Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Particle Processing by Olympia Oysters Ostrea lurida and Pacific Oysters Crassostrea gigas

  • Published:
Estuaries and Coasts Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The native Olympia oyster (Ostrea lurida) has been the subject of few detailed feeding studies compared with many other species of bivalve mollusk. More information on this species’ feeding activity and behavior are needed to better understand its historical ecological role in Pacific Northwest (PNW) estuaries, compared with that of the widely farmed, well-studied, non-native Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas). In this study, the feeding physiology and particle processing behaviors of O. lurida and C. gigas were examined in both controlled laboratory experiments and in situ trials that spanned the wet and dry seasons of the PNW. It was hypothesized that O. lurida would have lower filtration and particle processing rates than those of C. gigas. Results supported this hypothesis in that filtration and absorption rates of the Pacific oyster were significantly greater than those of O. lurida under laboratory conditions. In the field, C. gigas was also found to filter, absorb, and deposit organic material at significantly greater rates than O. lurida. These observations explain the previously reported greater growth rates of C. gigas relative to those of O. lurida. Furthermore, after applying data collected here to recent modeling efforts, it estimated that C. gigas could potentially remove between 1.2 and 3.6-fold and deposit between 1.6- and 4.6-fold more organic suspended material than comparable, historic populations of O. lurida in the PNW.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Askew, C.G. 1972. The growth of oysters Ostrea edulis and Crassostrea gigas in Emsworth Harbour. Aquaculture 1: 237–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asmus, R.M., and Harald Asmus. 1991. Mussel beds: limiting or promoting phytoplankton? Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 148 (2): 215–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P. 1995. Review of ecology and fishery of the Olympia oyster, Ostrea lurida with annotated bibliography. Journal of Shellfish Research 14: 501–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banas, N.S., B.M. Hickey, J.A. Newton, and J.L. Ruesink. 2007. Tidal exchange, bivalve grazing, and patterns of primary production in Willapa Bay, Washington, USA. Marine Ecology Progress Series 341: 123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barillé, L., and J. Prou. 1993. Modeling Japanese oyster physiological processes under natural tidal variation in suspended particulate matter. In Counc. Meet. of the Int. Counc. for the Exploration of the Sea, Copenhagen, Denmark.

  • Barillé, L., J. Prou, M. Héral, and D. Razet. 1997. Effects of high natural seston concentrations on the feeding, selection, and absorption of the oyster Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 212 (2): 149–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(96)02756-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayne, B.L. 2002. A physiological comparison between Pacific oysters Crassostrea gigas and Sydney Rock oysters Saccostrea glomerata: food, feeding and growth in a shared estuarine habitat. Marine Ecology Progress Series 232: 163–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayne, B.L. 2017. Biology of Oysters. 1st ed. Cambridge: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayne, B.L., A.J.S. Hawkins, E. Navarro, and I.P. Iglesias. 1989. Effects of seston concentration on feeding, digestion and growth in the mussel Mytilus edulis. Marine Ecology Progress Series 55: 47–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, B., and A. Bradbury. 2012. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife plan for rebuilding Olympia oyster (Ostrea lurida) populations in Puget Sound with a historical and contemporary overview. Brinnon: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bougrier, S., A.J.S. Hawkins, and M. Héral. 1997. Preingestive selection of different microalgal mixtures in Crassostrea gigas and Mytilus edulis analysed by flow cytometry. Aquaculture 150 (1-2): 123–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown C.A., and R.J Ozretich. 2007. An approach to developing nutrient criteria for Pacific Northwest estuaries: a case study of Yaquina Estuary, Oregon. Washington, DC: US EPA Office of Research and Development Laboratory, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Western Ecology Division.

  • Brown, C.A., and R.J. Ozretich. 2009. Coupling between the coastal ocean and Yaquina Bay, Oregon: Importance of oceanic inputs relative to other nitrogen sources. Estuaries and Coasts 32 (2): 219–237.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Comeau, L.A., A.L. Mallet, C.E. Carver, and T. Guyondet. 2014. Impact of high-density suspended oyster culture on benthic sediment characteristics. Aquacultural Engineering 58: 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2013.12.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cranford, P.J., and P.S. Hill. 1999. Seasonal variation in food utilization by the suspension-feeding bivalve molluscs Mytilus edulis and Placopecten magellanicus. Marine Ecology Progress Series 190: 223–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cranford, P. J., J. E. Ward, and S. E. Shumway. 2011. Bivalve Filter Feeding: Variability and Limits of the Aquaculture Biofilter. In Shellfish Aquaculture and the Environment, ed. Sandra E. Shumway, 81–124. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Crooks, J.A. 2002. Characterizing ecosystem-level consequences of biological invasions: the role of ecosystem engineers. Oikos 97 (2): 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.970201.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, D. 1979. Introduced species and the Maine situation. In Exotic species in mariculture, ed. R. Mann, 149–164. London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enright, C.T., G.F. Newkirk, J.S. Craigie, and J.D. Castell. 1986. Evaluation of phytoplankton as diets for juvenile Ostrea edulis L. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 96 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(86)90009-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gascon, C., T.M. Brooks, T. Contreras-MacBeath, N. Heard, W. Konstant, J. Lamoreux, F. Launay, M. Maunder, R.A. Mittermeier, S. Molur, R.K. al Mubarak, M.J. Parr, A.G.J. Rhodin, A.B. Rylands, P. Soorae, J.G. Sanderson, and J.C. Vié. 2015. The importance and benefits of species. Current Biology 25 (10): R431–R438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.03.041.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerdes, D. 1983. The Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas: Part I. Feeding behaviour of larvae and adults. Aquaculture 31 (2-4): 195–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(83)90313-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geurts van Kessel, A.J.M., B.J. Kater, and T.C. Prins. 2003. Veranderende draagkracht van de Oosterschelde voor kokkels. RIKZ: Rijkswaterstaat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, M.W., and C.J. Langdon. 2018. Ecophysiology of the Olympia Oyster, Ostrea lurida, and Pacific Oyster, Crassostrea gigas. Estuaries and Coasts 41 (2): 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-017-0273-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray MW, Zu Ermgassen PSE, Gair J, Langdon CJ, Lemagie EP, Lerczak JA. 2019. Spatially explicit estimates of in situ filtration by native oysters to augment ecosystem services during restoration. Estuaries and Coasts. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-019-00515-3.

  • Grizzle, R.E., J.K. Greene, and L.D. Coen. 2008. Seston removal by natural and constructed intertidal eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) reefs: a comparison with previous laboratory studies, and the value of in situ methods. Estuaries and Coasts 31 (6): 1208–1220.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, A.J.S., R.F.M. Smith, B.L. Bayne, and M. Heral. 1996. Novel observations underlying the fast growth of suspension-feeding shellfish in turbid environments: Mytilus edulis. Marine Ecology Progress Series 131: 179–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, A.J.S., R.F.M. Smith, S. Bougrier, B.L. Bayne, and M. Héral. 1997. Manipulation of dietary conditions for maximal growth in mussels, Mytilus edulis, from the Marennes-Oléron Bay, France. Aquatic Living Resources 10 (1): 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, A.J.S., B.L. Bayne, S. Bougrier, M. Héral, J.I.P. Iglesias, E. Navarro, R.F.M. Smith, and M.B. Urrutia. 1998a. Some general relationships in comparing the feeding physiology of suspension-feeding bivalve molluscs. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 219 (1-2): 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, A.J.S., R.F.M. Smith, S.H. Tan, and Z.B. Yasin. 1998b. Suspension-feeding behaviour in tropical bivalve molluscs: Perna viridis, Crassostrea belcheri, Crassostrea iradelei, Saccostrea cucculata and Pinctada margarifera. Marine Ecology Progress Series 166: 173–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, A.J.S., M.R. James, R.W. Hickman, S. Hatton, and M. Weatherhead. 1999. Modelling of suspension-feeding and growth in the green-lipped mussel Perna canaliculus exposed to natural and experimental variations of seston availability in Marlborough Sounds, New Zealand. Journal of Marine Ecology Progress Series 191: 217–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, S.-C., D.A. Kreeger, and R.I.E. Newell. 2003. Tidal and seasonal variations in the quantity and composition of seston in a North American, mid-Atlantic saltmarsh. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 56 (3-4): 547–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7714(02)00205-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karentz, D., and C.D. McIntire. 1977. Distribution of diatoms in the plankton of Yaquina Estuary, Oregon. Journal of Phycology 13 (4): 379–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3646.1977.00379.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, M.L., J.C. Cornwell, M.S. Owens, and K.T. Paynter. 2013. Denitrification and nutrient assimilation on a restored oyster reef. Marine Ecology Progress Series 480: 1–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kincaid, T. 1968. The ecology of Willapa Bay, Washington, in relation to the oyster industry. Seattle: Self Published.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiorboe, T., and F. Mohlenberg. 1981. Particle selection in suspension-feeding bivalves. Marine Ecology Progress Series 5: 291–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreeger, D.A. 1993. Seasonal patterns in utilization of dietary protein by the mussel Mytilus trossulus. Marine Ecology Progress Series 95: 215–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreeger, D.A., and R.I.E. Newell. 2001. Seasonal utilization of different seston carbon sources by the ribbed mussel, Geukensia demissa (Dillwyn) in a mid-Atlantic salt marsh. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 260 (1): 71–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langdon, C.J., and C.A. Siegfried. 1984. Progress in the development of artificial diets for bivalve filter feeders. Aquaculture 39 (1-4): 135–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(84)90262-X Recent Innovations in Cultivation of Pacific Molluscs.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loosanoff, V. L. 1962. Effects of turbidity on some larval and adult bivalves. In Proceeding of the Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute, 80–85. Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute

  • Loosanoff, V.L., and F.D. Tommers. 1948. Effect of suspended silt and other substances on rate of feeding of oysters. Science 107 (2768): 69–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lunstrum, A., K. McGlathery, and A. Smyth. 2018. Oyster (Crassostrea virginica) Aquaculture shifts sediment nitrogen processes toward mineralization over denitrification. Estuaries and Coasts 41 (4): 1130–1146.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Markert, A., A. Wehrmann, and I. Kröncke. 2010. Recently established Crassostrea-reefs versus native Mytilus-beds: differences in ecosystem engineering affects the macrofaunal communities (Wadden Sea of Lower Saxony, southern German Bight). Biological Invasions 12 (1): 15–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Means, J.C., and R.D. Wijayaratne. 1984. Chemical characterization of estuarine colloidal organic matter: Implications for Adsorptive Processes. Bulletin of Marine Science 35: 449–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarro, J.M., and J. Widdows. 1997. Feeding physiology of Cerastoderma edule in response to a wide range of seston concentrations. Marine Ecology Progress Series 152: 175–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, R.I.E., and S.J. Jordan. 1983. Preferential ingestion of organic material by the American oyster Crassostrea virginica. Marine Ecology Progress Series (Oldendorf) 13: 47–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, R.I.E., and E.W. Koch. 2004. Modeling seagrass density and distribution in response to changes in turbidity stemming from bivalve filtration and seagrass sediment stabilization. Estuaries and Coasts 27 (5): 793–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, R.I.E., J.C. Cornwell, and M.S. Owens. 2002. Influence of simulated bivalve biodeposition and microphytobenthos on sediment nitrogen dynamics: A laboratory study. Limnology and Oceanography 47 (5): 1367–1379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NOAA Restoration Center and PSRF. 2010. West Coast Native Oyster Restoration Workshop Proceedings. U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA restoration center.

  • Norkko, A., J.E. Hewitt, S.F. Thrush, and G.A. Funnell. 2001. Benthic-pelagic coupling and suspension-feeding bivalves: Linking site-specific sediment flux and biodeposition to benthic community structure. Limnology and Oceanography 46 (8): 2067–2072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norling, P., and N. Kautsky. 2008. Patches of the mussel Mytilus sp. are islands of high biodiversity in subtidal sediment habitats in the Baltic Sea. Aquatic Biology 4 (1): 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padilla, Dianna K. 2010. Context-dependent impacts of a non-native ecosystem engineer, the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas. Integrative and Comparative Biology 50 (2): 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icq080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauley G.B., B. Van Der Raay, and D. Troutt. 1988. Species Profiles: Life Histories and Environmental Requirements of Coastal Fishes and Invertebrates (Pacific Northwest), Pacific Oyster. DTIC Document.

  • Porter, E.T., J.C. Cornwell, and L.P. Sanford. 2004. Effect of oysters Crassostrea virginica and bottom shear velocity on benthic-pelagic coupling and estuarine water quality. Marine Ecology Progress Series 271: 61–75. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps271061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prins, T.C., and A.C. Smaal. 1994. The role of the blue mussel Mytilus edulis in the cycling of nutrients in the Oosterschelde estuary (The Netherlands). Hydrobiologia 282: 413–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prins, T.C., A.C. Smaal, and R.F. Dame. 1997. A review of the feedbacks between bivalve grazing and ecosystem processes. Aquatic Ecology 31 (4): 349–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puget Sound Restoration Fund. 2018. Olympia Oyster Restoration. https://restorationfund.org/projects/olympiaoyster

  • Reise, K., and J.E.E. Van Beusekom. 2008. Interactive effects of global and regional change on a coastal ecosystem. Helgoland Marine Research 62 (1): 85–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren, J.S., A.H. Ross, and D.R. Schiel. 2000. Functional descriptions of feeding and energetics of the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas in New Zealand. Marine Ecology Progress Series 208: 119–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, C.A., R. Seed, E.M.H. Al-Roumaihi, and L. McDonald. 1993. Distribution, shell growth and predation of the New Zealand oyster, Tiostrea (= Ostrea) lutaria Hutton, in the Menai Strait, North Wales. Journal of Shellfish Research 12: 207–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richkus, W.A. 2013. Role of ecological risk assessment findings in agency decision-making regarding oyster restoration in Chesapeake Bay. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal 19 (5): 1253–1263. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2013.767113.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, M., J.E. Ward, S.E. Shumway, G.H. Wikfors, E. Pales-Espinosa, and B. Allam. 2013. Effects of particle surface properties on feeding selectivity in the eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica and the blue mussel Mytilus edulis. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 446: 320–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruesink, J.L., H.S. Lenihan, A.C. Trimble, K.W. Heiman, F. Micheli, J.E. Byers, and M.C. Kay. 2005. Introduction of non-native oysters: ecosystem effects and restoration implications. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36 (1): 643–689. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102003.152638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruesink, J.L., B.E. Feist, C.J. Harvey, J.S. Hong, A.C. Trimble, and L.M. Wisehart. 2006. Changes in productivity associated with four introduced species: ecosystem transformation of a ‘pristine’ estuary. Marine Ecology Progress Series 311: 203–215. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps311203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, E.N. 1957. The rise and decline of the Olympia oyster. Elma: Olympia Oyster Growers Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Testa, J.M., D.C. Brady, J.C. Cornwell, M.S. Owens, L.P. Sanford, C.R. Newell, S.E. Suttles, and R.I.E. Newell. 2015. Modeling the impact of floating oyster (Crassostrea virginica) aquaculture on sediment-water nutrient and oxygen fluxes. Aquaculture Environment Interactions 7 (3): 205–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Nature Conservancy. 2018. Oysters. The Nature Conservancy in Washington. https://www.nature.org/en-us/about-us/where-we-work/united-states/washington/stories-in-washington/washington-oysters-in-puget-sound/

  • Trimble, A.C., J.L. Ruesink, and B.R. Dumbauld. 2009. Factors preventing the recovery of a historically overexploited shellfish species, Ostrea lurida Carpenter 1864. Journal of Shellfish Research 28 (1): 97–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troost, K. 2010. Causes and effects of a highly successful marine invasion: case-study of the introduced Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas in continental NW European estuaries. Journal of Sea Research 64 (3): 145–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban, E.R., and D.L. Kirchman. 1992. Effect of kaolinite clay on the feeding activity of the eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 160 (1): 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(92)90109-N.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Army Corps of Engineers. 2009. Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for Oyster Restoration in Chesapeake Bay Including the Use of a Native and/or Nonnative Oyster. Norfolk: The Corps of Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velasco, L.A., and J.M. Navarro. 2005. Feeding physiology of two bivalves under laboratory and field conditions in response to variable food concentrations. Marine Ecology Progress Series 291: 115–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J.E., and S.E. Shumway. 2004. Separating the grain from the chaff: particle selection in suspension- and deposit-feeding bivalves. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 300 (1-2): 83–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2004.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson-Ormond, E.A., E.N. Powell, and S.M. Ray. 1997. Short-term and small-scale variation in food availability to natural oyster populations: food, flow and flux. Marine Ecology 18 (1): 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zu Ermgassen, P., M.W. Gray, C.J. Langdon, M.D. Spalding, and R.D. Brumbaugh. 2013. Quantifying the historic contribution of Olympia oysters to filtration in Pacific Coast (USA) estuaries and the implications for restoration objectives. Aquatic Ecology 47 (2): 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-013-9431-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The National Estuarine Research Reserve System fellowship awarded to MWG (Award No. NA10NOS4200025) supported the experiments and the Molluscan Broodstock Program staff provided valuable resources during the studies. Additional support to MWG was provided by the Oregon Society of Conchologists, the Mamie Markham Research Award, and Anja Robinson Fellowship from the Hatfield Marine Science Center, OSU, and by the USDA-ARS Shellfish program at HMSC (CRIS project 5358-6300-00200D).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Horn Point Laboratory, University of Maryland College of Environmental Sciences, Cambridge, MD, USA

    Matthew W. Gray

  2. Coastal Oregon Marine Experimental Station and Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Hatfield Marine Science Center, Oregon State University, Newport, OR, USA

    Chris Langdon

Authors
  1. Matthew W. Gray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chris Langdon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew W. Gray.

Additional information

Communicated by Marco Bartoli

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gray, M.W., Langdon, C. Particle Processing by Olympia Oysters Ostrea lurida and Pacific Oysters Crassostrea gigas. Estuaries and Coasts 42, 779–791 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-018-0480-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-018-0480-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation