bayesian calibration of dynamic building energy models for parameter estimation and performance prediction. Energy and Buildings, 124: 194–202.Google Scholar
  138. Liang X, Hong T, Shen GQ (2016). Improving the accuracy of energy baseline models for commercial buildings with occupancy data. Applied Energy, 179: 247–260.Google Scholar
  139. Lim H, Zhai ZJ (2017a). Comprehensive evaluation of the influence of meta-models on Bayesian calibration. Energy and Buildings, 155: 66–75.Google Scholar
  140. Lim H, Zhai ZJ (2017b). Review on stochastic modeling methods for building stock energy prediction. Building Simulation, 10: 607–624.Google Scholar
  141. Lin H-W, Hong T (2013). On variations of space-heating energy use in office buildings. Applied Energy, 111: 515–528.Google Scholar
  142. Luo X, Hong T, Chen Y, Piette MA (2017). Electric load shape benchmarking for small- and medium-sized commercial buildings. Applied Energy, 204: 715–725.Google Scholar
  143. Maile T, Bazjanac V, Fischer M (2012). A method to compare simulated and measured data to assess building energy performance. Building and Environment, 56: 241–251.Google Scholar
  144. Manfren M, Aste N, Moshksar R (2013). Calibration and uncertainty analysis for computer models—A meta-model based approach for integrated building energy simulation. Applied Energy, 103: 627–641.Google Scholar
  145. Marmaras JM (2014). Measurement and verification—Retrocommissioning of a LEED gold rated building through means of an energy model: Are aggressive energy simulation models reliable? Master Thesis, University of Massachusetts Amherst, USA.Google Scholar
  146. Menezes AC, Cripps A, Bouchlaghem D, Buswell R (2012). Predicted vs. actual energy performance of non-domestic buildings: Using post-occupancy evaluation data to reduce the performance gap. Applied Energy, 97: 355–364.Google Scholar
  147. Mihai A, Zmeureanu R (2017). Bottom-up evidence-based calibration of the HVAC air-side loop of a building energy model. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 10: 105–123.Google Scholar
  148. Mills E, Bourassa N, Piette MA (2005). The cost-effectiveness of commissioning new and existing commercial buildings: Lessons from 224 buildings. In: Proceedings of the National Conference on Building Commissioning.Google Scholar
  149. MIT Sustainable Design Group (2016). Boston Citywide Energy Model. Available at http://web.mit.edu/sustainabledesignlab/projects/BostonEnergyModel. Accessed 15 May 2016.
  150. Mirakhorli A, Dong B (2016). Occupancy behavior based model predictive control for building indoor climate—A critical review. Energy and Buildings, 129: 499–513.Google Scholar
  151. Moglia M, Cook S, McGregor J (2017). A review of Agent-Based Modelling of technology diffusion with special reference to residential energy efficiency. Sustainable Cities and Society, 31: 173–182.Google Scholar
  152. Morari M, Lee JH (1999). Model predictive control: Past, present and future. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 23: 667–682.Google Scholar
  153. Muehleisen RT, Bergerson J, Collier N, Graziano DJ, Tatara E (2016). Agent based technology adoption model for program planning and design. In: Proceedings of 2016 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings.Google Scholar
  154. Müller MO (2013). Diffusion Dynamics of Energy-Efficient Renovations: Causalities and Policy Recommendations. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  155. Munir S, Stankovic JA, Liang CJM, Lin S (2013). Cyber physical system challenges for human-in-the-loop control. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Feedback Computing.Google Scholar
  156. Nachtrieb R (2013). System Dynamics model of residential and commercial lighting markets. In: Proceedings of the 31 International Conference of the System Dynamics Society.Google Scholar
  157. Najafi M, Auslander DM, Bartlett PL, Haves P, Sohn MD (2012). Application of machine learning in the fault diagnostics of air handling units. Applied Energy, 96: 347–358.Google Scholar
  158. Nagy Z, Yong FY, Frei M, Schlueter A (2015). Occupant centered lighting control for comfort and energy efficient building operation. Energy and Buildings, 94: 100–108.Google Scholar
  159. National Center for Atmospheric Research (2018). Weather Research and Forecasting Model. Available at http://www.mmm.ucar.edu/weather-research-and-forecasting-model. Accessed 14 Jan 2018.
  160. National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) (2018). Lamp Indices. Available at http://www.nema.org/Intelligence/Pages/Lamp-Indices.aspx. Accessed 11 Sept 2017.
  161. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. (2017). ResStock Analysis Tool. Available at https://www.nrel.gov/buildings/resstock.html. Accessed 21 Jan 2018.
