Experimental Investigation on the Fatigue Behaviour of Heat-Treated Tubular T-Joints
- 161 Downloads
The stress distribution along the weld toe (SCF test) and the fatigue life of tubular T-joints (Fatigue test) were experimentally investigated in this study. Three specimens with identical geometric properties were tested to failure under fatigue cyclic loading at the brace end. Prior to the loading tests procedure, SCF and Fatigue tests, two specimens went through one cycle of heating and cooling naturally. The SCF test results showed that the maximum Stress Concentration Factor (SCF) occurred at the chord saddle for all the specimens. The fatigue cracks were initiated at the chord saddles of the three tested specimens. The fatigue test results showed that the fatigue life was longer the higher the target maximum temperature was. The development of the crack aspect ratio with the normalised crack length was discussed among the specimens. Finally, the fatigue life results obtained from the experiment compared with those from CIDECT and API guidelines.
Keywordstubular T-joint Post-fire stress concentration factors fatigue life
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- American Welding Society (AWS) (2010). Structural welding codesteel, AWS D1.1/D1.1M.Google Scholar
- American Petroleum Institute (API) (2000). RP2A-LRFD Recommended practice for planning, designing and constructing fixed offshore structures, 21st ed.Google Scholar
- Electrical Power Research Institute (EPRI) (2007). Carbon steel handbook, Palo Alto, California, USA.Google Scholar
- Krauss, G. (1980). Principles of heat treatment of steel, American Society for Metals, Metals Park, Ohio.Google Scholar
- Moisan, É., Sabourin, M., Bernard, M., and Bui-Quoc, T. (2006). “Residual stress measurements in hydraulic turbine welded joints.” IAHR 23rd symposium on hydraulic machinery and systems, Yokohama, Japan.Google Scholar
- Qian, X., Jitpairod, K., Marshall, P., Swaddiwudhipong, S., Ou, Z., Zhang, Y., and Pradana, M. R. (2014). “Fatigue and residual strength of concrete-filled tubular X-joints with full capacity welds.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, vol. 100, pp. 21–35, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.04.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Qian, X., Nguyen, C. T., Petchdemaneengam, Y., Ou, Z., Swaddiwudhipong, S., and Marshall, P. (2013a). “Fatigue performance of tubular Xjoints with PJP+ welds: II—Numerical investigation.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, vol. 89, pp. 252–261, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.07.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Thelning, K. E. (2013). Steel and its heat treatment, Butterworth-Heinemann, Jordan Hill, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Wardenier, J., Packer, J., Zhao, X. L., and van der Vegte, G. J. (2010). Hollow sections in structural applications. Comité International pour le Développement et l’Étude de la Construction Tubulaire (CIDECT), Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
- Zhao, X. L., Herion, S., Packer, J. A., Puthli, R., Sedlacek, G., Wardenier, J., Weynand, K., van Wingerde, A., and Yeomans, N. (2000). Design guide for circular and rectangular hollow section joints under fatigue loading, Comité International pour le Développement et l’Étude de la Construction Tubulaire (CIDECT) Publication No. 8, TUV-Verlag, Germany.Google Scholar