Immunomodulation in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Current State and Future Perspectives

Abstract

The heart failure (HF) epidemic is growing and approximately half of the HF patients have heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). HFpEF is a heterogeneous syndrome, characterized by a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≥ 50%) with diastolic dysfunction, and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Underlying comorbidities of HFpEF, i.e., hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, obesity, and renal failure, lead to a systemic pro-inflammatory state, thereby affecting normal cardiac function. Increased inflammatory biomarkers predict incident HFpEF and are higher in patients with HFpEF as compared with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Randomized trials in HFpEF patients using traditional HF medication failed to demonstrate a clear benefit on hard endpoints (mortality and/or HF hospitalization). Therefore, therapies targeting underlying comorbidities and systemic inflammation in early HFpEF may provide better opportunities. Here, we provide an overview of the current state and future perspectives of immunomodulatory therapies for HFpEF.

Introduction

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for ≈ 50% of all heart failure (HF) patients (≈ 6.2 million American adults with HF from 2013 to 2016) with increased prevalence in the elderly population (> 70 years) and women (> 80% of all HF diagnoses) [1,2,3,4]. HFpEF is diagnosed when HF symptoms are present in combination with signs of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) and elevated levels of natriuretic peptides are evident, but left ventricular ejection fraction is preserved (LVEF ≥ 50%) [5]. HFpEF is accompanied by a plethora of comorbidities, including hypertension, obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and coronary artery disease, which contribute to increased morbidity and mortality [3, 6,7,8]. Some comorbidities cause a chronic pro-inflammatory state, leading to structural and functional alterations of the vasculature and myocardium ultimately resulting in the clinical syndrome of HFpEF [6, 9,10,11,12]. Persisting “chronic” inflammation is one of the hallmarks of disease progression, with disturbances in humoral anti-cardiac autoimmunity as one of the involved pathways [8, 11, 13]. HFpEF is associated with elevated levels of cytokines, chemokines, and endothelial adhesion molecules promoting infiltration of activated inflammatory cells into the heart [8, 9]. Altogether, these data suggest that therapies targeting inflammation could be more effective in HFpEF than current treatment options. This review summarizes traditional therapies for HFpEF and its comorbidities with a chronic inflammatory profile and discusses the current state and future perspectives of immunomodulation, based on experimental and preclinical models.

Current Treatment Options for HFpEF

Guideline-Based HFrEF Treatment

Thus far, randomized trials in HFpEF patients using traditional HF medication failed to demonstrate a benefit on mortality and hospitalization for HF (HHF) [11]. Despite proven efficacy in HFrEF, β-blockers (nebivolol), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB; candesartan, irbesartan), ACE inhibitors (ACEi; perindopril), and digoxin showed a neutral effect on mortality and hospitalization in the HFpEF population. Supplementary Table 1 provides an overview of important phase III clinical trials for HFpEF. Given the important role of inflammation in HFpEF [14], it is striking that effects on the inflammatory state are in most cases not reported. Only the TOPCAT trial measured high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) [15], which were not affected by treatment and may have contributed to the lack of benefit.

Comorbidities with a Chronic Inflammatory Profile

Trials targeting systemic inflammation in HFpEF are currently lacking. Therefore, we summarize preclinical research and ongoing trials focusing on hypertension and T2DM, which have a known inflammatory phenotype.

Hypertension

Hypertension is the most common comorbidity (> 65%) in HFpEF and associated with inflammation [16]. Angiotensin II is responsible for hypertension-induced inflammation and subsequent myocardial and vascular damage [17]. However, commonly used drugs for hypertension (ACEi, ARB) showed a neutral effect on mortality or HHF (Supplementary Table 1). Data on calcium channel blockers in HFpEF patients are lacking, although trials in HFpEF patients with pulmonary hypertension are ongoing (identifier: NCT03153111, NCT03620526, and NCT03043651).

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Approximately 45% of all HFpEF patients have T2DM, and T2DM patients are twice as likely to develop HF [18]. T2DM increases morbidity and mortality in HFpEF patients [19, 20]. Several mechanisms could explain this increased risk. Insulin resistance enhances free fatty acid metabolism and reduces myocardial glucose uptake, leading to increasing amounts of toxic intermediates and reactive oxygen species (ROS) [21]. Subsequent secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines by the myocardium and epicardium attracts macrophages impairing myocardial and vascular function [22]. Furthermore, hyperglycemia increases sodium retention, and T2DM patients in general have increased neurohumoral activation [23].

Metformin

Metformin decreases hepatic glucose production, increases tissue insulin sensitivity, and is associated with improved cardiac outcome based on experimental models. Metformin attenuated LV remodeling in a hypertensive rat model by inhibiting aldosterone-induced fibroblast activation [24]. A study assessing the effect of metformin on functional capacity and hemodynamic parameters in HFpEF patients with pulmonary hypertension is ongoing (NCT03629340).

Thiazolidinediones

Thiazolidinediones (glitazones) stimulate fatty acid storage in adipocytes, thereby increasing glucose utilization and lowering serum glucose level. However, they may cause sodium and water retention leading to congestion [5]. Dipeptidylpeptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i; gliptins) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, which increase insulin release and prolong its action, are suggested to worsen HF although the exact mechanism remains unclear [25, 26].

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors (SGLT2i)

This novel class of drugs showed benefits beyond glycemic control in preventing HF in T2DM patients. SGLT2i reduces renal glucose reabsorption and increases urinary glucose excretion, next to restoration of sodium delivery, thereby increasing diuresis [27,28,29]. The EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial was first to show a 38% reduction in cardiovascular mortality in high-risk patients with T2DM [27, 29]. The phase III clinical trial testing empafligozin in HFpEF patients with and without T2DM (EMPEROR-PRESERVED; NCT03057951) is still ongoing [30]. Furthermore, an ongoing study testing dapafligozin in HFpEF patients (PRESERVED-HF; NCT03030235) is assessing changes in N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels as primary outcome.

Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (PPAR-γ) Agonists

PPAR-γ agonists (glitazones) reduce inflammation, oxidative stress, and hypertrophy in adipocytes and cardiomyocytes [31]. In a HFpEF rat model (8%NaCl-diet), pioglitazone attenuated the development of LV fibrosis and stiffening and prevented development of HFpEF [32]. Another study with obese rats showed that pioglitazone attenuated LV hypertrophy, fibrosis, and LVDD [33]. An observational study with pioglitazone demonstrated improvement in diastolic filling properties in patients with T2DM [34].

Obesity and Lipid Metabolism

Obesity and hyperlipidemia are important comorbidities in HFpEF and linked to systemic inflammation [35]. Weight loss improved exercise capacity and led to a reduction in hs-CRP [36] and reduced pulmonary artery pressure leading to an improved hemodynamic profile [37]. Due to the metabolic derangement in obesity, hyperlipidemia is frequently present leading to the prescription of statins, which gained interest for their beneficial pleiotropic effects including improvement of endothelial dysfunction and antioxidant- and anti-inflammatory properties in cardiovascular disease [38]. Importantly, statins also exert a direct immunomodulatory effect by reducing expression of major histocompatibility complex II (MHCII) and T cell response [39]. Although currently not recommended as standard therapy, statins might improve outcome in HFpEF [40]. In an experimental HFpEF rat model, statins suppressed concentric remodeling and decreased collagen synthesis [41]. A recent post hoc analysis of the TOPCAT trial and a large registry (> 113.000 patients) showed associations between statin use and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality [42, 43]. Taken together, statins hold great potential, but large clinical trials are necessary to show improvement in mortality and/or hospitalization.

Immunomodulation in HFpEF

Although inflammation is a major driver in the pathophysiology of HFpEF, trials primarily focusing on systemic inflammatory pathways in HFpEF are currently lacking. Targeting specific components of the inflammatory process might decrease cardiac remodeling and benefit cardiac function. Based on experimental data, important novel therapeutic options are discussed below and summarized in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure1

Pathophysiological mechanisms of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) as targets for therapy. Comorbidities, such as hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and obesity, lead to chronic systemic inflammation and subsequently HFpEF, associated with myocardial inflammation and damage (red). Immunomodulation targeting either comorbidities or underlying disease mechanisms (green), which is the focus of this review, can decrease myocardial inflammation and damage and are currently under evaluation

Nitric Oxide Signaling

Normally, NO is produced by cardiac microvascular endothelial cells resulting in activation of soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) in cardiomyocytes and vascular smooth muscle cells. sGC in turn produces cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP), which regulates protein kinase G (PKG) [44]. However, in HFpEF this pathway is often defective, and low PKG activity results in cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and can eventually lead to LVDD [9]. Interference with this pathway could provide benefits for vascular and myocardial remodeling, including attenuation of hypertrophy, fibrosis, impaired cardiac relaxation, and eventually LVDD [9].

Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitors (PDE5i)

PDE5i inhibit breakdown of cGMP levels, thus activating protein kinase G, which resulted in decreased LV/cardiomyocyte stiffness and LV relaxation time and prevention of HFpEF in Zucker diabetic fatty rats [44]. However, in the RELAX trial, the PDE5i sildenafil did not alter exercise capacity nor improves clinical status in HFpEF patients [45].

Nitrate and Nitrite

Nitrate and nitrite increase NO bioavailability, contributing to vascular integrity and function. In the NEAT-HFpEF trial, nitrate isosorbide mononitrate caused HFpEF patients to be less active and no QoL improvement was observed [46, 47]. In the INDIE-HFpEF trial, inorganic nitrate was inhaled, which again showed no improvement in exercise capacity and QoL [48], which could partially be due to the short-acting nature of nebulized nitrite [46].

Soluble Guanylate Cyclase Stimulators (sGCs)

The sGCs riociguat has proven anti-fibrotic, anti-proliferative, and anti-inflammatory effects [49]. However, in the DILATE-1 trial, treatment of HFpEF patients with pulmonary hypertension did not change mean pulmonary artery pressure but increased stroke volume and decreased systolic blood pressure and right ventricular end-diastolic area. In the SOCRATES-PRESERVED trial, treatment with the sGCs vericiguat in HFpEF patients showed improvements in QoL, even though natriuretic peptide levels and left atrial volume did not change [50].

TNF-α Antagonists

Pro-inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α, IL-1, and IL-6, can lead to progressive LV dysfunction and remodeling, pulmonary edema, and cardiomyopathy [51]. TNF-α promotes LV remodeling mostly through alterations in the extra cellular matrix (ECM) [52]. Rats treated with TNF-α (dosage reflecting levels in HF patients) presented with time-dependent changes in LV dimension accompanied by a progressive degradation of the ECM [51] and in an experimental rat model with streptozotocin-induced diabetic cardiomyopathy, a monoclonal antibody against tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) as well as an interleukin converting enzyme (ICE) inhibitor protected from myocardial inflammation and fibrosis [53, 54]. Additionally, transgenic mice overexpressing TNF-α develop progressive LV dilation and congestive HF [55].

PDEis and Inhibition of TNF-α Production

The PDEi pentoxifylline improved LVEF and reduction of TNF-α and Fas/Apo-1 in HFpEF. However, TNF-α was still increased compared with healthy individuals and CRP was not measured [56]. Thalidomide inhibits production of TNF-α and other inflammatory mediators and is clinically used in Crohn’s disease, despite unclear mechanism of action [57,58,59]. In HFrEF patients, LVEF and QoL were improved, and a significant decrease in LV end-diastolic volume and heart rate was observed [10]. This was accompanied by decreased protein expression of the matrix degrading matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) [60]. Trials of thalidomide in HFpEF patients have yet to be conducted.

Aldosteric Antagonists for the TNF Receptor and (Chimeric) Antibodies

Studies in HF patients with the aldosteric antagonists for the TNF receptor etanercept showed improved QoL, increased 6-min walk distance, and improved LVEF [59]. However, two multicenter trials using different dosages of etanercept (RECOVER and RENAISSANCE) were terminated prematurely because of lack of improved clinical outcome in patients. This may be related to etanercept properties that enable stabilization of TNF-α and increase its bioactivity in vivo. Increased circulating levels of biologically active TNF-α in HF patients might therefore contribute to worsening of HF symptoms [59]. The chimeric antibody infliximab neutralizes TNF-α and is effective in Crohn’s disease and rheumatoid arthritis. Infliximab was tested in HF patients (ATTACH) and resulted in increased mortality and HHF, possibly through complement fixation in the heart [61].

IL-1 Antagonists

IL-1β is primarily produced by inflammatory cells and a product of cytoplasmic innate immune complexes, the inflammasomes [62,63,64]. Crohn’s disease, psoriasis, and rheumatoid arthritis can all be treated with IL-1 antagonists [63]. In a mouse model of acute myocardial infarction (MI), IL-1β antagonists improved LV diastolic function [65]. The IL-1 receptor antagonist anakinra showed to reduce systemic inflammation and improve aerobic exercise capacity in a pilot trial (D-HART) in HFpEF patients with high inflammatory risk (CRP > 2 mg/L) [66]. However, in the subsequent phase II trial (D-HART2), anakinra failed to improve cardiac output, reflected by a lack of benefit on peak oxygen consumption and ventilatory efficiency, despite a reduction in CRP and NT-proBNP, and improvement in exercise time and QoL [40, 67].

Decrease of Uric Acid Production

Uric acid is known to predict mortality and the need for heart transplantation in HF patients. Uric acid is a by-product of purine metabolism via the xanthine oxidase pathway. Uric acid in its crystallized form can trigger IL-1β-mediated inflammation via activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. The OPTIME-HF trial evaluated the xanthine oxidase inhibitor oxypurinol, which decreases production of uric acid, in HFrEF patients (LVEF ≤ 40%), but no improvement of morbidity, mortality, or QoL was seen [68].

IL-1 Antibodies

In the CANTOS trial, patients with prior MI and hs-CRP levels of > 2 mg/mL were treated with the IL-1β neutralizing antibody canakinumab once every 3 months and had a median follow-up of 3.7 years, leading to less HHF [69]. In a sub-analysis, patients who achieved reduced hs-CRP levels (< 2 mg/L) after 3 months had reduced cardiovascular mortality of 31% [70]. Interestingly, a post hoc analysis of the CANTOS trial showed that IL-1 inhibition reduced HHF- and HF-related mortality linking immunomodulation in HF with improved outcome [69].

Recently, accumulation of unfolded proteins was discovered in both humans and animal models with HFpEF [71], and unfolded protein response (UPR) effectors were found to be decreased in the myocardium of both experimental and human HFpEF [72]. The UPR can activate NF-κB [73] and lead to formation of inflammasomes [74], the latter posing as a new target for HFpEF therapy highlighting the promising nature of canakinumab.

Methotrexate

Methotrexate is a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug and is primarily used in rheumatoid arthritis. However, it was associated with reduced cardiovascular events, including HHF [75]. In a small prospective randomized clinical trial with HFrEF patients (LV < 45%) treated for 12 weeks, it resulted in a significant reduction of TNF, IL-6, and MCP-1 levels; upregulation of anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10 and soluble IL-1 receptor antagonist); and improvement in HF classification, 6-min walk test distance, and QoL. However, treatment did not affect LV remodeling [59, 76]. Methotrexate might be beneficial in the treatment of HFpEF, particularly in patients with a high inflammatory risk profile.

High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL)/Apolipoprotein A-I (ApoA-I)

High-density lipoprotein (HDL) and its main protein component apolipoprotein A-I (ApoA-I) have immunomodulatory properties, which pose an interesting target in patients with HFpEF [77]. Experimentally, increased ApoA-I/HDL levels showed a protective effect on vascular function by downregulation of the angiotensin-1 receptor [78]. More recently, infusion of recombinant HDL in a TAC model protected against oxidative stress and apoptosis, improving diastolic function compared with sham animals [79], and decreased hypertrophy, fibrosis, and adverse remodeling in murine model of T2DM-induced diabetic cardiomyopathy and HFpEF [80, 81]. The presence of ApoA-I immune complexes, illustrating the presence of autoantibodies, were associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events [82]. In the MILANO-PILOT trial, recombinant HDL showed no relevant adverse events although the effect on plaque progression was neutral and further drug development was halted. Furthermore, in a large cohort of HF patients, HDL particle analysis showed an association between derangement in small HDL particle concentration and adverse outcome in HFrEF (most pronounced) and HFpEF [83]. To our knowledge, a randomized trial investigating ApoA-I administration or a way to enhance HDL directly has not been performed. In this perspective, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors might come into play, which are safe and seem to increase long-term ApoA-I levels [84].

B Cell Depletion

B cell responses are crucial in host defense and tightly regulated by our immune system. However, in HFpEF, systemic inflammation combined with exposure of cardiac proteins by damaged or dead cardiomyocytes may break immune tolerance and result in the activation of autoreactive T and B cells [85]. B cell depletion, using monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab (anti-CD20), is used in patients with autoimmune disease and may be interesting in HFpEF. CD20+ B cell depletion significantly improved cardiac function in mice with TAC-induced pressure overload HF, showing reduced dilatation, hypertrophy, fibrosis, and oxidative stress [86]. The anti-inflammatory drug pirfenidone reduced B cell dependent adverse cardiac remodeling [87]. Rituximab was used in six patients with inflammatory dilated cardiomyopathy resistant to steroid treatment and positive for B cells in endomyocardial biopsies. Two injections of rituximab at a 4-week interval on top of standard HF medication resulted in improved LVDD, LVEF, and NYHA class, in five out of six patients [88]. Although the underlying mechanism needs to be elucidated, this shows the potential of B cell targeting therapies.

Intravenous Immunoglobulin Injection

A key feature of B cells is the production of immunoglobulins, and autoreactive B cells can produce antibodies targeting myocardial proteins [89]. Binding of autoantibodies to cardiac-specific antigens on cardiomyocytes may induce cardiac dysfunction, e.g., by affecting contractility, inducing cellular toxicity and cardiomyocyte lysis [90,91,92,93]. The presence of these autoantibodies is associated with end-stage HF [92]. The most abundant immunoglobulin subtype in patients with HF is IgG, including IgG1 and IgG3 subclasses [94]. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) injection can clear these antibodies from the body, which in HF patient showed to have limited benefit and contradictory results [95, 96]. Monthly IVIG treatment for 6 months was shown to improve LVEF in patients with chronic HF [95], while IVIG treatment did not result in improvement in early onset cardiomyopathy [97]. This suggests that autoantibodies may be more relevant in late stage chronic HF. However, most HF patients showed a decline in LVEF after discontinuation of the therapy [98]. This indicates that treatment should be prolonged or maybe even chronic, with increased risk for adverse side effects.

Cell Therapy

Progenitor cells, including mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) and cardiac progenitor cells, are able to improve cardiac function, despite poor cardiac engraftment [99, 100]. Benefits may be directly related to immunosuppressive properties of progenitor cells [101, 102]. MSC and MSC-derived extracellular vesicles have been shown to modulate T and B cells, inhibit the formation of plasma cells, lower antibody production in vitro [101, 103,104,105,106], and suppress immunoglobulin production in B cells from HF patients [107]. Moreover, MSC are used as potential immunosuppression for multiple autoimmune disorders and graft-versus-host diseases [108, 109] and could be important to suppress antibody-mediated immune responses in chronic HF. The ongoing REGRESS-HFpEF trial investigates intracoronary treatment with allogenic cardiosphere-derived cells in HFpEF patients and is expected to show reduction in pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic signaling (NCT02941705). Experimentally, in a murine T2DM model, MSC injection leads to beneficial immunomodulation and improvement of T2DM-associated diastolic dysfunction and cardiomyocyte stiffness [110].

Regulatory T Cells

T cells are found in cardiac tissue of HF patients [93, 111] and have been implicated as important players in the pathogenesis of non-ischemic HF [112]. The amount of regulatory T cells is decreased in patients with HFrEF and HFpEF [113]. In addition, T cell receptor-deficient mice and T cell depletion in wild-type TAC mice reduced adverse remodeling [112]. Regulatory T cells represent a unique subtype of T cells instrumental for the maintenance of immune homeostasis by suppressing T cell responses and cytokine production. Expansion of regulatory T cells, by infusion of IL-2 or IL-2 immune complexes, attenuated LV inflammation and progression of HF in TAC mice [114]. Noteworthy, several clinical trials (phases I–III) using ex vivo expanded regulatory T cells are currently running for different disease entities, mostly solid organ transplantation and autoimmune disease (reviewed in [115]). Although still very preliminary, one may speculate that expansion of regulatory T cells may also be beneficial in HFpEF patients and possibly result in (partially) attenuated disease progression.