  162. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2018). UrbanOpt. Available at https://www.nrel.gov/buildings/urbanopt.html. Accessed 8 Jan 2018.
  163. Navigant Consulting (2013). Demand-Side Resource Potential. Study Report. Prepared for: Kansas City Power and Light Energizing Life.Google Scholar
  164. Navigant Consulting (2016). Updated Buildings Sector Appliance and Equipment Costs and Efficiency. Available at https://www.eia.gov/analysis/studies/buildings/equipcosts/pdf/full.pdf.
  165. Navigant Consulting (2017). Residential End Uses: Historical Efficiency Data and Incremental Installed Costs for Efficiency Upgrades.Google Scholar
  166. Navigant Consulting and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (2011). Technical Support Document: Energy Efficiency Program for Consumer Products and Commercial and Industrial Equipment: Residential Clothes Dryers and Room Air Conditioners.Google Scholar
  167. Navigant Consulting and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (2014). Technical Support Document: Energy Efficiency Program for Consumer Products and Commercial and Industrial Equipment: General Service Lamps. Available at https://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EERE-2010-BT-STD-0037-0136.
  168. Navigant Consulting and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (2014). Technical Support Document: Energy Efficiency Program for Consumer Products and Commercial and Industrial Equipment: Commercial Packaged Boilers. Available at https://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EERE-2010-BT-STD-0037-0136.
  169. Navigant Consulting and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (2016). Technical Support Document: Energy Efficiency Program for Consumer Products and Commercial and Industrial Equipment: Commercial Water Heating Equipment.Google Scholar
  170. Nemtzow D (2017). Buildings and the Grid 101: Why Does it Matter for Energy Efficiency? Available at https://energy.gov/eere/buildings/articles/buildings-and-grid-101-why-does-it-matterenergy-efficiency. Accessed 21 Jan 2018.Google Scholar
  171. New Buildings Institute (2018). Getting to Zero Database. Available at https://newbuildings.org/resource/getting-to-zero-database. Accessed 28 Jan 2018.
  172. Noonan DS, Hsieh LHC, Matisoff D (2013). Spatial effects in energyefficient residential HVAC technology adoption. Environment and Behavior, 45: 476–503.Google Scholar
  173. Østergård T, Jensen RL, Maagaard SE (2016). Building simulations supporting decision making in early design—A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 61: 187–201.Google Scholar
  174. Otter M, Elmqvist H, Blochwitz T, Mauss J, Junghanns A, Olsson H (2011). Functional Mockup Interface—Overview. Available at http://synchronics.inria.fr/lib/exe/fetch.php/modelica-fmi-elmqvist.pdf. Google Scholar
  175. Palmer KA, Hale WT, Such KD, Shea BR, Bollas GM (2016). Optimal design of tests for heat exchanger fouling identification. Applied Thermal Engineering, 95: 382–393.Google Scholar
  176. Packey DJ (1993). Market penetration of new energy technologies. NREL/TP-462-4860. Golden, CO, USA: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.Google Scholar
  177. Pang X, Wetter M, Bhattacharya P, Haves P (2012). A framework for simulation-based real-time whole building performance assessment. Building and Environment, 54: 100–108.Google Scholar
  178. Pang X, Nouidui TS, Wetter M, Fuller D, Liao A, Haves P (2016). Building energy simulation in real time through an open standard interface. Energy and Buildings, 117: 282–289.Google Scholar
  179. Papadopoulos S, Azar E (2016). Integrating building performance simulation in agent-based modeling using regression surrogate models: A novel human-in-the-loop energy modeling approach. Energy and Buildings, 128: 214–223.Google Scholar
  180. Piette MA, Kinney SK, Haves P (2001). Analysis of an information monitoring and diagnostic system to improve building operations. Energy and Buildings, 33: 783–791.Google Scholar
  181. Piette MA, Hong T, Wetter M, et al. (2016). Hierarchical occupancy responsive model predictive control at room, building and campus levels. A proposal of the joint U.S.-China CERC-BEE program.Google Scholar
  182. Pomponi F, Moncaster A (2018). Scrutinising embodied carbon in buildings: The next performance gap made manifest. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81: 2431–2442.Google Scholar
  183. Raju PS, Teotia APS (1985). An Evaluation of Market Penetration Forecasting Methodologies for New Residential and Commercial Energy Technologies. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Minority Economic Impact Research and Education Division.Google Scholar
  184. Radhakrishnan N, Su Y, Su R, Poolla K (2016). Token based scheduling for energy management in building HVAC systems. Applied Energy, 173: 67–79.Google Scholar
