Advertisement

Folia Geobotanica

, Volume 53, Issue 1, pp 103–113 | Cite as

The effect of the dominant grass Festuca rupicola on the establishment of rare forbs in semi-dry grasslands

  • Monika Partzsch
  • Maria Faulhaber
  • Tim Meier
Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Establishment is the most sensitive process in the life-cycle of plant species, and each stage – from germination to survival and growth – can be affected by environmental factors and plant traits. We hypothesized that the dominant tussock grass Festuca rupicola negatively affects forb establishment in semi-dry grasslands where it has recently expanded into. Moreover, we expected that seedling recruitment is affected by grass density and seed size, with larger seeded forbs being more successful in areas of higher grass density. In a garden experiment, we sowed seven forb individuals of differing seed size (smallest to largest: Veronica spicata < Dianthus carthusianorum < Plantago media < Biscutella laevigata < Filipendula vulgaris < Scabiosa ochroleuca < Sanguisorba minor) into pots with zero, one, two and three grass individuals, and assessed germination, survival and growth over one year. As expected, increasing grass density negatively affected germination, survival and growth of forbs; however, contrary to our expectation, seed size did not influence any of parameters measured. The response of each individual species varied from zero or weak to strong with respect to grass density. Festuca rupicola therefore acts as a strong competitor against the establishment of forbs, irrespective of their seed size, and its spread lowers species diversity in semi-dry grasslands.

Keywords

Garden experiment Seed size Seedling recruitment Species competition Species dynamics 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are very thankful to the editor-in-chief, the associated editor and the two anonymous referees for their helpful comments, all of which helped to make the manuscript more constructive. We also thank Isabell Hensen and Anselm Krumbiegel for their helpful remarks on the first version of our manuscript, and Christine Voigt for her technical help, and Daniel McCluskey for checking our English.

Supplementary material

12224_2017_9298_MOESM1_ESM.doc (56 kb)
Fig. S1 (DOC 56 kb)
12224_2017_9298_MOESM2_ESM.doc (22 kb)
Table S1 (DOC 22 kb)
12224_2017_9298_MOESM3_ESM.doc (42 kb)
Table S2 (DOC 42 kb)

References

  1. Bakker JD, Wilson SD, Christian JM, Li XD, Ambrose LG, Waddington J (2003) Contingency of grassland restoration on year, site, and competition from introduced grasses. Ecol Applic 13:137–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bornkamm R (2006) Fifty years vegetation development of a xerothermic calcareous grassland in Central Europe after heavy disturbance. Flora 201:249–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brooker RW, Maestre FT, Callaway RM, Lortie CL, Cavieres LA, Kunstler G, Liancourt P, Tielbörger K, Travies JMJ, Anthelme F, Armas C, Coll L, Corcket E, Delzon S, Forey E, Kikvidze Z, Olofsson J, Pugnaire F, Quiroz CL, Saccone P, Schiffers K, Seifan M, Touzard B, Michalet R (2008) Facilitation in plant communities: the past, the present, and the future. J Ecol 96:18–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bullock JM, Hill CB, Dale MP, Silvertown J (1994) An experimental study of the effects of sheep grazing on vegetation change in a species-poor grassland and the role of seedling recruitment into gaps. J Appl Ecol 31:493–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Counts RL, Lee PF (1991) Germination and early seedling growth in some northern wild rice (Zizania palustris) populations differing in seed mass. Canad J Bot 69:689–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Del-Val E, Crawley MJ (2005) What limits herb biomass in grasslands: competition of herbivory? Oecologia 142:202–211CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dickson TL, Foster BL (2011) Fertilization decreases plant biodiversity even when light is not limiting. Ecol Letters 14:380–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Donath TW, Eckstein RL (2010) Effects of bryophytes and grass litter on seedling emergence vary by vertical seed position and seed size. Pl Ecol 207:257–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Döring J, Borg H (2008) Ist das Klima von Halle (Saale) noch “normal”? Betrachtungen anhand der Temperatur- und Niederschlagsreihe von 1851 bis heute. Hercynia NF 41:3–21Google Scholar
  10. Dostálek J, Frantík T (2012) The impact of different grazing periods in dry grassland on the expansive grass Arrhenatherum elatius L. and on woody species. Environm Managem 49:855–861Google Scholar
  11. Eckstein RL (2005) Differential effects of interspecific interactions and water availability on survival, growth and fecundity of three congeneric grassland herbs. New Phytol 166:525–536CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellenberg H, Leuschner C (2010) Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen: in ökologischer, dynamischer und historischer Sicht. Ulmer-Verlag, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  13. Enyedi ZK, Ruprecht E, Deák M (2008) Long-term effects of the abandonment of grazing on steppe-like grasslands. Appl Veg Sci 11:53–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eriksson O (1999) Seed mass variation and its effect on germination and seedling performance in the clonal herb Convallaria majalis. Acta Oecol 20:61–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eriksson A, Eriksson OE (1997) Seedling recruitment in semi-natural pastures: the effects of disturbance, seed size, phenology and seed bank. Nordic J Bot 17:469-482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Franco AC, Nobel PS (1988) Interactions between seedlings of Agave deserti and the nurse plant Hilaria rigida. Ecol 69:1731–1740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frank D, Herdam H, Hilbig W, Jage H, John HG, Kison HU, Korsch H, Stolle J. (2004) Rote Liste der Farn- und Blütenpflanzengesellschaften des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt. Ber Landesamtes f Umweltschutz Sachsen-Anh 39:91–110Google Scholar
  18. Fenner M, Thompson K (2005) The ecology of seeds. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Galvánek D, Lepš J (2012) The effect of management on productivity, litter accumulation and seedling recruitment in a Carpathian mountain grassland. Pl Ecol 213:523–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goldberg DE, Werner PA (1983) The effects of size of opening in vegetation and litter cover on seedling establishment of goldenrods (Solidago spp.) Oecologia 60:149–155CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Grace JB (1999) The factors controlling species density in herbaceous plant communities: an assessment. Perspect Pl Ecol Evol Syst 2:1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grime JP, Jeffrey DW (1965) Seedling establishment in vertical gradients of sunlight. J Ecol 53:621–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gross KL (1984) Effects of seed size and growth form on seedling establishment of six monocarpic perennial plants. J Ecol 72:369–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grubb PJ (1977) The maintenance of species richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche. Biol Rev 52:107–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Habel JC, Dengler J, Janišová M, Török P, Wellstein C, Wiezik M (2013) European grassland ecosystems: threatened hotspots of biodiversity. Biodivers & Conservation 22:2131–2138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Higgins SL, Richardson DM (1999) Predicting plant migration rates in a changing world: the role of long-distance dispersal. Amer Naturalist 153:464–475Google Scholar
  28. Holmgren M, Scheffer M, Huston MA (1997) The interplay of facilitation and competition in plant communities. Ecology 78:1966–1975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Howard TG, Goldberg DE (2001) Competitive response hierarchies for germination, growth, and survival and their influence on abundance. Ecology 82:979–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jakobsson A, Eriksson (2000) A comparative study of seed number, seed size, seedling size and recruitment in grassland plants. Oikos 88:794–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jäger EJ (ed) (2011) Exkursionsflora von Deutschland, founded by Rothmaler W, Gefäßpflanzen: Grundband. Spektrum Akad. Verlag, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  32. Jensen K, Gutekunst K (2003) Effects of litter on establishment of grassland plant species: the role of seed size and successional status. Basic Appl Ecol 4:579–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jongejans E, Soons MB, de Kroon H (2006) Bottlenecks and spatiotemporal variation in the sexual reproduction pathway of perennial meadow plants. Basic Appl Ecol 7:71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jorritsma-Wienk LD, Ameloot E, Lenssen JPM, de Kroon H (2006) Differential responses of germination and seedling establishment in populations of Tragopogon pratensis (Asteraceae). Pl Biol 9:109–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jutila HM, Grace JB (2002) Effects of disturbance on germination and seedling establishment in