A Stochastic Dual Response Surface Method for Reliability Analysis Considering the Spatial Variability
- 98 Downloads
To solve spectral stochastic finite element problems, the collocation-based spectral stochastic finite element method (SSFEM) was developed, and the Stochastic Response Surface Method (SRSM) was used to represent uncertainty propagation. Therefore, the accuracy of SRSM is important for obtaining more accurate probabilistic results. The weighted SRSM was developed to improve the global accuracy of SRSM, but it is not suitable for random field problems because weights might distort the response surface. In this study, a new Stochastic Dual-response Surface Method (SDRSM) was developed to improve the accuracy of SRSM. The SDRSM combines the conventional SRSM and target-weighted SRSM (TWSRSM), which is assigned a weight for the numerical result corresponding to the collocation point. Then, the proposed method was extended to deal with problems involving random fields. For comparison with the conventional methods (SRSM and WSRSM), two numerical examples involving random fields were carried out. Compared with Monte Carlo simulation results, SDRSM shows the smallest error without the addition of the collocation points. In addition, the mean absolute errors for equally spaced probability intervals were compared, and their mean and standard deviation of SDRSM were relatively smaller than that of other methods.
Keywordsstochastic finite element method random field karhunen-loeve expansion hermite polynomial stochastic response surface method
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Ghosh, D. and Iaccarino, G. (2007). “Applicability of the spectral stochastic finite element method in time-dependent uncertain problems.” Annual Research Briefs 2007, pp. 133–141.Google Scholar
- Pukl, R., Jansta, M., Cervenka, J., Vorechovský, M., Novák, D., and Rusina, R. (2006). “Spatial variability of material properties in nonlinear computer simulation.” Proceedings of the EURO-C Conference, Mayrhofen, Austria, pp. 891–896.Google Scholar
- Sudret, B. and Der Kiureghian, A. (2000). Stochastic finite element methods and reliability: A state-of-the-art Report, Technical Report on UCB/SEMM-2000/08, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UC Berkeley.Google Scholar
- Tatang, M. A. (1995). Direct Incorporation of Uncertainty in Chemical and Environmental Engineering Systems, PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar