Frontiers of Optoelectronics

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 60–68 | Cite as

Use of fiber Bragg grating sensors for monitoring delamination damage propagation in glass-fiber reinforced composite structures

  • Ayad Kakei
  • Jayantha A. Epaarachchi
Research Article


Embedded fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensors have been widely used for damage monitoring of fiber composite structures for a few decades. However, many remaining engineering challenges have delayed FBG based in situ structural health monitoring (SHM) systems. One of the major problem associated with FBG based SHM system is the unavailability of reliable data processing algorithms. The present work details a study which has been undertaken for identification of delamination crack propagation in fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) composite plate under uniaxial loading. The strain measured by embedded FBG sensors closer to the crack tip was used to qualitatively and quantitatively analyze delamination damage propagation using recently proposed elasto-plastic model. Strain energy release rate was calculated and compared with the model prediction. The study has concluded that the delamination crack propagation in a FRP composite can be monitored successfully using an integral approach of FBG sensors measurements and the predictions of proposed elasto-plastic model.


fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensors composite damage modelling fracture energy 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



Authors like to acknowledge the technical support provided by Mr. Mohan Trada, School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering and Mr. Wayne Crowell, Centre for Future Materials of USQ.


  1. 1.
    Kakei A, Epaarachchi J, Mainul M, Leng J. Development of fracture and damage modeling concepts for composite materials. In: Epaarachchi J, Kahandawa G, eds. Structural Health Monitoring Technologies and Next-Generation Smart Composite Structures. 2016, Roca Raton: CRC Press, 339–364Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kuhtz M, Hornig A, Gude M, Jäger H. A method to control delaminations in composites for adjusted energy dissipation characteristics. Materials & Design, 2017, 123: 103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Olave M, Vara I, Usabiaga H, Aretxabaleta L, Lomov S V, Vandepitte D. Nesting effect on the mode II fracture toughness of woven laminates. Composites Part A, Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2015, 74: 174–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shokrieh MM, Zeinedini A, Ghoreishi S M. On the mixed mode I/II delamination R-curve of E-glass/epoxy laminated composites. Composite Structures, 2017, 171: 19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shokrieh MM, Heidari-Rarani M. Effect of stacking sequence on Rcurve behavior of glass/epoxy DCB laminates with 0°//0° crack interface. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2011, 529: 265–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shokrieh MM, Heidari-Rarani M, Ayatollahi MR. Delamination Rcurve as a material property of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites. Materials & Design, 2012, 34: 211–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ghasemnejad H, Hadavinia H, Aboutorabi A. Effect of delamination failure in crashworthiness analysis of hybrid composite box structures. Materials & Design, 2010, 31(3): 1105–1116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yasaee M, Bigg L, Mohamed G, Hallett S R. Influence of Z-pin embedded length on the interlaminar traction response of multidirectional composite laminates. Materials & Design, 2017, 115: 26–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shaoquan W, Shangli D, Yu G, Yungang S. Thermal ageing effects on mechanical properties and barely visible impact damage behavior of a carbon fiber reinforced bismaleimide composite. Materials & Design, 2017, 115: 213–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chang F K. Structural Health Monitoring. Lancaster: DESTechnol Publications, 2003Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vieira A, de Oliveira R, Frazão O, Baptista J M, Marques A T. Effect of the recoating and the length on fiber Bragg grating sensors embedded in polymer composites. Materials & Design, 2009, 30(5): 1818–1821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kousiatza C, Karalekas D. In-situ monitoring of strain and temperature distributions during fused deposition modeling process. Materials & Design, 2016, 97: 400–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kantaros A, Karalekas D. Fiber Bragg grating based investigation of residual strains in ABS parts fabricated by fused deposition modeling process. Materials & Design, 2013, 50: 44–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kanerva M, Antunes P, Sarlin E, Orell O, Jokinen J, Wallin M, Brander T, Vuorinen J. Direct measurement of residual strains in CFRP-tungsten hybrids using embedded strain gauges. Materials & Design, 2017, 127(Supplement C): 352–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yashiro S, Takeda N, Okabe T, Sekine H. A new approach to predicting multiple damage states in composite laminates with embedded FBG sensors. Composites Science and Technology, 2005, 65(3–4): 659–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sans D, Stutz S, Renart J, Mayugo J A, Botsis J. Crack tip identification with long FBG sensors in mixed-mode delamination. Composite Structures, 2012, 94(9): 2879–2887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Okabe T, Yashiro S. Damage detection in holed composite laminates using an embedded FBG sensor. Composites Part A, Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2012, 43(3): 388–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kahandawa G C, Epaarachchi J, Wang H, Canning J, Lau K T. Extraction and processing of real time strain of embedded FBG sensors using a fixed filter FBG circuit and an artificial neural network. Measurement, 2013, 46(10): 4045–4051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kahandawa G C, Epaarachchi J A, Wang H, Followell D, Birt P. Use of fixed wavelength fibre-Bragg grating (FBG) filters to capture time domain data from the distorted spectrum of an embedded FBG sensor to estimate strain with an artificial neural network. Sensors and Actuators A, Physical, 2013, 194: 1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Takeda S, Okabe Y, Takeda N. Delamination detection in CFRP laminates with embedded small-diameter fiber Bragg grating sensors. Composites Part A, Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2002, 33(7): 971–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Takeda S, Minakuchi S, Okabe Y, Takeda N. Delamination monitoring of laminated composites subjected to low-velocity impact using small-diameter FBG sensors. Composites Part A, Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2005, 36(7): 903–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kakei A A, Islam M, Leng J, Epaarachchi J. Use of an elasto-plastic model and strain measurements of embedded fibre Bragg grating sensors to detect Mode I delamination crack propagation in woven cloth (0/90) composite materials. Structural Health Monitoring, 2017, doi:10.1177/1475921717694812Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ling H Y, Lau K, Cheng L, Su Z. Mode II fracture behaviour monitoring for composite laminates using embedded fibre Bragg grating sensors. Composite Structures, 2006, 76(1–2): 88–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ling H Y, Lau K T, Su Z, Wong E T T. Monitoring mode II fracture behaviour of composite laminates using embedded fiber-optic sensors. Composites Part B, Engineering, 2007, 38(4): 488–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stutz S, Cugnoni J, Botsis J. Studies of mode I delamination in monotonic and fatigue loading using FBG wavelength multiplexing and numerical analysis. Composites Science and Technology, 2011, 71(4): 443–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kakei A, Epaarachchi J A, Islam M, Leng J, Rajic N. Detection and characterisation of delamination damage propagation in woven glass fibre reinforced polymer composite using thermoelastic response mapping. Composite Structures, 2016, 153: 442–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chauffaille S, Jumel J, Shanahan M E R. Elasto-plastic analysis of the single cantilever beam adhesion test. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2011, 78(13): 2493–2504CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sorensen L, Botsis J, Gmür T, Cugnoni J. Delamination detection and characterisation of bridging tractions using long FBG optical sensors. Composites Part A, Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2007, 38(10): 2087–2096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pereira G, McGugan M, Mikkelsen L P. FBG_SiMul V1.0: Fibre Bragg grating signal simulation tool for finite element method models. SoftwareXGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical and Electrical EngineeringUniversity of Southern QueenslandToowoombaAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Future MaterialsUniversity of Southern QueenslandToowoombaAustralia
  3. 3.College of EngineeringUniversity of KirkukKirkukIraq

Personalised recommendations