Building Simulation

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 419–429 | Cite as

Fast simulation of dynamic heat transfer through building envelope via model order reduction

Research Article Advances in Modeling and Simulation Tools

Abstract

In this paper, a fast and accurate numerical simulation method on dynamic heat transfer through building envelopes has been developed by using the Krylov subspace and the balanced truncation model order reduction (MOR) algorithms. The computational accuracy and efficiency of the two MOR algorithms are discussed through the numerical simulation on a roof heat transfer in a one-day period, and then the two verified algorithms are applied to simulate the heat transfer through a multilayer wall for a week and the two-dimensional heat transfer through an L-shape thermal bridge. The results show that the relative errors of the two algorithms to the harmonic response method or to the direct solution method are all less than 1%, and the solving time with the two MOR algorithms decreases greatly. In addition, the Krylov subspace MOR algorithm has a faster solving speed and is more suitable for solving the heat transfer through a building envelope than the balanced truncation MOR algorithm.

Keywords

dynamic heat transfer model order reduction (MOR) Krylov subspace balanced truncation building envelope 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agdas D, Srinivasan RS (2014). Building energy simulation and parallel computing: Opportunities and challenges. In: Proceedings of 2014 Winter Simulation Conference, Savannah, GA, USA, pp. 3167–3175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antoulas AC (2005). Approximation of Large-Scale Dynamical Systems. Philadelphia: SIAM.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Arendt K, Krzaczek M (2014). Co-simulation strategy of transient CFD and heat transfer in building thermal envelope based on calibrated heat transfer coefficients. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 85: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ascione F, Bianco N, Masi R F D, et al. (2013). Simplified state space representation for evaluating thermal bridges in building: Modelling, application and validation of a methodology. Applied Thermal Engineering, 61: 344–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bai Z (2002). Krylov subspace techniques for reduced-order modeling of large-scale dynamical systems. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 43: 9–44.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Beattie CA, Gugercin S (2007). Krylov-based minimization for optimal H2 model reduction. In: Proceedings of 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 4385–4390.Google Scholar
  7. Chen P, Cao S, Guo J (1987). Air Conditioning Load Calculation Theory and Method. Shanghai: Tongji University Press. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  8. Chinese Meteorological Information Center (2005). Chinese building thermal environment analysis of meteorological data. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  9. Chu CC, Lai MH, Feng WS (2006). The multiple point global Lanczos method for multiple-inputs multiple-outputs interconnect order reductions. IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics Communications and Computer Sciences, E89-A: 2706–2716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chu CC, Lai MH, Feng WS (2008). Model Order reductions for MIMO systems using globa Krylov subspace methods. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 79: 1153–1164.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Feldman P, Freund RW (1995). Reduced-order modelling of large linear subcircuits via a block Lanczos algorithm. In: Proceeding of 32nd Design Automation Conference, pp. 474–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Freund RW (2000). Krylov-subspace methods for reduced-order modeling in circuit simulation. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 123: 395–421.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Gao Y, Fan R, Zhang QL, Roux JJ (2014). Building dynamic thermal simulation of low-order multi-dimensional heat transfer. Journal of Central South University, 1: 293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garg V, Chandrasen K, Mathur J, Tetali S, Jawa A (2011). Development and performance evaluation of a methodology, based on distributed computing, for speeding EnergyPlus simulation. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 4: 257–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Garg V, Jawa A, Mathur J, Bhatia A (2014). Development and analysis of a tool for speed up of EnergyPlus through parallelization. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 7: 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grimme EJ (1997). Krylov projection methods for model reduction. PhD Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA.Google Scholar
  17. Gugercin S, Antoulas AC (2004). A survey of model reduction by balanced truncation and some new results. International Journal of Control, 77: 748–766.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. He X, Kong Q, Xiao Z (2015). Fast simulation methods for dynamic heat transfer through building envelope based on model-orderreduction. In: Proceedings of 9th International Symposium on Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (ISHVAC) and 3rd International Conference on Building Energy and Environment (COBEE), Tianjin, China.Google Scholar
  19. Ibrahim M, Biwole PH, Wurtz E, Achard P (2014). A study on the thermal performance of exterior walls covered with a recently patented silica-aerogel-based insulating coating. Building and Environment, 81: 112–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jiang Y (2010). Model Order Reduction Method. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  21. Kontoleon KJ, Theodosiou ThG, Tsikaloudaki KG (2013). The influence of concrete density and conductivity on walls’ thermal inertia parameters under a variety of masonry and insulation placements. Applied Energy, 112: 325–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Koyunbaba BK, Yilmaz Z, Ulgen K (2013). An approach for energy modeling of a building integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) Trombe wall system. Energy and Buildings, 67: 680–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li K, Su H, Chu J, Xu C (2013). A fast-POD model for simulation and control of indoor thermal environment of buildings. Building and Environment, 60: 150–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lin Y, Bao L, Wei Y (2009). Order reduction of bilinear MIMO dynamical systems using new block Krylov subspaces. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 58: 1093–1102.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Li RC, Bai ZJ (2005). Structure-preserving model reduction using Krylov subspace projection formulation. Communication in Mathematical Science, 3: 179–199.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Manso M, Castro-Gomes J (2015). Green wall systems: A review of their characteristics. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41: 863–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moore B (1981). Principal component analysis in linear systems: Controllability, observability, and model reduction. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 26: 17–32.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Pernebo L, Silverman LM (1982). Model reduction via balanced state space representations. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 27: 382–387.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Sorensen DC, Antoulas AC (2002). The Sylvester equation and approximate balanced reduction. Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 351: 671–700.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhou X, Hong T, Yan D (2014). Comparison of HVAC system modeling in EnergyPlus, DeST and DOE-2.1E. Building Simulation, 7: 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhu D, Hong T, Yan D, Wang C (2013). A detailed loads comparison of three building energy modeling programs: EnergyPlus, DeST and DOE-2.1E. Building Simulation, 6: 323–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Human Settlement & Civil EngineeringXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’an, ShaanxiChina
  2. 2.School of Mathematics & StatisticsXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’an, ShaanxiChina

Personalised recommendations