Building Simulation

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 323–336 | Cite as

An approach for building design optimization using design of experiments

Research Article Building Thermal, Lighting, and Acoustics Modeling

Abstract

Building simulation based optimization involves direct coupling of the optimization algorithm to a simulation model, making it computationally intensive. To overcome this issue, an approach is proposed using a combination of experimental design techniques (fractional factorial design and response surface methodology). These techniques approximate the simulation model behavior using surrogate models, which are several orders of magnitude faster than the simulation model. Fractional factorial design is used to identify the significant design variables. Response surface methodology is used to create surrogate models for the annual cooling and lighting energy with the screened significant variables. The error for these models is less than 10%, validating their effectiveness. These surrogate models speed up optimization with genetic algorithms, for single- and multi-objective optimization problems and scenario analyses, resulting in a better solution. Thus, optimization becomes possible within reasonable computational time with the proposed methodology. This framework is illustrated using the case study of a three-storey office building for New Delhi.

Keywords

factorial design sensitivity analysis response surface methodology surrogate modelling genetic algorithms optimization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams BM, Mohamed SE, William JB, Keith RD, John PE, Kenneth TH, Lara EB, et al. (2014). Dakota, a multilevel parallel objectoriented framework for design optimization, parameter estimation, uncertainty quantification, and sensitivity analysis. Version 6.0 theory manual. Albuquerque, NW, USA: Sandia National Laboratories.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarez LF (2000). Design optimization based on genetic programming. PhD Thesis, University of Bradford, UK.Google Scholar
  3. Deb K (2001). Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Dhariwal J, Banerjee R (2015). Building simulation based optimization through design of experiments. Paper presented at 2nd IBPSAItaly Conference (BSA2015), Bozen-Bolzano, Italy.Google Scholar
  5. Eisenhower B, O’Neill Z, Narayanan S, Fonoberov VA, Mezić I (2012). A methodology for meta-model based optimization in building energy models. Energy and Buildings, 47: 292–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. EnergyPlus (2014). EnergyPlus Engineering Reference, the Reference to EnergyPlus Calculations. Available at http://www.energyplus.gov. Accessed 15 Nov 2014.Google Scholar
  7. Evins R, Pointer P, Vaidyanathan R, Burgess S (2012). A case study exploring regulated energy use in domestic buildings using design of experiments and multi-objective optimisation. Building and Environment, 54: 126–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. GCCA (2015). A Practical Guide to Cool Roofs and Cool Pavements. Global Cool Cities Alliance, Available at http://www.coolrooftoolkit.org/. Accessed 15 Nov 2015.Google Scholar
  9. Gerber DJ, Ibanez M (2014). Paradigms in Computing: Making, Machines, and Models for Design Agency in Architecture. Los Angeles: eVolo.Google Scholar
  10. Gerber DJ, Pantazis E, Marcolino L, Heydarian A (2015). A multi agent systems for design simulation framework: Experiments with virtual physical social feedback for architecture. In: Proceedings of Symposium on Simulation for Architecture & Urban Design (SimAUD), Part of Spring Simulation Multiconference (SpringSim), Alexandria, VA, USA.Google Scholar
  11. Gong X, Akashi Y, Sumiyoshi D (2012). Optimization of passive design measures for residential buildings in different Chinese areas. Building and Environment, 58: 46–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. IBPSA (2015). BS2015 student competition. Available at http://www.ibpsa.org/?page_id=464. Accessed 15 Nov 2015.Google Scholar
  13. IGBC (2011). Green Building Rating System for New Construction and Major Renovations, LEED 2011 for India. Hyderabad, India: Indian Green Building Council.Google Scholar
  14. Iooss B, Lemaître P (2015). A review on global sensitivity analysis methods. In: Dellino G, Meloni C (eds), Uncertainty Management in Simulation-Optimization of Complex Systems: Algorithms and Applications. New York: Springer. pp. 101–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jin Q, Overend M (2012). Facade renovation for a public building based on a wholelife value approach. In: Proceedings of Building Simulation and Optimization Conference, Loughborough, UK.Google Scholar
  16. Karaguzel OT, Zhang R, Lam KP (2014). Coupling of whole-building energy simulation and multi-dimensional numerical optimization for minimizing the life cycle costs of office buildings. Building Simulation, 7: 111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Machairas V, Tsangrassoulis A, Axarli K (2014). Algorithms for optimization of building design: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 31: 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Magnier L, Haghighat F (2010). Multiobjective optimization of building design using TRNSYS simulations, genetic algorithm, and Artificial Neural Network. Building and Environment, 45: 739–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Manu S, Shukla Y, Rawal R, de Dear R, Thomas L (2014). India Model for Adaptive (thermal) Comfort-IMAC 2014. Ahmedabad: CARBSE. Available at http://www.carbse.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Introduction_IMAC2014.pdf.Google Scholar
  20. MERC (2014). Electricity Tariff for Reliance Infrastructure— Distribution Consumers. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, Available at http://www.rinfra.com/pdf/Tariff_for_ uploading_010414.pdf. Accessed 15 Nov 2014.Google Scholar
  21. Montgomery DC (2007). Design and Analysis of Experiments. New Delhi: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  22. Nassif N (2014). Modeling and optimization of HVAC systems using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm. Building Simulation, 7: 237–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nayak JK, Prajapati JA (2006). Handbook on Energy Conscious Buildings. IIT Bombay and Solar Energy Centre, Ministry of Non-Conventional Energy Sources, Government of India: R & D project no. 3/4(03)/99-SEC.Google Scholar
  24. Nguyen AT, Reiter S (2014). Passive designs and strategies for lowcost housing using simulation-based optimization and different thermal comfort criteria. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 7: 68–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nguyen AT, Reiter S, Rigo P (2014). A review on simulation-based optimization methods applied to building performance analysis. Applied Energy, 113: 1043–1058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nguyen AT, Reiter S (2015). A performance comparison of sensitivity analysis methods for building energy models. Building Simulation, 8: 651–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. RADIANCE (2016). The RADIANCE 4.2 Synthetic Imaging System. Available at http://radsite.lbl.gov/radiance/. Accessed 10 Oct 2016.Google Scholar
  28. Ramesh T, Prakash R, Shukla KK (2012). Life cycle energy analysis of a residential building with different envelopes and climates in Indian context. Applied Energy, 89: 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reeves CR, Wright C (1996). Genetic algorithms and the design of experiments. In: Davis LD, De Jong K, Vose MD, Whitley LD (eds), Evolutionary Algorithms. New York: Springer. pp. 207–226.Google Scholar
  30. Robertson JJ, Polly BJ, Collis JM (2015). Reduced-order modeling and simulated annealing optimization for efficient residential building utility bill calibration. Applied Energy, 148: 169–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. SSEF (2014). Cool Roofs for Cool Delhi. Shakti Sustainable Energy Foundation, Available at http://shaktifoundation.in/initiative/cool-roofs-for-cool-delhi/. Accessed 15 Nov 2014.Google Scholar
  32. Stat-Ease (2014). Design-Expert® software, version 9. Available at http://www.statease.com.Google Scholar
  33. Tian W (2013). A review of sensitivity analysis methods in building energy analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 20: 411–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tresidder E, Zhang Y, Forrester AIJ (2012). Acceleration of building design optimisation through the use of Kriging surrogate models. Paper presented at First Building Simulation and Optimization Conference (BSO12), Loughborough, UK.Google Scholar
  35. Twiga (2014). Twiga Insul. Available at http://www.twigafiber.com/twigainsul.php. Accessed 15 Nov 2014.Google Scholar
  36. Wetter M (2009). GenOpt, Generic Optimization Program—User Manual, Version 3.0.0. Technical Report LBNL-2077E. Berkeley, USA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wetter M, Wright J (2004). A comparison of deterministic and probabilistic optimization algorithms for nonsmooth simulationbased optimization. Building and Environment, 39: 989–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Energy Science and EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology BombayMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of ArchitectureMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations