Product Quality Evaluation Method Based on Product Gene Theory

  • He Li (李贺)
  • Hongzhong Huang (黄洪钟)
  • Yichao Yin (殷毅超)
  • Kaiyan Zhang (张凯延)
  • Peng Huang (黄鹏)


Traditional quality inspection based product quality evaluation method with complex process has high operating cost and requires more professional knowledge. To remove the above limitation, this paper leads product gene theory into product quality evaluation. Methods of quality influencing factors based modeling and encoding are established. Combined with similarity theory and product gene theory, a product gene similarity analysis based quality evaluation method is proposed. The proposed method is low cost, operates easily and requires less specialized knowledge. A case study is conducted to prove the correctness and feasibility of this method.

Key words

product quality evaluation gene theory product gene similarity analysis 

CLC number

U 472.32 

Document code


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    AHMED S, HASSAN M. Survey and case investigations on application of quality management tools and techniques in SMIs [J]. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 2003, 20(7): 795–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    CASTURA J C, ANTÚ NEZ L, GIMÉ NEZ A, et al. Temporal check-all-that-apply (TCATA): A novel dynamic method for characterizing products [J]. Food Quality and Preference, 2016, 47: 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    MITRA A. Fundamentals of quality control and improvement [M]. Hoboken, New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2016.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    BENYAHIA K A, GHRICI M, KENAI S, et al. Analysis of the relationship between nondestructive and destructive testing of low concrete strength in new structures [J]. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2017, 18(2): 191–205.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    CONDE B, RAMOS L F, OLIVEIRA D V, et al. Structural assessment of masonry arch bridges by combination of non-destructive testing techniques and three-dimensional numerical modelling: Application to Vilanova bridge [J]. Engineering Structures, 2017, 148: 621–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    FOX C, DOKTOR M, KURZ W, et al. Evaluation of steel buildings by means of non-destructive testing methods [J]. CE/papers, 2017, 1(2/3): 4560–4569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    CHEN H W, CAO S Q, XU Z, et al. Research on mechanical product gene [J]. Machine Tool & Hydraulics, 2009, 37(4): 155–158 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    MI J H, LI Y F, YANG Y J, et al. Reliability assessment of complex electromechanical systems under epistemic uncertainty [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2016, 152: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    BENASSI J L G, AMARAL D C, FERREIRA L D. Towards a conceptual framework for product vision [J]. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2016, 36(2): 200–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    ZAWADZKI P, ŻYWICKI K. Smart product design and production control for effective mass customization in the industry 4.0 concept [J]. Management and Production Engineering Review, 2016, 7(3): 105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    SUN L B, GUO S S, LI Y B. Research on quality control theory based on product quality genes[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2013, 24(21): 2885–2890 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    LI J R, TAO F, CHENG Y, et al. Big data in product lifecycle management [J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2015, 81(4): 667–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    BOBILLO F, STRACCIA U. Optimising fuzzy description logic reasoners with general concept inclusion absorption [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2016, 292(1): 98–129.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    WECKENMANN A, AKKASOGLU G, WERNER T. Quality management-history and trends [J]. The TQM Journal, 2015, 27(3): 281–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    ELBADIRY A H, BASSETTO S J, OUALIMS. Study of similarity analysis methods for aviation system failures [J]. IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, 2016, 31(6): 12–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    ZADEH L A. Fuzzy logic: A personal perspective [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2015, 281: 4–20.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Shanghai Jiaotong University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • He Li (李贺)
    • 1
  • Hongzhong Huang (黄洪钟)
    • 1
  • Yichao Yin (殷毅超)
    • 1
  • Kaiyan Zhang (张凯延)
    • 1
  • Peng Huang (黄鹏)
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for System Reliability and SafetyUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of ChinaChengduChina

Personalised recommendations