Building Simulation

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 575–583 | Cite as

Bayesian estimation of occupancy distribution in a multi-room office building based on CO2 concentrations

Research Article Indoor/Outdoor Airflow and Air Quality
  • 57 Downloads

Abstract

Occupancy information in an office building is an important asset for determining energy-efficient operations and emergency evacuation of a building. In this study, we developed a method to estimate the occupancy distribution in a multi-room office building using Bayesian inference. The Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm was used to estimate the real-time occupancy in individual rooms based on indoor carbon dioxide concentrations. The office building was made-up of five rooms with different physical configurations and dimensions, and the rooms were air-conditioned and ventilated by a central air handling unit. The carbon dioxide concentration data were generated by the simulation software CONTAMW according to a given schedule of occupancy and the supply airflow rates in each room. The objective of the present paper is to investigate the effects of various parameters of Bayesian inference on the accuracy of estimation results. The parameters include the probability of prior information, the uncertainty level of CO2 data, and the time interval for monitoring CO2.

Keywords

Bayesian inference occupancy estimation carbon dioxide office building 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2016R1D1A1B01009625) and by the Industry-Academic Cooperation Program to support Industry Research Institute (C0340813).

References

  1. Banerjee S, Carlin BP, Gelfand AE (2014). Hierarchical Modeling and Analysis for Spatial Data, 2nd edn. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Benezeth Y, Laurent H, Emile B, Rosenberger C (2011). Towards a sensor for detecting human presence and characterizing activity. Energy and Buildings, 43: 305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Calì D, Matthes P, Huchtemann K, Streblow R, Müller D (2015). CO2 based occupancy detection algorithm: Experimental analysis and validation for office and residential buildings. Building and Environment, 86: 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dodier RH, Henze GP, Tiller DK, Guo X (2006). Building occupancy detection through sensor belief networks. Energy and Buildings, 38: 1033–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dong B, Andrews B, Lam KP, Höynck M, Zhang R, Chiou Y-S, Benitez D (2010). An information technology enabled sustainability test-bed (ITEST) for occupancy detection through an environmental sensing network. Energy and Buildings, 42: 1038–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Erickson VL, Carreira-Perpiñán MÁ, Cerpa AE (2014). Occupancy modeling and prediction for building energy management. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, 10(3): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Han H, Jang KJ, Han C, Lee J (2013). Occupancy estimation based on CO2 concentration using dynamic neural network model. In: Proceedings of the 34th Air Infiltration and Ventilation Centre Conference, Athens, Greece.Google Scholar
  8. Kruschke JK (2010). Doing Bayesian Data Analysis: A Tutorial with R and BUGS. Burlington, MA, USA: Academic Press.MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Li N, Calis G, Becerik-Gerber B (2012). Measuring and monitoring occupancy with an RFID based system for demand-driven HVAC operations. Automation in Construction, 24: 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nyarko K, Wright-Brown C (2013). Cloud based passive building occupancy characterization for attack and disaster response. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security, Waltham, MA, USA.Google Scholar
  11. Shin C, Han H (2015). Occupancy estimation in a subway station using Bayesian simulation based on carbon dioxide and particle concentrations. International Journal of Mechanical Systems Engineering, 1: 106. https://doi.org/10.15344/2455-7412/2015/106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Teixeira T, Dublon G, Savvides A (2010). A survey of human-sensing: Methods for detecting presence, count, location, track, and identity. ENALAB Technical Report 09-2010, Vo1, No. 1. Available at https://papers.ger.sh/Teixeira-SurveyHumanSensing-2010.pdf.Google Scholar
  13. U. S. DOE (2007). Building Energy Data Book. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy.Google Scholar
  14. Zhang R, Lam KP, Chiou YS, Dong B (2012). Information-theoretic environment features selection for occupancy detection in open office spaces. Building Simulation, 5: 179–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Zhao Y, Zeiler W, Boxem G, Labeodan T (2015). Virtual occupancy sensors for real-time occupancy information in buildings. Building and Environment, 93: 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kookmin UniversitySeoulR.O. Korea

Personalised recommendations