Vast viruses are thought to be associated with mosquitoes. Anopheles sinensis, Armigeres subalbatus, Culex quinquefasciatus, and Culex tritaeniorhynchus are very common mosquito species in China, and whether the virome structure in each species is species-specific has not been evaluated. In this study, a total of 2222 mosquitoes were collected from the same geographic location, and RNAs were sequenced using the Illumina Miseq platform. After querying to the Refseq database, a total of 3,435,781, 2,223,509, 5,727,523, and 6,387,867 paired-end reads were classified under viral sequences from An. sinensis, Ar. subalbatus, Cx. quinquefasciatus, and Cx. tritaeniorhynchus, respectively, with the highest prevalence of virus-associated reads being observed in Cx. quinquefasciatus. The metagenomic comparison analysis showed that the virus-related reads were distributed across 26 virus families, together with an unclassified group of viruses. Anelloviridae, Circoviridae, Genomoviridae, Iridoviridae, Mesoniviridae, Microviridae, Myoviridae, Parvoviridae, Phenuiviridae, and Podoviridae were the top ten significantly different viral families among the four species. Further analysis reveals that the virome is species-specific in four mosquito samples, and several viral sequences which maybe belong to novel viruses are discovered for the first time in those mosquitoes. This investigation provides a basis for a comprehensive knowledge on the mosquito virome status in China.
Mosquito Comparative metagenomics Virome China
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
We thank the Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention for assistance in mosquito sampling within the Hubei Province. This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Science and Technology Basic Work Program 2013FY113500).
HX and ZY designed the experiments. YW, and LZ, carried out the experiments. HX, YW, CS, and AE analyzed the data. HX, YW and ZY wrote the paper. HX and CS checked and finalized the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Compliance with Ethics Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Animal and Human Rights Statement
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Frey KG, Biser T, Hamilton T, Santos CJ, Pimentel G, Mokashi VP, Bishop-Lilly KA (2016) Bioinformatic characterization of mosquito viromes within the Eastern United States and Puerto Rico: discovery of novel viruses. Evol Bioinform 12:1–12. https://doi.org/10.4137/EBO.S38518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Self LS, Shin HK, Kim KH, Lee KW, Chow CY, Hong HK (1973) Ecological studies on Culex tritaeniorhynchus as a vector of Japanese encephalitis. Bull World Health Organ 49:41–47PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Shi M, Lin XD, Tian JH, Chen LJ, Chen X, Li CX, Qin XC, Li J, Cao JP, Eden JS, Buchmann J, Wang W, Xu J, Holmes EC, Zhang YZ (2016) Redefining the invertebrate RNA virosphere. Nature 540:539–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang HL (1990) The natural infection rate of mosquitoes by Japanese encephalitis B virus in Yunnan province. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi 24:265–267 (in Chinese)PubMedGoogle Scholar
Zheng Y, Cao Y, Fu S, Cheng J, Zhao J, Dai P, Kong X, Liang G (2015) Isolation and identification of mosquito-borne arboviruses in Yuncheng city, Shanxi province, 2012. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi 36:368–373 (in Chinese)PubMedGoogle Scholar