Discussion and Conclusion

Prevalence of HFpEF differs between sexes and races [116], and most patients present with comorbidities linked to chronic inflammation, such as hypertension and T2DM. Based on increasing knowledge of the HFpEF pathophysiology, it is not surprising that previous trials in HFpEF using traditional HF medication did not show benefits on HHF- or HF-related mortality. Therefore, therapies targeting underlying comorbidities and systemic inflammation in early HFpEF might provide better alternatives.

Many questions can be raised on patient selection for HFpEF trials. Given the very heterogeneous HFpEF population, it might not be sensible to aim for a generalized therapy. We should rather consider the sex differences, differences in LVEF, presence of comorbidities, degree of LVDD, and levels of NT-proBNP, troponin, and CRP [11]. As many HFpEF-related comorbidities are more prevalent in women and estrogens play a beneficial role in inflammation and HF progression, postmenopausal women might be more prone to systemic inflammation and HFpEF as reviewed by our group [117]. Interestingly, most trials focusing on immunomodulation in HFpEF still include more men than women (Supplementary Table 2).

The translational challenge to bring promising therapies from experimental models to HFpEF patients as seen with methotrexate use highlights the need for suitable preclinical models, which implements several aspects of the syndrome. Until now, development of new therapies based on underlying disease mechanisms is progressing slowly, as animal models of HFpEF are not yet well established and mimic either one or a selection of risk factors, such as LVH, hypertension, ageing, obesity, or diabetes [118, 119]. Besides, rodent models of LVDD mainly use males and progress to HFrEF within a variable amount of time. This progression from HFpEF to HFrEF does not necessarily occur in humans [120].

Immunomodulation in HFpEF holds encouraging results, but new (immunomodulatory) therapies based on disease mechanisms call for better experimental models for HFpEF. With this review, we aimed to provide an overview of the current state and future perspectives of immunomodulatory therapies for HFpEF based on preclinical experimental models and early clinical data. Promising future therapies include IL-1β antagonists (e.g., anakinra), which show improvement of exercise capacity and QoL and reduce inflammation upon HFpEF [66, 67]. Additionally, canakinumab treatment of patients with prior MI and elevated CRP reduced HHF, and lower CRP was correlated to reduced mortality [69]. However, low-dose methotrexate did not reduce IL-1β, IL-6, or CRP levels [70], which suggests that the ability of the drug to reduce CRP is limited to clinical situations in which inflammation levels are high [70]. As such, future clinical trials may benefit from selecting HFpEF patients with high inflammatory risk.

Abbreviations

ApoA-I:

Apolipoprotein A-I

CRP:

C-reactive protein

cGMP:

Cyclic guanosine monophosphate

ECM:

Extra cellular matrix

HF:

Heart failure

HHF:

HF hospitalization

HFpEF:

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

HFrEF:

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

HDL:

High-density lipoproteins

hs-CRP:

High-sensitive C-reactive protein

Ig:

Immunoglobulin

IVIG:

Intravenous immunoglobulin

IL:

Interleukin

ICE:

Interleukin converting enzyme

LVDD:

Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction

LVEF:

Left ventricular ejection fraction

MHCII:

Major histocompatibility complex II

NO:

Nitric oxide

NLRP3:

NOD-like receptor protein

NT-proBNP:

N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide

PPAR-γ:

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors

PDE:

Phosphodiesterase

PCSK9:

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9

PKG:

Protein kinase G

QoL:

Quality of life

sGC:

Soluble guanylate cyclase

TAC:

Transverse aortic constriction

TNF-α:

Tumor necrosis factor

T2DM:

Type 2 diabetes mellitus

MSC:

Mesenchymal stromal cells

References

  1. 1.

    Plitt, G. D., Spring, J. T., Moulton, M. J., & Agrawal, D. K. (2018). Mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and diastolic dysfunction. Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy, 16(8), 579–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/14779072.2018.1497485.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    van Heerebeek, L., & Paulus, W. J. (2016). Understanding heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Where are we today? Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation, 24(4), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-016-0810-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Upadhya, B., Pisani, B., & Kitzman, D. W. (2017). Evolution of a geriatric syndrome: Pathophysiology and treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 65(11), 2431–2440. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15141.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Benjamin, E. J., Muntner, P., Alonso, A., Bittencourt, M. S., Callaway, C. W., Carson, A. P., et al. (2019). Heart disease and stroke statistics—2019 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 139(10). https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659.

  5. 5.

    Ponikowski, P., Voors, A. A., Anker, S. D., Bueno, H., Cleland, J. G. F., Coats, A. J. S., et al. (2016). 2016 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the special contribution of. European Heart Journal, 37(27), 2129–2200. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Tromp, J., Westenbrink, B. D., Ouwerkerk, W., van Veldhuisen, D. J., Samani, N. J., Ponikowski, P., et al. (2018). Identifying pathophysiological mechanisms in heart failure with reduced versus preserved ejection fraction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 72(10), 1081–1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.06.050.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Lim, S. L., & Lam, C. S. P. (2016). Breakthrough in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Are we there yet? The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine, 31(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2016.31.1.1.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Glezeva, N., & Baugh, J. A. (2014). Role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and its potential as a therapeutic target. Heart Failure Reviews, 19(5), 681–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-013-9405-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Paulus, W. J., & Tschöpe, C. (2013). A novel paradigm for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Comorbidities drive myocardial dysfunction and remodeling through coronary microvascular endothelial inflammation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 62(4), 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.02.092.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Agoston, I., Dibbs, Z. I., Wang, F., Muller, G., Zeldis, J. B., Mann, D. L., & Bozkurt, B. (2002). Preclinical and clinical assessment of the safety and potential efficacy of thalidomide in heart failure. Journal of Cardiac Failure, 8(5), 306–314. https://doi.org/10.1054/jcaf.2002.128684.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Parikh, K. S., Sharma, K., Fiuzat, M., Surks, H. K., George, J. T., Honarpour, N., et al. (2018). Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction expert panel report: Current controversies and implications for clinical trials. JACC: Heart Failure. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2018.06.008.

  12. 12.

    Camici, P. G., Tschöpe, C., Di Carli, M. F., Rimoldi, O., & Van Linthout, S. (2020). Coronary microvascular dysfunction in hypertrophy and heart failure. Cardiovascular Research, 116(4), 806–816. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvaa023.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Adamo, L., Rocha-Resende, C., Prabhu, S. D., & Mann, D. L. (2020). Reappraising the role of inflammation in heart failure. Nature Reviews. Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-019-0315-x.

  14. 14.

    Tromp, J., Khan, M. A. F., Klip, I. T., Meyer, S., de Boer, R. A., Jaarsma, T., et al. (2017). Biomarker profiles in heart failure patients with preserved and reduced ejection fraction. Journal of the American Heart Association. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003989.

  15. 15.

    Myhre, P. L., Vaduganathan, M., O’Meara, E., Claggett, B. L., de Denus, S., Jarolim, P., et al. (2020). Mechanistic effects of spironolactone on cardiovascular and renal biomarkers in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A TOPCAT biorepository study. Circulation. Heart Failure. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.006638.

  16. 16.

    Nosalski, R., McGinnigle, E., Siedlinski, M., & Guzik, T. J. (2017). Novel immune mechanisms in hypertension and cardiovascular risk. Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports, 11(4), 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12170-017-0537-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ruiz-Ortega, M., Esteban, V., Rupérez, M., Sánchez-López, E., Rodríguez-Vita, J., Carvajal, G., & Egido, J. (2006). Renal and vascular hypertension-induced inflammation: Role of angiotensin II. Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mnh.0000203190.34643.d4.

  18. 18.

    Lehrke, M., & Marx, N. (2017). Diabetes mellitus and heart failure. American Journal of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.05.014.

  19. 19.

    Packer, M. (2018). Is metformin beneficial for heart failure in patients with type 2 diabetes? Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 136, 168–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2017.12.011.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    McHugh, K., DeVore, A. D., Wu, J., Matsouaka, R. A., Fonarow, G. C., Heidenreich, P. A., et al. (2019). Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and diabetes: JACC state-of-the-art review. Journal of the Am Coll Cardiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.033.

  21. 21.

    Dei Cas, A., Khan, S. S., Butler, J., Mentz, R. J., Bonow, R. O., Avogaro, A., et al. (2015). Impact of diabetes on epidemiology, treatment, and outcomes of patients with heart failure. JACC: Heart Failure. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2014.08.004.

  22. 22.

    Cherian, S., Lopaschuk, G. D., & Carvalho, E. (2012). Cellular cross-talk between epicardial adipose tissue and myocardium in relation to the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease. American Journal of Physiology. Endocrinology and Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00061.2012.

  23. 23.

    Thorp, A. A., & Schlaich, M. P. (2015). Relevance of sympathetic nervous system activation in obesity and metabolic syndrome. Journal Diabetes Research. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/341583.

  24. 24.

    Mummidi, S., Das, N. A., Carpenter, A. J., Kandikattu, H., Krenz, M., Siebenlist, U., et al. (2016). Metformin inhibits aldosterone-induced cardiac fibroblast activation, migration and proliferation in vitro, and reverses aldosterone + salt-induced cardiac fibrosis in vivo. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2016.07.006.

  25. 25.

    Gilbert, R. E., & Krum, H. (2015). Heart failure in diabetes: Effects of anti-hyperglycaemic drug therapy. Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61402-1.

  26. 26.

    Savarese, G., Perrone-Filardi, P., D’Amore, C., Vitale, C., Trimarco, B., Pani, L., & Rosano, G. M. C. (2015). Cardiovascular effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in diabetic patients: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.12.017.

  27. 27.

    Zinman, B., Wanner, C., Lachin, J. M., Fitchett, D., Bluhmki, E., Hantel, S., et al. (2015). Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. The New England Journal of Medicine, 373(22), 2117–2128. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1504720.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Gallo, L. A., Wright, E. M., & Vallon, V. (2015). Probing SGLT2 as a therapeutic target for diabetes: Basic physiology and consequences. Diabetes & Vascular Disease Research, 12(2), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1479164114561992.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Butler, J., Hamo, C. E., Filippatos, G., Pocock, S. J., Bernstein, R. A., Brueckmann, M., et al. (2017). The potential role and rationale for treatment of heart failure with sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors. European Journal of Heart Failure, 19(11), 1390–1400. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.933.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Anker, S. D., Butler, J., Filippatos, G. S., Jamal, W., Salsali, A., Schnee, J., et al. (2019). Evaluation of the effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibition with empagliflozin on morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction: Rationale for and design of the EMPEROR-preserved trial. European Journal of Heart Failure, 21(10), 1279–1287. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.1596.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Botta, M., Audano, M., Sahebkar, A., Sirtori, C. R., Mitro, N., & Ruscica, M. (2018). PPAR agonists and metabolic syndrome: An established role? International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19041197.

  32. 32.

    Kamimura, D., Uchino, K., Ishigami, T., Hall, M. E., & Umemura, S. (2016). Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma prevents development of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; inhibition of Wnt-beta-catenin signaling as a possible mechanism. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, 68(2), 155–161. https://doi.org/10.1097/FJC.0000000000000397.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Matsuura, N., Asano, C., Nagasawa, K., Ito, S., Sano, Y., Minagawa, Y., et al. (2015). Effects of pioglitazone on cardiac and adipose tissue pathology in rats with metabolic syndrome. International Journal of Cardiology, 179, 360–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.11.099.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Clarke, G. D., Solis-Herrera, C., Molina-Wilkins, M., Martinez, S., Merovci, A., Cersosimo, E., et al. (2017). Pioglitazone improves left ventricular diastolic function in subjects with diabetes. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-0078.

  35. 35.

    Obokata, M., Reddy, Y. N. V., Pislaru, S. V., Melenovsky, V., & Borlaug, B. A. (2017). Evidence supporting the existence of a distinct obese phenotype of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.026807.

  36. 36.

    Kitzman, D. W., Brubaker, P., Morgan, T., Haykowsky, M., Hundley, G., Kraus, W. E., et al. (2016). Effect of caloric restriction or aerobic exercise training on peak oxygen consumption and quality of life in obese older patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA - J Am Med Assoc. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.17346.

  37. 37.

    Reddy, Y. N. V., Anantha-Narayanan, M., Obokata, M., Koepp, K. E., Erwin, P., Carter, R. E., & Borlaug, B. A. (2019). Hemodynamic effects of weight loss in obesity. JACC: Heart Failure. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2019.04.019.

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Davignon, J. (2004). Beneficial cardiovascular pleiotropic effects of statins. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000131517.20177.5a.

  39. 39.

    Kwak, B., Mulhaupt, F., Myit, S., & Mach, F. (2000). Statins as a newly recognized type of immunomodulator. Nature Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1038/82219.

  40. 40.

    Lam, C. S. P., Voors, A. A., de Boer, R. A., Solomon, S. D., & van Veldhuisen, D. J. (2018). Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: From mechanisms to therapies. European Heart Journal, 39(30), 2780–2792. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy301.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Gomez-Garre, D., Gonzalez-Rubio, M. L., Munoz-Pacheco, P., Caro-Vadillo, A., Aragoncillo, P., & Fernandez-Cruz, A. (2010). Rosuvastatin added to standard heart failure therapy improves cardiac remodelling in heart failure rats with preserved ejection fraction. European Journal of Heart Failure, 12(9), 903–912. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjhf/hfq101.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Tsujimoto, T., & Kajio, H. (2018). Favorable effects of statins in the treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in patients without ischemic heart disease. International Journal of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.12.109.

  43. 43.

    Lee, M. S., Duan, L., Clare, R., Hekimian, A., Spencer, H., & Chen, W. (2018). Comparison of effects of statin use on mortality in patients with heart failure and preserved versus reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. The American Journal of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.04.027.

  44. 44.

    Matyas, C., Nemeth, B. T., Olah, A., Torok, M., Ruppert, M., Kellermayer, D., et al. (2017). Prevention of the development of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction by the phosphodiesterase-5A inhibitor vardenafil in rats with type 2 diabetes. European Journal of Heart Failure, 19(3), 326–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.711.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Redfield, M. M., Chen, H. H., Borlaug, B. A., Semigran, M. J., Lee, K. L., Lewis, G., et al. (2013). Effect of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibition on exercise capacity and clinical status in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 309(12), 1268–1277. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.2024.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Upadhya, B., Haykowsky, M. J., & Kitzman, D. W. (2018). Therapy for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Current status, unique challenges, and future directions. Heart Failure Reviews, 23(5), 609–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-018-9714-z.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Redfield, M. M., Anstrom, K. J., Levine, J. A., Koepp, G. A., Borlaug, B. A., Chen, H. H., et al. (2015). Isosorbide mononitrate in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. The New England Journal of Medicine, 373(24), 2314–2324. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1510774.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Borlaug, B. A., Anstrom, K. J., Lewis, G. D., Shah, S. J., Levine, J. A., Koepp, G. A., et al. (2018). Effect of inorganic nitrite vs placebo on exercise capacity among patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: The INDIE-HFpEF randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 320(17), 1764–1773. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.14852.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Bonderman, D., Pretsch, I., Steringer-Mascherbauer, R., Jansa, P., Rosenkranz, S., Tufaro, C., et al. (2014). Acute hemodynamic effects of riociguat in patients with pulmonary hypertension associated with diastolic heart failure (DILATE-1): A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose study. Chest, 146(5), 1274–1285. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.14-0106.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Pieske, B., Maggioni, A. P., Lam, C. S. P., Pieske-Kraigher, E., Filippatos, G., Butler, J., et al. (2017). Vericiguat in patients with worsening chronic heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: Results of the SOluble guanylate Cyclase stimulatoR in heArT failurE patientS with PRESERVED EF (SOCRATES-PRESERVED) study. European Heart Journal, 38(15), 1119–1127. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw593.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Mann, D. L. (2002). Inflammatory mediators and the failing heart: Past, present, and the foreseeable future. Circulation Research, 91(11), 988–998. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.0000043825.01705.1b.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Bryant, D., Becker, L., Richardson, J., Shelton, J., Franco, F., Peshock, R., et al. (1998). Cardiac failure in transgenic mice with myocardial expression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Circulation, 97(14), 1375–1381. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.97.14.1375.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Westermann, D., Linthout, S., Dhayat, S., Dhayat, N., Schmidt, A., Noutsias, M., et al. (2007). Tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonism protects from myocardial inflammation and fibrosis in experimental diabetic cardiomyopathy. Basic Research in Cardiology, 102(6), 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00395-007-0673-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Westermann, D., Van Linthout, S., Dhayat, S., Dhayat, N., Escher, F., Bucker-Gartner, C., et al. (2007). Cardioprotective and anti-inflammatory effects of interleukin converting enzyme inhibition in experimental diabetic cardiomyopathy. Diabetes, 56(7), 1834–1841. https://doi.org/10.2337/db06-1662.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Kubota, T., McTiernan, C. F., Frye, C. S., Slawson, S. E., Lemster, B. H., Koretsky, A. P., et al. (1997). Dilated cardiomyopathy in transgenic mice with cardiac-specific overexpression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Circulation Research, 81(4), 627–635. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.81.4.627.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Sliwa, K., Woodiwiss, A., Candy, G., Badenhorst, D., Libhaber, C., Norton, G., et al. (2002). Effects of pentoxifylline on cytokine profiles and left ventricular performance in patients with decompensated congestive heart failure secondary to idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. The American Journal of Cardiology, 90(10), 1118–1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02779-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Paravar, T., & Lee, D. J. (2008). Thalidomide: Mechanisms of action. International Reviews of Immunology, 27(3), 111–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/08830180801911339.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Blam, M. E., Stein, R. B., & Lichtenstein, G. R. (2001). Integrating anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: Current and future perspectives. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 96(7), 1977–1997. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03931.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Mann, D. L. (2015). Innate immunity and the failing heart: The cytokine hypothesis revisited. Circulation Research, 116(7), 1254–1268. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.302317.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Gullestad, L., Ueland, T., Fjeld, J. G., Holt, E., Gundersen, T., Breivik, K., et al. (2005). Effect of thalidomide on cardiac remodeling in chronic heart failure: Results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Circulation, 112(22), 3408–3414. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.564971.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Chung, E., Packer, M., Hung Lo, K., Fasanmade, A., & Willerson, J. (2003). Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot trial of infliximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor-alpha, in patients with moderate-to-severe heart failure. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000077913.60364.D2.

  62. 62.

    Agostini, L., Martinon, F., Burns, K., McDermott, M. F., Hawkins, P. N., & Tschopp, J. (2004). NALP3 forms an IL-1beta-processing inflammasome with increased activity in Muckle-Wells autoinflammatory disorder. Immunity, 20(3), 319–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1074-7613(04)00046-9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Dinarello, C. A., & van der Meer, J. W. M. (2013). Treating inflammation by blocking interleukin-1 in humans. Seminars in Immunology, 25(6), 469–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smim.2013.10.008.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Martinon, F., Mayor, A., & Tschopp, J. (2009). The inflammasomes: Guardians of the body. Annual Review of Immunology, 27, 229–265. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132715.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Toldo, S., Mezzaroma, E., Bressi, E., Marchetti, C., Carbone, S., Sonnino, C., et al. (2014). Interleukin-1beta blockade improves left ventricular systolic/diastolic function and restores contractility reserve in severe ischemic cardiomyopathy in the mouse. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, 64(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/FJC.0000000000000106.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Van Tassell, B. W., Arena, R., Biondi-Zoccai, G., Canada, J. M., Oddi, C., Abouzaki, N. A., et al. (2014). Effects of interleukin-1 blockade with anakinra on aerobic exercise capacity in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (from the D-HART pilot study). The American Journal of Cardiology, 113(2), 321–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.08.047.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Van Tassell, B. W., Trankle, C. R., Canada, J. M., Carbone, S., Buckley, L., Kadariya, D., et al. (2018). IL-1 blockade in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circulation. Heart Failure, 11(8), e005036. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.118.005036.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Hare, J. M., Mangal, B., Brown, J., Fisher, C., Freudenberger, R., Colucci, W. S., et al. (2008). Impact of oxypurinol in patients with symptomatic heart failure. Results of the OPT-CHF study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.01.068.

  69. 69.

    Everett, B. M., Cornel, J. H., Lainscak, M., Anker, S. D., Abbate, A., Thuren, T., et al. (2019). Anti-inflammatory therapy with canakinumab for the prevention of hospitalization for heart failure. Circulation, 139(10), 1289–1299. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038010.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Ridker, P. M., Everett, B. M., Pradhan, A., MacFadyen, J. G., Solomon, D. H., Zaharris, E., et al. (2019). Low-dose methotrexate for the prevention of atherosclerotic events. The New England Journal of Medicine, 380(8), 752–762. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1809798.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    González-López, E., Gallego-Delgado, M., Guzzo-Merello, G., De Haro-Del Moral, F. J., Cobo-Marcos, M., Robles, C., et al. (2015). Wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis as a cause of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv338.