  185. Ramos Ruiz G, Fernández Bandera C, Gómez-Acebo Temes T, Sánchez-Ostiz Gutierrez A (2016). Genetic algorithm for building envelope calibration. Applied Energy, 168: 691–705.Google Scholar
  186. Ratcliffe C, Chen H, Shanks TRW, Nam Y, Schreiner M, Zhan M, Sherraden M (2007). Assessing Asset Data on Low-Income Households: Current Availability and Options for Improvement. Available at http://psidonline.isr.umich.edu/Guide/Quality/AssessingAssetData.pdf%5Cnpapers2://publication/uuid/B1A68 A8F-A5A3-4F78-8D89-721D9AA90DFC.Google Scholar
  187. Reddy TA (2006). Literature Review on Calibration of Building Energy Simulation Programs. ASHRAE Transactions, 112: 226–240.Google Scholar
  188. Regnier C, Sun K, Hong T, Piette MA (2018). Quantifying the benefits of a building retrofit using an integrated system approach: A case study. Energy and Buildings, 159: 332–345.Google Scholar
  189. Reinhart CF, Dogan T, Jakubiec JA, Rakha T, Sang A (2013). Umi—An urban simulation environment for building energy use, daylighting and walkability. In: Proceedings of the 13th International IBPSA Building Simulation Conference, Chambéry, France.Google Scholar
  190. Reinhart CF, Davila CC (2016). Urban building energy modeling—A review of a nascent Field. Building and Environment, 97:196–202.Google Scholar
  191. Rocky Mountain Institute (2010). Black Belt Energy Modeling. Available at https://d231jw5ce53gcq.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Pathways-to-Zero_Black-Belt-Modeling_Matrix_2010.pdf. Accessed 28 Jan 2018.
  192. Robinson JF, Foxon TJ, Taylor PG (2016). Performance gap analysis case study of a non-domestic building. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers—Engineering Sustainability, 169: 31–38.Google Scholar
  193. Rogers EM (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. Available at https://doi.org/citeulike-article-id:126680. Google Scholar
  194. Roth A (2017). Building Energy Modeling 101: What Is It and What Is DOE’s Role? Available at https://energy.gov/eere/buildings/articles/building-energy-modeling-101-what-it-and-what-doe-srole. Accessed 28 Jan 2018.Google Scholar
  195. Salakij S, Yu N, Paolucci S, Antsaklis P (2016). Model-based predictive control for building energy management 1: Energy modeling and optimal control. Energy and Buildings, 133: 345–358.Google Scholar
  196. Samuelson HW, Ghorayshi A, Reinhart CF (2016). Analysis of a simplified calibration procedure for 18 design-phase building energy models. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 9: 17–29.Google Scholar
  197. Shen E, Hong T (2009). Simulation-based assessment of the energy savings benefits of integrated control in office buildings. Building Simulation, 2: 239–351.Google Scholar
  198. Sokol J, Cerezo Davila C, Reinhart C (2017). Validation of a Bayesianbased method for defining residential archetypes in urban building energy models. Energy and Buildings, 134: 11–24.Google Scholar
  199. Sopha BM, Klöckner CA, Hertwich EG (2013). Adoption and diffusion of heating systems in Norway: Coupling agent-based modeling with empirical research. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 8: 42–61.Google Scholar
  200. Sorrell S, Dimitropoulos J, Sommerville M (2009). Empirical estimates of the direct rebound effect: A review. Energy Policy, 37: 1356–1371.Google Scholar
  201. Sun Y (2014). Closing the building energy performance gap by improving our predictions. PhD Thesis, Georgia Tech, USA.Google Scholar
  202. Sun K, Yan D, Hong T, Guo S (2014). Stochastic modeling of overtime occupancy and its application in building energy simulation and calibration. Building and Environment, 79: 1–12.Google Scholar
  203. Sun K, Hong T, Taylor-Lange SC, Piette MA (2016). A pattern-based automated approach to building energy model calibration. Applied Energy, 165: 214–224.Google Scholar
  204. Sun K, Hong T (2017a). A framework for quantifying the impact of occupant behavior on energy savings of energy conservation measures. Energy and Buildings, 146: 383–396.Google Scholar
  205. Sun K, Hong T (2017b). A simulation approach to estimate energy savings potential of occupant behavior measures. Energy and Buildings, 136: 43–62.Google Scholar
  206. Sunikka-Blank M, Galvin R (2012). Introducing the prebound effect: The gap between performance and actual energy consumption. Building Research and Information, 40: 260–273.Google Scholar
  207. Tofield B (2012). Delivering a low-energy low energy building: Making quality commonplace. Build with CaRe report, University of East Anglia, Norwich.Google Scholar
  208. Transportation Utility Management System (2018). Available at http://wisconsindot.gov/Pages/doing-bus/eng-consultants/cnsltrsrces/util/tums.aspx. Accessed 14 Jan 2018.
  209. Trcka M, Hensen JLM, Wetter M (2009). Co-simulation of innovative integrated HVAC systems in buildings. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 2: 209–230.Google Scholar
  210. Turner C, Frankel M (2008). Energy Performance of LEED® for New Construction Buildings. New Buildings Institute.Google Scholar
  211. U.S. Census Bureau (2017a). American Community Survey (ACS). Available at https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs. Accessed 21 Aug 2017.
  212. U.S. Census Bureau (2017b). American Housing Survey (AHS). Available at https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/ahs.html. Accessed 21 Aug 2017.
  213. U.S. Department of Commerce. (2017). Data Archive. Available at https://www.bea.gov/histdata. Accessed 17 Aug 2017.
  214. U.S. Department of Energy Advanced Research Projects Agency (2014). DELTA Program Overview.Google Scholar
  215. U.S. Department of Energy (2015a). A common definition of zero energy buildings. Available at https://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2015/09/f26/bto_common_definition_zero_energy_buildings_093015.pdf. Accessed 28 Jan 2018.
  216. U.S. Department of Energy (2015b). Wireless Occupancy Sensors for Lighting Controls: An Applications Guide for Federal Facility Managers.Google Scholar
  217. U.S. Department of Energy (2018a). EnergyPlus. Available at http://EnergyPlus.net. Accessed 14 Jan 2018.
  218. U.S. Department of Energy (2018b). Sensors and Controls R&D. Available at https://energy.gov/eere/buildings/sensors-andcontrols-rd-0. Accessed 21 Jan 2018.
  219. U.S. Department of Energy (2018c). Exascale Computing Project. Available at https://www.exascaleproject.org. Accessed 14 Jan 2018.
  220. U.S. Department of Energy (2018d). Building Performance Database. Available at https://energy.gov/eere/buildings/building-performancedatabase. Accessed 21 Jan 2018.
  221. U.S. Department of Energy (2018e). Building Energy Data Exchange Specification (BEDES). Available at https://energy.gov/eere/buildings/building-energy-data-exchange-specification-bedes. Accessed 21 Jan 2018.
  222. U.S. Department of Energy Appliance Standards Program (2016). Commercial Packaged Boiler National Impact Analysis (NIA). Available at https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=EERE-2013-BT-STD-0030-0047. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.
  223. U.S. Department of Energy Building Technologies Office (2016). Multi-year program plan. Available at https://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2016/02/f29/BTO_MYPP_2016.pdf. Accessed 28 Jan 2018.
  224. U.S. Department of Energy Building Technologies Office (BTO) (2017). Scout. Available at https://energy.gov/eere/buildings/scout. Accessed 17 Aug 2017.
  225. U.S. Energy Information Administration (1998). Impacts of the Kyoto Protocol on US Energy Markets and Economic Activity. Energy Information Administration Report. Available at http://publication/uuid/25820077-B3E8-466C-AB36-DC2113CDE1B2.Google Scholar
  226. U.S. Energy Information Administration (2015). An Assessment of Interval Data and Their Potential Application to Residential Electricity End-Use Modeling.Google Scholar
  227. U.S. Energy Information Administration (2016). Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS). Available at https://www.eia.gov/consumption/commercial. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.
  228. U.S. Energy Information Administration (2017a). Annual Energy Outlook 2017. Available at https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.
  229. U.S. Energy Information Administration (2017b). Commercial Demand Module of the National Energy Modeling System: Model Documentation.Google Scholar
  230. U.S. Energy Information Administration (2017c). Residential Demand Module of the National Energy Modeling System: Model Documentation.Google Scholar
  231. U.S. Energy Information Administration (2017d). Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS). Available at https://www.eia.gov/consumption/residential. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.