a coastal prairie grassland: a test of the competitive release hypothesis. J Ecol 90:291–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kladivová A, Münzbergová Z (2016) Interacting effects of grazing and habitat conditions on seedling recruitment and establishment. J Veg Sci 27:834–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Knappová J, Knapp M, Münzbergová Z (2013) Spatio-temporal variation in contrasting effects of resident vegetation on establishment, growth and reproduction of dry grassland plants: implications for seed addition experiments. PLOS ONE 8:e65879CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Kotorová I, Lepš J (1999) Comparative ecology of seedling recruitment in an oligotrophic wet meadow. J Veg Sci 10:175–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Koutsovoulou K, Daws MI, Thanos CA (2013) Campanulaceae: a family with small seeds that require light for germination. Ann Bot (Oxford) 113:135–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kowarik I (2003) Biologische Invasionen: Neophyten und Neozoen in Mitteleuropa. Ulmer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  41. Křenová Z, Lepš J (1996) Regeneration of a Gentiana pneumonanthe population in an oligotrophic wet meadow. J Veg Sci 7:107–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Leishman MR (1999) How well do plant traits correlate with establishment ability? Evidence from a study of 16 calcareous grassland species. New Phytol 141:487–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Leishman MR, Westoby M (1994) The role of large seed size in shaded conditions: experimental evidence. Funct Ecol 8:205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ludewig K., Wanner A, Jensen K (2015) Recolonization and facilitation in Baltic salt marsh vegetation. Ann Bot Fenn 52:181–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mahn EG (1996) Einfluß spontaner und gelenkter Sukzessionsprozesse in Braunkohlentagebaulandschaften auf die Entwicklung einer ressourcenangepaßten Vegetationsstruktur. Hercynia NF 30:5–12Google Scholar
  46. Miglécz T, Tóthmérész B, Valkó O, Kelemen A, Török P (2013) Effects of litter on seedling establishment: an indoorexperiment with short-lived Brassicaceae species. Pl Ecol 214:189–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Milberg P, Andersson L, Thompson K (2000) Large-seeded species are less dependent on light for germination than small-seeded ones. Seed Sci Res 10:99–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Moles AT, Westoby M (2002) Seed addition experiments are more likely to increase recruitment in larger-seeded species. Oikos 99:241–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Moles AT, Westoby M (2004) Seedling survival and seed size: a synthesis of the literature. J Ecol 92:372–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Moles AT, Westoby M (2006) Seed size and plant strategy across the whole life cycle. Oikos 113:91–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Münzbergová Z (2004) Effect of spatial scale on factors limiting species distributions in dry grassland fragments. J Ecol 92:854–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nystuen KO, Evju M, Rusch GM, Graae BJ, Eide NE (2014) Rodent population dynamics affect seedling recruitment in alpine habitats. J Veg Sci 25:1004–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Partzsch M (2000) Die Porphyrkuppenlandschaft des unteren Saaletals – Strukturwandel ihrer Vegetation in den letzten vier Jahrzehnten. Tuexenia 20:153–187Google Scholar
  54. Partzsch M (2011) Does land-use change affect the interactions between two dry grassland species? Flora 206:550–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Partzsch M, Piesch C, Hensen I (2011) A comparative study of germination biology and plant performance in two dry grassland species. Folia Geobot 46:35–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ryser P (1993) Influences of neighbouring plants on seedling establishment in limestone grassland. J Veg Sci 4:195–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schupp EW (1995) Seed-seedlings conflicts, habitat choice, and pattern of plant recruitment. Amer J Bot 82:99–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Silvertown JW (1981) Seed size, life span, and germination date as coadapted features of plant life history. Amer Naturalist 118:860–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Smith RS, Rushton SP (1994) The effects of grazing management on the vegetation of mesotrophic (meadow) grassland in Northern England. J Appl Ecol 31:13–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. SPSS (2015) SPSS for Windows 21.0. SPSS, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  61. Tessier M, Cloaguen JC, Lefeuvre JC (2000) Factors affecting the population dynamics of Suaeda maritima at initial stages of development. Pl Ecol 147:193–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Thompson K, Bakker JP, Bekker RM (1997) The soil seed banks of north west Europe: methodology, density and longevity. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  63. Vera ML (1997) Effects of altitude and seed mass on germination and seedling survival of heathland plants in north Spain. Pl Ecol 133:101–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Villar-Salvador P, Puértolas J, Cuesta B, Peñuelas JL, Uscola M, Heredia-Guerrero N, Rey Benayas JM (2012) Increase in size and nitrogen concentration enhances seedling survival in Mediterranean plantations. Insights from an ecophysiological conceptual model of plant survival. New Forests 43:755–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vítová A, Lepš J (2011) Experimental assessment of dispersal and habitat limitation in an oligotrophic wet meadow. Pl Ecol 212:1234–1242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Watt TA, Gibson CWD (1988) The effects of sheep grazing on seedling establishment and survival in grassland. Pl Ecol 78:91–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Weis IM (1982) The effect of propagule size on germination and seedling growth in Mirabilis hirsuta. Canad J Bot 60:1868–1874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wu G, Du G (2007) Germination is related to seed mass in grasses (Poaceae) of the eastern Quinhai-Tibetan Plateau, China. Nordic J Bot 25:361–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Xiong S, Nilsson C, Johansson ME (2001) Effects of litter accumulation on riparian vegetation: importance of particle size. J Veg Sci 12:231–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zobel M, Otsus M, Liira J, Moora M, Möls T (2000) Is small-scale species richness limited by seed availability or microsite availability? Ecol 81:3274–3282CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Biology/Geobotany and Botanical GardenMartin-Luther-University Halle-WittenbergHalle (Saale)Germany

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options