Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology

, Volume 33, Issue 6, pp 2737–2746 | Cite as

Investigation of wind tunnel wall effect and wing-fuselage interference regarding the prediction of wing aerodynamics and its influence on the horizontal tail

  • Ngoc T. B. HoangEmail author
  • Binh V. Bui


The calculation of aerodynamic characteristics of a wing is the basic problem for aerodynamic design of aircraft. Wing aerodynamics can be determined experimentally and numerically. The method of fixing the wing in the test chamber of wind tunnel is related to disturbance of flow through the wing. When the wing is entirely fixed in the test chamber, the disturbance is usually caused by the sting connecting the wing to the test chamber. The experiments in this paper fixed the wing by clamping to the wind tunnel wall at the wing symmetry surface (root section). With this wing fixation, it was possible to take advantage of the wingspan twice, but to obtain the 3D wing experiment results, it was necessary to evaluate the impact of the wind tunnel wall effect. As for aircrafts, the aerodynamic force of the aircraft’s wing will have certain difference than that of the wing alone. The intersection region between the wind tunnel wall and wing root (for the experiment), as well as between the fuselage and wing root have complex interactions of boundary layers, in particular separation phenomena in the boundary layers. By solving the differential equation for viscous flows, it was possible to visualize the picture of streamlines and flow separations in this interference region and the aerodynamic characteristics of the wing. The singularity method was also used to compare results within its application range. The aerodynamic coefficients in the two cases with and without interference were analyzed. Complex interactions in the interference region could alter the predicted aerodynamic force calculated for the wing alone, which should be estimated. Very strong separations in the wing-fuselage interference region at large angles of attack turned into vortices at the rear impacting on the horizontal tail aerodynamics that is related to the balance problem of the aircraft.


Wind tunnel wall effect Wing-fuselage interference Experiment Numerical methods Pressure distributions Aerodynamic coefficients 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Y. S. Won, B. A. Haider, C. H. Sohn and Y. M. Koo, Aerodynamic performance evaluation of basic airfoils for an agricultural unmanned helicopter using wind tunnel test and CFD simulation, J. of Mechanical Science and Technology, 31 (12) (2017) 5829–5838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    M. Masdari, M. Jahanmiri, M. R. Soltani, A. Tabrizian and M. Gorji, Experimental investigation of a supercritical airfoil boundary layer in pitching motion, J. of Mechanical Science and Technology, 31 (1) (2017) 189–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    J. Piquee and C. Breitsamter, Numerical and experimental investigations of an elasto-flexible membrane wing at a Reynolds number of 280000, Aerospace, 4 (2017) 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    G. Fillola, G. Carrier and J-B. Dor, Experimental study and numerical simulation of flow around wing control surface, ICAS-Secretariat - 25th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences (2006).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    E. Tangermann, M. Klein, S. L. Herbst, R. Hain and C. J. Kahler, Numerical and experimental investigation of the flow around a three-dimensional SD7003 wing, 10th International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena (TSFP10), Chicago, USA (2017).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    M. R. Soltani, M. Masdari and M. R. Tirandaz, Effect of an end plate on surface pressure distributions of two swept wings, Chinese J. of Aeronautics, 30 (5) (2017) 1631–1643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    M. Hadidoolabi and H. Ansarian, Supersonic flow over a pitching delta wing using surface pressure measurements and numerical simulations, Chinese J. of Aeronautics, 31 (1) (2017) 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    H. Sobieczky, Configuration test cases for aircraft wing root design and optimization, International Symposium on Inverse Problems in Engineering Mechanics, Nagano, Japan (1998) 371–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    W. D. Wolhart and D. F. Thomas Jr, Static Longitudinal and Lateral Stability Characteristics at Low Speed of Unswept-Midwing Models Having Wings with an Aspect Ratio of 2, 4, or 6, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Langley Aeronautical Lab, Washington, USA (1956).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    M. H. Nguyen and T. B. N. Hoang, Experimental study of laminar separation phenomenon combining with numerical calculations, Vietnam J. of Mechanics, 33 (2) (2011) 95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    T. B. N. Hoang and V. B. Bui, Experimental and numerical studies of wing-tip effect and wing downwash affecting the horizontal tail, J. of Mechanical Science and Technology, 33 (2) (2019) 649–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    T. B. N. Hoang, Computational investigation of the variation in wing aerodynamic load under the effect of aeroelastic deformations, J. of Mechanical Science and Technology, 32 (10) (2018) 4665–4673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    J. Katz and A. Plotkin, Low Speed Aerodynamics, 2nd Ed., Cambridge University Press, New York, USA (2001).CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    S. Ristic, Flow visualisation techniques in wind tunnels Part I — Non optical methods, Scientific Technical Review, LVII No. 1 (2007).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    D. Filipiak, R. Szczepaniak, T. zahorski, R. Babel, S. Stabryn and W. Stryczniewicz, Flow visualization over an airfoil with flight control surfaces in a water tunnel, Transactions of the Institute of Aviation, 1 (246) (2017) 63–78.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    H. S. Nguyen, T. B. N. Hoang, V. P. Dinh and M. H. Nguyen, Experiments and numerical calculation to determine aerodynamic characteristics of flows around 3D wings, Vietnam J. of Mechanics, 36 (2) (2014) 133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    R. Berger and L. M. M. Boermans, Aerodynamic design of the wing-fuselage junction for the high-performance sailplane Mu-31, Technical Soaring, 28 (3) (2004) 13–23.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    N. Deng, Q. Qu and R. K. Agarwal, Numerical study of the aerodynamics of DLR-F6 wing-body in unbounded flow field and in ground effect, 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Texas (2017).Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    H. Schlichting and E. A. Truckenbrodt, Aerodynamics of the Airplane, McGraw-Hill, USA (1979).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© KSME & Springer 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Transportation EngineeringHanoi University of Science and TechnologyHanoiVietnam

Personalised recommendations