Advertisement

Brittonia

, Volume 70, Issue 3, pp 277–288 | Cite as

New records of the rare North American endemic Chara brittonii (Characeae), with comments on its distribution

  • Kenneth G. Karol
  • Mitchell S. Alix
  • Robin W. Scribailo
  • Paul M. Skawinski
  • Robin S. Sleith
  • Joseph A. Sardina
  • John D. Hall
Article
  • 90 Downloads

Abstract

Characeae is a family of freshwater green algal macrophytes found on every continent except Antarctica. Although some species are thought to be cosmopolitan, others appear to be restricted to relatively small geographic areas. Chara brittonii is a North American endemic previously reported from eight scattered populations in Indiana, Michigan, New Jersey, and Ohio. Given that few extant populations were known, basic questions about its distribution, habitat preference, morphology, and phylogenetic placement remained unanswered. We have surveyed every reported locality for C. brittonii except the New Jersey locality, because the collection details are vague, and also surveyed numerous additional waterbodies in Indiana, Michigan, and Wisconsin. We have found extant populations in nine localities in three states. These include one newly reported site in Indiana and five newly reported sites in Wisconsin, the first known populations in that state. Chara brittonii seems to have been extirpated from several historical sites in recent decades. We expanded both the range and the number of known extant populations for C. brittonii and hypothesize that C. brittonii may be more widespread in the Midwest than previously thought. Factors contributing to the actual and apparent rarity of this species are discussed including its preferred habitat and small size. We observed that the number of antheridial scute cells of C. brittonii varied from 4–8 with both triangular and elongate scutes produced on the same thallus, an unusual condition for the family. Phylogenetic analyses using three plastid-encoded markers placed C. brittonii among a paraphyletic grade of C. foliolosa sensu lato strains in the monophyletic subsection Willdenowia. We propose that C. foliolosa, as currently recognized, represents a species complex of several phylogenetically distinct lineages, and conclude that C. brittonii is a structurally and phylogenetically distinct species worthy of conservation.

Keywords

Aquatic plants Biogeography Charophyta Ecology Green algae Phylogeny 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank BUT, CACS, ILL, NY, PUL, and UWSP for providing specimens for this study. We especially acknowledge the University of Wisconsin Herbarium (WIS) for generously providing specimens on loan and allowing us to review their recent collections. We are particularly grateful for the assistance in field collections and sample preparations provided by Ryan Scribailo. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for critically evaluating and improving the manuscript. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant numbers DEB-1020660 and DEB-1036466 and by the Hanes Trust under grant number 205891.

Supplementary material

12228_2018_9527_Fig4_ESM.gif (927 kb)
Suppl. Material 1

Phylogeny of Characeae based on a Maximum Likelihood (RAxML) analysis of three plastid-encoded genes (atpB, psbC, rbcL). Numbers above the branches represent, respectively, bootstrap support from Maximum Parsimony and RAxML analyses and posterior probabilities from Bayesian Inference. An asterisk represents a bootstrap value of 100 or a posterior probability of 1.0. A dash represents a bootstrap value of 50 or less and a posterior probability of 0.5 or less. Numbers in brackets are barcodes for herbarium specimens. NY = William and Lynda Steere Herbarium, The New York Botanical Garden; US = National Museum of Natural History Herbarium, Smithsonian Institution. The genera Lamprothamnium, Lychnothamnus, Nitella, Nitellopsis, and Tolypella were found to be monophyletic. However, the subfamily Nitelleae was paraphyletic with Nitella sister to the Chareae. (GIF 926 kb)

12228_2018_9527_MOESM1_ESM.tif (5.3 mb)
High resolution image (TIFF 5395 kb)

Literature cited

  1. Alix, M. S. & R. W. Scribailo. 2011. Charophyceae, Charales, Characeae, Chara drouetii R. D. Wood, 1965: First record for the state of Quintana Roo, Mexico. Check List 7: 21–24.Google Scholar
  2. Alix, M. S., R. W. Scribailo & C. W. Weliczko. 2017. Nitellopsis obtusa (Desv.) J. Groves, 1919 (Charophyta: Characeae): new records from southern Michigan, USA with notes on environmental parameters known to influence its distribution. BioInvasions Records 6: 311–319.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, T. F. 1880–1893. Characeae Americanae Exsiccatae, Fasc. I: 1–10, II: 11–20 (1880); III: 21–30, IV: 31–40a (1888); V: 41–46 (1893).Google Scholar
  4. –––––. 1888. Characeae of America. John C. Rankin, Jr., New York.Google Scholar
  5. Bednarz, R., H. Wandell, P. Steen, P. W. Dimond, J. Latimore & W. Dimond. 2015. Cooperative Lakes Monitoring Program Manual. Michigan Department of Water Quality, Water Bureau MI/DEQ/WRD-15/004, Lansing, MI.Google Scholar
  6. Blindow, I., A. Hargeby & G. Andersson. 2002. Seasonal changes of mechanisms maintaining clear water in a shallow lake with abundant Chara vegetation. Aquatic Botany 72: 315–334.Google Scholar
  7. Brainard, A. S. & K. L. Schulz. 2016. Impacts of the cryptic macroalgal invader, Nitellopsis obtusa, on macrophyte communities. Freshwater Science 36: 55–62.Google Scholar
  8. Braun, A., & C. F. O. Nordstedt. 1882. Fragmente einer Monographie der Characeen. Nach den hinterlassenen Manuscripten A. Braun’s. ‘Abhandlungen Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1882’Google Scholar
  9. Casanova, M. T., A. García & J. L. Porter. 2003. Charophyte rediscoveries in Australia: what and why? Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica 20: 129–138.Google Scholar
  10. Collins, F. S., I. Holden & W. A. Setchell. 1895–1919. Phycotheca Boreali-Americana 1–46, A-E: 1–2300, I-CXXV.Google Scholar
  11. Daily, F. K. 1953. The Characeae of Indiana. Butler University Botanical Studies 11: 5–49.Google Scholar
  12. –––––. 1958. Some observation on the occurrence and distribution of Characeae in Indiana. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 68: 95–107.Google Scholar
  13. Escobar, L. E., H. Qiao, N. D. B. Phelps, C. K. Wagner & D. J. Larkin. 2016. Realized niche shift associated with the Eurasian charophyte Nitellopsis obtusa becoming invasive in North America. Scientific Reports 6: 1–15.Google Scholar
  14. Griffin, D. G., III, & V. W. Proctor. 1964. A population study of Chara zeylanica in Texas, Oklahoma, and New Mexico. American Journal of Botany 51: 120–124.Google Scholar
  15. Groves, J. 1931. On the antheridium of Chara zeylanica Willd. Journal of Botany, British and Foreign 69: 97–98.Google Scholar
  16. Guindon, S., J. F. Dufayard, V. Lefort, M. Anisimova, W. Hordik & O. Gascuel. 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic Biology 59: 307–321.Google Scholar
  17. Hall, J. D. & K. G. Karol. 2016. Inventory of freshwater algae (excluding diatoms) of Harriman State Park (Rockland and Orange Counties, New York). Brittonia 68: 148–169.Google Scholar
  18. –––––, K. Fučiková, C. Lo, L. A. Lewis & K. G. Karol. 2010. An assessment of proposed DNA barcodes in freshwater green algae. Cryptogamie, Algologie 31: 529–555.Google Scholar
  19. Hauxwell, J., S. Knight, K. I. Wagner, A. Mikulyuk, M. E. Nault, M. Porzky & S. Chase. 2010. Recommended baseline monitoring of aquatic plants in Wisconsin: sampling design, field and laboratory procedures, data entry and analysis, and applications. WI-DNR Bureau of Science Services: PUB-SS-1068.Google Scholar
  20. Hiebert, R. D., D. A. Wilcox & N. B. Pavlovic. 1986. Vegetation patterns in and among pannes (calcareous intradunal pools) at the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Indiana. American Midland Naturalist 116: 276–281.Google Scholar
  21. Huelsenbeck, J. P. & F. Ronquist. 2000. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Distributed by the authors.Google Scholar
  22. Hutchinson, G. E. 1975. A treatise on limnology. Vol. 3. John Wiley & Sons, New York, London, Sydney.Google Scholar
  23. INDNR. 2014. Tier II aquatic vegetation survey protocol. Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Fish and Wildlife, Indianapolis, Indiana.Google Scholar
  24. –––––. 2015. Emergent vegetation survey protocol. Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Fish and Wildlife, Indianapolis, Indiana.Google Scholar
  25. Jeppesen, E., M. A. Søndergaard, M. O. Søndergaard & K. Christoffersen. 1998. The structuring role of submerged macrophytes in lakes. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Karol, K. G. & R. S. Sleith. 2017. Discovery of the oldest record of Nitellopsis obtusa (Charophyceae, Charophyta) in North America. Journal of Phycology.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.12557
  27. –––––, P. M. Skawinski, R. M. McCourt, M. E. Nault, R. Evans, M. E. Barton, M. S. Berg, D. J. Perleberg & J. D. Hall. 2017. First discovery of the charophycean green alga Lychnothamnus barbatus (Charophyceae) extant in the New World. American Journal of Botany 104: 1108–1116.Google Scholar
  28. Lanfear, R., B. Calcott, S. Y. W. Ho & S. Guindon. 2012. PartitionFinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution 29: 1695–1701.Google Scholar
  29. –––––, P. B. Frandsen, A. M. Wright, T. Senfeld & B. Calcott. 2017. PartitionFinder 2: new methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analysis. Molecular Biology and Evolution  https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw260.
  30. Mann, H., V. W. Proctor & A. S. Taylor. 1999. Toward a biogeography of North American charophytes. Australian Journal of Botany 47: 445–458.Google Scholar
  31. Meiers, S. T., V. W. Proctor & R. L. Chapman. 1999. Phylogeny and biogeography of Chara (Charophyta) inferred from 18S rDNA sequences. Australian Journal of Botany 47: 347–360.Google Scholar
  32. Mikulyuk, A., J. Hauxwell, P. Rasmussen, S. Knight, K. I. Wagner, M. E. Nault & D. Ridgley. 2010. Testing methodology for assessing plant communities in temperate inland lakes. Lake and Reservoir Management 26: 54–62.Google Scholar
  33. Miller, M. A., W. Pfieffer & T. Schwartz. 2010. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), New Orleans, LA: 1–8.Google Scholar
  34. Parker, B. C., G. J. Schumacher & L. A. Whitford. 1984. Some rarely reported algae of the Appalachian Mountains: why so rare? Virginia Journal of Science 35: 197–215.Google Scholar
  35. Pérez, W., J. D. Hall, R. M. McCourt & K. G. Karol. 2014. Phylogeny of North American Tolypella (Charophyceae, Charophyta) based on plastid DNA sequences with a description of Tolypella ramosissima sp. nov. Journal of Phycology 50: 776–789.Google Scholar
  36. –––––, M. T. Casanova, J. D. Hall, R. M. McCourt & K. G. Karol. 2016. Phylogenetic congruence of ribosomal operon and plastid gene sequences for the Characeae with an emphasis on Tolypella (Characeae, Charophyceae). Phycologia 56: 230–237.Google Scholar
  37. Proctor, V. W. 1962. Viability of Chara oospores taken from migratory waterfowl. Ecology 43: 528–529.Google Scholar
  38. –––––. 1999. Charophytivory, playas y papalotes, a local paradigm of global relevance. Australian Journal of Botany 47: 399–406.Google Scholar
  39. ––––– & F. H. Wiman. 1971. An experimental approach to the systematics of the monoecious-conjoined members of the genus Chara, series Gymnobasalia. American Journal of Botany 58: 885–893.Google Scholar
  40. –––––, D. G. Griffin III & A. T. Hotchkiss. 1971. A synopsis of the genus Chara, series Gymnobasalia (subsection Willdenowia RDW). American Journal of Botany 58: 894–901.Google Scholar
  41. Robinson, C. B. 1906. The Chareae of North America. Bulletin of the New York Botanical Garden 4: 244–308.Google Scholar
  42. Sawa, T. 1973. Two new species of Tolypella (Characeae) from North America. Journal of Phycology 9: 472–482.Google Scholar
  43. Scribailo, R. W. & M. S. Alix. 2010. A checklist of North American Characeae. Charophytes 2: 38–52.Google Scholar
  44. Sleith, R. S., A. J. Havens, R. A. Stewart & K. G. Karol. 2015. Distribution of Nitellopsis obtusa (Characeae) in New York, U.S.A. Brittonia 67: 166–172.Google Scholar
  45. Stamatakis, A., M. Ott & T. Ludwig. 2005. RAxML-OMP: an efficient program for phylogenetic inference on SMPs. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Parallel Computing Technologies (PaCT2005), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3506: 288–302.Google Scholar
  46. –––––, P. Hoover & J. Rougemont. 2008. A fast bootstrapping algorithm for the RAxML web-servers. Systematic Biology 57: 758–771.Google Scholar
  47. Swofford, D. L. 2003. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4., Sinauer Associates, Sutherland, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  48. Thiers, B. 2017. Index Herbariorum: A global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden's Virtual Herbarium. http://sweetgum.nybg.org/science/ih/
  49. Wood, R. D. 1962. New combinations and taxa in the revision of Characeae. Taxon 11: 7–25.Google Scholar
  50. ––––– & K. Imahori. 1965. A Revision of the Characeae. Verlag von J. Cramer, Weinheim.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth G. Karol
    • 1
  • Mitchell S. Alix
    • 2
  • Robin W. Scribailo
    • 2
  • Paul M. Skawinski
    • 3
  • Robin S. Sleith
    • 1
  • Joseph A. Sardina
    • 1
  • John D. Hall
    • 4
  1. 1.Lewis B. and Dorothy Cullman Program for Molecular SystematicsThe New York Botanical GardenBronxUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesPurdue University NorthwestWestvilleUSA
  3. 3.UW-Extension Lakes ProgramUniversity of Wisconsin - Stevens PointStevens PointUSA
  4. 4.Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations