Fish Movement Through an Estuary Mouth Is Related to Tidal Flow
- 410 Downloads
Many species of fish move between ocean and estuarine habitats; however, there is little evidence of the magnitude of fish undertaking these movements particularly over short time scales. Such information is critical in understanding the connectivity between these major habitats. We used an acoustic camera to observe the entire entrance of a small estuary over a 4-month period during 3 h of ebb and flood tides and during day and night, which allowed us to count all fish passing through the entrance and observe their schooling behaviour. Nearly 30,000 fish transited in 60 h of observation over the study period, with a mean of 1396 (±240 S.E.) fish per 3 h deployment and a maximum of 4636 fish per 3 h. Of these, 20,170 entered the estuary while 7751 exited. Movements of fish were closely related to tidal flow when fish movement peaked during the middle of the tide. While the majority of fish swam with the tide, approximately 32 % swam against the tidal current. The schooling behaviour of transiting fish varied between fish entering and exiting the estuary, with incoming fish far more likely to school than those exiting. This may be an antipredator behaviour but also related to group navigation. This study has provided insights into the tight coupling of estuaries and ocean, and the tidal influence on the mass movements of fish.
KeywordsConnectivity Tidal flow Diel Estuary Ocean Fish behaviour Acoustic camera
Funding for this research was provided by the School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Science (BEES) at the University of New South Wales. The DIDSON was funded by Australian Research Council grant LE10010059. Logistical support and advice was provided by the Warringah Council.
- Beck M.W., K.L. Heck, K.W. Able, D.L. Childers, D.B. Eggleston, B.M. Gillanders, B. Halpern, C.G. Hays, K. Hoshino, T.J. Minello, R.J. Orth, P.F. Sheridan, and M.P. Weinstein. 2001. The identification, conservation, and management of estuarine and marine nurseries for fish and invertebrates. Bioscience 51: 633–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cavagna A., S.M.D. Queiros, I. Giardina, F. Stefanini, and M. Viale. 2013. Diffusion of individual birds in starling flocks. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 280.Google Scholar
- Elsdon T.S., B.K. Wells, S.E. Campana, B.M. Gillanders, C.M. Jones, K.E. Limburg, D.H. Secor, S.R. Thorrold, and B.D. Walther. 2008. Otolith chemistry to describe movements and life-history parameters of fishes: hypotheses, assumptions, limitations and inferences. In Oceanography and marine biology: an annual review, vol Vol 46, 297–29+. Boca Raton: CRC Press-Taylor and Francis Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Forward R.B., and R.A. Tankersley. 2001. Selective tidal-stream transport of marine animals. Oceanography and marine biology: an annual review 39: 305–353.Google Scholar
- Core Team R.. 2014. A language for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
- Shaw, E. 1970. Schooling in fishes: Critique and review. Development and evolution of behaviour (eds L.R. Aronson, E. Tobach, D.S. Lehrman and J.S. Rosenblatt), pp. 452–480. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
- Whitfield A.K. 1998. Biology and ecology of fishes in southern African estuaries, 223. Ichthyological monographs of the J.L.B. Smith Institute of Ichthyology.Google Scholar
- Wood S.N. 2006. Generalized additive models. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton: An introduction with R.Google Scholar