Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Scientific Foundation and Possible Implications for Practice of the Minimizing Adverse Haemorrhagic Events by Transradial Access Site and Systemic Implementation of AngioX (MATRIX) Trial

  • Published:
Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Early invasive management and the use of combined antithrombotic therapies have decreased the risk of recurrent ischaemia in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) but have also increased the bleeding risk. Transradial intervention (TRI) and bivalirudin infusion compared to transfemoral intervention (TFI) or unfractionated heparin (UFH) plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) decrease bleeding complications in patients with ACS. To what extent, a bleeding preventive strategy incorporating at least one of these two treatment options translates into improved outcomes is a matter of debate. The Minimizing Adverse Haemorrhagic Events by Transradial Access Site and Systemic Implementation of AngioX study is a large-scale, multicenter, prospective, open-label trial, conducted at approximately 100 sites in Europe aiming to primarily assess whether TRI and bivalirudin infusion, as compared to TFI and UFH plus provisional GPI, decrease the 30-day incidence of death, myocardial infarction or stroke across the whole spectrum of ACS patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Steg, P. G., James, S. K., Atar, D., et al. (2012). ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. European Heart Journal, 33, 2569–2619.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jneid, H., Anderson, J. L., Wright, R. S., et al. (2012). 2012 ACCF/AHA focused update of the guideline for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2007 guideline and replacing the 2011 focused update): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Circulation, 126, 875–910.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Doyle, B. J., Rihal, C. S., Gastineau, D. A., & Holmes, D. R., Jr. (2009). Bleeding, blood transfusion, and increased mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention: implications for contemporary practice. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 53, 2019–2027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rao, S. V., O’Grady, K., Pieper, K. S., et al. (2005). Impact of bleeding severity on clinical outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes. The American Journal of Cardiology, 96, 1200–1206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Eikelboom, J. W., Mehta, S. R., Anand, S. S., Xie, C., Fox, K. A., & Yusuf, S. (2006). Adverse impact of bleeding on prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation, 114, 774–782.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hochholzer, W., Wiviott, S. D., Antman, E. M., et al. (2011). Predictors of bleeding and time dependence of association of bleeding with mortality: insights from the Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition With Prasugrel—Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 38 (TRITON-TIMI 38). Circulation, 123, 2681–2689.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Spencer, F. A., Moscucci, M., Granger, C. B., et al. (2007). Does comorbidity account for the excess mortality in patients with major bleeding in acute myocardial infarction? Circulation, 116, 2793–2801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, T. Y., Xiao, L., Alexander, K. P., et al. (2008). Antiplatelet therapy use after discharge among acute myocardial infarction patients with in-hospital bleeding. Circulation, 118, 2139–2145.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rao, S. V., Jollis, J. G., Harrington, R. A., et al. (2004). Relationship of blood transfusion and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Jama, 292, 1555–1562.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sabatine, M. S., Morrow, D. A., Giugliano, R. P., et al. (2005). Association of hemoglobin levels with clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndromes. Circulation, 111, 2042–2049.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lopes, R. D., Subherwal, S., Holmes, D. N., et al. (2012). The association of in-hospital major bleeding with short-, intermediate-, and long-term mortality among older patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. European Heart Journal, 33, 2044–2053.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yusuf, S., Mehta, S. R., Chrolavicius, S., et al. (2006). Comparison of fondaparinux and enoxaparin in acute coronary syndromes. The New England Journal of Medicine, 354, 1464–1476.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stone, G. W., Witzenbichler, B., Guagliumi, G., et al. (2008). Bivalirudin during primary PCI in acute myocardial infarction. The New England Journal of Medicine, 358, 2218–2230.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dewilde, W. J., Oirbans, T., Verheugt, F. W., et al. (2013). Use of clopidogrel with or without aspirin in patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet, 381, 1107–1115.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cutlip, D. E., Windecker, S., Mehran, R., et al. (2007). Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation, 115, 2344–2351.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mehran, R., Rao, S. V., Bhatt, D. L., et al. (2011). Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation, 123, 2736–2747.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ndrepepa, G., Schuster, T., Hadamitzky, M., et al. (2012). Validation of the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium definition of bleeding in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation, 125, 1424–1431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Valgimigli, M., Campo, G., Percoco, G., et al. (2010). Randomized comparison of 6- versus 24-month clopidogrel therapy after balancing anti-intimal hyperplasia stent potency in all-comer patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention Design and rationale for the PROlonging Dual-antiplatelet treatment after Grading stent-induced Intimal hyperplasia study (PRODIGY). American Heart Journal, 160, 804–811.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stone, G. W., McLaurin, B. T., Cox, D. A., et al. (2006). Bivalirudin for patients with acute coronary syndromes. The New England Journal of Medicine, 355, 2203–2216.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Montalescot, G., White, H. D., Gallo, R., et al. (2006). Enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in elective percutaneous coronary intervention. The New England Journal of Medicine, 355, 1006–1017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. White, H. D., Aylward, P. E., Gallo, R., et al. (2010). Hematomas of at least 5 cm and outcomes in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the SafeTy and Efficacy of Enoxaparin in PCI patients, an internationaL randomized Evaluation (STEEPLE) trial. American Heart Journal, 159, 110–116.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vranckx, P., Campo, G., Anselmi, M., et al. (2012). Does the site of bleeding matter? A stratified analysis on location of TIMI-graded bleedings and their impact on 12-month outcome in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. EuroIntervention, 8, 71–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Verheugt, F. W., Steinhubl, S. R., Hamon, M., et al. (2011). Incidence, prognostic impact, and influence of antithrombotic therapy on access and nonaccess site bleeding in percutaneous coronary intervention. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 4, 191–197.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Campeau, L. (1989). Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, 16, 3–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Valgimigli, M., Saia, F., Guastaroba, P., et al. (2012). Transradial versus transfemoral intervention for acute myocardial infarction: a propensity score-adjusted and -matched analysis from the REAL (REgistro regionale AngiopLastiche dell’Emilia-Romagna) multicenter registry. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 5, 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jolly, S. S., Yusuf, S., Cairns, J., et al. (2011). Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet, 377, 1409–1420.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Romagnoli, E., Biondi-Zoccai, G., Sciahbasi, A., et al. (2012). Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 60, 2481–2489.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Parodi, G., Antoniucci, D., Nikolsky, E., et al. (2010). Impact of bivalirudin therapy in high-risk patients with acute myocardial infarction: 1-year results from the HORIZONS-AMI (Harmonizing Outcomes with RevasculariZatiON and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 3, 796–802.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Steg, P. G., van’t Hof, A., Hamm, C. W., et al. (2013). Bivalirudin started during emergency transport for primary PCI. The New England Journal of Medicine, 369, 2207–2217.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Valgimigli, M., Tebaldi, M., Campo, G., et al. (2012). Prasugrel versus tirofiban bolus with or without short post-bolus infusion with or without concomitant prasugrel administration in patients with myocardial infarction undergoing coronary stenting: the FABOLUS PRO (Facilitation through Aggrastat By drOpping or shortening Infusion Line in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction compared to or on top of PRasugrel given at loading dOse) trial. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 5, 268–277.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cortese, B., Limbruno, U., Severi, S., De Matteis, S., Diehl, L., & Piti, A. (2011). Effect of prolonged Bivalirudin infusion on ST-segment resolution following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (from the PROBI VIRI 2 study). The American Journal of Cardiology, 108, 1220–1224.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cortese, B., Picchi, A., Micheli, A., et al. (2009). Comparison of prolonged bivalirudin infusion versus intraprocedural in preventing myocardial damage after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with angina pectoris. The American Journal of Cardiology, 104, 1063–1068.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Stone, G. W. (2009). Ischaemia versus bleeding: the art of clinical decision-making. Lancet, 373, 695–696.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Collaborative Group. (1988). Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2. ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival). Lancet, 2, 349–360.

    Google Scholar 

  35. The GUSTO investigators. (1993). An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. The New England Journal of Medicine, 329, 673–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Keeley, E. C., Boura, J. A., & Grines, C. L. (2003). Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet, 361, 13–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Valgimigli.

Additional information

Associate Editor Emanuele Barbato oversaw the review of this article.

The MATRIX trial is sponsored by the Gruppo Italiano Studi Emodinamica and EUSTRATEGY (co-sponsor), and it is conducted with support from The Medicines Company and Terumo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Valgimigli, M., Calabrò, P., Cortese, B. et al. Scientific Foundation and Possible Implications for Practice of the Minimizing Adverse Haemorrhagic Events by Transradial Access Site and Systemic Implementation of AngioX (MATRIX) Trial. J. of Cardiovasc. Trans. Res. 7, 101–111 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-013-9537-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-013-9537-1

Keywords

Navigation