Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparoscopic-Assisted Transhiatal Esophagectomy (LATE) for Carcinoma of the Esophagus

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Total laparoscopic approach for the management of carcinoma of the esophagus has not gained much popularity due to its complexity. The aim of this study was to evaluate safety, feasibility, and outcome of laparoscopic-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy (LATE) for patients with carcinoma of the esophagus. This retrospective study involves a total of 26 patients with carcinoma of the esophagus who were considered for LATE by a single surgical team from January 2010 to September 2014. The median (range) age was 55 years (35–72), and male to female ratio was 20:6. The median (range) operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay were 300 min (180–660), 300 ml (100–500), and 11.5 days (8–25), respectively. Pulmonary complications and cervical anastomotic leak (including one patient with conduit necrosis) occurred in eight (30.7 %) and three (11.5 %) patients, respectively. AJCC stage (7th ed.) was IIA in 12 (46.15 %), IIB in 10 (38.46 %), IIIA in 3 (11.53 %), and IIIB in 1 (3.84 %) patient. Surgical resection margin was negative in all but one patient (3.8 %). The median (range) number of lymph nodes (LN) retrieved was 13 (8–28). During a median follow-up 19 months (8–39), five patients (19.23 %) developed recurrence and three (11.5 %) of them died. LATE is a safe and feasible for the management of selected patients with carcinoma of the lower thoracic esophagus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD (1999) Transhiatal esophagectomy: clinical experience and refinements. Ann Surg 230:392–400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Pennathur A, Zhang J, Chen H, et al. (2010) The “best operation” for esophageal cancer? Ann Thorac Surg 89:S2163–S2167

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. DePaula AL, Hashiba K, Ferriera EA, et al. (1995) Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy with esophagogastroplasty. Surg Laparosc Endosc 5:1–5

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Avital S, Zundel N, Szomstein S, Rosenthal R (2005 jul) Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Am J Surg 190(1):69–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hulscher JBF, van Sandick J, de Boer AGEM, et al. (2002) Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 347:1662–1669

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, et al. (2003) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 238:486–494

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Boshier PR, Anderson O, Hanna GB. Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy for the treatment of esophagogastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2011: Dec 254(6):894–906

  8. Chu KM, Law SY, Fok M, et al. (1997) A prospective randomized comparison of transhiatal and transthoracic resection for lower-third esophageal carcinoma. Am J Surg 174:320–324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lerut T, Nafteux P, Moons J, et al. (2004) Three-field lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction in 174 R0 resections: impact on staging, disease-free survival, and outcome: a plea for adaptation of TNM classification in upper-half esophageal carcinoma. Ann Surg 240:962–972

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Rizk N, Venkatraman E, Park B, et al. (2006) American joint committee on cancer staging system. The prognostic importance of the number of involved lymph nodes in esophageal cancer: implications for revisions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 132:1374–1381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hirdaya H. Nag.

Ethics declarations

Written informed consent was obtained from all the patients. As per prevailing guidelines, permission from the ethics committee was not necessary.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

B G, V., Nag, H.H. & Varshney, V. Laparoscopic-Assisted Transhiatal Esophagectomy (LATE) for Carcinoma of the Esophagus. Indian J Surg 80, 5–8 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-016-1537-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-016-1537-3

Keywords

Navigation