  72. 72.

    Schiattarella, G. G., Altamirano, F., Tong, D., French, K. M., Villalobos, E., Kim, S. Y., et al. (2019). Nitrosative stress drives heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1100-z.

  73. 73.

    Tam, A. B., Mercado, E. L., Hoffmann, A., & Niwa, M. (2012). ER stress activates NF-κB by integrating functions of basal IKK activity, IRE1 and PERK. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045078.

  74. 74.

    Overley-Adamson, B., Artlett, C. M., Stephens, C., Sassi-Gaha, S., Weis, R. D., & Thacker, J. D. (2014). Targeting the unfolded protein response, XBP1, and the NLRP3 inflammasome in fibrosis and cancer. Cancer Biology & Therapy. https://doi.org/10.4161/cbt.27820.

  75. 75.

    Bălănescu, A., Bojincă, V., Bojincă, M., Donisan, T., & Bălănescu, S. (2018). Cardiovascular effects of methotrexate in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (review). Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2018.6992.

  76. 76.

    Gong, K., Zhang, Z., Sun, X., Zhang, X., Li, A., Yan, J., et al. (2006). The nonspecific anti-inflammatory therapy with methotrexate for patients with chronic heart failure. American Heart Journal, 151(1), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2005.02.040.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Yu, B. L., Wang, S. H., Peng, D. Q., & Zhao, S. P. (2010). HDL and immunomodulation: An emerging role of HDL against atherosclerosis. Immunology and Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1038/icb.2009.112.

  78. 78.

    Van Linthout, S., Spillmann, F., Lorenz, M., Meloni, M., Jacobs, F., Egorova, M., et al. (2009). Vascular-protective effects of high-density lipoprotein include the downregulation of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor. Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.118919.

  79. 79.

    Aboumsallem, J. P., Mishra, M., Amin, R., Muthuramu, I., Kempen, H., & De Geest, B. (2018). Successful treatment of established heart failure in mice with recombinant HDL (Milano). British J Pharmacol. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.14463.

  80. 80.

    Aboumsallem, J. P., Muthuramu, I., Mishra, M., Kempen, H., & De Geest, B. (2019). Effective treatment of diabetic cardiomyopathy and heart failure with reconstituted HDL (Milano) in mice. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20061273.

  81. 81.

    Mishra, M., Muthuramu, I., Aboumsallem, J. P., Kempen, H., & De Geest, B. (2018). Reconstituted hdl (Milano) treatment efficaciously reverses heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in mice. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19113399.

  82. 82.

    Henson, D., Tahhan, A. S., Nardo, D., Quyyumi, A. A., & Venditto, V. J. (2019). Association between ApoA-I (apolipoprotein A-I) immune complexes and adverse cardiovascular events-brief report. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.312964.

  83. 83.

    Hunter, W. G., McGarrah, R. W., Kelly, J. P., Khouri, M. G., Craig, D. M., Haynes, C., et al. (2019). High-density lipoprotein particle subfractions in heart failure with preserved or reduced ejection fraction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.059.

  84. 84.

    Koren, M. J., Sabatine, M. S., Giugliano, R. P., Langslet, G., Wiviott, S. D., Ruzza, A., et al. (2019). Long-term efficacy and safety of evolocumab in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.1024.

  85. 85.

    Eriksson, U., & Penninger, J. M. (2005). Autoimmune heart failure: New understandings of pathogenesis. International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, 37(1), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2004.06.014.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Ma, X.-L., Lin, Q.-Y., Wang, L., Xie, X., Zhang, Y.-L., & Li, H.-H. (2019). Rituximab prevents and reverses cardiac remodeling by depressing B cell function in mice. Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie, 114(193), 108804.

  87. 87.

    Adamo, L., Staloch, L. J., Rocha-Resende, C., Matkovich, S. J., Jiang, W., Bajpai, G., et al. (2018). Modulation of subsets of cardiac B lymphocytes improves cardiac function after acute injury. JCI insight, 3(11), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Tschöpe, C., Van Linthout, S., Spillmann, F., Posch, M. G., Reinke, P., Volk, H.-D., et al. (2019). Targeting CD20+ B-lymphocytes in inflammatory dilated cardiomyopathy with rituximab improves clinical course: A case series. European Heart Journal - Case Reports, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcr/ytz131.

  89. 89.

    Bansal, S. S., Ismahil, M. A., Goel, M., Patel, B., Hamid, T., Rokosh, G., & Prabhu, S. D. (2017). Activated T lymphocytes are essential drivers of pathological remodeling in ischemic heart failure. Circulation: Heart Failure. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.116.003688.

  90. 90.

    Sattler, S., Fairchild, P., Watt, F. M., Rosenthal, N., & Harding, S. E. (2017). The adaptive immune response to cardiac injury-the true roadblock to effective regenerative therapies? NPJ Regenerative medicine, 2(1), 19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Okazaki, T., Tanaka, Y., Nishio, R., Mitsuiye, T., Mizoguchi, A., Wang, J., et al. (2003). Autoantibodies against cardiac troponin I are responsible for dilated cardiomyopathy in PD-1-deficient mice. Nature Medicine, 9(12), 1477–1483. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm955.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Youker, K. A., Assad-Kottner, C., Cordero-Reyes, A. M., Trevino, A. R., Flores-Arredondo, J. H., Barrios, R., et al. (2014). High proportion of patients with end-stage heart failure regardless of aetiology demonstrates anti-cardiac antibody deposition in failing myocardium: Humoral activation, a potential contributor of disease progression. European Heart Journal, 35(16), 1061–1068.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    van den Hoogen, P., de Jager, S. C. A., Huibers, M. M. H., Schoneveld, A. H., Puspitasari, Y. M., Valstar, G. B., et al. (2019). Increased circulating IgG levels, myocardial immune cells and IgG deposits support a role for an immune response in pre- and end-stage heart failure. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.14619.

  94. 94.

    Zhang, H., Li, P., Wu, D., Xu, D., Hou, Y., Wang, Q., et al. (2015). Serum IgG subclasses in autoimmune diseases. Medicine (United States), 94(2), e387. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000387.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Aukrust, P., Yndestad, A., Ueland, T., Kristian Damås, J., Frøland, S., & Gullestad, L. (2006). The role of intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of chronic heart failure. International Journal of Cardiology, 112(1), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.05.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Cordero-Reyes, A. M., Youker, K. A., & Torre-Amione, G. (2013). The role of B-cells in heart failure. Methodist DeBakey Cardiovascular Journal, 9(1), 15–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    McNamara, D. M., Holubkov, R., Starling, R. C., Dec, G. W., Loh, E., Torre-Amione, G., et al. (2001). Controlled trial of intravenous immune globulin in recent-onset dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation, 103(18), 2254–2259.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Gullestad, L., & Aukrust, P. (2005). Review of trials in chronic heart failure showing broad-spectrum anti-inflammatory approaches. The American Journal of Cardiology, 95(11), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.03.008.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Hou, D., Youssef, E. A. S., Brinton, T. J., Zhang, P., Rogers, P., Price, E. T., et al. (2005). Radiolabeled cell distribution after intramyocardial, intracoronary, and interstitial retrograde coronary venous delivery: Implications for current clinical trials. Circulation, 112(9 SUPPL), 150–156. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.526749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    van den Akker, F., Feyen, D. A. M., Van Den Hoogen, P., Van Laake, L. W., Van Eeuwijk, E. C. M., Hoefer, I., et al. (2017). Intramyocardial stem cell injection: Go(ne) with the flow. European Heart Journal, 38(3), 184–186.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Börger, V., Bremer, M., Ferrer-Tur, R., Gockeln, L., Stambouli, O., Becic, A., & Giebel, B. (2017). Mesenchymal stem/stromal cell-derived extracellular vesicles and their potential as novel immunomodulatory therapeutic agents. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 18(7).

  102. 102.

    Rasmusson, I., Le Blanc, K., Sundberg, B., & Ringdén, O. (2007). Mesenchymal stem cells stimulate antibody secretion in human B cells. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, 65(4), 336–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3083.2007.01905.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    van den Akker, F., Vrijsen, K. R., Deddens, J. C., Buikema, J. W., Mokry, M., van Laake, L. W., et al. (2018). Suppression of T cells by mesenchymal and cardiac progenitor cells is partly mediated via extracellular vesicles. Heliyon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00642.

  104. 104.

    Franquesa, M., Mensah, F. K., Huizinga, R., Strini, T., Boon, L., Lombardo, E., et al. (2015). Human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells abrogate plasmablast formation and induce regulatory B cells independently of T helper cells. Stem Cells, 33(3), 880–891. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.1881.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Luk, F., Carreras-Planella, L., Korevaar, S. S., de Witte, S. F. H., Borràs, F. E., Betjes, M. G. H., et al. (2017). Inflammatory conditions dictate the effect of mesenchymal stem or stromal cells on B cell function. Frontiers in Immunology, 8, 1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Carreras-Planella, L., Monguió-Tortajada, M., Borràs, F. E., & Franquesa, M. (2019). Immunomodulatory effect of MSC on B cells is independent of secreted extracellular vesicles. Frontiers in Immunology, 10, 1288. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.01288.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Van Den Hoogen, P., De Jager, S. C. A., Mol, E. A., Schoneveld, A. S., Huibers, M. M. H., Vink, A., et al. (2019). Potential of mesenchymal- and cardiac progenitor cells for therapeutic targeting of Bcells and antibody responses in end-stage heart failure. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227283.

  108. 108.

    Le Blanc, K., Rasmusson, I., Sundberg, B., Götherström, C., Hassan, M., Uzunel, M., & Ringdén, O. (2004). Treatment of severe acute graft-versus-host disease with third party haploidentical mesenchymal stem cells. Lancet, 363(9419), 1439–1441. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16104-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Rad, F., Ghorbani, M., Mohammadi Roushandeh, A., & Habibi Roudkenar, M. (2019). Mesenchymal stem cell-based therapy for autoimmune diseases: Emerging roles of extracellular vesicles. Molecular Biology Reports, 46(1), 1533–1549.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Van Linthout, S., Hamdani, N., Miteva, K., Koschel, A., Müller, I., Pinzur, L., et al. (2017). Placenta-derived adherent stromal cells improve diabetes mellitus-associated left ventricular diastolic performance. Stem Cells Translational Medicine, 6(12), 2135–2145. https://doi.org/10.1002/sctm.17-0130.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Abbate, A., Bonanno, E., Mauriello, A., Bussani, R., Biondi-Zoccai, G. G. L., Liuzzo, G., et al. (2004). Widespread myocardial inflammation and infarct-related artery patency. Circulation, 110(1), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000133316.92316.81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Nevers, T., Salvador, A. M., Grodecki-Pena, A., Knapp, A., Velázquez, F., Aronovitz, M., et al. (2015). Left ventricular T-cell recruitment contributes to the pathogenesis of heart failure. Circulation: Heart Failure, 8(4), 776–787. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002225.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Li, N., Bian, H., Zhang, J., Li, X., Ji, X., & Zhang, Y. (2010). The Th17/Treg imbalance exists in patients with heart failure with normal ejection fraction and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Clinica Chimica Acta, 411(23–24), 1963–1968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2010.08.013.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Wang, H., Hou, L., Kwak, D., Fassett, J., Xu, X., Chen, A., et al. (2016). Increasing regulatory T cells with interleukin-2 and interleukin-2 antibody complexes attenuates lung inflammation and heart failure progression. Hypertension, 68(1), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.07084.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Romano, M., Fanelli, G., Albany, C. J., Giganti, G., & Lombardi, G. (2019). Past, present, and future of regulatory T cell therapy in transplantation and autoimmunity. Frontiers in Immunology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00043.

  116. 116.

    Pandey, A., Omar, W., Ayers, C., LaMonte, M., Klein, L., Allen, N. B., et al. (2018). Sex and race differences in lifetime risk of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Circulation, 137(17), 1814–1823. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031622.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Sickinghe, A. A., Korporaal, S. J. A., Den Ruijter, H. M., & Kessler, E. L. (2019). Estrogen contributions to microvascular dysfunction evolving to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Frontiers in Endocrinology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00442.

  118. 118.

    Swirski, F. K., & Nahrendorf, M. (2018). Cardioimmunology: The immune system in cardiac homeostasis and disease. Nature Reviews Immunology, 18(12), 733–744. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-018-0065-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Van Empel, V., & Brunner-La Rocca, H. P. (2015). Inflammation in HFpEF: Key or circumstantial? International Journal of Cardiology, 189(1), 259–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Conceicao, G., Heinonen, I., Lourenco, A. P., Duncker, D. J., & Falcao-Pires, I. (2016). Animal models of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation, 24(4), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-016-0815-9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was funded by the Netherlands Heart Institute (Fellowship for ELK), the Netherlands Cardiovascular Research Initiative: An initiative with support of the Dutch Heart Foundation [CVON2014-11 RECONNECT], and the Dutch Heart Foundation (2013T084, Queen of Hearts program) to JPGS and SCAdJ. This work was also supported by the Project EVICARE (725229) of the European Research Council (ERC) to JPGS.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SCAdJ had the idea for the article; CY, ELK, and MIFJO performed the literature search and drafted the manuscript; SCAdJ, PvdH, and JPGS critically revised the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saskia C.A. de Jager.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Editor-in-Chief Enrique Lara-Pezzi oversaw the review of this article

Electronic Supplementary Material

ESM 1

(DOCX 24 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kessler, E.L., Oerlemans, M.I., van den Hoogen, P. et al. Immunomodulation in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Current State and Future Perspectives. J. of Cardiovasc. Trans. Res. 14, 63–74 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-020-10026-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • HFpEF
  • LVDD
  • Immunomodulation
  • Inflammation
  • Clinical trials
  • Preclinical models