Advertisement

Kew Bulletin

, Volume 66, Issue 1, pp 83–99 | Cite as

Phylogeny and biogeography of the lamioid genus Phlomis (Lamiaceae)

  • C. Mathiesen
  • A.-C. Scheen
  • C. Lindqvist
Article

Summary

The genus Phlomis is one of the largest genera of subfamily Lamioideae (Lamiaceae) with more than 100 recognised species distributed in Asia, southern Europe and northern Africa. Morphological studies have suggested that the species can be split into two morphologically distinct groups that have previously been recognised as either sections or separate genera. The current study represents the first molecular phylogenetic study of the genus in which taxa representative of the entire genus are included. In contrast to considerable morphological and ecological variation among taxa, sequence variation in the trnL intron, the trnLF intergenic spacer, and the rps16 intron was low, resulting in sparse phylogenetic resolution, particularly among the South West Asian and Mediterranean taxa. However, the results support a split of the genus into two separate groups that are recognised here as the genera Phlomoides and Phlomis in order to decrease taxonomic complexity. The close relationship between Phlomis s.l. and Eremostachys, pointed out by several authors, is confirmed, and in a noteworthy new finding, the small Asian genus Notochaete, is more closely related to the Phlomis s.l. lineage than previously assumed. The two monotypic genera Pseuderemostachys and Lamiophlomis as well as Notochaete hamosa are transferred to Phlomoides and three new combinations are made. Character optimisation analyses based on geographic distributions of all taxa show that the groups obtained by molecular phylogenetic analysis correlate well with biogeography. The results suggest that the Phlomis s.l. lineage has a Central Asian origin in an area around Western China.

Key Words

Biogeography Lamiaceae Phlomis Phlomoides phylogeny rps16 intron trnL – trnF 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the A, O, S, UPS, and US herbaria and Jim Mann Taylor (NCCPG National Collection of Phlomis) for providing plant material, and Jan Wesenberg for translation of Russian literature. This research was supported by the Research Council of Norway (grant no. 154145), the University of Oslo (Norway) and University at Buffalo (SUNY, USA).

References

  1. Adylov, T. A., Kamelin, R. V. & Makhmedov, A. M. (1986). Notae de Lamiaceis (Lamiaceae). Novosti Sist. Vyssh. Rast. 23: 110 – 114 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  2. _____, _____ & _____ (1987). Phlomoides. In: A. I. Vvedensky (ed.), Conspectus Florae Asiae Mediae, pp. 91 – 107. Academiae Scientarum USSR, Tashkent.Google Scholar
  3. Albaladejo, R. G., Aparicio, A. & Silvestre, S. (2004). Variation patterns in the Phlomis × composita (Lamiaceae) hybrid complex in the Iberian Peninsula. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 145: 97 – 108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. _____, Aguilar, J. F., Aparicio, A. & Feliner, G. N. (2005). Contrasting nuclear-plastidial phylogenetic patterns in the recently diverged Iberian Phlomis crinita and P. lychnitis lineages (Lamiaceae). Taxon 54: 987 – 998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aparicio, A. (1997). Fitness components of the hybrid Phlomis × margaritae Aparicio & Silvestre (Lamiaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 124: 331 – 343.Google Scholar
  6. _____ & Albaladejo, R. G. (2003). Microsporogenesis and meiotic abnormalities in the hybrid complex of Phlomis composita (Lamiaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 143: 79 – 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. _____, _____, Porras, M. & Ceballos, G. (2000). Isozyme evidence for natural hybridzation in Phlomis (Lamiaceae): Hybrid origin of the rare P. × margaritae. Ann. Bot. 85: 7 – 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Azizian, D. & Cutler, D. F. (1982). Anatomical, cytological and phytochemical studies on Phlomis L. and Eremostachys Bunge (Labiatae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 85: 249 – 281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. _____ & Moore, D. M. (1982). Morphological and palynological studies in Phlomis L, Eremostachys Bunge and Paraphlomis Prain (Labiatae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 85: 225 – 248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bentham, G. (1830). Synopsis of the genera and species of Indoan Labiatae. In: N. Wallich, Plantae asiaticae rariores 1. Treuttel & Würtz, London, Paris, Strasbourg.Google Scholar
  11. _____ (1832 – 1836). Labiatarum Genera et Species. James Ridgeway and Sons, London.Google Scholar
  12. Boissier, E. (1879). Flora Orientalis vol. 4 part 1. H. Georg, Genevae, Basileae, Lugduni.Google Scholar
  13. Briquet, J. (1897). Phlomis L. In: A. P. Engler & K. Prantl (ed.), Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, pp. 248 – 249. W. Engelmann, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  14. Cantino, P. D. (1992). Evidence for a polyphyletic origin of the Labiatae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 79: 361 – 379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Corriveau, J. L. & Coleman, A. W. (1988). Rapid screening method to detect potential biparental inheritance of plastid DNA and results for over 200 angiosperm species. Amer. J. Bot. 75: 1443 – 1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fang, L.-Q., Pan, Y.-Z. & Gong, X. (2007). A karyomorphological study in the monotypic genus Lamiophlomis and five species in Phlomis (Lamiaceae). Acta Phytotax. Sin. 45: 627 – 632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farris, J. S., Albert, V. A., Kallersjo, M., Lipscomb, D. & Kluge, A. G. (1996). Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neighbor-joining. Cladistics 12: 99 – 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goloboff, P. A., Farris, J. S. & Nixon, K. (2003a). TNT: Tree analysis Using New Technology. Version 1.0. Program and documentation available at http://www.zmuc.dk/public/phylogeny/tnt.
  19. _____, _____, Källersjö, M., Oxelman, B., Ramírez, M. J. & Szumik, C. A. (2003b). Improvements to resampling measures of group support. Cladistics 19: 324 – 332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. _____, Carpenter, J. M., Arias, J. S. & Esquivel, D. R. M. (2008). Weighting against homoplasy improves phylogenetic analysis of morphological data sets. Cladistics 24: 1 – 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hall, T. A. (1999). BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl. Acids Symp. Ser. 41: 95 – 98.Google Scholar
  22. Harley, R. M., Atkins, S., Budantsev, A. L., Cantino, P. D., Conn, B. J., Grayer, R., Harley, M. M., De Kok, R., Krestovskaya, T., Morales, R., Paton, A. J., Ryding, O. & Upson, T. (2004). Labiatae. In: J. W. Kadereit (ed.), The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants vol. VII Flowering Plants — Dicotyledons. Lamiales (except Acanthaceae including Avicenniaceae), pp. 167 – 275. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  23. Hedge, I. C. (1990). Labiateae. In: S. I. Ali & Y. J. Nassir (eds), Flora of Pakistan, pp. 193 – 217. BCC and T Press, University of Karachi.Google Scholar
  24. Herder, F. (1868). Enumeratio plantarum in regionibus Cis- et Transiliensibus a CL. semenovio anno 1857 collectarum. Labiatae. Bull. Soc. Imp. Naturalistes Moscou 41: 379 – 394.Google Scholar
  25. Holmgren, P. K. & Holmgren, N. H. (1998). Index Herbariorum: A Global Directory of Public Herbaria and Associated Staff. New York Botanical Garden's Virtual Herbarium. http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih/.
  26. Hooker, J. D. (1885). Phlomis L., Notochaete Benth. & Eremostachys Bunge. Flora of British India, 691 – 695. L. Reeve & Co., London.Google Scholar
  27. Huber-Morath, A. (1982). Phlomis L. In: P. H. Davis (ed.), Flora of Turkey, 102 – 126. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  28. Kamelin, R. V. & Makhmedov, A. M. (1990a). [The system of the genus Phlomoides (Lamiaceae)]. Bot. Zhurn. (Moscow & Leningrad) 75: 241 – 250 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  29. _____ & _____ (1990b). [A new system of the genus Phlomis (Lamiaceae)]. Bot. Zhurn. (Moscow & Leningrad) 75: 1163 – 1167 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  30. Knorring, O. E. (1954a). Phlomis L. In: B. K. Shiskin (ed.), Flora of the USSR (English version), pp. 41 – 77. Keter Publishing House, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
  31. _____ (1954b). Eremostachys Bge. In: B. K. Shiskin (ed.), Flora of the USSR (English version), pp. 3 – 41. Keter Publishing House, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
  32. Kudo. Y. (1929). Labiatarum Sino-Japonicarum Prodromus. Mem. Fac. Sci. & Agric., Taihoku Imp. Univ. 2: 1 – 332.Google Scholar
  33. Li, H. W. & Hedge, I. C. (1994a). Lamiophlomis Kudô. In: P. H. Raven & Z. Y. Wu (eds.), Flora of China, 156. Science Press, Beijing & Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis.Google Scholar
  34. _____ & _____ (1994b). Phlomis Linnaeus. In: P. H. Raven & Z. Y. Wu (eds), Flora of China, 143 – 155. Science Press, Beijing & Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis.Google Scholar
  35. _____ & _____ (1994c). Notochaete Bentham. In: P. H. Raven & Z. Y. Wu (eds.), Flora of China, 139. Science Press, Beijing & Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis.Google Scholar
  36. _____ & _____ (1994d). Eremostachys Bunge. In: P. H. Raven & Z. Y. Wu (eds.), Flora of China, 140 – 141. Science Press, Beijing & Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis.Google Scholar
  37. Lindqvist, C. & Albert, V. A. (2002). Origin of the Hawaiian endemic mints within North American Stachys (Lamiaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 89: 1709 – 1724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Link, J. H. F. (1829). Handbuch zür Erkennung der nutzbarsten und am häufigsten vorkommenden Gerwächse. Berlin.Google Scholar
  39. Linné, C. Von. (1735). Regnum Vegetabile; Didynamia, Phlomis. Systema Naturae Ed. I. Lugduni batavorum.Google Scholar
  40. _____ (1753). Phlomis. Species Plantarum II: 584 – 587. Laurentii Salvii, Holmiae.Google Scholar
  41. Makhmedov, A. M. (1986). Generis Phlomoides Moench (Lamiaceae) species nova ex Asia media. Novosti Sist. Vyss. Rast. 23: 115 – 116.Google Scholar
  42. _____ (1990). Systema Generis Eremostachys Bunge (Lamiaceae). Novosti Sist. Vyss. Rast. 27: 135 – 137.Google Scholar
  43. Mateu, I. (1986). Revisión del género Phlomis L. (Labiatae) en la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares. Acta Bot. Malacit. 11: 177 – 204.Google Scholar
  44. Moench, C. (1794). Methodus plantas horti botanici et agri Marburgensis a straminum situ describendi. Marburgi Cattorum.Google Scholar
  45. Müller, K. (2005). SeqState. Nees Institute for Biodiversity of Plant, University of Bonn, Bonn.Google Scholar
  46. Nixon, K. C. (2002). Winclada, Version 1.00.08. Published by the author.Google Scholar
  47. Oxelman, B., Liden, M. & Berglund, D. (1997). Chloroplast rps16 intron phylogeny of the tribe Sileneae (Caryophyllaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 206: 393 – 410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pan, Y.-Z., Fang, L.-Q., Hao, G., Cai, J. & Gong, X. (2009). Systematic position of Lamiophlomis and Paraphlomis (Lamiaceae) based on nuclear and chloroplast sequences. J. Syst. Evol. 47: 535 – 542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pau, C. (1918a). Plantas de Melilla. Bol. Soc. Aragonesa Ci. Nat. 17: 123 – 133.Google Scholar
  50. _____ (1918b). Una ligera visita botaníca a Tous. Butl. Inst. Catalana Hist. Nat. 18: 158 – 161.Google Scholar
  51. _____ (1922). Nueva contribución al estudio de la flora de Almería. Mem. Mus. Ci. Nat. Barcelona, Ser. Bot. 1: 6 – 34.Google Scholar
  52. Popov, M. G. P. (1941). Op-yt monografii roda Eremostachys Bge. Tentamen monographiae generis Eremostachys Bge. Nouv. Mem. Soc. Nat. Mosc. 19: 1 – 166.Google Scholar
  53. Rechinger, K. H. (1982a). Eremostachys. In: Flora Iranica pp. 256 – 292. Akademische Druck-u. Verlagsanstalt, Graz.Google Scholar
  54. _____ (1982b). Phlomis. In: Flora Iranica pp. 292 – 316. Akademische Druck-u. Verlagsanstalt, Graz.Google Scholar
  55. Rivas-Martínez, S., Asensi, A., Molero, J. & Valle, F. (1991). Endemismos vasculares de Andalucía. Rivasgodaya 6: 5 – 76.Google Scholar
  56. Ryding, O. (2008). Pericarp structure and phylogeny of the Phlomis group (Lamiaceae subfam. Lamioideae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 127: 299 – 316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Scheen, A.-C. & Albert, V. A. (2007). Nomenclatural and taxonomic changes within the Leucas clade (Lamioideae; Lamiaceae). Syst. Geogr. Pl. 77: 229 – 238.Google Scholar
  58. _____ & _____ (2009). Molecular phylogenetics of the Leucas group (Lamioideae; Lamiaceae). Syst. Bot. 34: 173 – 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. _____, Lindqvist, C., Fossdal, C. G. & Albert, V. A. (2007). Molecular phylogenetics of tribe Synandreae, a North American lineage of lamioid mints (Lamiaceae). Cladistics 23: 1 – 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. _____, Bendiksby, A. M., Ryding, O., Mathiesen, C., Albert, V. A. & Lindqvist, C. (2010). Molecular phylogenetics, character evolution and suprageneric classification of Lamioideae (Lamiaceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 97: 191 – 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Simmons, M. P. & Ochoterena, H. (2000). Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst. Biol. 49: 369 – 381.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Taberlet, P., Gielly, L., Pautou, G. & Bouvet, J. (1991). Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Pl. Molec. Biol. 17: 1105 – 1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Taylor, J. M. (1998). Phlomis. The Neglected Genus. National Council for the Conservation of Plants and Gardens, UK.Google Scholar
  64. Thompson, J. D. (2005). Plant evolution in the Mediterranean. Oxford University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wagstaff, S. J. & Olmstead, R. G. (1997). Phylogeny of Labiatae and Verbenaceae inferred from rbcL sequences. Syst. Bot. 22: 165 – 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. _____, Hickerson, L., Spangler, R., Reeves, P. A. & Olmstead, R. G. (1998). Phylogeny in Labiatae s. l., inferred from cpDNA sequences. Pl. Syst. Evol. 209: 265 – 274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Board of Trustees of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Natural History MuseumUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  3. 3.Department of Plant and Environmental SciencesUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
  4. 4.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity at Buffalo (SUNY)BuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations