Skip to main content
Log in

Iterative Learning Control Algorithm for Feedforward Controller of EGR and VGT Systems in a CRDI Diesel Engine

  • Published:
International Journal of Automotive Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The modern diesel engines equip the exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) system to suppress the NOx emissions. In addition, the variable geometric turbocharger (VGT) system is installed to improve the drivability and fuel efficiency. These EGR and VGT systems have cross-coupled behavior because they interact with the intake and the exhaust manifolds. Furthermore, the turbocharger time delay, gas flow dynamics through EGR pipe cause the nonlinearity characteristics. These nonlinear multi-input-multi-output characteristics cause the degradation of control accuracy, especially during the transient condition. In order to improve the control accuracy, this study proposes an iterative learning control (ILC) algorithm for feedforward controller of EGR and VGT systems. The feedforward controller obtains the values about EGR and VGT actuators using the previous control results in predefined transient states. The ILC algorithm consists of a PD-type learning function and a low-pass filter. The control gains of learning function are determined to guarantee the convergence of learning results. In addition, the low-pass filter is designed for robustness against plant disturbance. The proposed control algorithm was validated by engine experiment which repeated predefined transient states. The error was reduced by 15 % according to the gain. As a result, the proposed algorithm is affordable for improving the transient control performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

y :

plant output

u :

input

d :

uncertainty of transient condition

k :

time step index

e :

tracking error

Q :

Q-filter

L :

learning function

P :

plant response

p :

impulse system response

q :

time shift index

y :

vectors of plant output

u :

vectors of plant input

d :

vectors of uncertainty

W :

known and stable disturbance

Δ:

unknown and stable disturbance

K d :

derivative learning gain

K p :

proportional learning gain

j :

iteration index

d :

desired value

References

  • Ammann, M., Fekete, N. P., Guzzella, L. and Glattfelder, A. H. (2003). Model-based control of the VGT and EGR in a turbocharged common-rail Diesel engine: Theory and passenger car implementation. SAE Paper No. 2003-01-0357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arimoto, S., Kawamura, S. and Miyazaki, F. (1984). Bettering operation of robots by learning. J. Field Robotics 1, 2, 123–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bien, Z. and Xu, J.-X. (2012). Iterative Learning Control: Analysis, Design, Integration and Applications. Springer. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bristow, D. A. and Alleyne, A. G. (2003). A manufacturing system for microscale robotic deposition. Proc. IEEE American Control Conf., Denver, Colorado, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bristow, D. A., Tharayil, M. and Alleyne, A. G. (2006). A survey of iterative learning control. IEEE Control Systems 26, 3, 96–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chauvin, J., Corde, G., Petit, N. and Rouchon, P. (2008). Motion planning for experimental airpath control of a diesel homogeneous charge-compression ignition engine. Control Engineering Practice 16, 9, 1081–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C.-T. (1995). Linear System Theory and Design. Oxford University Press, Inc. London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, P. and Wang, J. (2013). Observer-based estimation of air-fractions for a diesel engine coupled with aftertreatment systems. IEEE Trans. Control Systems Technology 21, 6, 2239–2250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desantes, J. M., Arrègle, J., Molina, S. and Lejeune, M. (2000). Influence of the EGR rate, oxygen concentration and equivalent fuel/air ratio on the combustion behaviour and pollutant emissions of a heavy-duty diesel engine. SAE Paper No. 2000-01-1813.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elci, H., Longman, R. W., Phan, M., Juang, J.-N. and Ugoletti, R. (1994). Discrete frequency based learning control for precision motion control. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Humans, Information and Technolog, San Antonio, Texas, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, I., Liu, C.-S. and Oehlerking, D. (2009). Coordinated EGR-rate model-based controls of turbocharged diesel engines via an intake throttle and an EGR valve. Proc. IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conf., Dearborn, Michigan, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenander, U. and Szegö, G. (2001). Toeplitz Forms and Their Applications. University of California Press. California, USA.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzella, L. and Amstutz, A. (1998). Control of diesel engines. IEEE Control Systems 18, 5, 53–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havlicsek, H. and Alleyne, A. (1999). Nonlinear control of an electrohydraulic injection molding machine via iterative adaptive learning. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics 4, 3, 312–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, J. B. (1988). Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals. McGraw-Hill. New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, S., Park, I., Chung, J. and Sunwoo, M. (2015). Gain scheduled controller of EGR and VGT systems with a model-based gain scheduling strategy for diesel engines. IFAC-PapersOnLine 48, 15, 109–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, R. (1993). Learning control of robot manipulators. J. Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 115, 2B, 402–411.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, M. (2003). Mean-value Modelling and Robust Control of the Airpath of a Turbocharged Diesel Engine. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of Cambridge. Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladommatos, N., Abdelhalim, S. M., Zhao, H. and Hu, Z. (1998). Effects of EGR on heat release in diesel combustion. SAE Paper No. 980184.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., Park, I., Sunwoo, M. and Lee, W. (2013). AUTOSAR-ready light software architecture for automotive embedded control systems. Trans. Korean Society of Automotive Engineers 21, 1, 68–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. and Sunwoo, M. (2014). Model-based control of a diesel engine variable geometry turbine and exhaust gas recirculation system using a linear parameter varying methodology. Proc. Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: J. Automobile Engineering 228, 14, 1633–1643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longman, R. W. (2000). Iterative learning control and repetitive control for engineering practice. Int. J. Control 73, 10, 930–954.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Messner, W., Horowitz, R., Kao, W.-W. and Boals, M. (1991). A new adaptive learning rule. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 36, 2, 188–197.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, K. (1996). Iterative learning control for deterministic systems. Automatica 6, 32, 948–949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, K. L., Dahleh, M. and Bhattacharyya, S. P. (1992). Iterative learning control: A survey and new results. J. Field Robotics 9, 5, 563–594.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Noack, R., Jeinsch, T., Sari, A. H. A. and Weinhold, N. (2014). Data-driven self-tuning feedforward control by iterative learning control. Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Industrial Electronics (ISIE), Istanbul, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norrlof, M. (2002). An adaptive iterative learning control algorithm with experiments on an industrial robot. IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation 18, 2, 245–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norrlöf, M. and Gunnarsson, S. (2002). Time and frequency domain convergence properties in iterative learning control. Int. J. Control 75, 14, 1114–1126.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Park, I., Hong, S. and Sunwoo, M. (2014a). Robust air-tofuel ratio and boost pressure controller design for the EGR and VGT systems using quantitative feedback theory. IEEE Control Systems 22, 6, 2218–2231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, I., Lee, W. and Sunwoo, M. (2012). Application software modeling and integration methodology using AUTOSAR-ready light software architecture. Trans. Korean Society of Automotive Engineers 20, 6, 117–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y., Park, I., Lee, J., Min, K. and Sunwoo, M. (2014b). Nonlinear compensators of exhaust gas recirculation and variable geometry turbocharger systems using air path models for a CRDI diesel engine. J. Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power 136, 4, 041602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saab, S. S. (2003). Stochastic P-type/D-type iterative learning control algorithms. Int. J. Control 76, 2, 139–148.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Van Nieuwstadt, M. J., Kolmanovsky, I. V., Moraal, P. E., Stefanopoulou, A. and Jankovic, M. (2000). EGR-VGT control schemes: Experimental comparison for a highspeed diesel engine. IEEE Control Systems 20, 3, 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, M., Reader, G. T. and Hawley, J. G. (2004). Diesel engine exhaust gas recirculation–A review on advanced and novel concepts. Energy Conversion and Management 45, 6, 883–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manbae Han.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Min, K., Sunwoo, M. & Han, M. Iterative Learning Control Algorithm for Feedforward Controller of EGR and VGT Systems in a CRDI Diesel Engine. Int.J Automot. Technol. 19, 433–442 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-018-0042-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-018-0042-z

Key words

Navigation