  232. Van Dronkelaar C, Dowson M, Spataru C, Mumovic D (2016). A review of the energy performance gap and its underlying causes in non-domestic buildings. Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering, http://doi.org/10.3389/fmech.2015.00017. Google Scholar
  233. Wagner A, O’Brien L, Dong B (2018). Exploring Occupant Behavior in Buildings: Methods and Challenges. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.Google Scholar
  234. Wang S, Cui J (2005). Sensor-fault detection, diagnosis and estimation for centrifugal chiller systems using principal-component analysis method. Applied Energy, 82: 197–213.Google Scholar
  235. Wang C, Yan D, Jiang Y (2011). A novel approach for building occupancy simulation. Building Simulation, 4: 149–167.Google Scholar
  236. Wang L, Greenberg S, Fiegel J, Rubalcava A, Earni S, Pang X, Yin R, Woodworth S, Hernandez-Maldonado J (2013). Monitoring-based HVAC commissioning of an existing office building for energy efficiency. Applied Energy, 102: 1382–1390.Google Scholar
  237. Wang H, Zhai Z (2016). Advances in building simulation and computational techniques: A review between 1987 and 2014. Energy and Buildings, 128: 319–335.Google Scholar
  238. Weiss M, Junginger M, Patel MK, Blok K (2010). A review of experience curve analyses for energy demand technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77: 411–428.Google Scholar
  239. Wetter M (2009). Modelica-based modelling and simulation to support research and development in building energy and control systems. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 2: 143–161.Google Scholar
  240. Wetter M (2011). Co-simulation of building energy and control systems with the Building Controls Virtual Test Bed. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 4: 185–203.Google Scholar
  241. Wetter M, Fuchs M, Grozman M, Helsen P, Jorissen L, Müller F, Nytsch-Geusen D, Picard C, Sahlin D, Thorade P (2015a). IEA EBC Annex 60 Modelica Library—An international collaboration to develop a free open-source model library for buildings and community energy systems. In: Proceedings of the 14th International IBPSA Building Simulation Conference, Hyderabad, India.Google Scholar
  242. Wetter M, Bonvini M, Nouidui TS (2015b). Equation-based languages—A new paradigm for building energy modeling, simulation and optimization. Energy and Buildings, 117: 290–300.Google Scholar
  243. Wilkerson JT, Cullenward D, Davidian D, Weyant JP (2013). End use technology choice in the National Energy Modeling System (NEMS): An analysis of the residential and commercial building sectors. Energy Economics, 40: 773–784.Google Scholar
  244. Williams A, Atkinson B, Garbesi K, Page E, Rubinstein F (2012a). Lighting controls in commercial buildings. LEUKOS, 8(3): 161–180.Google Scholar
  245. Williams JH, DeBenedictis A, Ghanadan R, Mahone A, Moore J, et al. (2012b). The technology path to deep greenhouse gas emissions cuts by 2050: The pivotal role of electricity. Science, 335(6064): 53–59.Google Scholar
  246. Yan D, O’Brien W, Hong T, Feng X, Burak Gunay H, Tahmasebi F, Mahdavi A (2015). Occupant behavior modeling for building performance simulation: Current state and future challenges. Energy and Buildings, 107: 264–278.Google Scholar
  247. Yan D, Hong T, Dong B, Mahdavi A, D’Oca S, Gaetani I, Feng X (2017). IEA EBC Annex 66: Definition and simulation of occupant behavior in buildings. Energy and Buildings, 156: 258–270.Google Scholar
  248. Yin R, Kiliccote S, Piette MA (2014). Linking measurements and models in commercial buildings: A case study for model calibration and demand response strategy evaluation. Energy and Buildings, 124: 222–235.Google Scholar
  249. Yoshino H, Hong T, Nord N (2017). IEA EBC annex 53: Total energy use in buildings—Analysis and evaluation methods. Energy and Buildings, 152, 124–136.Google Scholar
  250. Yun GY, Song K (2017). Development of an automatic calibration method of a VRF energy model for the design of energy efficient buildings. Energy and Buildings, 135: 156–165.Google Scholar
  251. Zhang T, Nuttall WJ (2007). An agent based simulation of smart metering technology adoption. International Journal of Agent Technologies and Systems (IJATS). Available at https://doi.org/10.4018/jats.2012010102. Google Scholar
  252. Zhang R, Hong T (2017). Modeling of HVAC operational faults in building performance simulation. Applied Energy, 202: 178–188.Google Scholar
  253. Zhao Y, Wang S, Xiao F (2013). Pattern recognition-based chillers fault detection method using Support Vector Data Description (SVDD). Applied Energy, 112: 1041–1048.Google Scholar
  254. Zhou X, Hong T, Yan D (2014). Comparison of HVAC system modeling in EnergyPlus, DeST and DOE-2.1E. Building Simulation, 7: 21–33.Google Scholar
  255. Zhu D, Hong T, Yan D, Wang C (2013). A detailed loads comparison of three building energy modeling programs: EnergyPlus, DeST and DOE-2.1E. Building Simulation, 6: 323–335.Google Scholar
  256. Zibin N, Zmeureanu R, Love J (2016). Automatic assisted calibration tool for coupling building automation system trend data with commissioning. Automation in Construction, 61: 124–133.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Building Technology and Urban Systems DivisionLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations