Advertisement

Brittonia

, Volume 70, Issue 1, pp 150–154 | Cite as

On embryo polarity, polycotyly, and the homology test of conjunction: A reply to Kuijt´s (2017) critique

  • Favio González
  • Natalia Pabón-Mora
Article

In a recent paper, we presented detailed morphoanatomical evidence clarifying that what has been interpreted as a polycotyledonous embryo in Psittacanthus actually corresponds to the endosperm, and that the seedlings are typically dicotyledonous (González & Pabón-Mora, 2017). This paper has been criticized by Kuijt (2017, this issue), who has consistently (Kuijt, 1967, 1970, 1973, 2015) upheld the occurrence of polycotyly and concurrent lack of endosperm (hereafter PCLoE), an interpretation dating back to Eichler (1868). Kuijt’s critique, lacking significant new empirical data, is based on the assumption that our results contain taxonomic misidentification, seedling misinterpretation, and biased interpretation of the literature. Here we reply one by one to the issues raised in his rebuttal.

First, there is no such taxonomic misidentification of Struthanthus and Psittacanthusseedlings in our Fig. 3. In addition to the samples used to reconstruct Fig. 3, we have further examined 80+...

Literature cited

  1. Eichler, A. W. 1868. Loranthaceae. Pp. 156–198. In: C. F. P. von Martius (ed.). Flora Brasiliensis 3(1). Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  2. Engler, A. & K. Krause. 1935. Loranthaceae. Pp. 98–203. In: A. Engler & K. Prantl (eds.). Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2 Aufl. 16b. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  3. González, F. & N. Pabón-Mora. 2017. On the supposed polycotyledony and lack of endosperm in Psittacanthus (Loranthaceae). Brittonia 69: 176–185.Google Scholar
  4. Johansen, D. A. 1950. Plant embryology. Embryogeny of the Spermatophyta. Waltham, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  5. Johri, B. M. & S. P. Bhatnagar. 1972. Loranthaceae. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  6. Johri, B. M., J. S. Agrawal & S. Garg. 1957. Morphological and embryological studies in the family Loranthaceae. I. Helicanthes elastica (Desr.) Dans. Phytomorphology 7: 336–354.Google Scholar
  7. Kuijt, J. 1967. On the structure and origin of the seedling of Psittacanthus schiedeanus (Loranthaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 45: 1497–1505.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 1970. Seedling establishment in Psittacanthus (Loranthaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 48: 705–711.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 1971. Notes on the seedling and early primary haustorium of Struthanthus quercicola (Loranthaceae). Acta Botanica Neerlandica 20: 467–474.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 1973. Further evidence of the systematic position of Psittacanthus sonorae (Loranthaceae). Madroño 22: 177–185.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 1982. Seedling morphology and its systematic significance in Loranthaceae of the New World, with supplementary comments on Eremolepidaceae. Botanische Jahrbucher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 103: 305–342.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2003. Two new South American species of Struthanthus (Loranthaceae) posing a challenge to circumscription of neotropical genera. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 142: 469–474.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 2009. Monograph of Psittacanthus (Loranthaceae). Systematic Botany Monographs 86: 1–361.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 2015. Santalales. Pp. 1–189. In: J. Kuijt & B. Hansen (eds.). The families and genera of vascular plants, vol. 12, Flowering plants: Eudicots; Santalales, Balanophorales. Springer, Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 2017. A rebuttal to a recent article by González and Pabón-Mora (2017) claiming the absence of polycotyly and the presence of endosperm in Psittacanthus (Loranthaceae). Brittonia (this issue).Google Scholar
  16. Patterson, C. 1982. Morphological characters and homology. Pp. 21–74. In: K. A. Joysey & A. E. Friday (eds.). Problems of phylogenetic reconstruction. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Facultad de Ciencias, Instituto de Ciencias NaturalesUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaSede BogotáColombia
  2. 2.Instituto de BiologíaUniversidad de AntioquiaMedellínColombia

Personalised recommendations