Abstract
Traditional quality inspection based product quality evaluation method with complex process has high operating cost and requires more professional knowledge. To remove the above limitation, this paper leads product gene theory into product quality evaluation. Methods of quality influencing factors based modeling and encoding are established. Combined with similarity theory and product gene theory, a product gene similarity analysis based quality evaluation method is proposed. The proposed method is low cost, operates easily and requires less specialized knowledge. A case study is conducted to prove the correctness and feasibility of this method.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AHMED S, HASSAN M. Survey and case investigations on application of quality management tools and techniques in SMIs [J]. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 2003, 20(7): 795–826.
CASTURA J C, ANTÚ NEZ L, GIMÉ NEZ A, et al. Temporal check-all-that-apply (TCATA): A novel dynamic method for characterizing products [J]. Food Quality and Preference, 2016, 47: 79–90.
MITRA A. Fundamentals of quality control and improvement [M]. Hoboken, New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
BENYAHIA K A, GHRICI M, KENAI S, et al. Analysis of the relationship between nondestructive and destructive testing of low concrete strength in new structures [J]. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2017, 18(2): 191–205.
CONDE B, RAMOS L F, OLIVEIRA D V, et al. Structural assessment of masonry arch bridges by combination of non-destructive testing techniques and three-dimensional numerical modelling: Application to Vilanova bridge [J]. Engineering Structures, 2017, 148: 621–638.
FOX C, DOKTOR M, KURZ W, et al. Evaluation of steel buildings by means of non-destructive testing methods [J]. CE/papers, 2017, 1(2/3): 4560–4569.
CHEN H W, CAO S Q, XU Z, et al. Research on mechanical product gene [J]. Machine Tool & Hydraulics, 2009, 37(4): 155–158 (in Chinese).
MI J H, LI Y F, YANG Y J, et al. Reliability assessment of complex electromechanical systems under epistemic uncertainty [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2016, 152: 1–15.
BENASSI J L G, AMARAL D C, FERREIRA L D. Towards a conceptual framework for product vision [J]. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2016, 36(2): 200–219.
ZAWADZKI P, ŻYWICKI K. Smart product design and production control for effective mass customization in the industry 4.0 concept [J]. Management and Production Engineering Review, 2016, 7(3): 105–112.
SUN L B, GUO S S, LI Y B. Research on quality control theory based on product quality genes[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2013, 24(21): 2885–2890 (in Chinese).
LI J R, TAO F, CHENG Y, et al. Big data in product lifecycle management [J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2015, 81(4): 667–684.
BOBILLO F, STRACCIA U. Optimising fuzzy description logic reasoners with general concept inclusion absorption [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2016, 292(1): 98–129.
WECKENMANN A, AKKASOGLU G, WERNER T. Quality management-history and trends [J]. The TQM Journal, 2015, 27(3): 281–293.
ELBADIRY A H, BASSETTO S J, OUALIMS. Study of similarity analysis methods for aviation system failures [J]. IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, 2016, 31(6): 12–22.
ZADEH L A. Fuzzy logic: A personal perspective [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2015, 281: 4–20.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Foundation item: the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11472075)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, H., Huang, H., Yin, Y. et al. Product Quality Evaluation Method Based on Product Gene Theory. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. (Sci.) 23, 438–443 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-018-1946-5
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-018-1946-5