Skip to main content
Log in

Seismic Response of Circular Tunnels in Jointed Rock

  • Geotechnical Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although deformation along a weak joint under a strong seismic event can seriously damage the tunnel, the effect of joint has not yet been well understood or quantified. We perform a series of pseudo-static discrete element analyses to evaluate the effect of deformation along rock joint on the seismic response of circular tunnels. We also perform parallel continuum analyses to compare and quantify their differences. A comprehensive set of joint parameters are considered in this study. The results illustrate that the joint significantly increases the moment demand in the tunnel lining, whereas it has a secondary influence on the thrust. The joint stiffness and shear strength have critical influence on the tunnel response. Widely spaced joint set produces a larger tunnel response. The tunnel response is highest for vertical and horizontal joints, and the lowest when the joint dips at an angle of 45°. The moment in jointed rock may be 20 times higher than that in intact rock. The pronounced deviation from continuum analyses highlights the need to estimate the influence of discontinuities on the seismic response of underground tunnels from discrete element analyses. This may be of concern for critical structures such as nuclear facilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahn, J. K., Park, D. H., Kim, D. K., and Kim, K. Y. (2013). “Evaluation of seismic performance of road tunnels in operation.” Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp.69–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyroudis, S. and Pitilakis, K. (2012), “Seismic fragility curves of shallow tunnels in alluvial deposits.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 35, pp. 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asakura, T. and Sato, Y. (1996). “Damage to mountain tunnels in hazard area.” Soils and foundations, pp. 301–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandis, S., Lumsden, A., and Barton, N. (1983). “Fundamentals of rock joint deformation.” Elsevier, Vol. 20, pp. 249–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, N. (1995). The influence of joint properties in modelling jointed rock masses, 8th ISRM congress: International Society for Rock Mechanics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, N. R. (1976). “The shear strength of rock and rock joints.” International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, Vol. 13, No. 9, pp. 255–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhasin, R. and Høeg, K. (1998). “Parametric study for a large cavern in jointed rock using a distinct element model (UDEC—BB).” International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp.17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulanger, R. and Ziotopoulou, K. (2012). PM4Sand (Version 2): a sand plasticity model for earthquake engineering applications, University of California at Davis, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilingir, U. and Gopal Madabhushi, S. (2011). “A model study on the effects of input motion on the seismic behaviour of tunnels.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 452–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao, H., Wu, Y., Ma, G., and Zhou, Y. (2001). “Characteristics of surface ground motions induced by blasts in jointed rock mass.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao, Y. and Azzam, R. (2005). “The plastic zones and displacements around underground openings in rock masses containing a fault.” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashash, Y. M. A, Karina, K., Koutsoftas, D., and O'Riordan, N. (2010). “Seismic design considerations for underground box structures.” Earth Retention Conference, Vol. 3, pp. 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashash, Y. M. A. (2002). Seismic design of underground structures: Role of numerical modeling, North American Tunneling.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashash, Y. M. A. and Park, D. (2001). “Non-linear one-dimensional seismic ground motion propagation in the Mississippi embayment.” Engineering Geology, Vol. 62, Nos. 1-3, pp. 185–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashash, Y. M. A., Marulanda, C., Ghaboussi, J., and Jung, S. (2003). “Systematic update of a deep excavation model using field performance data.” Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 30, pp. 477–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itasca Consulting Group, I. (2002). Manual, FLAC, Itasca Consulting Group, Inc.

  • Itasca Consulting Group, I. (2004). UDEC Universal Distinct Element Code, User's Manual, Itasca Consulting Group, Inc.

  • Kulhawy, F. H. (1975). “Stress deformation properties of rock and rock discontinuities.” Engineering Geology, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 327–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. and Ma, G. (2010). “Analysis of blast wave interaction with a rock joint.” Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, Vol. 43, No. 6, pp. 777–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, M. and Brady, B. (1999). “Analysis of the dynamic performance of an underground excavation in jointed rock under repeated seismic loading.” Geotechnical & Geological Engineering, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MOCT (2010). The Revision of the Road-Design Guideline (The Chapter of Tunnel), Ministry of Constructio and Transportation.

  • Penzien, J. and Wu, C. L. (1998). “Stresses in linings of bored tunnels.” International Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 27, pp. 283–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnabel, P. B., Lysmer, J. L., and Seed, H. B. (1972). SHAKE: A computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites, EERC-72/12, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedarat, H., Kozak, A., Hashash, Y., Shamsabadi, A., and Krimotat, A. (2009). “Contact interface in seismic analysis of circular tunnels.” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 482–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seed, H. B. and Idriss, I. M. (1970). Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analyses, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanmarcke, E. H., Fenton, G. A., and Heredia-Zavoni, E. (1999). SIMQKEII, Conditioned earthquake ground motion simulator: User's manual, version 2.1 Princeton University, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vardakos, S. S., Gutierrez, M. S., and Barton, N. R. (2007). “Backanalysis of Shimizu Tunnel No. 3 by distinct element modeling.” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 401–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. (1993). “Seismic design of tunnels: A state-of-the-art approach, Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas.” Inc., New York, NY, Monograph 7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Duhee Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoo, JK., Park, JS., Park, D. et al. Seismic Response of Circular Tunnels in Jointed Rock. KSCE J Civ Eng 22, 1121–1129 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-1184-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-1184-7

Keywords

Navigation